Whether it's your first Bonnaroo or you’re a music festival veteran, we welcome you to Inforoo.
Here you'll find info about artists, rumors, camping tips, and the infamous Roo Clues. Have a look around then create an account and join in the fun. See you at Bonnaroo!!
Neither does voting for it. I’m not going to vote for something I fundamentally disagree with.
I would argue that if 7 passes it provides momentum toward something like what you're talking about, which we could then vote on and which I would also vote for.
Your vote keeps the status quo in place, which I think would be a worse version of what you're opposed to.
Not trying to start an argument but I disagree. If I vote yes I’m essentially saying I’m ok with people replacing free agents. I think the momentum doesn’t really even make sense. Especially when we could easily just start a new proposal to eliminate replacing free agents.
Also the status quo isn’t a bad thing. We did agree to the rules before playing right?
I would argue that if 7 passes it provides momentum toward something like what you're talking about, which we could then vote on and which I would also vote for.
Your vote keeps the status quo in place, which I think would be a worse version of what you're opposed to.
Not trying to start an argument but I disagree. If I vote yes I’m essentially saying I’m ok with people replacing free agents. I think the momentum doesn’t really even make sense. Especially when we could easily just start a new proposal to eliminate replacing free agents.
Also the status quo isn’t a bad thing. We did agree to the rules before playing right?
This post, which includes the bolded blanket argument against any rule changes, as well as your Against vote, already imply that you're ok with people replacing free agents, because that is already the rule and you're voting to keep it.
Not trying to start an argument but I disagree. If I vote yes I’m essentially saying I’m ok with people replacing free agents. I think the momentum doesn’t really even make sense. Especially when we could easily just start a new proposal to eliminate replacing free agents.
Also the status quo isn’t a bad thing. We did agree to the rules before playing right?
This post, which includes the bolded blanket argument against any rule changes, as well as your Against vote, already imply that you're ok with people replacing free agents, because that is already the rule and you're voting to keep it.
If no rules changed I wouldn’t be mad. However I’m glad we have the proposal system to fix any loose ends (even if I disagree with the outcome). I guess I’m failing to see how an against vote means I’m more ok with replacing agents than a for vote. If I vote for I’m literally saying I want people to replace (with limits). It’s a lose lose situation from my perspective.
I’d rather it not pass because then we can just do a proposal banning replacements.
If no rules changed I wouldn’t be mad. However I’m glad we have the proposal system to fix any loose ends (even if I disagree with the outcome). I guess I’m failing to see how an against vote means I’m more ok with replacing agents than a for vote. If I vote for I’m literally saying I want people to replace (with limits). It’s a lose lose situation from my perspective.
I’d rather it not pass because then we can just do a proposal banning replacements.
We can do a proposal banning replacements either way. I don't really want to right now, because we have so many proposals that take people so long to vote on that I'd rather not re-word one in the middle of it being voted on, but I truly don't care very much. I think what you're describing is the best option, but I don't expect to be affected by this, regardless.
We can do a proposal banning replacements either way. I don't really want to right now, because we have so many proposals that take people so long to vote on that I'd rather not re-word one in the middle of it being voted on, but I truly don't care very much. I think what you're describing is the best option, but I don't expect to be affected by this, regardless.
Fair, I wasn’t trying to be a dick hope I didn’t come off like that.
We can do a proposal banning replacements either way. I don't really want to right now, because we have so many proposals that take people so long to vote on that I'd rather not re-word one in the middle of it being voted on, but I truly don't care very much. I think what you're describing is the best option, but I don't expect to be affected by this, regardless.
Fair, I wasn’t trying to be a dick hope I didn’t come off like that.
Neither was I. I was about to get there, but I ultimately didn't because it's all pretty dumb anyway.
Lmao @ that Roo '10 mock for billing Wale right above Deadmau5
edit: yeah 10, must've looked over it when I saw June 10-13.. edit: also yeah I know it's the actual thing but idk how to call it else than a 'mock', a poster I guess?
Last Edit: Mar 7, 2018 16:41:49 GMT -5 by Bing - Back to Top