Whether it's your first Bonnaroo or you’re a music festival veteran, we welcome you to Inforoo.
Here you'll find info about artists, rumors, camping tips, and the infamous Roo Clues. Have a look around then create an account and join in the fun. See you at Bonnaroo!!
So wait, EAP, you vote for me with poopy reasoning (again, you said I wasn't really that suspicious and then voted for me in the damn runoff) and I reciprocated after a little bit of thought. I would hardly call that a suspicious stack. What did you expect? I said unless Viking made himself look way more suspicious than he already did, that I was probably going to change my vote to you to defend myself, and thats what I did. The only thing my vote has to do with RDK is that he triggered a memory in my head of me and sarah fighting while you just sat and watched, and how similar it is to this situation, save being at the end of the game.
honestly viking you remind me of kdogg and i think your long posts are going to end up being too confusing and will be easy to hide behind.
it doesn't look like it will matter b/c all of you are so content with voting me straight off (i guess my fellow mafia hate me too huh??? they don't want to save me at all.)
honestly viking you remind me of kdogg and i think your long posts are going to end up being too confusing and will be easy to hide behind.
it doesn't look like it will matter b/c all of you are so content with voting me straight off (i guess my fellow mafia hate me too huh??? they don't want to save me at all.)
EAP>>>>CTZ>>>>viking
This is almost a verbatim quote from last round when you were mafia:
Lets also remember the last two times EAP was a townie and called out as mafia and put in a runoff. She flipped her poop and took it VERY personal and got very offensive.
She's not doing that this time, just kind of rolling with it. Even saying "whatever, vote me out, Im busy anyways."
I mean, lets be real.
I am flipping out dummy!!!! Last time I was just like, what? Little ole me???
But like I said before you can't argue with people who are just saying whatever they want with no real backage or evidence.
And poop face this week is hella busy for me, it's not like I've been crazy posting around the board and then saying I'm too busy for here.
what do you want me to say viking? of course i've said some of the same stuff in games. i'm sure i could find the same thing if you've played 20 plus games. but you've only played two.
So wait, viking, you stacked on SFA for "good luck"? That doesn't make any sense. At all. I'd like to see you go into the runoff.
CSTNZ >>> Bacon >>> roonectar >>> Viking
CSTNZ, I am having trouble understanding why you thought that voting for SFA this time was any different than my voting for him last game because he has a 3 letter acronym.
I wasn't around much last game in the very beginning so I probably didn't notice.
Last game, you DID comment in Day 1 several times, including on this very issue. Either you forgot or you are ignoring that. Also, your comment on forgetting that previous games have no impact on this game is very suspicious considering that last game we had an extensive discussion of odds over the very same person.
the reason i haven't really responded is b/c i don't really have anything to say??? i guess you guys are always wanting people to say so much! sometimes i don't do that! geeze.
Thats not true. CSNTZ actually was one fo the lowest post counts in the last two first rounds he played in.
But now, you just said CZTNZ didn't post much in the first couple of days...something just doesn't add up for me. EAP, I feel (And that's all I have this early in the game, a feeling) you're being targeted, but I'm not sure if CZTNZ or Viking is responsible. I'm going out on a limb here, but I'm changing my vote to Viking, to try and help you out of this.
And tell us what you think. I have only been a townie in the games I've played, so I don't know how I would play different. However, you play is not matching when you were a townie.
Keep in mind my vote is still on CSTNZ, but I really want to hear and suspicions you have or at least a logic thread.
Yeah SFA has been really quiet. I've been saying this whole round how he's a really valuable player and we shouldn't vote him off... maybe he's just letting me do the talking for him while he sits back with his mafia and laughs?
But in all seriousness, EAP, saying that no one is trying to save you is not much. I really doubt that, if you are indeed mafia, your mafia brethren would stick their necks out and risk the whole game in the very first round.
CSTNZ, I am having trouble understanding why you thought that voting for SFA this time was any different than my voting for him last game because he has a 3 letter acronym.
Also, I have a lot of issues with this post:
Last game, you DID comment in Day 1 several times, including on this very issue. Either you forgot or you are ignoring that. Also, your comment on forgetting that previous games have no impact on this game is very suspicious considering that last game we had an extensive discussion of odds over the very same person.
Thats not true. CSNTZ actually was one fo the lowest post counts in the last two first rounds he played in.
But now, you just said CZTNZ didn't post much in the first couple of days...something just doesn't add up for me. EAP, I feel (And that's all I have this early in the game, a feeling) you're being targeted, but I'm not sure if CZTNZ or Viking is responsible. I'm going out on a limb here, but I'm changing my vote to Viking, to try and help you out of this.
CMP>>>CZTNZ>>>Viking[/quote]
Both are true. Go back and read last game. Cstnz had a low post count by virtue of Phi, RDK, and myself going at it. Where he did post, it was related to the issue I pointed out. As I said last night. Before you jump to a conclusion, go back and read previous games
Also, found this post interesting from last game too, since it is similar to what you are saying now:
And poop face this week is hella busy for me, it's not like I've been crazy posting around the board and then saying I'm too busy for here.
[/quote]
actually last time i really was busy. on thursday night i had an all district art show that i was in charge of for my school. i had to mat and hang 130 student art pieces essentially by myself that week.
now i am just saying that b/c i don't want to spend the whole game defending my townie playing style. it gets old and frustrating (see LLL last game and/or one of my townie meltdowns).
Yeah SFA has been really quiet. I've been saying this whole round how he's a really valuable player and we shouldn't vote him off... maybe he's just letting me do the talking for him while he sits back with his mafia and laughs?
But in all seriousness, EAP, saying that no one is trying to save you is not much. I really doubt that, if you are indeed mafia, your mafia brethren would stick their necks out and risk the whole game in the very first round.
hmm so other people are coming around on viking now. Like I said when I changed my vote to EAP, it was purely for protective purposes. Her reaction is not helping my mild suspicions right now, but my plan was always to keep an eye on Viking, even if my suspicions had eased a bit.
Thanks for pointing that out, CMP, because that really was confusing to me when we had that exchange. I mean, I kind of just counted on Viking as being the research guy, so if he said I posted more then I probably posted more. That was a bad assumption. I think we all need to start fact checking Vikings long winded accusations and references to previous game. He could just be lying and I don't think anyone is checking up on his facts.
Same goes with that whole statistics/percentage thing. I'm terrible at math so I absolutely did not, but did anyone even check that he wasn't just blowing smoke and that those percentages weren't just made up? Again, not accusing you viking, but I am saying that I think we need to start checking up on the things you say if you're going to be "researching" so much.
Post by CMPMGCTRCKS on Mar 24, 2012 13:42:47 GMT -5
Fair enough, I should double check myself on those things.
It's not really so much jumping to a conclusion, as I said, this early in the game you can really only go on your hunches if you'e a townie. I know you talked a lot last game as well, but it still screams Mafia to me. For some reason, you and CZTNZ's words are just more suspicious to me right now. I don't want to see EAP go down this easily when nothing she's done has stood out to me.
I'm also painfully aware that I'm the new guy here, and probably easily swayed by more experienced players, so I figure the best thing for me to do right now is use my vote to keep things close.
All of the quotes I've read from viking are accurate. Not going to do the math on those statistics though. He posts so much that someone will be able to find something to point out so maybe CMP is just making a last ditch effort to save EAP.
That along with EAP's reaction makes me feel confident with my vote.
Posting a logical theory against viking or CSTNZ rather than saying "IM NOT MAFIA!" and pointing fingers at people not in the runoff might be more helpful for you.
Fair enough, I should double check myself on those things.
It's not really so much jumping to a conclusion, as I said, this early in the game you can really only go on your hunches if you'e a townie. I know you talked a lot last game as well, but it still screams Mafia to me. For some reason, you and CZTNZ's words are just more suspicious to me right now. I don't want to see EAP go down this easily when nothing she's done has stood out to me.
I'm also painfully aware that I'm the new guy here, and probably easily swayed by more experienced players, so I figure the best thing for me to do right now is use my vote to keep things close.
Yes, please check before you post something like that. I assumed people were fact checking on me, especially since I charted wrong last game. Just so you know, in Mafia 45, CSTNZ had 5 posts in day 1. That day ended awkwardly, since Bek had to bow out, but at the time, it stood for 6.7% of posts. That is well below the average. Last game, CSTNZ had 8 posts. 3 of those were related to me, and how I was playing. the 8 posts accounted for 4.5% of the activity that game, which as I said, was skewed by Phi and me.
And CSTNZ, I have offered to send the chart to anyone who wants to look at it. Just PM me, and I will send it to you.
Oh, like I said, I'm not really doubting you so much as stating that I haven't been, and I'm not sure if anyone else has been, fact checking your stuff.
I'm not sure what you are trying to say with those percentages? I posted about you last game because your long winded explainations were bound to get someone whacked. Basically I play by the rule, don't show all of your cards, because then mafia will just kill you, or adapt their plan to your theory. But that's just my mind,you can play however you want, and clearly it didnt hurt us last game.
But seriously, what does this
Just so you know, in Mafia 45, CSTNZ had 5 posts in day 1. That day ended awkwardly, since Bek had to bow out, but at the time, it stood for 6.7% of posts. That is well below the average. Last game, CSTNZ had 8 posts. 3 of those were related to me, and how I was playing. the 8 posts accounted for 4.5% of the activity that game, which as I said, was skewed by Phi and me.
It doesnt mean much. I didnt post much in the first game at the beginning because we were all waiting on bek and it was my first game. I didnt post much in the second game at the beginning because I was very busy that week. I've explained those things thoroughly again and again, so what are you trying to imply/say/do by posting that?
Oh, like I said, I'm not really doubting you so much as stating that I haven't been, and I'm not sure if anyone else has been, fact checking your stuff.
I'm not sure what you are trying to say with those percentages? I posted about you last game because your long winded explainations were bound to get someone whacked. Basically I play by the rule, don't show all of your cards, because then mafia will just kill you, or adapt their plan to your theory. But that's just my mind,you can play however you want, and clearly it didnt hurt us last game.
But seriously, what does this
Just so you know, in Mafia 45, CSTNZ had 5 posts in day 1. That day ended awkwardly, since Bek had to bow out, but at the time, it stood for 6.7% of posts. That is well below the average. Last game, CSTNZ had 8 posts. 3 of those were related to me, and how I was playing. the 8 posts accounted for 4.5% of the activity that game, which as I said, was skewed by Phi and me.
It doesnt mean much. I didnt post much in the first game at the beginning because we were all waiting on bek and it was my first game. I didnt post much in the second game at the beginning because I was very busy that week. I've explained those things thoroughly again and again, so what are you trying to imply/say/do by posting that?
It was for cmp. He said that their was an issue with my saying you don't post a lot, but you posted about me a lot. I was clarifying for him so he could see I was not making things up. That post implied nothing. It was just to reenforce my veracity
Well Bacon I'd really like to know why you voted for me. Phi did that whole "vote for this guy! I'll explain why later!" thing a decent bit last round and it always drove me nuts. I haven't been doing anything except trying to keep myself in the game because I think both of the other parties in the runoff are at least a little bit suspicious, and I feel that they are definitely more suspicious than I am right now.
