Whether it's your first Bonnaroo or you’re a music festival veteran, we welcome you to Inforoo.
Here you'll find info about artists, rumors, camping tips, and the infamous Roo Clues. Have a look around then create an account and join in the fun. See you at Bonnaroo!!
This word also has a underground meaning once you break it down. Let’s take “Bonn” for example and it actually turns into the word “Bone”. We all know gays use this word to describe the action of when they are fecal fisting their Cuban cabana boy at their sex bath house parties. Now let’s look at Roo, “Roo” is short for “Kangaroo”.So put the full true message together and you get“Bone a Kangaroo
Post by Fishing Maniac on Aug 7, 2008 21:05:14 GMT -5
As a NYer and Jets fan I hope we keep him. He can't be any more tragic than the recent QB attempts. All I cn say is that it's a good thing I'm not a Giants hater. Last season makes me happy. ;D
Then again, while the Packers don't want to play Favre, i hear playing the Packers is a big deal to Favre, so I'm thinking he wants the Bucs and the Pack want the Jets. I still think its retarded how the Packers ran him out of town. I heard a phone call with Steve Marriuci who said that Brett Favre went to GB wanting to play there, but when he got to camp and had that meeting with McCarthy he got the sense they didn't want him there, this being yesterday. Retarded.
They didn't run Favre out of town; they got sick of his bullshit.
The past couple seasons, there's been plenty of speculation about Favre retiring in the post-season; he always got time to make the decision on his timetable.
In March, he "officially" retired with the press conference and all.
In June, the week before Bonnaroo, he privately contacted the Packers to say he wanted to un-retire. Within a week, he told the Packers he changed his mind and wanted to stay retired.
Lately... well, we all know how that goes.
Good riddance.
I wish him the best of luck, though... if only because the better he does, the better the Packers' draft pick becomes.
Post by ziggyandthemonkeys on Aug 8, 2008 15:08:22 GMT -5
That is the other side of the argument^. I just disagree, when a name and talent like Favre wants to come back, you make it happen, and go win a fricken superbowl. That Favre was indecisive would certainly be an understatement though.
That is the other side of the argument^. I just disagree, when a name and talent like Favre wants to come back, you make it happen, and go win a fricken superbowl. That Favre was indecisive would certainly be an understatement though.
How long would you have expected the Packers to wait, anyway? They were already preparing for the post-Favre era for three months when he offered-and-retracted his un-retirement for the first time. Fool me once, shame on you... If he wanted to unretire, he should have gone balls to the wall in the first place.
Aaron Rodgers is on the last year of his current contract, and would have had good reason for entertaining other options if Favre stayed around. No matter what team he's on, we know Favre doesn't have that many years left in him. I'm sure the Packers kept this in mind as they weighed the decision between Favre and Ted Thompson's "quarterback of the future."
As far as the freakin' Super Bowl... the Packers might've made it last year, if it weren't for an overtime interception thrown by a certain someone...
Post by ziggyandthemonkeys on Aug 12, 2008 15:16:02 GMT -5
Would've never made it to the divisionals with Aaron Rodgers^ anyways. You don't wait at all, its not like Favre would be joining a new team, same personnel, same playbook, you just plug him in, kinda like the Jets did. Let Aaron Rodgers go, Brian Brohm will have a year under his belt by then.