Whether it's your first Bonnaroo or you’re a music festival veteran, we welcome you to Inforoo.
Here you'll find info about artists, rumors, camping tips, and the infamous Roo Clues. Have a look around then create an account and join in the fun. See you at Bonnaroo!!
If Tejas and I were Mafia, I wouldn’t be “supporting” him for everyone to see. I was agreeing with Phi saying it sold him. I wasn’t “avoiding” mentioning Tejas for my vote. I simply did not think he was suspicious. I cast my vote on someone with only one vote, because I didn’t know we wanted multiple people runoffs. I’ve said this three times now. I don’t think Tejas was “distancing” himself from me. Other people have voted for me the way that he did.
If Tejas and I were Mafia, I wouldn’t be “supporting” him for everyone to see.
unless you were new to the game and didn't realize it would be obvious honestly Amy, I like you everywhere else on the forum, but I knew you were the second Mafia right away. since I had Tejas's name, it was way too easy.
Wow I walk away for 15 mins.. And I come to this. I'm in a doctors office right now but expect my full reply soon.. And o'neil you just fucked yourself.. If your going to fake inspector on the 2nd day, you better have more than half truths and twisted facts to support your claim.. But I'll get more into that when I'm on a computer..
You're just too young to grasp how stylin' I really was. All the boys wanted to do me when I was 5. Actually the girls did too. My haircut was confusing.
interesting that your "autocorrected" edit only changed the first word of your post. "See man!!!" has a different meaning than "Ahhh man!!!", don't you think?
interesting that your "autocorrected" edit only changed the first word of your post. "See man!!!" has a different meaning than "Ahhh man!!!", don't you think?
Ahhh man!!! I bet Im on the short list for the 3rd arnt I. God dammit!
Edit: autocorrected.
Lol. I'm posting from my iphone, I thought I'd be put together with those 2 because Tejas has kinda been warming up to me most of the game, and blackamy could appear to be distancing from me by throwing my name out there so much. I know I'd be focused in on my if I were you.
If Tejas and I were Mafia, I wouldn’t be “supporting” him for everyone to see.
unless you were new to the game and didn't realize it would be obvious honestly Amy, I like you everywhere else on the forum, but I knew you were the second Mafia right away. since I had Tejas's name, it was way too easy.
carry on though.
Even being new, that is obvious. Why are you bringing up "everywhere else on the forum"? I'm pretty sure we all know that nothing in here is personal, but you won't stop saying, "nothing personal."
I'm confused what you're referring to in regards to me "changing my mind." I never said Phi was mafia. Earlier, I pointed out that there were 3 people who failed to create a 3-way run off last round. (Linana, Phi, and BlackAmy). I also wrote that I don't think Phi is suspicious as a result of the MikeD whack. If anything, I was neutral towards Phi, and still feel the same way.
Plus, the fact that Tejas seems to be completely pulling reasons out his arse to vote for Phi only makes me think Phi is more likely innocent. I really don't understand what Tejas is doing with that. The fact that Tejas was really comprehensible/ logical last game and not so much this game makes me worried about him. If Tejas didn't have enough votes, I'd be voting for him to be in the runoff. But as it stands, I think you're the second best use of my vote and I'd like to have you both in there.
I'm indifferent on the 3rd person since it doesn't seem like having Linana in there gained any traction. Amy is probably a good candidate if anything just to get her talking.
Jimmy I really don't understand whats not logical about my reason to Phi? He voted for boneroo just because boneroo voted for him. I saw that as Phi voting for boneroo in spite.
I'd personally like to have seen a Tejas/Phi/Amy 3 person runoff. But since my vote on Phi is insignificant. I'm going to change it to boneroo to cause a 3 person runoff.
I know sometimes the mafia will fake inspector, and there's no way to know with certainty that O'neill is telling the truth, but for now, her revelation is about all that makes sense. My suspicions about Tejas never did abate, and Amy fits the profile of the mafia who tries to fly under the radar (that we were warned about earlier), so maybe it's all true.
Or maybe O'neill is mafia and making it all up? Reading back through, I'm just not feeling that this is the case.
I voted for Tejas since he was my given name (I figured it was a calculated risk, since I didn't want to be pegged as inspector, but there was a valid enough reason and I wanted to see who would jump in):
o'neil>>>Tejas I don't want Boneroo to just be automatically voted off. maybe he is a townie and the mafia are happy with how votes are going, which is why no one else voted for anyone who already had one vote. I went with Tejas because he was trying to wrap it up quickly. I have no real sense for where anyone stands yet.
so then Tejas fired back with a fairly unbelievable excuse (who doesn't pay attention to votes on the first day?):
This is such a stupid point to bring up. Theirs no way for you to reasonably assume I did it on purpose, and its impossible to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that I simply just overlooked a vote. Not that I was being lackadaisical but I simply just overlooked a post. Which is not unheard of. This is your first failed attempt to grasp at straws to give credit to your "Inspector" claim.
However if you look at Mafia 61 when I was a townie, I wasn't concerned with being in possible runoffs. I think the best way to show that your a townie is by doing things in the interest of the town(opposed to making claims that no one can prove like saying "Im a townie!!"). Plus its still early and we haven't even had input from one player(Dr. Joe) so I expect more dialogue and some vote shuffling to go on. But you can bet that If I do get voted off quickly or any other player gets voted off quickly then the Mafia won that day.
then he implied that I would change my vote, which would no longer leave him in the runoff. so which is it? you don't care, or you are trying to apply pressure to remove yourself?
I'd be surprised if o'neil kept her vote on me, since she said the only reason she voted for me is because I stacked on boneroo. Which I already said I overlooked LD's vote, and changed my vote accordingly. But it is funny that she voted for me cause I stacked on another player. Then she stacks a vote on me?
Do you know why I implied that you would change your vote? Because it was the most logical thing, hello!!!
Just follow me for a bit..
-I stack on boneroo, that raises your suspicion
-So in order to act on your suspicion you do the very thing that made you suspicious of me
DAFAQ?!?
Its like you saying you lost respect for your best friend because she committed adultery. Then that same night you go out and sleep with someone whos not your husband..
So of course I assumed that your vote wouldn't stick. I was only using logic. Maybe I was going too fast for you, I'll try to type sloooooower next time.
then I saw this and immediately had a feeling BlackAmy was mafia (because my vote made sense to everyone else besides Tejas):
Please show me where everyone agreed that your vote made sense? Maybe a quote from some other player? I'd really like to know.. Next time your going to twist the truth at least put some effort into it, your making it too easy to call you on your bullsh*T then there was this (playing the noob card):
First I cannot speak for boneroo but I've only played 1 game of mafia so my level of "experience" is very very limited. So if your basing your idea that I might be mafia off my experience then you would be wrong. Secondly, I dont know what to tell you to believe my explanation. What advantage would I have gained from stacking on boneroo then retracting my vote? If anything it put me in the spotlight, and not that I dont mind being the spotlight but it definitely makes the other townies question me. And while I appreciate you assume thatN
You may spin it as me playing the noob card, but everything I posted was the flat out truth. The fact that your claiming I'm playing the noob card is once again you trying to spin the truth to fit your claim.
LD, such a wild claim to make in the first day. Do you care to explain yourself?
Obviously it was a joke? Do you know something I dont know? One of the hardest things to do in this game is to determine someones tone with their post. Yes LD was being whacky and weird, but he called me mafia before he went all gangsta on us... Funny how you would know that he was OBVIOUSLY joking.
Not quite sure what to think of this? Obviously I know LD is faking inspector since hes saying a fellow townie is mafia. But why fake inspector day 1?? And of course who does he say is mafia, but the player who has been talking the most trying to engage in conversation. Coincidence? I dont think so. But lets say Boner is right.IF LD is inspector and he was given my name. Im guessing their would be no runoff and I would be voted straight off. But then my fellow mafia members would lynch him and hes dead... Where does that leave us? 2 mafia and 7 townies with most of them being inexperienced. And the town would be a day behind on the voting pattern since I would be voted straight off. Doesnt seem to favor the town in that scenario. Or the right scenario. For some reason LD is faking inspector as Mafia in day 1 and he wants to take down the townie whos doing the most investigative work. In this scenario, LD could convince everyone to vote me off, then at night he and the other mafia lynches another townie. That would make the teams 6v3. Even if the townies wise up and vote him off, after another lynching that makes the teams 5v2 and because of his misdirection the town would have a very tough time figuring out the other mafia members. Especially since the lynched townies will probably be the most experienced. So you'll be left 5v2 with probably all 5 of the most inexperienced townies against 2 mafia members who would have to do very little at this point since LD would take the most heat. In fact the other 2 mafia members could even lead the charge against LD after its apparent LD faked inspector and throw the town off their trail completely. Either way both scenarios don't really favor the town. But this has clearly shifted all my attention to LD and in my mind hes clearly mafia.
Interesting how you don't mention the context in which I wrote that post.
At the time everyone had one vote apiece on them. LD just called me mafia, which was obviously a lie. So of course he gathered most of my attention. AGAIN, your trying so hard to twist truths and leave out important things like the context of my post to fit your story. Sorry but you cant fit a round peg in a square hole
Tejas stacked on Bone, then o'neil stacks on Tejas, for good reasoning, albeit an easy one too. Then Tejas chickens out after realizing the stack, then more or less asks o'neil to change as well and were all back to single votes. To me, this looks like Tejas is trying to steer clear, why would someone want to make it look like they are steering clear of any stacks?
Well than if he didn't call you mafia at least once last game, you made it one game farther than most folks do Basically I wouldn't take it too seriously unless you have a reason to be nervous about being called mafia.
Again your leaving out important parts. You highlight the parts where Mike D raises suspicion, but you seem to leave out the fact that Mike D thought I was a townie... Let me refresh your memory
From my perspective Tejas backing out on his first vote stack is a huge red flag, hence my last vote and post. I am very pleased to see this much discussion and know that there is a very good possibility that we have 2 townies, didn't see too much scrambling going on to get either a third or swap out a member of the runoff. Looking at the two in question, I believe that Tajas has a much higher chance of being mafia than LD. Jimmyroo made a comment about Tajas being a lightning rod for activity and I do agree that what we have seen so far will help us out greatly down the road no matter which one is killed off, if he is mafia or a townie. If nothing else, I feel this will be one of the most helpful first rounds I have seen.
So Mike D said that we have a "good possibility" that their are two townies. However, He did say out of the two I was more likely to be mafia. But we only had 2 people in the runoff. Its a 50/50 chance that one of us is more likely than the other... My whole point is that you left out the part that Mike D thought we were both townies.. And I understand why you would. It would totally throw off your fake inspector claim, and you wouldnt want to do that now would you.
I felt bad that I wasn’t on here all night, but I see I didn’t miss much. I have no reason to keep my vote on Bogart. I don’t see him showing any traits that I would assume go towards Mafia… but I don’t really know what I’m doing yet? My vote is leaning towards LD. Or I could vote against Jimmyroo for vengeance.
You do know that she only mentioned LD, Bogart, & Jimmyroo riight? And eventually she changed her vote off of Bogart, so this really is irrelevant
Ok so just to get this straight I'm getting voted off because...
A)I posted too much, even though I never tried to influence votes just asked questions which is exactly what townies are suppose to do. So not sure how I come across as suspicious... Seriously read my posts only when LD called me mafia is when I made any kind of ripples.
B) I vote stacked boneroo for about an hour then switched my vote. Which I've said numerous times was a overlook. (And btw boneroo has his vote on LD)
And now
C) LD would never do what hes done in this game if he were mafia.
Even though theirs flaws in all three of reasons Reason (C) has to be the worst. LD did a phenomenal job as a mafia member last game. So good in fact that he won the game last round by having everyone think the same way Phi is thinking. Keep in mind that LD was mafia with Jimmyroo and LLL
OHH SHEIIIIIT.. You know what.. I GIVE UP!! You really hit the nail on the coffin! The reason I'm mafia is because I quacking defended myself? That is the most lazy asinine reason to help your case I'm mafia. What the hell else am I suppose to do?! Would not defending myself prove that im a townie?
not changing my vote from LD at this point, but just wondering about the last couple of posts with unexplained edits Tejas? I get that the first one was long, just curious. I know the point about edits being suspicious didn't really occur to me until Viking brought it up but since then I haven't edited any posts. and if I did I would include a note to explain. I was reading back through the past couple of pages before bed to see if I missed anything that might point at either you or LD as being more likely to be mafia, and the edits jumped out.
The only reason I edited a few post is because of misspellings. Which does not effect the substance of my post. So I never bothered explaining. But again grabbing at straws..
If by defending me, you mean agreeing with Phi, then yes Amy was defending me?? You must have gotten lazier as you wrote this out because it is too easy to see when your clearly twisting post to fit your theory.
From my perspective Tejas backing out on his first vote stack is a huge red flag, hence my last vote and post. I am very pleased to see this much discussion and know that there is a very good possibility that we have 2 townies, didn't see too much scrambling going on to get either a third or swap out a member of the runoff. Looking at the two in question, I believe that Tajas has a much higher chance of being mafia than LD.
I've already stated that you seem to not mention that Mike D thinks its a good possibility that were both townie
Ellabelle or Blackamy. They haven't said much and the best way to get some one to talk is to throw a vote their way.
Again twisting fact so this will fit your story. Me and amy really had no interaction up until this point so I dont know why I would be distancing myself from her. I was being logical and wanted 2 of the more quieter players in the runoff.
Here a thought thougw What if amy is mafia, and one of the 3 votes amy has is inspector? I mean it seems unusual for someone who has not said a thing to be in a runoff. Add to that the fact that its her very first game of mafia, and she decided to play on a spur of the moment. Regardless I think she definitely deserves to be in the runoff
and this is why I am coming out- because I think I have made myself a target (because of the post above, and this one):
I've been really quiet this weekend, because I had chicojuarz here. I thought it was quiet and slow moving on the weekends, but now I know. Boneroo, Phi, and Oniel are who I have my eyes on. I didn't realize that there should be run-offs to get people talking. I thought you just vote on who you want gone. Now that I know about the run-offs I want to think about it more and give my vote tomorrow morning.
On a scale 1-10 I give your fake inspector a 6. It seems to have merit on a first read, but when you go back and really look at your post thiers so many half truths and gaps of logic that it wasn't that hard to point them out. Oh and just for fun...
Tejas > Phi > Boneroo > Blackamy.
Disclaimer: Disregard any grammatical errors. I'm not re reading this thing..
You're just too young to grasp how stylin' I really was. All the boys wanted to do me when I was 5. Actually the girls did too. My haircut was confusing.
The thing is, I cannot see any reason for her to pull a fake. Unless she's mafia with 2 people in the runoff. but from someone who pulled a fake, when i did ot, my 2 partners were both in a runoff, and had odysseus call out all 3 of us, our backs were at the wall,, so this doesnt add up. I moved attention away from my 2 partners, and was then sacrificed to retain any credibility I could get. But in the end, the damage was already done. I don't see any desperate situation o'neil could be in with her mafia comrades, unless it was LD, me and o'neil as mafia, but even then, faking inspector would run the risk of having the real Inspector come out, and I've already experienced that, and as I said, it didnt turn out that well in the end
I'm gonna have to take one old word for it, unless someone can come up with a better theory. Tejas calling her lazy, grasping at straws, over and over again, just comes off as desperate. Sorry bro.
oh for pete's sake. I am leaving work right now, so I don't have time to respond to every point (but I will when I get home). let's just take the first couple. as I mentioned, I had previously abbreviated some posts to the salient points for the sake of brevity, but since that made it difficult for you to follow, I will include complete posts this time.
I voted for Tejas since he was my given name (I figured it was a calculated risk, since I didn't want to be pegged as inspector, but there was a valid enough reason and I wanted to see who would jump in):
so then Tejas fired back with a fairly unbelievable excuse (who doesn't pay attention to votes on the first day?):
This is such a stupid point to bring up. Theirs no way for you to reasonably assume I did it on purpose, and its impossible to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that I simply just overlooked a vote. Not that I was being lackadaisical but I simply just overlooked a post. Which is not unheard of. This is your first failed attempt to grasp at straws to give credit to your "Inspector" claim.
I was just trying to avoid one player getting voted off so easily, since to me that seemed suspicious for mafia working together to quietly eliminate a townie, and set it up so that more than one person would have 2 votes. it wasn't personal Tejas, I think all votes are pretty arbitrary at the beginning. since you were the only one to add a second vote initially, and I wanted to add a second vote to someone else, I went with you. does that not make sense (the way it did in my head)?
It made perfect sense to me, because I had considered it myself.
I was actually going to vote for Tejas, after I saw that he voted for Boneroo (giving Boneroo 2 votes), because they had been bantering back & forth and I thought it would be interesting/fun to see a runoff between them. I figured there was a decent chance that one of them is mafia, based on their level of experience. But, for some reason I though Tejas already had 2 votes and therefore was already in the runoff with Boneroo, so I made a random vote instead. I'm glad someone else came along and voted for him, putting him in the runoff, since I miscounted his votes.
It totally threw me when Tejas changed his vote, making himself the only player with 2 votes. I'm not totally buying your explanation either; it still doesn't really make sense to me, but then again I'm new so maybe I'll understand it later. And while I can understand myself getting mixed up on the number of votes that someone already has, I consider Tejas to be a bit sharper than that so I'm not sure if I'm buying that his stack against boneroo was accidental.
I find a lot of Tejas' activity so far to be suspicious, but apparently in the last game Tejas also came across as suspicious and ended up being a townie. So I'm torn, but keeping my vote as is for now.
Also, at the time of oneill's vote Tejas had just stacked Boneroo. I don't see anything wrong with stacking on a player who does that. I also don't buy that Tejas "didn't see" that LD voted for Boneroo already.
Since there is no reason for me to keep my vote on blackamy right now I am going to suggest adding another to the run off. For the third I think we should add bone. Reason being he caused a lot of vote switching, because of the "accidental" vote by tejas. If no one agrees then so be it, just think we need 3. I should be open to discuss until deadline.
I really don't feel I have much to add. This is my first time playing with 5 of yall I think so I do feel a little lost at the moment. The biggest thing I am looking at right now, which has been brought up by some folks, is having a 2 person runoff instead of three. I know there is no real standard, but it threw me for a loop to only see Tejas and LD. It has been brought up in numerous other games how often LD is in early runoffs and seems to be one of the easy targets this early in the game. Several of the posts I have read point to that again. In his defense, LD can actually be one hell of a townie deeper into the game. Yes, he can often play a little wild and crazy, but I have seen him nail down 2-3 mafia with confidence deeper into the game. The downside is that folks tend to disregard him later for his wildness earlier on. I do understand the angle of wanting him out earlier.
From my perspective Tejas backing out on his first vote stack is a huge red flag, hence my last vote and post. I am very pleased to see this much discussion and know that there is a very good possibility that we have 2 townies, didn't see too much scrambling going on to get either a third or swap out a member of the runoff. Looking at the two in question, I believe that Tajas has a much higher chance of being mafia than LD. Jimmyroo made a comment about Tajas being a lightning rod for activity and I do agree that what we have seen so far will help us out greatly down the road no matter which one is killed off, if he is mafia or a townie. If nothing else, I feel this will be one of the most helpful first rounds I have seen.
first he claimed to not care about being in a runoff, because a townie wouldn't care:
then he implied that I would change my vote, which would no longer leave him in the runoff. so which is it? you don't care, or you are trying to apply pressure to remove yourself?
Do you know why I implied that you would change your vote? Because it was the most logical thing, hello!!!
Just follow me for a bit..
-I stack on boneroo, that raises your suspicion
-So in order to act on your suspicion you do the very thing that made you suspicious of me
DAFAQ?!?
Its like you saying you lost respect for your best friend because she committed adultery. Then that same night you go out and sleep with someone whos not your husband..
So of course I assumed that your vote wouldn't stick. I was only using logic. Maybe I was going too fast for you, I'll try to type sloooooower next time.
you might also try making sense. here's your next post making the same point, that to you, my vote didn't make sense:
Please show me where everyone agreed that your vote made sense? Maybe a quote from some other player? I'd really like to know.. Next time your going to twist the truth at least put some effort into it, your making it too easy to call you on your bullsh*T
so, I'm happy to show you where people agreed that my vote was logical:
I was just trying to avoid one player getting voted off so easily, since to me that seemed suspicious for mafia working together to quietly eliminate a townie, and set it up so that more than one person would have 2 votes. it wasn't personal Tejas, I think all votes are pretty arbitrary at the beginning. since you were the only one to add a second vote initially, and I wanted to add a second vote to someone else, I went with you. does that not make sense (the way it did in my head)?
It made perfect sense to me, because I had considered it myself.
I was actually going to vote for Tejas, after I saw that he voted for Boneroo (giving Boneroo 2 votes), because they had been bantering back & forth and I thought it would be interesting/fun to see a runoff between them. I figured there was a decent chance that one of them is mafia, based on their level of experience. But, for some reason I though Tejas already had 2 votes and therefore was already in the runoff with Boneroo, so I made a random vote instead. I'm glad someone else came along and voted for him, putting him in the runoff, since I miscounted his votes.
It totally threw me when Tejas changed his vote, making himself the only player with 2 votes. I'm not totally buying your explanation either; it still doesn't really make sense to me, but then again I'm new so maybe I'll understand it later.
And while I can understand myself getting mixed up on the number of votes that someone already has, I consider Tejas to be a bit sharper than that so I'm not sure if I'm buying that his stack against boneroo was accidental.
I find a lot of Tejas' activity so far to be suspicious, but apparently in the last game Tejas also came across as suspicious and ended up being a townie. So I'm torn, but keeping my vote as is for now.
Also, at the time of oneill's vote Tejas had just stacked Boneroo. I don't see anything wrong with stacking on a player who does that. I also don't buy that Tejas "didn't see" that LD voted for Boneroo already.
I gotta say this game looks to be quite a change from the norm, in a good way
That said, were not getting anywhere at all with all the single votes. Tejas stacked on Bone, then o'neil stacks on Tejas, for good reasoning, albeit an easy one too. Then Tejas chickens out after realizing the stack, then more or less asks o'neil to change as well and were all back to single votes. To me, this looks like Tejas is trying to steer clear, why would someone want to make it look like they are steering clear of any stacks?
Mike D >> Tejas
If nothing else, this gives someone a reason to stack a vote on me if you want. If not, yall at least gotta take a stab in the dark, pick a name, then see who reacts, defends, whatever. Let's get this friggin party started!!!
I'll give you this, Tejas. you are good at twisting words and talking people into one position or another. if I didn't know you were mafia, and didn't go back and actually read the posts again, I'd almost believe you.
Yes. 4 people with 2 votes would get us where we want to go as townies. The mafia would rather have short rounds and no runoffs. Runoffs require people to change their votes and shake things up. More people In the runoffs, better chance we ge a mafia or 2 in there. With 4 ppl in a runoff, we could have potential for 3 extra rounds,
Well Quack.
I'm going to go down in history as the worst player in the history of mafia.
A voice mail I left with the Long Island Medium, hopefully she relays the message over...
Correction, I'd be the worst player in the history of Mafia - when I choose to be.
Or maybe the one where the Inspector (name escapes me right now) came out right from the gate telling to kill the given name (Bonnie). Really bad play there.
I'm going to go down in history as the worst player in the history of mafia.
A voice mail I left with the Long Island Medium, hopefully she relays the message over...
Correction, I'd be the worst player in the history of Mafia - when I choose to be.
Or maybe the one where the Inspector (name escapes me right now) came out right from the gate telling to kill the given name (Bonnie). Really bad play there.
LD, you are dead. No posts related to the content of the thread
A voice mail I left with the Long Island Medium, hopefully she relays the message over...
Correction, I'd be the worst player in the history of Mafia - when I choose to be.
Or maybe the one where the Inspector (name escapes me right now) came out right from the gate telling to kill the given name (Bonnie). Really bad play there.
LD, you are dead. No posts related to the content of the thread
You're just too young to grasp how stylin' I really was. All the boys wanted to do me when I was 5. Actually the girls did too. My haircut was confusing.
o'neil
Showerless Shakedown Vendor Red Bull & Vodka Panda
ok, just looking at the rest of Tejas's post exhausted me. I am still willing to break it down point by point, as long as the rest of you are interested, but it won't be until tomorrow morning. I will also post my theory about the third mafia member, in case it's helpful for the rest of you townies after I'm assassinated by the mafia.
I'm not trying to bail on anyone tonight, but my eyes have sand in them and I have 8 hours of class tomorrow. please forgive me for not continuing my rebuttal this evening as planned.
I will also post my theory about the third mafia member, in case it's helpful for the rest of you townies after I'm assassinated by the mafia.
I doubt that would happen; wouldn't that just confirm that you are right? But just in case, make sure you post your theory before the whack is announced...
I'm starting to think this may just be an act coming from linana
Hmm. Well, I'm sorry you feel that way. I'm just flying by the seat of my pants here.
It's hard to not be suspicious of everyone. I have an inkling of suspicion about pretty much everyone here, even though I know only 2-3 are mafia. Right now I'm leaning toward trusting O'neill; I hope she isn't just brilliantly fooling us but I just have a feeling she's being truthful.
A few haven't posted much at all today, would like to hear more from others.
Tejas seems desperate (and a little rude) in his latest posts.
My head hurts and my boobs are sore. I'm going to go get some advil and a heating pad, and I may make an appearance in chat tonight; I haven't been there in a while.
I'm sure I won't be able to keep from checking back in here tonight to see if any more votes move.
