Whether it's your first Bonnaroo or you’re a music festival veteran, we welcome you to Inforoo.
Here you'll find info about artists, rumors, camping tips, and the infamous Roo Clues. Have a look around then create an account and join in the fun. See you at Bonnaroo!!
"potent and samp both kinda weird so I'm not gonna vote for either of them" is what you guys have? And conveniently neither Maddog nor rummy mentioning rummy was in his three named post?
But really, this is why you guys shouldn't do this shit on D1.
this defensive post remains so strange to me, but then potent's behavior at the end of last Round doesnt add up really.
like, MD had literally just quoted all of rooloo's posts and about half of them pointed to samp and/or potent. it was silly of either of them to try and deny that fact. sure to say "yeah this doesnt look great for me, but im not maf" is fine, but potent was trying to rewrite history aka the posts we were all reading with our own eyes where rooloo pointed to him like 3 separate times. just weird.
Considering you've found the need to respond to my threads as if you are threatened by me I offer you some peace my confused counterpart. May you find peace in your restless soul.
The Rooloo post about Potent and Samp being weird is off. But it should be interpreted as Rooloo potentially having Dans name but wanting to make it look like he wasn’t actually suss of Dan in attempt to not draw his attention. That’s more likely than him naming his givin as being suspicious outright.
i really dont think dan/jortles are maf together but one could be maf without the other for sure.
if jortles was dan's teammate, he'd ride the high of how blatantly the n1 whack points to potent and samp, no need to bring everyone's attention to dan instead.
Considering you've found the need to respond to my threads as if you are threatened by me I offer you some peace my confused counterpart. May you find peace in your restless soul.
but ok here is the sticker (and what i said didnt add up about potent's behavior near the end of last Round). basically, there are two options:
1. potent is town and annoyed at us, thus sorta giving up because he's over it 2. potent is mafia along with at least one of samp/dan/market, maybe two, and they figure statistically one of them is bound to die from this runoff regardless, so he's opting to just take the exile lying down because if not him, it'll likely be one of his teammates instead (and by not moving, he's giving less data to town - and inspo if they're still alive)
Considering you've found the need to respond to my threads as if you are threatened by me I offer you some peace my confused counterpart. May you find peace in your restless soul.
"potent and samp both kinda weird so I'm not gonna vote for either of them" is what you guys have? And conveniently neither Maddog nor rummy mentioning rummy was in his three named post?
But really, this is why you guys shouldn't do this shit on D1.
this defensive post remains so strange to me, but then potent's behavior at the end of last Round doesnt add up really.
like, MD had literally just quoted all of rooloo's posts and about half of them pointed to samp and/or potent. it was silly of either of them to try and deny that fact. sure to say "yeah this doesnt look great for me, but im not maf" is fine, but potent was trying to rewrite history aka the posts we were all reading with our own eyes where rooloo pointed to him like 3 separate times. just weird.
Just for clarification, there has been no "end of last round" - D2R1 was extended last night until noon today.
Laying in bed, I was annoyed that I was catching votes as a townie. I reacted petulantly to that fact and didn't consider any context when replying. I understand the post about me and samp and voting for Dan now in the context of the game. If I could take it back, I would. It is what it is.
rooloo pointed to me twice, not three times, and out of 7 posts, so not nearly half. He does point to samp more than me, and he points to you one post less than me. But yes, I really hate how people throw out 2-3 names "it's probably them".
but ok here is the sticker (and what i said didnt add up about potent's behavior near the end of last Round). basically, there are two options:
1. potent is town and annoyed at us, thus sorta giving up because he's over it 2. potent is mafia along with at least one of samp/dan/market, maybe two, and they figure statistically one of them is bound to die from this runoff regardless, so he's opting to just take the exile lying down because if not him, it'll likely be one of his teammates instead (and by not moving, he's giving less data to town - and inspo if they're still alive)
I understand why you read it as me being defensive. I mean it as you can usually read me, and you are very far off this game (or, of course, are mafia). I guess in the meta I'm glad about this but it's annoying for this particular game.
I wasn't going to move because I don't believe in that strategy. It's incumbent for someone stacked at 3 to move to get down to 2. If it leads to someone being exiled early, then the town needs to interpret that.
but ok here is the sticker (and what i said didnt add up about potent's behavior near the end of last Round). basically, there are two options:
1. potent is town and annoyed at us, thus sorta giving up because he's over it 2. potent is mafia along with at least one of samp/dan/market, maybe two, and they figure statistically one of them is bound to die from this runoff regardless, so he's opting to just take the exile lying down because if not him, it'll likely be one of his teammates instead (and by not moving, he's giving less data to town - and inspo if they're still alive)
3. Potent inspector, knew one of us would push a runoff, and is giving us a solid hint?
but ok here is the sticker (and what i said didnt add up about potent's behavior near the end of last Round). basically, there are two options:
1. potent is town and annoyed at us, thus sorta giving up because he's over it 2. potent is mafia along with at least one of samp/dan/market, maybe two, and they figure statistically one of them is bound to die from this runoff regardless, so he's opting to just take the exile lying down because if not him, it'll likely be one of his teammates instead (and by not moving, he's giving less data to town - and inspo if they're still alive)
3. Potent inspector, knew one of us would push a runoff, and is giving us a solid hint?
Considering you've found the need to respond to my threads as if you are threatened by me I offer you some peace my confused counterpart. May you find peace in your restless soul.
This is everything rooloo said that implicates other players, any of it could have gotten them whacked. Correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't think maf just throw away whacks, especially early game when there's names being thrown all around. We've got Dan, Samp, Potent, and Rummy to consider based on what rooloo had said.
Surprising lack of discussion about Rummy here, possibly because it seems like her name was mentioned as a joke reply. But based on the last game we played together, that's exactly the kind of thing I'd expect a cutthroat mafia player to do- get the person who mentioned them whacked. Occam's razor says Samp and Potent, but the Charlie Day Conspiracy section of my brain is pointing out MD and Rummy as the ones leading most of this discussion. If they're maf, they'd absolutely push samp or potent out before me because they actually know what they're doing and I'm much more likely to be swayed by discussion.
Overall, I'm still leaning towards Samp as our best exile today because of his excuse of "I was totally here!" and then it was pointed out that he totally wasn't here. That being said; I'm leaving my vote as is to continue the runoff. I think that otter makes a really good point with that third option.
but ok here is the sticker (and what i said didnt add up about potent's behavior near the end of last Round). basically, there are two options:
1. potent is town and annoyed at us, thus sorta giving up because he's over it 2. potent is mafia along with at least one of samp/dan/market, maybe two, and they figure statistically one of them is bound to die from this runoff regardless, so he's opting to just take the exile lying down because if not him, it'll likely be one of his teammates instead (and by not moving, he's giving less data to town - and inspo if they're still alive)
I understand why you read it as me being defensive. I mean it as you can usually read me, and you are very far off this game (or, of course, are mafia). I guess in the meta I'm glad about this but it's annoying for this particular game.
I wasn't going to move because I don't believe in that strategy. It's incumbent for someone stacked at 3 to move to get down to 2. If it leads to someone being exiled early, then the town needs to interpret that.
im good at reading you as a general rule yes but you just admitted that you acted petulantly/rashly, and that's precisely what i was reading into. this post and the one above are making me feel a bit better about you. it's been a sorta odd day 2, and i feel like we've almost certainly got at least one maf in this current 4-way situation, but im not at all dead set on who it is - and a big sticking point for me is that i dont believe you'd want to whack rooloo n1 if you were mafia and he posted the things he did.
Considering you've found the need to respond to my threads as if you are threatened by me I offer you some peace my confused counterpart. May you find peace in your restless soul.
This is everything rooloo said that implicates other players, any of it could have gotten them whacked. Correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't think maf just throw away whacks, especially early game when there's names being thrown all around. We've got Dan, Samp, Potent, and Rummy to consider based on what rooloo had said.
Surprising lack of discussion about Rummy here, possibly because it seems like her name was mentioned as a joke reply. But based on the last game we played together, that's exactly the kind of thing I'd expect a cutthroat mafia player to do- get the person who mentioned them whacked. Occam's razor says Samp and Potent, but the Charlie Day Conspiracy section of my brain is pointing out MD and Rummy as the ones leading most of this discussion. If they're maf, they'd absolutely push samp or potent out before me because they actually know what they're doing and I'm much more likely to be swayed by discussion.
Overall, I'm still leaning towards Samp as our best exile today because of his excuse of "I was totally here!" and then it was pointed out that he totally wasn't here. That being said; I'm leaving my vote as is to continue the runoff. I think that otter makes a really good point with that third option.
with all due respect, this is pretty much never gonna be what a vet player does. "never say never" blah blah, but it is precisely why i have spoken to the fact that i dont quite see a maf potent whacking rooloo upon further consideration, given rooloo's d1 posts.
my name was mentioned by rooloo once, yeah. but not in a context of where people were moving, who was voting for who, any sort of tracking of patterns or sus maneuvers. it was in a jokey post "naming the trio" (which obviously no one knows rn except for maf themselves); experienced players know that the risk vs reward ratio of whacking someone who mentions their name directly but not in a way that seems like they actually have their name is, well...riskier than it is rewarding.
Considering you've found the need to respond to my threads as if you are threatened by me I offer you some peace my confused counterpart. May you find peace in your restless soul.
This is everything rooloo said that implicates other players, any of it could have gotten them whacked. Correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't think maf just throw away whacks, especially early game when there's names being thrown all around. We've got Dan, Samp, Potent, and Rummy to consider based on what rooloo had said.
Surprising lack of discussion about Rummy here, possibly because it seems like her name was mentioned as a joke reply. But based on the last game we played together, that's exactly the kind of thing I'd expect a cutthroat mafia player to do- get the person who mentioned them whacked. Occam's razor says Samp and Potent, but the Charlie Day Conspiracy section of my brain is pointing out MD and Rummy as the ones leading most of this discussion. If they're maf, they'd absolutely push samp or potent out before me because they actually know what they're doing and I'm much more likely to be swayed by discussion.
Overall, I'm still leaning towards Samp as our best exile today because of his excuse of "I was totally here!" and then it was pointed out that he totally wasn't here. That being said; I'm leaving my vote as is to continue the runoff. I think that otter makes a really good point with that third option.
Oh. My. God! This is insane. I feel like I'm still in a loop from the last game where I point out things again and again and no one gives it any rational thought. I might as well just not be posting. The day ended on Sunday night. I was literally asleep for a big chunk of that game night (I know... crazy right?), and then we were waiting around for D2 to start for a long while if you remember. I guess I could have posted some fluff like some of the others, but I was working, and I just didn't see anything pressing that needed to be shared. Jeez.
but ok here is the sticker (and what i said didnt add up about potent's behavior near the end of last Round). basically, there are two options:
1. potent is town and annoyed at us, thus sorta giving up because he's over it 2. potent is mafia along with at least one of samp/dan/market, maybe two, and they figure statistically one of them is bound to die from this runoff regardless, so he's opting to just take the exile lying down because if not him, it'll likely be one of his teammates instead (and by not moving, he's giving less data to town - and inspo if they're still alive)
3. Potent inspector, knew one of us would push a runoff, and is giving us a solid hint?
Definitely not inspector. Have a solid feeling who is inspector, not rooloo, and don't want to say more than that.
yeah I just don't see why youd make a whole post around who you think could be teammates with Dan and then when it comes to it not vote for Dan
I voted for Dan at the end of D1R1. I don't think it's a good idea to throw the survivor of the final runoff back in the runoff. Of course there are exceptions, but this was not one of them.
This is everything rooloo said that implicates other players, any of it could have gotten them whacked. Correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't think maf just throw away whacks, especially early game when there's names being thrown all around. We've got Dan, Samp, Potent, and Rummy to consider based on what rooloo had said.
Surprising lack of discussion about Rummy here, possibly because it seems like her name was mentioned as a joke reply. But based on the last game we played together, that's exactly the kind of thing I'd expect a cutthroat mafia player to do- get the person who mentioned them whacked. Occam's razor says Samp and Potent, but the Charlie Day Conspiracy section of my brain is pointing out MD and Rummy as the ones leading most of this discussion. If they're maf, they'd absolutely push samp or potent out before me because they actually know what they're doing and I'm much more likely to be swayed by discussion.
Overall, I'm still leaning towards Samp as our best exile today because of his excuse of "I was totally here!" and then it was pointed out that he totally wasn't here. That being said; I'm leaving my vote as is to continue the runoff. I think that otter makes a really good point with that third option.
with all due respect, this is pretty much never gonna be what a vet player does. "never say never" blah blah, but it is precisely why i have spoken to the fact that i dont quite see a maf potent whacking rooloo upon further consideration, given rooloo's d1 posts.
my name was mentioned by rooloo once, yeah. but not in a context of where people were moving, who was voting for who, any sort of tracking of patterns or sus maneuvers. it was in a jokey post "naming the trio" (which obviously no one knows rn except for maf themselves); experienced players know that the risk vs reward ratio of whacking someone who mentions their name directly but not in a way that seems like they actually have their name is, well...riskier than it is rewarding.
with all due respect, this is pretty much never gonna be what a vet player does. "never say never" blah blah, but it is precisely why i have spoken to the fact that i dont quite see a maf potent whacking rooloo upon further consideration, given rooloo's d1 posts.
my name was mentioned by rooloo once, yeah. but not in a context of where people were moving, who was voting for who, any sort of tracking of patterns or sus maneuvers. it was in a jokey post "naming the trio" (which obviously no one knows rn except for maf themselves); experienced players know that the risk vs reward ratio of whacking someone who mentions their name directly but not in a way that seems like they actually have their name is, well...riskier than it is rewarding.
Weird post
whats weird about it? you know i am literally just stating meta truths.
Considering you've found the need to respond to my threads as if you are threatened by me I offer you some peace my confused counterpart. May you find peace in your restless soul.
i really appreciate Maᴙket Down 's willingness to jump into the Maf World with us, but he's definitely still learning a lot about nuances - so if he states something that he doesn't realize has significant reasons to not typically be what happens (e.g. a cutthroat/seasoned maf player opting to use their n1 whack on someone who wrote their name in a joke post of the "trio" when that person was just fucking around), if he is Town with me then i have a vested interest in providing him insight on why that isn't so much the "cutthroat/strategic" move he thinks it would be.
Considering you've found the need to respond to my threads as if you are threatened by me I offer you some peace my confused counterpart. May you find peace in your restless soul.
This is everything rooloo said that implicates other players, any of it could have gotten them whacked. Correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't think maf just throw away whacks, especially early game when there's names being thrown all around. We've got Dan, Samp, Potent, and Rummy to consider based on what rooloo had said.
Surprising lack of discussion about Rummy here, possibly because it seems like her name was mentioned as a joke reply. But based on the last game we played together, that's exactly the kind of thing I'd expect a cutthroat mafia player to do- get the person who mentioned them whacked. Occam's razor says Samp and Potent, but the Charlie Day Conspiracy section of my brain is pointing out MD and Rummy as the ones leading most of this discussion. If they're maf, they'd absolutely push samp or potent out before me because they actually know what they're doing and I'm much more likely to be swayed by discussion.
Overall, I'm still leaning towards Samp as our best exile today because of his excuse of "I was totally here!" and then it was pointed out that he totally wasn't here. That being said; I'm leaving my vote as is to continue the runoff. I think that otter makes a really good point with that third option.
Oh. My. God! This is insane. I feel like I'm still in a loop from the last game where I point out things again and again and no one gives it any rational thought. I might as well just not be posting. The day ended on Sunday night. I was literally asleep for a big chunk of that game night (I know... crazy right?), and then we were waiting around for D2 to start for a long while if you remember. I guess I could have posted some fluff like some of the others, but I was working, and I just didn't see anything pressing that needed to be shared. Jeez.
i hear you're frustrated, but pls dont take it personally. you see how the whack looks bad for you, right? that doesnt mean you are mafia. but it does mean there's a specific direction for us to go from the n1 whack and unfortunately one said direction is you.
Considering you've found the need to respond to my threads as if you are threatened by me I offer you some peace my confused counterpart. May you find peace in your restless soul.
whats weird about it? you know i am literally just stating meta truths.
I don’t think that’s a meta truth at all
you as seasoned maf like to use your n1 whack to off someone who did a jesty "trio post" that was likely a joke but then directly points back to you with probable little reward?
Considering you've found the need to respond to my threads as if you are threatened by me I offer you some peace my confused counterpart. May you find peace in your restless soul.
We're all a mess of paradoxes. Believing in things we know can't be true. We walk around carrying feelings too complicated and contradictory to express. But when it all becomes too big, and words aren't enough to help get it all out, there's always music.
you as seasoned maf like to use your n1 whack to off someone who did a jesty "trio post" that was likely a joke but then directly points back to you with probable little reward?
good 2 know
Sure, Including the given name in “joke” post is a legitimate inspector strategy. I did it last time I was inspector
Oh. My. God! This is insane. I feel like I'm still in a loop from the last game where I point out things again and again and no one gives it any rational thought. I might as well just not be posting. The day ended on Sunday night. I was literally asleep for a big chunk of that game night (I know... crazy right?), and then we were waiting around for D2 to start for a long while if you remember. I guess I could have posted some fluff like some of the others, but I was working, and I just didn't see anything pressing that needed to be shared. Jeez.
i hear you're frustrated, but pls dont take it personally. you see how the whack looks bad for you, right? that doesnt mean you are mafia. but it does mean there's a specific direction for us to go from the n1 whack and unfortunately one said direction is you.
I mean I do get why I'm under suspicion here - because rooloo named me in multiple posts and indicated that he wasn't voting alongside me and potent to see what we would do with our votes. Yeah, I get why people would vote for me for that. The most frustrating thing for me is this bit that you and others have repeated several times about me not being present during a night where there was nothing to be present for!
I do still think that it is too on the nose for an inspector to name their given or the people they're on the hunt for so blatantly. Joke post? Sure, but that doesn't fit with the posts where rooloo cast his vote for dan and explained his reasoning. You yourself indicated as much. You did it with a stipulation attached about being chummy with dan, but I think the logic is still sound all on its own.
ok so here is the rooloo post we've been discussing. at this time, the tally was:
Tranter - 4 (Danbob,Cum,Rummy,Market)
Danbob - 3 (Tranter,Jortles,MD)
Cum - 3 (Otter,Potent,samp)
obviously he was referring to the fact that he didn't want to vote alongside potent/samp, and tranter was already stacked to 4 - so that made his decision to vote dan. earlier in the day he wrote that thing i quoted above, of like "free my man dan *sad face*" and im not saying inspo would never ever say that bout their given, sure they might, but if inspo was going for d1 route of being chummy with their given to try and evade the n1 whack, im not sure they'd then come out with bold statements about two people they DO find sus - because for all they know, one or both of those persons are maf and they're drawing attention from maf with that post.which would be opposite the strategy of an inspo playing the move of being polite/neutral in d1 to keep it chill.
i hear you're frustrated, but pls dont take it personally. you see how the whack looks bad for you, right? that doesnt mean you are mafia. but it does mean there's a specific direction for us to go from the n1 whack and unfortunately one said direction is you.
I mean I do get why I'm under suspicion here - because rooloo named me in multiple posts and indicated that he wasn't voting alongside me and potent to see what we would do with our votes. Yeah, I get why people would vote for me for that. The most frustrating thing for me is this bit that you and others have repeated several times about me not being present during a night where there was nothing to be present for!
I do still think that it is too on the nose for an inspector to name their given or the people they're on the hunt for so blatantly. Joke post? Sure, but that doesn't fit with the posts where rooloo cast his vote for dan and explained his reasoning. You yourself indicated as much. You did it with a stipulation attached about being chummy with dan, but I think the logic is still sound all on its own.
alright so if we agree on this sentiment - who all are you looking at, if you think you/me/potent post from rooloo isnt anything to hang hats on?
Considering you've found the need to respond to my threads as if you are threatened by me I offer you some peace my confused counterpart. May you find peace in your restless soul.
I mean I do get why I'm under suspicion here - because rooloo named me in multiple posts and indicated that he wasn't voting alongside me and potent to see what we would do with our votes. Yeah, I get why people would vote for me for that. The most frustrating thing for me is this bit that you and others have repeated several times about me not being present during a night where there was nothing to be present for!
I do still think that it is too on the nose for an inspector to name their given or the people they're on the hunt for so blatantly. Joke post? Sure, but that doesn't fit with the posts where rooloo cast his vote for dan and explained his reasoning. You yourself indicated as much. You did it with a stipulation attached about being chummy with dan, but I think the logic is still sound all on its own.
alright so if we agree on this sentiment - who all are you looking at, if you think you/me/potent post from rooloo isnt anything to hang hats on?
Well I'm obviously on Dan right now based on the idea that rooloo was whacked for the reasons Jortles shared. And Dan's been pretty tight lipped for the most part, so if he's maf then some other mafia member must be taking the lead on trying to steer votes. Like Market said, you and MD have been leading the charge on getting people to vote for me and potent, but my instinct would be to say that MD is more likely than you. Like I've said, MD was first out of the gate with the post compilation, followed quickly by Dan voting for me, and then MD voting for potent. Plus, I think MD had some sus looking moves and posts on D1. The third? I'm less sure. My gut said tranter on D1, but now I'm not so sure.
alright so if we agree on this sentiment - who all are you looking at, if you think you/me/potent post from rooloo isnt anything to hang hats on?
Well I'm obviously on Dan right now based on the idea that rooloo was whacked for the reasons Jortles shared. And Dan's been pretty tight lipped for the most part, so if he's maf then some other mafia member must be taking the lead on trying to steer votes. Like Market said, you and MD have been leading the charge on getting people to vote for me and potent, but my instinct would be to say that MD is more likely than you. Like I've said, MD was first out of the gate with the post compilation, followed quickly by Dan voting for me, and then MD voting for potent. Plus, I think MD had some sus looking moves and posts on D1. The third? I'm less sure. My gut said tranter on D1, but now I'm not so sure.
this is helpful and aligns w some of what my gut is saying too. I definitely don’t think it is both you and potent, and I’ve already shared why I don’t think a potent maf would whack Rooloo n1. You might be inclined to but I think you’d have a teammate push for something else tbh.
Considering you've found the need to respond to my threads as if you are threatened by me I offer you some peace my confused counterpart. May you find peace in your restless soul.
Considering you've found the need to respond to my threads as if you are threatened by me I offer you some peace my confused counterpart. May you find peace in your restless soul.
Considering you've found the need to respond to my threads as if you are threatened by me I offer you some peace my confused counterpart. May you find peace in your restless soul.
The day ended on Sunday night. I was literally asleep for a big chunk of that game night (I know... crazy right?), and then we were waiting around for D2 to start for a long while if you remember. I guess I could have posted some fluff like some of the others, but I was working, and I just didn't see anything pressing that needed to be shared. Jeez. 
