Whether it's your first Bonnaroo or you’re a music festival veteran, we welcome you to Inforoo.
Here you'll find info about artists, rumors, camping tips, and the infamous Roo Clues. Have a look around then create an account and join in the fun. See you at Bonnaroo!!
ummm okay. Well that sucks because it seems like around this evening there is going to be some kind of theory coming out about me at some point, and I have a show tonight and wont be on the internet from 7 PM until at least 1-2 AM (when I will probably be inhebriated, we are playing at a bar that gives the bands free domestics) if not tomorrow afternoon. So I will have absolutely no way to defend myself. Unless you just dont want to make the deciding vote so you voted for the person with the lowest number of votes in the runoff.
Posting a logical theory against viking or CSTNZ rather than saying "IM NOT MAFIA!" and pointing fingers at people not in the runoff might be more helpful for you.
posting this again since eap went quiet after viking and cstnzs exchange.
ummm okay. Well that sucks because it seems like around this evening there is going to be some kind of theory coming out about me at some point, and I have a show tonight and wont be on the internet from 7 PM until at least 1-2 AM (when I will probably be inhebriated, we are playing at a bar that gives the bands free domestics) if not tomorrow afternoon. So I will have absolutely no way to defend myself. Unless you just dont want to make the deciding vote so you voted for the person with the lowest number of votes in the runoff.
I'm not 100% sure but I do find you more suspicious than both viking and CSTNZ.
I'd like to hear from sarah, though. She has been very quiet.
As has SFA even though he was the subject of conversation.
Like I said last game, I usually don't have much to say early on. Plus I'm rarely around a computer during the day. I had no idea I was possibly in the runoff until I had already been taken out of it. If I had of known the runoff was starting and my vote for EAP was going to put her in it I would have probably have made a random switch because that helped the townies last game. When we shook up the original runoff votes.
I don't really have a strong opinion on any of the three in the runoff. I do think the vote stacks on EAP make her look the less suspicious. But that not saying much this early on.
SFA, you think EAP is less suspicious than viking/cstnz after reading her last string of posts?
I was really going off of what anyone had said I was going off this vote tally from around noon:
CSTNZ - 3 EAP - 5 Viking - 2
I know we got lucky and voted off Surf in the first round last game but that's a pretty rare thing to do. Not sure if this is mafia vote stacking but it does seem that the mafia was fine sitting back and letting this happen. I might be wrong....
SFA, you have played a lot more games than I have so you should know that a vote tally means next to nothing so early in the day. Look at it now, 4-4 since EAP quit posting and let CSTNZ and viking argue more.
honestly viking you remind me of kdogg and i think your long posts are going to end up being too confusing and will be easy to hide behind.
it doesn't look like it will matter b/c all of you are so content with voting me straight off (i guess my fellow mafia hate me too huh??? they don't want to save me at all.)
EAP>>>>CTZ>>>>viking
and then of course the "oh I joked about being mafia so I'm definitely not":
Shortly afterwards cmp put focus on Viking eap switched to Viking and bacon moved off eap.
As I said, I noticed eap was getting hanged up on, and it's hard to believe that many people saw something suspicious. Seemed strange, and I just wanted people to stop and think.
Post by popsicle sarah on Mar 24, 2012 19:00:49 GMT -5
Sorry guys. I woke up this morning with severe ear pain and was at the walk in clinic when they opened at 8am. I have an ear infection. and I felt horrible all day. Now I have company in town and we're going to a show tonight. I'm sorry if I'm holding up the game. I can't read through everything right now, but I promise to read everything in the morning and vote.
Sorry guys. I woke up this morning with severe ear pain and was at the walk in clinic when they opened at 8am. I have an ear infection. and I felt horrible all day. Now I have company in town and we're going to a show tonight. I'm sorry if I'm holding up the game. I can't read through everything right now, but I promise to read everything in the morning and vote.
don't worry boo! we hope you are feeling better. have fun with everyone.
But now, you just said CZTNZ didn't post much in the first couple of days...something just doesn't add up for me. EAP, I feel (And that's all I have this early in the game, a feeling) you're being targeted, but I'm not sure if CZTNZ or Viking is responsible. I'm going out on a limb here, but I'm changing my vote to Viking, to try and help you out of this.
CMP>>>CZTNZ>>>Viking
i also don't see how that is any more suspicious than duddits (with also a weak explanation for why he vote for me + he has only posted like twice), you and then cztnz stacking your votes on me.
posting this again since eap went quiet after viking and cstnzs exchange.
i wasn't ignoring you or not responding on purpose. as much as i love inforoo/chat i actually have real life stuff to do. (if you can believe it ).
ok, the truth is i'm totally regretting the fake inspector move last game bc now i can tell none of you trust me (which is legit). in a way i'm going to give myself a little pat on the back b/c it kind of means i did a good job when when i was mafia in the last games. OF COURSE i said stuff as mafia that i would say as a townie, that is the point.....that you do NOT want people to be able to tell when you are mafia vs when you are a townsperson. it IS about tricking people. i'm sorry i'm a good trickster. haha.
but on the flipside that means i am usually good at reading other people, so i'd like that chance to prove that (especially to the newer players) i am an asset to the townies, when i can keep my cool.
if you want me to post theories about the two people in the runoff with me RDK, i will. i do not know if either of them is guilty or not yet. we JUST started. if i had to pick one to go now, it would be viking only bc as i said he does remind me of kdogg. kdogg is a an amazing resource to the townies bc of his research/data/long windedness but he is also a force for the mafia bc it is so hard to muck through all of his posts. i feel like viking is similar (this is a compliment viking, if you know kdogg and how seriously he takes stuff).
Shortly afterwards cmp put focus on Viking eap switched to Viking and bacon moved off eap.
this is actually not true, but thanks for skewing the facts.....
i switched from viking BEFORE cmp put "focus" on viking. the only thing cmp did was see that the two of them were ganging up on me.
EAP, I never ganged up on you. You can look back and see, but I have never changed my vote off of you. All I did was ask a few questions, and look back at what you did last game when you were mafia. I did the same thing with CSTNZ.
ok, the truth is i'm totally regretting the fake inspector move last game bc now i can tell none of you trust me (which is legit). in a way i'm going to give myself a little pat on the back b/c it kind of means i did a good job when when i was mafia in the last games. OF COURSE i said stuff as mafia that i would say as a townie, that is the point.....that you do NOT want people to be able to tell when you are mafia vs when you are a townsperson. it IS about tricking people. i'm sorry i'm a good trickster. haha.
but on the flipside that means i am usually good at reading other people, so i'd like that chance to prove that (especially to the newer players) i am an asset to the townies, when i can keep my cool.
if you want me to post theories about the two people in the runoff with me RDK, i will. i do not know if either of them is guilty or not yet. we JUST started. if i had to pick one to go now, it would be viking only bc as i said he does remind me of kdogg. kdogg is a an amazing resource to the townies bc of his research/data/long windedness but he is also a force for the mafia bc it is so hard to muck through all of his posts. i feel like viking is similar (this is a compliment viking, if you know kdogg and how seriously he takes stuff).
does anyone else have questions for me?
I do not know who kdogg is, but I will take it as a compliment. I do take this seriously, and I really want to win again, since I am a very bad loser. There is a problem with the post though. It is basically the caveman lawyer defense.
"I'm just a simple caveman. Your posts frighten and confuse me, but what I can tell you is that viking is guilty"
Everything I have posted is factual, and I think CSTNZ has actually gone back to fact check on some of what I posted. The thing with facts is that if you lie and make it up, you are dead. Thats why I don't understand why posting facts makes me more suspicious. I would love to hear your theories on us though.
I am really considering changin my vote, pending what Bacon has to say about CSNTZ later today, and any other comments.
Roonector and CMP, I have no idea why you guys are still voting for me. I am neither the "bad camper" and CMP, I think I showed you how there was no factual descrepancy, and that there was no ganging up. The search function on this board is really bad, but go back and at the very least read through a few games of the 3 people in the runoff's posts. CSNTZ was in Mafia 45&46. he was a townie both times. I was in 46 and I was a townie. With EAP, you have a huge selection. She was mafia in 45&46, inspector in 44, and townie going back to 39 before that. Take a good look at Mafia 40 especially, when she was thrown in the runoff as a townie.
It will help you with trying to sort out who is who. Of course, half the time, there is no mafia at all in the runoff, but I think we may have at least 1 in this one. Just a matter of figuring out who.
if you want me to post theories about the two people in the runoff with me RDK, i will. i do not know if either of them is guilty or not yet. we JUST started. if i had to pick one to go now, it would be viking only bc as i said he does remind me of kdogg. kdogg is a an amazing resource to the townies bc of his research/data/long windedness but he is also a force for the mafia bc it is so hard to muck through all of his posts. i feel like viking is similar (this is a compliment viking, if you know kdogg and how seriously he takes stuff).
does anyone else have questions for me?
I do not know who kdogg is, but I will take it as a compliment. I do take this seriously, and I really want to win again, since I am a very bad loser. There is a problem with the post though. It is basically the caveman lawyer defense.
"I'm just a simple caveman. Your posts frighten and confuse me, but what I can tell you is that viking is guilty"
Everything I have posted is factual, and I think CSTNZ has actually gone back to fact check on some of what I posted. The thing with facts is that if you lie and make it up, you are dead. Thats why I don't understand why posting facts makes me more suspicious. I would love to hear your theories on us though.
actually if you look at the part i underlined in bold, i did NOT say that you were guilty. but thank you for putting words in my mouth.
rdk was pressuring me to say thing about people in the runoff, so i did. just b/c constanza is reading all your posts and checking them, doesn't mean everyone else is. we all get busy and don't read everything all the time, that happens. plus it is easier to get confused when someone has written a million posts that are half a page long.
but once again, i didn't say that you were guilty (as everyone can see in my original quote). but the fact that you keep harping on things and twisting my words is making me think that i was on the right track....
actually if you look at the part i underlined in bold, i did NOT say that you were guilty. but thank you for putting words in my mouth.
rdk was pressuring me to say thing about people in the runoff, so i did. just b/c constanza is reading all your posts and checking them, doesn't mean everyone else is. we all get busy and don't read everything all the time, that happens. plus it is easier to get confused when someone has written a million posts that are half a page long.
but once again, i didn't say that you were guilty (as everyone can see in my original quote). but the fact that you keep harping on things and twisting my words is making me think that i was on the right track....
I appreciate that you did not say I was guilty, but I never said you did. Go back and read my post. You DID say you would pick me over CSTNZ. All I did was ask why. It is interesting that you are twisting what I say, while accusing me of twisting. I won't apologize for writing long posts either. You can choose to read them or choose not to.
^was that not you pretending to be me saying that you were guilty?? am i missing something?
also, i've explained multiple times why i would vote for you over constanza while admitting that we may all be townies. i'm not exactly sure what else you want me to say.
^was that not you pretending to be me saying that you were guilty?? am i missing something?
also, i've explained multiple times why i would vote for you over constanza while admitting that we may all be townies. i'm not exactly sure what else you want me to say.
No, that was me pretending to be caveman lawyer. If you have not seen the skit, I could see how you could misunderstand it. And I am asking for a better reason than you are voting for me because I write long posts. That seems counter intuitive to me.
I didn't want to vote for either of you. There are people not in the runoff who have done more suspicious things than the three of us IMO. Obviously, that's not a choice. Sorry.
).
