Conversation has pretty much died, but LLL has not logged on since the votes have swung to her. I am extending the round until 1 of the following:
1 - 10 PM roo time 2 - 6 players lock onto another player. You must confirm in thread that you would like to lock 3 - 2 Hours after LLL checks in on the game, starting now. (Which would close it at 6PM) (Note: If LLL posts after 8PM, the deadline will remain 10PM)
Once 1 of the above conditions are met, I am going to close it.
Post by LoveLuckLaughter on Mar 11, 2013 20:32:19 GMT -5
I'm up for a run-off against either one of you, I think it is FAR more beneficial for townies. I'd rather have a two person run-off at some point so that we can see at least two Mafia voting together for someone and everyone can use those sort of voting associations down the line. The current situation benefits only Mafia.
I agree with LLL. But I still think Bacon should be in the runoff. Regardless if it's against me or LLL. But, again, I know that's unlikely.
Bacon may just have a completely different vision of how the game best works than I do, but I am surprised that he is the one who initiated this idea to avoid a second run-off with only two players. It is unusual to do it this way, because the general theory is that it benefits Mafia.
You will have the time. There were a lot of vote changes today, so I am monitoring it to see what happens over the next hour. If no one moves, I will still close it, but I will try and wait for your final words if it is you. Please keep in mind that the deadline is set for 10PM right now. You have well over an hour.
Post by LoveLuckLaughter on Mar 11, 2013 20:47:07 GMT -5
In order for a second run off to occur, one person has to remain on their original vote for the third run-off person. This is standard play. I guess I'm not understanding your point here, and it is making it all sound even more suspicious.
Answer me this. If I were mafia would I really have done this? If anything I could of waited until the run-off was called and then switched to LLL if I had some vendetta against her.
Yes. You put me in place to be voted off without the benefit of a second run-off. And if not for the fact that I hadn't logged in and Viking extended the deadline, it would have worked. It's not like you were said "oh hey, deadline is coming, guess I'll at least change my vote so that we have a run-off". So you knew what you were doing, you knew what the results were about to be.
April 12-14th - Indio, CA - Coachella Weekend 1
May 3-5th - Memphis, TN - Beale St. Music Festival
June 13-16th - Manchester, TN - Bonnaroo
July 12-14th - Louisville, KY - Forecastle Festival
August 2-4th - Chicago, IL - Lollapalooza
September 27-29th - Atlanta, GA - TomorrowWorld
October 25-27th - Asheville, NC - Mountain Oasis
You don't want anyone making this decision you say, yet you do it here. We had a 5/5 tie. We were headed to a second run-off. You made it impossible for that to happen. You wanted me voted off, and fast.