Whether it's your first Bonnaroo or you’re a music festival veteran, we welcome you to Inforoo.
Here you'll find info about artists, rumors, camping tips, and the infamous Roo Clues. Have a look around then create an account and join in the fun. See you at Bonnaroo!!
Maybe so. It just means delving deeper into a hole which gets harder and harder to get out. Perry has been worse than Bush, so hopefully people will vote for a new governor and try to implement some change.
Post by ronburgandy? on Jun 6, 2006 10:05:40 GMT -5
phishdrum said:
Maybe so. It just means delving deeper into a hole which gets harder and harder to get out. Perry has been worse than Bush, so hopefully people will vote for a new governor and try to implement some change.
the problem is, that very few people that live there think like you do..i dont mean to generalize, but, come on..change? in texas??
lol, yeah . . . change in Texas doesn't happen too often. We still have corporal punishment in our public schools. It'll be interesting to see how the election pans out if Kinky gathered enough signatures. I think that is a big IF though.
And honestly, the most ignorant thing written on these boards (MELIKECHEESE) is Bush is a tool for the Christian right. Learn more about politics. The political power of the Christian right is extremely limited and downright limp.
While I agree that Bush (as well as all other politicians) is in the hands of private enterprise, I do no agree with the statement above at all. The "Christian Right" is a huge base, and they always turn out to vote.
And honestly, the most ignorant thing written on these boards (MELIKECHEESE) is Bush is a tool for the Christian right. Learn more about politics. The political power of the Christian right is extremely limited and downright limp.
While I agree that Bush (as well as all other politicians) is in the hands of private enterprise, I do no agree with the statement above at all. The "Christian Right" is a huge base, and they always turn out to vote.
Yeah, they are a HUGE influence. At least about the past 10 years or so
Post by george de la porge on Jun 6, 2006 15:02:05 GMT -5
im not gay nor is anyone im going to roo with, but i remember there used to be a gay phish fansite brianandrobert.com or I think (named after the song). They may have a bonaroo equivalent or something. In case anyone is interested......
i liked nader. but last election i caught him going off on vegas and and how such a sinful city should be shut down. really odd and out of character stuff for nader. kinda turned me off.
While I agree that Bush (as well as all other politicians) is in the hands of private enterprise, I do no agree with the statement above at all. The "Christian Right" is a huge base, and they always turn out to vote.
Yeah, they are a HUGE influence. At least about the past 10 years or so
Philly? Delaware? It's hard for me to take your opinion seriously. Correct me if I'm wrong, but have you ever met someone on the "Christian right." Have you asked them their opinion on gay marriage? Cause I probably know a good deal more about the issue and the beliefs of those on the "Christian Right" than either of you.
Most Christians I know do believe that homosexuality is a sin. But most don't hate homosexuals. Most aren't completely confident in that belief. And most believe that marriage under God and under state are two separate things and therefore federal or state intereference into gay marriage is unconstitutional. I would venture to suggest the illusion of a majority of Christians hating gay people has more to do with how poorly the democratic party does at even attempting to mobilize Christian voters on a subject like gay marriage. I know many Christians who would have voted down the gay marriage amendment had they been motivated too. Sadly, most of them remain unmotivated while the Republicans use fear and insincerity to delude older Christians into thinking gay marriage is an afront to their personal belief system.
Frankly, I think gay marriage is a herring thrown out by Republicans to distract their constituents from the real hot button issue, abortion. I would venture to suggest that abortion and not gay marriage is also the issue that drove many Christians away from the democratic party to begin with and IS the issue that most Christians decided to become actively political about. The DNC's total shutting out of pro-life democrats at their conventions was a major step in driving the Christian faith dangerously to the right. Cause let's face it people, the last thing any of us want is right wing politics and religious fervor becoming permanent bedmates. All the Republicans had to do to win the "Christian Right" was to give them a voice, pure and simple. You can't tell me the democrats can't at least pretend to care.
man. i have never met a religous person or a republican who has ever had an original thought. that record still stands. your right that gay marriage is just a distraction. your right that bush is a big business president. they all are. the biggest of all the businesses on earth is religion. and they are allowed to operate tax free. and now bush and his religous right army wanna give them tax dollars too. they wanna teach all of us about the magic guy in the sky instead of scientific facts. they wanna force non christian children to swear allegiance to one nation under god. that should be taken out. it wasnt even orginally in it. it was put in by religous extemists in the 50s. if religon and greed could be removed from the world it would be a perfect and peaceful place. bush is the exact definiton of religion and greed gone mad. anyone who dosent think the religous right is a powerful force is ignorant. why do you think john mccain is kissng their ass. what a hipocrit he is. they elected bush. why cant religous people mind their business. if you dont like gay marriage dfont marry someone from the same sex. if you dont like abortions dont have one. if you dont want your kids having sex before they are married thats fine but dont try to keep the protection that my children will need out of their hands. i think yall should move to gether and live that way. and let the rest of the modern world move out of ancient myths and outdated beliefs
imo
Last Edit: Jun 6, 2006 22:09:41 GMT -5 by Dude - Back to Top
and also its really hard to give a sh.it about what you think when your issues are forcing others to have unwanted children, keeping condoms out of the hands of sexually active people under the age of 18 because you would rather stick your heads in the ground and pretend it dosent happen, and not allowing gay people to get married. its pretty hard to take seriously. these are the people that time left behind and eventually it will finally go away. now that there are scientific explanations for hurricanes and sand storms theres is little to warrant any belief in the whole god thing. just the brain washing every sunday. and more and more people come to the realizatin that thats some bogus stuff every generation
there are so many more important things going on. but these people are off in there own little world controlling things. its scary
Last Edit: Jun 6, 2006 22:21:04 GMT -5 by Dude - Back to Top
I really don't think the country hates gay people when you have openly gay characters on TV sitcoms which are doing very well. We have prominent gay people all over our society who are all well respected people. And if you think about it, our society is probably the most tolerant of homosexuality in the history of mankind. In the past gay people had to hide the fact that they were gay, but now it is ok to be openly gay and a human being too.
When you have a free society, the move toward tolerance is an endless journey, and one we all must take together. However, along the way we do meet many roadblocks, like the right wing lunatics running the senate, congress and white house. These f*ckers choose to use issues like gay marriage, which is truly meaningless to the lives of every ordinary heterosexual voters, as a wedge issue to drive their lunatic supporters to the polls. It's such a transparent move from these power hungry mother f*ckers. They use the issue in even years, which, by coincidence i'm sure, are election years. And guess what? This issue will disapper in 2007 (like it did in 2005), only to be ressurrected in 2008.
exactly right. i guess its no surprise that the religous right can be so easily manipulated and be completely ignorant of facts in front of their faces. they have been practicing for hundereds of years.
Last Edit: Jun 6, 2006 22:42:54 GMT -5 by Dude - Back to Top
I live in Philly now, and grew up here. But I've spent the past 6 years in various parts of the world. Yes, I have met members of the "Christian Right." The consensus is that they believe it's a sin, but hate the sin, not the sinner.
dudewhersmyinforoo said:
man. i have never met a religous person or a republican who has ever had an original thought.
That's the kind of thinking that does nobody any good.
I've been a political junkie for the past 4 years including working on numerous campaigns and running for office myself. The situation can change. I think there's a large difference in the political landscape with Bush at 49% support than the current 27% (has it dropped below that yet?). Basically, this means that he's losing support even amongst his base. Sure, his vote will never vote Democrat, but they just might stay at home and not vote or undervote in lots of races. Both can have a huge effect on the final numbers. Another interesting thing to keep an eye on for the '08 presidential election is the majority electoral college pact floating around in some states... it basicallly says that once enough states ratify it to make the ratifying states represent a majority of the electoral college vote, they will change their selection method from the winner of their state's popular vote to the national popular vote, effectively eliminating the electoral college from the picture... You win the popular vote for president, you win the election.
There's so much to cover, so little time to continue typing... As for the topic of this thread, I hope everyone got to catch Jon Stewart tonight ripping William Bennett a new one. My favorite (not an exact transcript, but it's the same concepts at least)...
Bennett: "This debate is about whether or not gays should be able to get married" Stewart: "No, this debate is about whether gays are a part of the human condition or some random fetish"
Bennett basically froze and Jon called for a commercial break to let him recover
Colbert did a great job following up at the start of his show...
"Today the Senate reconvened to take up the most serious issue facing this country... monogomous gay couples dedicated to living their lives together"
As a side note... tuppy, you must be kidding... i would have never guessed ;P
man. i have never met a religous person or a republican who has ever had an original thought. that record still stands. ... and let the rest of the modern world move out of ancient myths and outdated beliefs
I know some pretty chill Buddhists who are very religious.
your right. i used to burn down with this rastafarian priest dude and he was bad ass. crazy as hell. but fun to chill with and certainly had some original thoughts. i guess i should make that statement under the context of a debate about american politics.
ok, so i am very very new on this board. the above quote... ah, nevermind...
all i wanted to say was my beautiful girlfriend and i will be enjoying our first bonnaroo this year! it's great that so many people are accepting, and talking about this ammendment. south carolina is voting on its own ammendment this november and we will be working against it. getting people together to talk about it is the best way to ensure hate doesn't become law in this country. thanks to all of you who speak up against hate!!!!!!
The whole gay thing is just a red herring that the GOP is using to try and garner votes. Dick Cheney is uber conservative, but his daughter is gay so he shuts his mouth on the gay issue.
anyone see the daily show last night??
Remember, the political tide is turning in favor of Dems again, so the GOP will try anything to keep their head up. Let's just hope they don't steal the next election again.
Post by bohemianboy on Jun 7, 2006 14:20:51 GMT -5
Very nice, considering the GOP was expecting i think 52 votes, and it looks like they only got 48. This is one of those things that has no actual chance of passing, though it is still scary that there is a huge amount of people taht do want it
Post by bohemianboy on Jun 7, 2006 14:25:45 GMT -5
Well, remmber that they needed 60 votes to get to an actual vote, in which they would've needed 67! You also have to remember that this is politics. If it was an actual vote on the ammendment, it is probable that they wouldn't have gotten as many votes, but knowing that this vote was practically useless, (most of) the Republicans all voted in favor, because thats what they were told to do. Its similar to the "legalization" in Denver. Its just for show, and has no real value to it
i must have missed it but how is the denver decrim ahve no value to it. i know state and federal laws are still in effect but it helps. i have spent a lot of time in ann arbor and poeople say the same thing about the laws there. but i have been busted 3 times in AA and they took my stuff and let me go each time. i didint even get the ticket that they can issue you. i got busted once on university prorperty(where it is not decriminalized) and it resulted in an arrest and court. so i would say that it is helpful. just not as much as the news makes it out to be. and at least it garnersnational attention for the cause and shows us that not everyone has lost their mind in this country. it is a small step but a step none the less
Gay folks should be able to get married!! Plain and simply!
"Marriage" is not going in front of some dude and saying i do and getting a piece of paper (from the gov't no less!), it's making a commitment to someone and honoring that commitment!
As my wife always says, you can't help who you love!!
Marriage is about love! nothing more!
The real issue here is the question of "married" (as defined by the state) rights and priveledges!
"They" don't want gay couples "married" so they don't get health care benifits or tax filing status. Stuff like that!!
I don't think it's any cheaper for a gay couple to make ends meet than a straight couple, why should they not get the same tax filing status as us??
And I completely agree with the assumption that gay divorce rates would probably be lower than hetero divorce rates.
Philly? Delaware? It's hard for me to take your opinion seriously. Correct me if I'm wrong, but have you ever met someone on the "Christian right." Have you asked them their opinion on gay marriage? Cause I probably know a good deal more about the issue and the beliefs of those on the "Christian Right" than either of you.
UMMM I have lived in NJ and CT my whole life... and those states are about as blue as you can get and I know members of the fundamentalist "Christian Right." I don't hang out with them, but I do come across them from time to time, especially being actively involved on my campus with student government and as an RA, where you don't get to pick who you work with.
I do ask every one of them who insist on trying to save me (I don't bring it up unless they do - and then the gloves are off) and I can say that you're sort of right in that they don't say they "hate" gay people (like the complete wackjobs protesting soldiers funerals), but they do all say that they believe gay people are going to burn in hell for all eternity. Unless of course they redeem themselves by asking for salvation, and "choosing" to not be gay anymore, blah blah blah.
So you're right, they don't "hate" them, they just 100% believe in their hearts that they are disgusting, morally reprehensible, damned sinners.... and that is close enough to hate for me!!!
babel said:
OK, I'll throw in my $.02
I've been a political junkie for the past 4 years including working on numerous campaigns and running for office myself. The situation can change. I think there's a large difference in the political landscape with Bush at 49% support than the current 27% (has it dropped below that yet?). Basically, this means that he's losing support even amongst his base. Sure, his vote will never vote Democrat, but they just might stay at home and not vote or undervote in lots of races. Both can have a huge effect on the final numbers. Another interesting thing to keep an eye on for the '08 presidential election is the majority electoral college pact floating around in some states... it basicallly says that once enough states ratify it to make the ratifying states represent a majority of the electoral college vote, they will change their selection method from the winner of their state's popular vote to the national popular vote, effectively eliminating the electoral college from the picture... You win the popular vote for president, you win the election.
There's so much to cover, so little time to continue typing... As for the topic of this thread, I hope everyone got to catch Jon Stewart tonight ripping William Bennett a new one. My favorite (not an exact transcript, but it's the same concepts at least)...
Bennett: "This debate is about whether or not gays should be able to get married" Stewart: "No, this debate is about whether gays are a part of the human condition or some random fetish"
Bennett basically froze and Jon called for a commercial break to let him recover
Colbert did a great job following up at the start of his show...
"Today the Senate reconvened to take up the most serious issue facing this country... monogomous gay couples dedicated to living their lives together"
As a side note... tuppy, you must be kidding... i would have never guessed ;P
I was going to bring that up, glad to see you already did Steward gave Bennett quite the smackdown last night, I was practically cheering when I saw it.
If you missed it you can go to www.comedycentral.com and click on the motherload link in the bottom middle "Daily show: interview with Bennett" is one of the first choices that comes up.
I agree with you that we should eliminate the electoral college, with the way our country has involved since it's inception, it's definately not a necessity anymore.
Last Edit: Jun 7, 2006 21:30:36 GMT -5 by Tara - Back to Top
"I can resist everything but temptation." - Oscar Wilde
I would like to know though how many gay people besides us go to Roo?
I'm bisexual. If I had went to Roo last year, I would have been going with my then boyfriend. Instead, this year, I'll be going with my girlfriend (straight), my best friend (bisexual), and his partner (gay).