Whether it's your first Bonnaroo or you’re a music festival veteran, we welcome you to Inforoo.
Here you'll find info about artists, rumors, camping tips, and the infamous Roo Clues. Have a look around then create an account and join in the fun. See you at Bonnaroo!!
Post by Hipster Doofus on Feb 2, 2009 12:34:58 GMT -5
Woodley should have won the MVP with his two sacks ;-)
Even though he really only had one. No fucking way that's not an incomplete pass. Sure Woodley grabbed his arm as it was cocked back, but Warner brought it forward and released it as his arm was going forward. The way those are called, that looked like a pass for sure, that it wasn't even reviewed is a fucking travesty. Sure would have liked seeing a hail mary to Fitzgerald.
Post by strumntheguitar on Feb 2, 2009 12:54:51 GMT -5
Yeah I gotta say that I agree Cardinals were robbed of quite a few opportunities in this game. Between Holmes using the ball as a prop in a TD celebration (which I hate that penalty but it is one so it should be enforced - 15 yards enforced on the kickoff) and deciding to not even review a play when it's impossible for coaches to challenge is just ridiculous to me.
Either way, I'm glad the Steelers won. But even as a Steelers fan I kind of wanted to see the intense action of a Warner hail mary to Fitzgerald just to see what would happen...
Oh, and how the feck did Holmes win the MVP over Big Ben?? Were the voters only watching the last drive of the game or something? Aside from that drive, Holmes could have been replaced by any slightly better than average receiver and the results would have been similar, in my opinion. Ben is reason the Steelers were even in contention in that game, much less ahead. He avoided numerous sacks and trouble to keep drives alive and threw with pinpoint accuracy when it was necessary. It was an incredible catch by Holmes at the end, but how about the perfection of the throw... which conveniently followed another perfect pass which went right through the hands of Mr. MVP himself...