Whether it's your first Bonnaroo or you’re a music festival veteran, we welcome you to Inforoo.
Here you'll find info about artists, rumors, camping tips, and the infamous Roo Clues. Have a look around then create an account and join in the fun. See you at Bonnaroo!!
Last four voters - Theo, Silver, Jaz, KPO Four without votes - Potent, Teddy, Theo, Jaz
Stacking decisions:
First four votes were all single votes, no stacks, you can look at them yourself Dan - stacked silver, voted with maddog, avoided stacking rummy and tranter Jortles - single vote for Teddy, avoiding throwing rummy, dan, and tranter into the runoff Potent - stacked Tranter, with Rummy, avoided throwing Rummy, Teddy, and Dan into the runoff Theo - single vote for Jortles, avoided throwing Rummy, Teddy, and Dan into the runoff Silver - stacked Jortles, voted with Theo, avoided throwing Rummy, Teddy, and Dan into the runoff Jaz - stacked Dan, with Teddy, avoided throwing Rummy and Teddy into the runoff KPO - singled Maddog, avoided throwing Rummy and Teddy into the runoff
I think it makes sense to switch up the runoff here, and based on the way things have fallen it makes sense to me to consider voting for Theo or Jaz.
Last four voters - Theo, Silver, Jaz, KPO Four without votes - Potent, KPO, Theo, Jaz
Stacking decisions:
First four votes were all single votes, no stacks, you can look at them yourself Dan - stacked silver, voted with maddog, avoided stacking rummy and tranter Jortles - single vote for Teddy, avoiding throwing rummy, dan, and tranter into the runoff Potent - stacked Tranter, with Rummy, avoided throwing Rummy, Teddy, and Dan into the runoff Theo - single vote for Jortles, avoided throwing Rummy, Teddy, and Dan into the runoff Silver - stacked Jortles, voted with Theo, avoided throwing Rummy, Teddy, and Dan into the runoff Jaz - stacked Dan, with Teddy, avoided throwing Rummy and Teddy into the runoff KPO - singled Maddog, avoided throwing Rummy and Teddy into the runoff
I think it makes sense to switch up the runoff here, and based on the way things have fallen it makes sense to me to consider voting for Theo or Jaz.
Dont think you mentioned the reason and also don't think you threw KPO into the Jaz/Theo group
I think it was implied since I listed them all and that's the reason I look at those lists, but regardless, you are correct, we are on the same page. People need to get moving with less than 3 hours to the deadline.
I will be fine moving to someone to keep a runoff at preferably 4 - and I will do so before 4pm. I know Jake Jortles will be willing to go back (or, I assume, I guess), so we really just need a Dan voter to back down.
i'll move but if theo's mafia it means you are mafia with him. Deal?
No deal, there is a causality problem in your equation, I am not mafia and have no idea on Theo's status. In fact, I pushed for him to be in the runoff by noting his status on both of my apparently infamous lists.
I feel like we have as good a chance as possible at having a mafia member in the runoff. So usually when we have a four person runoff and three votes come in and then there's a lot of quiet, the thinking is that mafia is fine with the runoff. This would usually lead me to want to switch my vote. I'm thinking though that for awhile, when I've been mafia, it's more common to sit back and let someone else make that move, and deal with it later if nobody moves. That makes me inclined to keep my vote where it is.
I think 12 hour rounds make sense after the initial voting. I'm also not opposed to getting a runoff set at a number we all agree upon, then working from there to whittle it down, and doing this all in D1R1. Maybe it's a 48 hour D1R1, where we start with 4, whittle down to 2, do everything without any deadlines passing. This would also increase flexibility to change the runoff at any point if someone were sus, or if the inspector came out and we could get the given first, etc.
To not believe - it's just a gut feel. And I only am not sold, I'm not against the idea. KPO is probably inspector, I just like entertaining chaotic theories.
Why you need to go - I don't trust your Rummy post that you recently quoted, so if we are told she is mafia, it raises my hackles for suspicion toward you. I also think Jaz reads as more likely town than not.
Post by Silver Surfer on Feb 26, 2021 18:19:43 GMT -5
Dont think the potent whack really points to anything. I will say, I think Jaz is probably town since I dont think mafia jaz would whack potent after he said he thinks Jaz is town
Post by Silver Surfer on Feb 26, 2021 18:53:41 GMT -5
I mean dude we've got nothing to go off of except day 1 and your fingerprints are admittedly all over that day because of both of your superstacks- of course your name is gonna keep coming up
I mean dude we've got nothing to go off of except day 1 and your fingerprints are admittedly all over that day because of both of your superstacks- of course your name is gonna keep coming up
what fingerprints? Did Jaz get exiled? If he did, I’d understand but practically everything I did was harmless. I didn’t even vote for Dan while Rummy did. And you kinda waive your right to talk about superstacks when you just did it too.
Also my problem was day 1 superstacks not superstacks in general
superstacks are much more damaging now. We are day 3, without inspector, and if I go, you guys are gonna have to go 2/2.
Arguably so sure. But also we learned your superstacks were completely without reason and only to bait a whack which would've only left town even MORE confused. And if you were trying to bait a whack, why would you try so many different names?
