Whether it's your first Bonnaroo or you’re a music festival veteran, we welcome you to Inforoo.
Here you'll find info about artists, rumors, camping tips, and the infamous Roo Clues. Have a look around then create an account and join in the fun. See you at Bonnaroo!!
I agree that I did come across as a little pompous, but I don't like to be fooled. I'll be the first to post that I was wrong if I am proven so, but what I listed above can't be easily denied, I've used that skin on a firefox on a mac before and I know that isn't how it would look. There is no sense for them to make an embedded javascript image with the wrong date on it, that's wasted web developer time. And for your information, a good web-dev (not saying 'roo has one) will not post an unfinished site that looks that out of kink online, not before it is working locally, and I seriously question how you would have come up with that URL since it is out of sync with the site hierarchy they've been using since www.bonnaroo.com went up.
How is it that you know this much about web programming, yet you don't know that semicolons ARE a valid URL character, they're just not accepted in some browsers?
"not accepted in some browsers" means not legitimate, or browsers aren't legitimate, and I'm looking at the standards page for javascript now to see.
of course not. not every fan does. but some do. same with clutch. it just worrys me that the bam margera jackasses of the world might show up for tool and clutch.
btw jackass and bam are the only mtv shows i watch. funny stuff. not trying to hate on them personally.
you worry too much! ;D
ya i know ;D i guess i just expect one thing from roo and they continually move further and further in a different direction. its upsetting. its like the family member who listens to radio pop and rap, and gets hooked on crack, you still love them but you hate to see them going down the road they are going down. but ill live. roo will still be a great time. but fr the first time i dont think it will be my favorite fest of the year. but we will see. i didnt thik so last year and it was incredible. and i wasnt even excited about radiohead. im excited for tool.
the funny thing is... BonnarooDetective didn't even take that screenshot...
and a ; CAN be in a site address...
I had no idea who took the screenie
and if ; parses SQL commands, then they would have to be running a SQL database to store ... pictures?
text. artists & urls.
lots easier to add additional artists (or ANY information for that matter) to a dynamic database, than to a static webpage, and the site would have to be "live" to reliably test connection to a SQL database, hence why it was online.
Post by BonnarooDetective on Feb 14, 2007 1:12:48 GMT -5
oorza said:
trustme said:
How is it that you know this much about web programming, yet you don't know that semicolons ARE a valid URL character, they're just not accepted in some browsers?
"not accepted in some browsers" means not legitimate, or browsers aren't legitimate, and I'm looking at the standards page for javascript now to see.
Well sir, I concede that you are very knowledgable on this subject. I, however, am not, which I why I would have had no idea of how to fake something like this.
How is it that you know this much about web programming, yet you don't know that semicolons ARE a valid URL character, they're just not accepted in some browsers?
"not accepted in some browsers" means not legitimate, or browsers aren't legitimate, and I'm looking at the standards page for javascript now to see.
make sure you look for %3B too. its the equivelent of a ;
and look at the link i posted for the boston orchrastra.. and explain that one too...
Post by BonnarooDetective on Feb 14, 2007 1:14:02 GMT -5
typeoserv said:
oorza said:
I had no idea who took the screenie
and if ; parses SQL commands, then they would have to be running a SQL database to store ... pictures?
text. artists & urls.
lots easier to add additional artists (or ANY information for that matter) to a dynamic database, than to a static webpage, and the site would have to be "live" to reliably test connection to a SQL database, hence why it was online.
and if ; parses SQL commands, then they would have to be running a SQL database to store ... pictures?
text. artists & urls.
lots easier to add additional artists (or ANY information for that matter) to a dynamic database, than to a static webpage, and the site would have to be "live" to reliably test connection to a SQL database, hence why it was online.
So for them to store the artists in an SQL database they'd have to have a dynamically updated image ... I don't know if that is even possible, but I do not know flash that well, so ... *shrugs*
well the record for most users online was broken today. it was in june of last year before today. i cant beleive this thread is still raging like a latenight bonnaroo drum circle with nitrous tanks. 20 some pages in half a day. damn.
Post by crazykittensmile on Feb 14, 2007 1:18:41 GMT -5
dudewhersmyinforoo said:
well the record for most users online was broken today. it was in june of last year before today. i cant beleive this thread is still raging like a latenight bonnaroo drum circle with nitrous tanks. 20 some pages in half a day. damn.
hahahaha, keith. that made me laugh so hard ;D ;D ;D