Whether it's your first Bonnaroo or you’re a music festival veteran, we welcome you to Inforoo.
Here you'll find info about artists, rumors, camping tips, and the infamous Roo Clues. Have a look around then create an account and join in the fun. See you at Bonnaroo!!
I smell cigar smoke hovering around the two players I have the most suspicion about.
Why would we feel the need to draw this much attention to ourselves if we were both mafia? We put each other in contention for the runoff to begin with. Wouldn't be a very smart plan.
That doesn't mean I think you are both Mafia. It would be pretty foolhardy for both of you to finagle a deal like this in plain sight of everyone when you could do it via PM. But then again it might be a good way to throw suspicion away from both of you by doing just that.
Post by LoveLuckLaughter on Jun 20, 2012 9:50:58 GMT -5
As predicted by me, here I am tossed into another run-off and somehow a host of others managed to wiggle out of it AGAIN. See what's going down here townies?
We're all a mess of paradoxes. Believing in things we know can't be true. We walk around carrying feelings too complicated and contradictory to express. But when it all becomes too big, and words aren't enough to help get it all out, there's always music.
I can tell you right now if I was mafia this game I would have kept viking in as long as possible. Not voted him out in first round.
Exactly what I said. He either mentioned something that tweaked the Mafia's ears or he pissed them off so personally that they offed him out of spite/not wanting to deal with his bullshit.
Note that he only voted for me, and called me guilty AFTER I voted for him. He has a knack for taking things personally and turning on players who he thinks have turned on him. He has down this MANY times and has been wrong MANY times. However, not only did he piss this player off personally, but he also mentioned their name as Mafia. And now, as predicted, Mafia is turning it on to me to get rid of another townie. And this guy is taking the lead.
LLL>>>SFA>>>Kdogg
Ive had my suspicions about him early on, but I try not to let round one suspicions cloud my judgements too much. When they become so obvious in round 2, I have to go with them.
We're all a mess of paradoxes. Believing in things we know can't be true. We walk around carrying feelings too complicated and contradictory to express. But when it all becomes too big, and words aren't enough to help get it all out, there's always music.
We're all a mess of paradoxes. Believing in things we know can't be true. We walk around carrying feelings too complicated and contradictory to express. But when it all becomes too big, and words aren't enough to help get it all out, there's always music.
We're all a mess of paradoxes. Believing in things we know can't be true. We walk around carrying feelings too complicated and contradictory to express. But when it all becomes too big, and words aren't enough to help get it all out, there's always music.
Post by LoveLuckLaughter on Jun 20, 2012 10:07:28 GMT -5
Remember that Mafia manipulates these run-offs to turn them their way guys. I am heading towards my second run-off, and by the some of the same players.
Mafia USUALLY splits their votes. I think maybe 2 voted viking, one for me. That is how it frequently goes.
Viking>> LLL SFA >> LLL LLL >> Viking Nic >> Viking NBF >> EAP Mike D >> EAP KDogg >> Bacon EAP >> Bacon >> Viking Bacon >> LLL Quacker >> Bacon >> LLL MC >> Viking
Left to vote:
Everyone has checked in. Dont want to rush any rounds. If we are going to move into a second runoff, I'd like to see that start tomorrow afternoon sometime and will then remain open until monday-ish. Any concerns, let me know. Shall see how conversation/voting goes tonight.
Note the key players here, and how Bacon and EAP each wiggled out of this one. Coincidence? Hell no. It is pretty likely at least one is Mafia. I have a working theory, and a list of 4 who I suspect at this point.
We're all a mess of paradoxes. Believing in things we know can't be true. We walk around carrying feelings too complicated and contradictory to express. But when it all becomes too big, and words aren't enough to help get it all out, there's always music.
I read over the thread (sorry y'all I passed the funk out after work yesterday) and I'm not getting too much conclusive. I'm sure that the popular theory of mafia jumping on the Viking vote is probably at least partially true, though I'm sure, depending on how smart our mafia are, they would have had at least one vote for LLL instead, just as she previously stated. I'm gonna stay on Bacon, because I'm cool with this LLL-Kdogg-Bacon runoff we seem to have going. I'm not saying anything that hasn't been said, I know and I apologize, I haven't been paying close attention so far in this game due to some unforeseen circumstances, but we're all good now, so I'm back in the game.
Post by nicthedick85 on Jun 20, 2012 11:37:15 GMT -5
Yea no doubt not to offend anyone but keeping Viking alive stirs up so many theories and confuses the hell out of townies. Last time I was mafia the plan was to keep viking alive and long as possible. So my guess is he pissed off too many people townies and mafia included or he was actually mafia.
If LLL is going in based on Kdogg's ideas on NBF. Then I think EAP should go along for the ride. The only problem is a 4 person runoff is fairly pointless.
Post by nicthedick85 on Jun 20, 2012 11:41:48 GMT -5
I think getting LLL out of runoff for say EAP would be better. Once it gets closer to runoff time I may change my vote so something for others to think about.
I think getting LLL out of runoff for say EAP would be better. Once it gets closer to runoff time I may change my vote so something for others to think about.
and why is that???
i'm not changing my vote from bacon (yet, sorry bacon, i want to see you in the runoff.)
i'm not saying LLL is guilty, but i haven't done anything that makes me stand out anymore than her.
I thnk a Kdogg/Bacon/LLL runoff is a great idea. I'm sure you have at least one Mafia member in there, maybe two.
If you'll reread my post, you'll see that I'm thinking along those very same lines.
I've got a couple other players I'd be comfortable voting for right now, but other players had already independently decided they belonged in the runoff anyway. I considered their likelihood of guilt vs. yours, and I notice a double-positive between you and the dead players while I only notice a single-positive looking at any of the others. I'm going for my double-positive now and keeping an eye on my single-positives for later.
Conversation but not much movement. Lets set a 9pm EDT target date to move into the runoff. If conversation is active and there are questions to be answered, or vote movement, it will remain open. Otherwise runoff starts at 9 pm.
I think getting LLL out of runoff for say EAP would be better. Once it gets closer to runoff time I may change my vote so something for others to think about.
and why is that???
i'm not changing my vote from bacon (yet, sorry bacon, i want to see you in the runoff.)
i'm not saying LLL is guilty, but i haven't done anything that makes me stand out anymore than her.
After rereading the thread. You, Kdoggs, and SFAs votes seem fishy call me crazy. I don't doubt I'm 100% wrong. I seem to always do better with my gut in this game then think it way too deep like some.
Post by nicthedick85 on Jun 20, 2012 15:19:56 GMT -5
Going to leave my vote as is unless some switching goes off before runoff. Hopefully I will be back from movies 9 est. Got to check out prometheus or however you spell it.
Viking>> LLL SFA >> LLL LLL >> Viking Nic >> Viking NBF >> EAP Mike D >> EAP KDogg >> Bacon EAP >> Bacon >> Viking Bacon >> LLL
Left to vote: Quacker MC
Quacker adds a vote for Bacon but then along comes MC and makes a vote that COULD be what Bacon describes as "forceing people's hands." Then Quacker evens it up saying he doesn't want Viking voted strait off.
Viking>> LLL SFA >> LLL LLL >> Viking Nic >> Viking NBF >> EAP Mike D >> EAP KDogg >> Bacon EAP >> Bacon >> Viking Bacon >> LLL Quacker >> Bacon >> LLL MC >> Viking
So in little over 3 hours 4 out of 11 people decided who the second runoff would be between. WELL, 5 because later that night is when Viking has his blow up and sealed his fate.
I would like to point out that I made the misake of strait up saying I was happy with my vote for LLL. I think it's could have given the mafia a go ahead to put her in.
I will say that I don't fault Bacon or EAP for making self preservation votes but they both have played enoghe that the self preservation card is the first line of defense for a mafia member in an early runoff.
So I guess I'm still a little baffelled that LLL is somehow back in the hotseat?
Edit: To be clear, I'm not against LLL being in the runoff. I just find it a little strange that she has yet again became the focus of attention to sevearl people.
Last Edit: Jun 20, 2012 18:22:22 GMT -5 by Deleted - Back to Top
Still no movement (someone say still? I need a drink). If no changes 9 pm... that said - if changes as sfa pointed out, may leave it open as i do not particularly care for last minute change ups.
Still no movement (someone say still? I need a drink). If no changes 9 pm... that said - if changes as sfa pointed out, may leave it open as i do not particularly care for last minute change ups.
Hello Dear, I was just referring to the times because of how quick it happened. That round had plenty of time for people to switch things up. That's why I added the thing about Viking. I wasn't trying to say people made moves at the last minute.
Last Edit: Jun 20, 2012 18:43:32 GMT -5 by Deleted - Back to Top