Whether it's your first Bonnaroo or you’re a music festival veteran, we welcome you to Inforoo.
Here you'll find info about artists, rumors, camping tips, and the infamous Roo Clues. Have a look around then create an account and join in the fun. See you at Bonnaroo!!
Leave it all on the field if you have anymore thoughts otter
Leaving it all on the field. But sure that I’m wrong on various points.
Potent - my given mafioso.
Cum - early vote on potent, bringing to 2. Seems unlikely to be a mafia move?
Rummy… strong town read. Or playing a near-perfect mafia, which rummy is entirely capable of. May be fruit vendor.
Pink… either highly confused town or mafia. The early vote trade with Mafia. Then pushing tranter to 3 … switch to me during a runoff. Was squarely in my crosshairs for N1 guess.
Cincy’s early switch from potent to me is sus, but also self preservation. Then switched back to potent. … then switched back to me (plausibly to even up numbers) … a lot of sus moves… deserves scrutiny. Under consideration for N1 guess.
Jortles jumped around a lot and ultimately got to potent. Strong town read.
Theo - pushed potent during runoff. Quiet, but nothing overtly sus. Leaning town.
Granted - quiet. At one point had three votes and then slid quietly out of the radar, kinda interesting but not sure there is anything to it.
Maddog - pushed me to 4 vs. potent in last runoff. Wrong, but could just be a bad guess. I’m sure I’ve got a few in this rant.
Tranter - had a lot of early votes and drifted out of runoff despite being very quiet. cast the deciding vote against over potent. See maddog, but even more egregious. Deserves scrutiny. Under consideration for N1 guess.
Samp, Maddog, Theo, tranter- guessing there is at least one mafia in here. Played quiet and generally below the radar. Would focus on transfer maddog and then samp from this group.
Good luck town.
Cincy, you're talking about my votes from d1, but I made well-reasoned moves with the information I had at the time of my votes. I've been open about my reasoning throughout the game, but you know who hasn't been open and was making sus moves on d1? Tranter. Been MIA for a large portion of the game and when he was active he was going on about fruit...
I don't understand the faking the fruit thing. if tranter is town it seems like a weird thing to harp on.
I'm sure if you go to any of the doctor games someone that wasn't doctor most likely flat out said I'm doctor
every handful of games someone opens with "I'm inspector" or says things really baity to trick mafia into whacking them.
no one knew how the fruit thing was gonna play out. mafia wouldn't really have any sort of precedent to say 'fruit person wouldn't do this/that'. so idk it just felt like an attempt to mislead mafia more than town because at some point fruit person would reveal
Post by steponsampras on Jan 14, 2023 19:02:21 GMT -5
We're coming up on the end of the extension, and I feel like - at this point - Theo is going to miss the vote. He's been online throughout the day and I tagged him earlier. I thought we probably only had one mafia left in the game at this point, but what if it is both theo and tranter? If it comes close to 8 and it looks like theo is going to miss the vote I'm going to be forced to move to cincy. If theo and tranter are both mafia that would ensure a mafia victory. Makes sense given everything we've seen.
We're getting really close to the Jags kickoff, so I'm guessing its going to be hard to make an appeal to Jake Jortles, but I'll tag him just in case. Capital Cincy, I know you were waiting on theo before considering a switch to tranter, but I really think there is a lot of risk in not keeping either tranter or theo in the runoff. If you feel more confident about theo, I'd join you in a switch to him.
Post by steponsampras on Jan 14, 2023 19:53:44 GMT -5
I mean I wasn't really that sus on theo until I realized how absent he'd been since d1. Even after that I still felt more confident about tranter, and hey maybe theo is just totally tuned out, but his absence creates a situation where it is going to be me and you in a runoff, and I don't think we can dismiss the possibility that is intentional given what we've seen.