Whether it's your first Bonnaroo or you’re a music festival veteran, we welcome you to Inforoo.
Here you'll find info about artists, rumors, camping tips, and the infamous Roo Clues. Have a look around then create an account and join in the fun. See you at Bonnaroo!!
^^^ It would help more if there were more new players and a noob mafia tried to make a mountain out of a molehill, but most of the vets already know what I'm going to do and don't try to make something out of it.
This is true. I was just curious. I forgot to mention the other angel of the mafia using it against you. I think there have been some push but I don't remember it being a big deal either way.
Post by kikosanchez on Jan 22, 2013 23:05:52 GMT -5
^^^ Por que?? B/c I said you'd be a bad player last game for voting me? lol get over it, I was just trying to rile up possible mafioso. But once again, why would you want to vote for me?? The game just started, what in the world do you have on anyone?? At least justify yourself if you're going to throw out random ass suspicion
How is asking a question and thanking for a responce being louder than normal? I'd said about 4 times as much by this point last game. Oh well I'm never one to get defensive about going in to a Day 1 runoff and thats not going to change now.
Post by kikosanchez on Jan 23, 2013 11:41:22 GMT -5
I feel like we should get a quiet person in, considering we have 3 talkers so far in. I originally was going to move off and put in a quiet person, but Bacon seems to be all over the place, so I'm going to stick with my vote for now.
Anyone willing to put in a quiet person? Mike, EAP, LD, being pretty quiet so far.
Post by kikosanchez on Jan 23, 2013 11:44:16 GMT -5
^^^ N/m, thank you for putting in a quiet person Jimmy. Not to mention taking me out haha. It is still a 3-way. Is that what we want? IMO I like the runoff, though I'd rather Hakuna not be there seeing how invaluable he was last game to us.
Thanks Kiko, but as always say, I'm in this for the long haul and townie win, if i have to go to runoff to get some dirt out there thats fine. While obviously I'm a little suspicious of Bacon coming after me, I looked back and it doesn't seem out of character. I can appriciate trying to get things riled up a little bit as it seems people are holding back(guilty myself) and a little nervous of ruffling feathers. So in that case
Hakuna >> Jimmy
Not to much, just trying to shake things up. While it cleary falls into "why would mafia do that", LD is usually a good day 1 mafia target. I don't know that I would do this if it was a vote forcing Jimmy into the runoff or SFA out, but neither apply so I'm going to run with it and see where anyone else stands. It was starting to get quiet, so I tend to beleive Mafia was ok with the Me, Kiko, Bacon runoff. Jimmy's move of shaking it up would be a pretty ballsy move, so maybe it was the move mafia was waiting for.
I've been quiet this round too. Figured I might as well point that out myself rather than have somebody else do it and make it a big deal. I've just been watching who is the jumping on and jumping off whom and trying to see who is being manipulative.
I have no problem with any three people being in the runoff. So whatever happens by midnight happens. The first round makes no sense (to me anyway) until it can be assessed in the context of the 2nd and 3rd rounds so I don't have a lot to say right now.
Post by NothingButFlowers on Jan 23, 2013 17:12:02 GMT -5
I'm pretty much okay with it. I don't think I've played with LD before (maybe once?), but of the games I've watched with him in them, this does seem different.
I kind of thought Hakuna's vote change to "shake things up" was a pretty non-shaking-things-up kind of vote change.
NBF, Mike, Roonectar, got anything to add to the game?? The round does end in a few hours, I will take it you are okay with the status quo?
I don't have much, if anything to add really. I tend to lean towards the notion that the folks that get put into the round 1 runoff are typically innocent. For a while I used to play that those who put the second vote on were more likely to be mafia. This has been true for a few of the games I have played, but by no means a high enough majority to base all my games on it. Something I always watch though.
The only thing I thought was quasi-suspicious so far was NBF's vote and response about Kiko. There were other players to vote for that had no votes to avoid any suspicion, but we all know that someone has to start the stacking. It just reminded me of my first vote last game that I played it safe, but that was enough to get me voted off first round with 2 others in the runoff. Right now it's not much to go on, but that's all I have seen that has raised any bit of suspicion.
In the 44 hours that this topic has been open so far, I have been working for 21 and sleeping for 11-12. Forgive me for having a life. I don't have a job with computer access, and no longer have a smartphone.
Yeah, I'm Mafia Jimmy. Go f*ck yourself. Gonna break out the knife set and stab yo cracka azz up.
At this point I see no reason to change my vote. I think everyone has shown about the same level of suspicious activity which is to say, basically none.
Post by kikosanchez on Jan 24, 2013 11:05:49 GMT -5
So far I like LD and less so Bacon in the runoff, not sure why Hakuna or Jimmy are in. I'd like to move this to a 3 or 2 person, getting Hak or Jim out.
I definitely don't like that the 3 remaining voters have also been the quietest (added the least substance I should say).
So far I like LD and less so Bacon in the runoff, not sure why Hakuna or Jimmy are in. I'd like to move this to a 3 or 2 person, getting Hak or Jim out.
I definitely don't like that the 3 remaining voters have also been the quietest (added the least substance I should say).
You might want to take into account that not everyone plays like you, kiko.
Plus, this doesn't make any sense anyway.
How are we the three players who have added the least substance? Not to say that any of us has had a ton to say, but there are other players who are at least equally as quiet.
LD only has two posts, one of which is making his initial vote, and the other is an excuse about why he hasn't said anything.
Quacker has three posts, one of which is his initial vote, one is unrelated to the game, and one is pointing out that he has been particularly quiet so far.
And Mike D has two posts, one of which is his initial vote, and one of which is substantial and game related (calling me somewhat suspicious for what I think is a kind of bullsh*tty reason, by the way).
I am a little on edge about LD as well. Although it wasn't right at the last minute, it doesn't agree with me how he threw a fourth into the runoff late in the round like that. If he had some reason other than just a recip vote I would probably see it differently. At this point I think he needs to stay in the runoff, but I am not gonna stack a 4th vote on him.
NBF - a know it's not the best reason to call you out, that's why I didn't change my vote along with it.
I think you're right Bacon. But everyone has been quiet and there is so little to go on. LD being an easy target ,for me anyways, is quickly becoming a "mafia wouldn't do that" excuse. Usually there is something suspicious somebody locks down on and goes after. Be it just a stupid comment, voting last/late, etc... At this point we really haven't had any of that. I totally echo MikeDs sentiments from his post on LD and I'm not switching my vote to Bacon just for the sake of reciprocating. So I'll just stick for the time being.
