Whether it's your first Bonnaroo or you’re a music festival veteran, we welcome you to Inforoo.
Here you'll find info about artists, rumors, camping tips, and the infamous Roo Clues. Have a look around then create an account and join in the fun. See you at Bonnaroo!!
I'm not saying let's all kick each other in the nuts, but a little nipple twisting never hurts.
Well, the truth is, that's not what happened. LLL was upset because her opinion wasn't even validated at the being of the 3rd round. NOT A SINGLE PLAYER put forth a reason for me being whacked, which should have solved the whole question then and there. Her main alley is killed off???? What kind of fake inspector would kill off the main person that believed them? Not a single one of you fully questioned that. Instead the game went into chaos for awhile.
She was attacked, ignored and told she was full of poop. Basically, that her opinion didn't matter. Add the fact that she had logic on her side and that others CLEARLY weren't keeping up with the game, that's a very frustrating situation to be in. You should try it some time. It's not fun and it doesn't add value to the game.
Wlviking, I like that you read back and fact check. That's what all players should do.
Last Edit: Mar 23, 2012 2:47:17 GMT -5 by Deleted - Back to Top
I'm sure you'll catch on quick, this is only my 3rd game.
So wheres the baconator? Right now SFA is on his way to getting voted off, which is something I definitely don't want until I have a reason to believe he's mafia. He was helpful last round in making me see through EAPs stinky BS
I'm sure you'll catch on quick, this is only my 3rd game.
So wheres the baconator? Right now SFA is on his way to getting voted off, which is something I definitely don't want until I have a reason to believe he's mafia. He was helpful last round in making me see through EAPs stinky BS
No one is getting put in a runoff, let alone voted out for another 18 hours. Remember the 36 hour rule. Also, voting normally does not close on a weekend, but if we firm up a runoff, I would not mind entering it tonight.
Besides, I just voted for sfa for luck. If push came to shove, I am moving off of him. That being said, I would like to get going. Where the hell is Bacon
Sorry folks didn't realize we had started already. Since a good majority haven't played with me before I'll be sure to explain everything I do.
Voting partners are the work of mafia imo. It neutralizes everyone's votes and then if the mafia are crafty enough it allows them to decide who is in the ceremonial Day 1 run-off. That is why I always make sure to be the one who chooses one of the people who will go into the run-off. Often this appears suspicious and it has gotten me voted off day 1 in the past. Yes I do know that I have no way of knowing who is mafia and I am operating solely on hunches at this point. That said there is a 3/10 chance the person I vote for is mafia. If the mafia choose who goes into the run-off that person will always be a towny (well not always...).
So the way my hunch works normally is that I am of the opinion that the person receiving 2 votes is the least likely to be mafia at this point. Therefore there is a higher possibility the person that, that person is voting for is mafia. Therefore
So the way my hunch works normally is that I am of the opinion that the person receiving 2 votes is the least likely to be mafia at this point. Therefore there is a higher possibility the person that, that person is voting for is mafia. Therefore
Baconus66 >>> EAP
huh??? that does not make sense to me. especially b/c i voted for SFA first? so the person who would have been placing the second vote on him was viking...not me.
plus, wouldn't that theory apply to you? i now have 2 votes and you are the one who voted for me....so you must be mafia? am i missing something?
i would like to see a third person in the runoff. normally i'd reciprocate to bacon, but he doesn't have any votes and that would take SFA out of the runoff (which i actually don't mind doing, since he hasn't been suspicious to me at all and bacon's "theory" seems a little off).
does anyone want to put a third person in the runoff?
I mean, I'm not totally opposed to a 3rd in the runoff because, as I said before, I don't want SFA gone until I KNOW that he is mafia... and I really don't think EAP is mafia 3 games in a row (of course, it is possible, especially with a new ref.)
So the way my hunch works normally is that I am of the opinion that the person receiving 2 votes is the least likely to be mafia at this point. Therefore there is a higher possibility the person that, that person is voting for is mafia. Therefore
Baconus66 >>> EAP
huh??? that does not make sense to me. especially b/c i voted for SFA first? so the person who would have been placing the second vote on him was viking...not me.
plus, wouldn't that theory apply to you? i now have 2 votes and you are the one who voted for me....so you must be mafia? am i missing something?
I'm not saying you mafia. I'm saying there is a better chance that you are mafia than whoever a mafia member might put in the run-off. 3/10 chance
And yes that would apply to me too, but only if you are a towny.
Hey. The mafia lost for the first game since mafia 38 last game. We got surf by luck in the first round. Keeping with what helped win, I am moving off Phi.
Hey. The mafia lost for the first game since mafia 38 last game. We got surf by luck in the first round. Keeping with what helped win, I am moving off Phi.
