Whether it's your first Bonnaroo or you’re a music festival veteran, we welcome you to Inforoo.
Here you'll find info about artists, rumors, camping tips, and the infamous Roo Clues. Have a look around then create an account and join in the fun. See you at Bonnaroo!!
Post by oleander124 on Aug 15, 2007 13:19:27 GMT -5
Check out this website...it shows original photos of celebrities, then what the same photo looks like after they photoshop the sh!t out of it. These make me sick...
Hell - the photo of Kelly Clarkson made me feel good but I don't understand why they felt the need to retouch it - even in the original pic - she is beautiful
OMG - Halle Berry is beautifu without retouching also
Brittany Murphy needed the help tho
Cameron Diaz looks good before the retouch
Ya know - I can see why they would retouch some of them but there are others that only needed better light exposure
Last Edit: Aug 15, 2007 14:29:39 GMT -5 by Meg - Back to Top
Hell - the photo of Kelly Clarkson made me feel good but I don't understand why they felt the need to retouch it - even in the original pic - she is beautiful
Hell - the photo of Kelly Clarkson made me feel good but I don't understand why they felt the need to retouch it - even in the original pic - she is beautiful
They de-junked her trunk!
I like her in the first one too.
hahaha - that is exactly what I thought! They made her too skinny like Brook said - part of her appeal for me is that she has a "normal" body - flaws and all
Wow! They didn't even do anything to Halle Berry, just a color change.
Personally, I think they kind of suck at it. They blow out the skin tones so far there is absolutely no detail left.
I don't know who she is, but the girl on the bottom row, fifth from the left - they actually made her arm and legs FATTER. That's really sad that she's that skinny.
Biglou used to work on a Victoria Secret type catalog, retouching the models. He said they photoshopped the crap out of them too.
