Whether it's your first Bonnaroo or you’re a music festival veteran, we welcome you to Inforoo.
Here you'll find info about artists, rumors, camping tips, and the infamous Roo Clues. Have a look around then create an account and join in the fun. See you at Bonnaroo!!
Considering you've found the need to respond to my threads as if you are threatened by me I offer you some peace my confused counterpart. May you find peace in your restless soul.
Considering you've found the need to respond to my threads as if you are threatened by me I offer you some peace my confused counterpart. May you find peace in your restless soul.
Considering you've found the need to respond to my threads as if you are threatened by me I offer you some peace my confused counterpart. May you find peace in your restless soul.
Considering you've found the need to respond to my threads as if you are threatened by me I offer you some peace my confused counterpart. May you find peace in your restless soul.
Considering you've found the need to respond to my threads as if you are threatened by me I offer you some peace my confused counterpart. May you find peace in your restless soul.
Considering you've found the need to respond to my threads as if you are threatened by me I offer you some peace my confused counterpart. May you find peace in your restless soul.
Considering you've found the need to respond to my threads as if you are threatened by me I offer you some peace my confused counterpart. May you find peace in your restless soul.
Well, this has been an exciting day. I don't see a reason to move my vote off Tainted at this point, and am not inclined to move my vote just for movement's sake atm.
People that moved their vote to Carini for the 3-way, you leaving your vote on him now that we're in the runoff?
Right now I'm inclined to keep my vote on Jaz. Nothing has really changed to me from when I initially decided I think Jaz is the most suspicious person in the runoff.
Does anyone have any articulable reason for voting Carini or Tainted besides "we want a 3-way runoff"? I'm not against a 3-way runoff in general but I feel like these guys got thrown in there without any real reason. Why was it decided that Carini and Taint are more deserving that JFG? Just some questions I have for the Carini and tainted voters
Right now I'm inclined to keep my vote on Jaz. Nothing has really changed to me from when I initially decided I think Jaz is the most suspicious person in the runoff.
Does anyone have any articulable reason for voting Carini or Tainted besides "we want a 3-way runoff"? I'm not against a 3-way runoff in general but I feel like these guys got thrown in there without any real reason. Why was it decided that Carini and Taint are more deserving that JFG? Just some questions I have for the Carini and tainted voters
I wasn't really wanting to take my vote off of JFG, but did so since no one else was moving and Jaz was stacked up to 4. Which then obviously makes it much less likely JFG stays in the runoff, but I thought it was better to do that than keep such a high stack on Jaz.
My choice of going to Tainted over Carini was based on the fact I didn't feel comfortable voting along with the people on Carini and Tainted was one of the people voting for Jaz.
There's at least one person in each of the three groups (on Jaz v Carini v Taint) that I don't particularly want to vote alongside, but such is life.
I do find it interesting that EAP cited a few complaints about Jimmy and yet is now voting with him. I don't really want to move off of Jaz but also don't feel entirely comfortable being in that trio - something feels off in the EAP/Jimmy interactions and then their subsequent actions.
We have til 10, so I'm gonna think on it for a few more hours. Might switch, might not.
Considering you've found the need to respond to my threads as if you are threatened by me I offer you some peace my confused counterpart. May you find peace in your restless soul.
There's at least one person in each of the three groups (on Jaz v Carini v Taint) that I don't particularly want to vote alongside, but such is life.
I do find it interesting that EAP cited a few complaints about Jimmy and yet is now voting with him. I don't really want to move off of Jaz but also don't feel entirely comfortable being in that trio - something feels off in the EAP/Jimmy interactions and then their subsequent actions.
We have til 10, so I'm gonna think on it for a few more hours. Might switch, might not.
Please explain what feels "off" about MY actions.
I don't think it's fair to lump EAP's incoherent gameplay, gibberish, and her ultimately voting alongside me with my criticism of EAP, and then act like we are tied together in some way.
I wil say this,though. I am also uncomfortable with voting alongside EAP (although I'd submit she is voting alongside me as I was one of his first two votes and EAP was his 4th).
I think EAP is wildly inconsistent with her reasoning which makes me wonder if she's a sloppy mafia or just having a poor/lazy game as town. Right now I'm going with the latter, and it's because Jaz is holing up and kinda letting this whole EAP thing make people wonder if he's being stacked up by mafia. I know that's what I'd do if I was Jaz.
At the end of the day, I can't get over how Jaz came after me in round 1 trying to sway things towards me. I made legitimate criticisms of EAP and he wrote it off as me being mean or whatever and then put a vote on me. I've since mentioned this and Jaz hasn't addressed it, probably hoping it gets swept under the rug.
Meanwhile, it feels to me like EAP was voting for me because that's justhow she plays. She doesn't use logic and makes up fake reasons to vote for people because she's too lazy to read the damn thread. She seems to be doing the same with Jaz now which is fine with me because I actually find Jaz suspicious.
I wil say this,though. I am also uncomfortable with voting alongside EAP (although I'd submit she is voting alongside me as I was one of his first two votes and EAP was his 4th).
I think EAP is wildly inconsistent with her reasoning which makes me wonder if she's a sloppy mafia or just having a poor/lazy game as town. Right now I'm going with the latter, and it's because Jaz is holing up and kinda letting this whole EAP thing make people wonder if he's being stacked up by mafia. I know that's what I'd do if I was Jaz.
At the end of the day, I can't get over how Jaz came after me in round 1 trying to sway things towards me. I made legitimate criticisms of EAP and he wrote it off as me being mean or whatever and then put a vote on me. I've since mentioned this and Jaz hasn't addressed it, probably hoping it gets swept under the rug.
Meanwhile, it feels to me like EAP was voting for me because that's justhow she plays. She doesn't use logic and makes up fake reasons to vote for people because she's too lazy to read the damn thread. She seems to be doing the same with Jaz now which is fine with me because I actually find Jaz suspicious.
Okay, so here is the actual exchange that we've had this game:
Slack offered a lot of thoughts on possible theories, and Jimmy tried to shut him up, which I don't like. Slack knows how to play. Then Jimmy voted for EAP, who isn't playing at all outside of her usual way. I agree with his desire for at least three in an initial runoff, but not his reasoning - seemed kinda like a lazy excuse to put one of the better players in the runoff.
Yes, I voted for you, because I disagreed with your reasoning regarding Slack stating his theories. Had nothing to do with you being "mean".
Could you be wrong on more points? Slack has played this game like 2-3 times if I recall correct. Perhaps he can advise better on that number.
Next, I didn't try to shut him up. I gave good advice.
Third, my reason for voting EAP was good. She was the last to place a vote and DIDNT create a runoff. She then ignored me for half a day and said she didn't want to create a runoff because she doesn't want that "power". That's ridiculous.
Fourth, EAP isn't good at this game. She's lazy. I don't think I've once seen her win the game for the town based on her figuring out who is mafia. If I wanted to kill a good player id vote for SFA.
Slack has played in five games. And yeah I probably sounded more aggressive than I intended to last night, but I disagree with your advice and reasoning for voting for EAP. It's the first round - I ain't got shit to go off of, so it's gonna be small non-points like this on which I base my vote.
Again, restating the reasoning for my vote, and reiterating that in the first round I have to pick insignificant shit to base my vote off of. Maybe you didn't see this? Because after another reread I don't see you ever asking me anything that I didn't address (if I just missed it on my reread, please point it out to me). I disagreed with your reasoning, so I voted for you. And I explained why. If you disagree with my reasoning that's fine, and I can see why it would make you defensive, but was round one - what more reasoning could I possibly have to vote for someone? Nobody has solid footing in day one. I then never mentioned you again this entire game, so I don't know how you consider that me trying to "sway things towards" you. And as I've stated earlier in this round (after the runoff started, so I no longer had the opportunity to vote for her), I agree with you about EAP's gameplay in this game. It sucks and it's frustrating. But apparently me saying that now also makes me suspicious?
It seems like if I disagree with you on something, that makes me suspicious in your eyes. But then if I agree with you on something (like I do now in regards to EAP), you just see that as me trying to get the town to think that EAP is Mafia. You have an incredible tendency for tunnelvision in this game, Jimmy, and it makes you easy to manipulate. I know this because I've done it as Mafia myself. Please keep that in mind now and in future games.
If you want to vote for me that's fine, but can we at least not pretend that your suspicions are based on anything concrete? You say that I haven't addressed your criticisms of me, but I have. You say that I've been trying to sway the town towards you, but I haven't. For what it's worth, I'm leaning towards you being town, because you don't get overly accusatory like this when you're Mafia. But Christ, man, take the blinders off.
Well, this has been an exciting day. I don't see a reason to move my vote off Tainted at this point, and am not inclined to move my vote just for movement's sake atm.
People that moved their vote to Carini for the 3-way, you leaving your vote on him now that we're in the runoff?
Most likely; I don't have a strong read on either of them so I see no need to move my vote. I have a slightly raised eyebrow at Taint at the moment because his only reason for voting for me is "I have a feeling" (which why I initially voted for him, in addition to wanting new people in the runoff), but that's just me being defensive, and isn't really enough for me to move my vote back to him just yet.
You can say what you want Jaz, but you voted for me and not EAP. It's easy for you to go back on what you said now that EAP isn't a runoff candidate.
I'm not going back on what I said. At the time of my vote, I wanted someone new in the runoff. That was before she placed her emo-vote on me. By the time she had done that, she was out of runoff contention. It was her second erratic vote that more greatly aroused my suspicions.
