Whether it's your first Bonnaroo or you’re a music festival veteran, we welcome you to Inforoo.
Here you'll find info about artists, rumors, camping tips, and the infamous Roo Clues. Have a look around then create an account and join in the fun. See you at Bonnaroo!!
maybe i'm missing something but why doesn't the original thebigcappdogg just make another account? like without the the.
It might have happened several times, and it might be that on each occurrence, the new account received an IP ban. Might be that the kindhearted jester behind the Big Capp Dogg doesn't want to run out of places to post from because every location in his or her life has been IP banned.
Post by Jake Jortles on Feb 6, 2016 21:14:24 GMT -5
I just got around to voting yes. I find juggs to be much more funny with his normal account, because parodies bore me after a while.
The idea that "a rule is a rule" got me thinking... If insider created a second account and started dropping headliner leaks from that account, everyone would be ok with it, including the mods. As long as that assumption is correct, that means that the quality of the duplicate account does matter. The poll here says the rest.
I just got around to voting yes. I find juggs to be much more funny with his normal account, because parodies bore me after a while.
The idea that "a rule is a rule" got me thinking... If insider created a second account and started dropping headliner leaks from that account, everyone would be ok with it, including the mods. As long as that assumption is correct, that means that the quality of the duplicate account does matter. The poll here says the rest.
Just for the record, my comment was strictly observation, not a mod callout or opinion on any of the vagaries of civic duty, statistical polling, the law, the education system, naming use and copyrights, or humor and irony. Which actually, under different agendas, could have made for interesting forum discussion topics.
Since it's my field and the world's slowest day at work I just wanted to share some quick fun facts about the poll. Let's assume nobody voted twice (I think the two accounts bit has been discussed once or twice here), and that nobody's voted affected anyone else's. As it stands at the time of me starting to do the work the vote stands at 70-17 in favour of the Capp Dogg's reinstatement.
That's 70/87 or roughly 80% to 20%. A 99% credible interval (basically a confidence interval but roided up computation) is bounded at [69.5%, 91.4%]. This means any reasonable test, say 50% to find a majority, would show statistically significant evidence to support the hypothesis that Inforoo wants the Capp Dog back. Reject the null all that, you don't want to see that part.
Here's that fact visualized in a probability distribution. The implied distribution is in black and this absurd 50% of people might still not want the Capp Dog back assumption is in red. Doesn't look like it fits.
More numbers! If it were a 50/50 split on opinion about Capp Dog, the odds of us seeing a 70-17 vote (or more dramatic in the "yea" column) is 9.78E-08. That's 0.000000098%, or roughly 1 in 10.2 million. It's close to the odds you'll get Ebola in the next year (assuming you live in the US of A) at 1 in 13.3 million, and those of North Korea winning the next World Cup.
Here's that fact visualized in a probability distribution. The assumed distribution is in black and our place on that is red. Doesn't look like it fits.
As for this idea that we'd need 21,000 people to vote to make it valid,or 10,500 yeas, I think that's a bit silly. People aren't contesting election results because they don't have 100% turnout. In every US presidential election (I know electoral college, let's pretend it's a popular vote) since 1828 the result has been decided by a margin slimmer than the remainder of the voter turnout. So if you want to be pedantic about this, then there's no real true democratically elected president in the US in 200 years.
I voted yes. Capp Dogg adds value to the forum which is more than can be said of most of 20,999 other members. Will do a survey analysis on that if you want.
edit: Woops, figures are huge. edit 2: Spotted a small error in code. Figure 2 updated accordingly. Typed numbers still correct.
I just got around to voting yes. I find juggs to be much more funny with his normal account, because parodies bore me after a while.
The idea that "a rule is a rule" got me thinking... If insider created a second account and started dropping headliner leaks from that account, everyone would be ok with it, including the mods. As long as that assumption is correct, that means that the quality of the duplicate account does matter. The poll here says the rest.
The Big Capp Dogg is insider....
no wonder she didn't stop by this year, she's banned!!!!!!!11!!
Since it's my field and the world's slowest day at work I just wanted to share some quick fun facts about the poll. Let's assume nobody voted twice (I think the two accounts bit has been discussed once or twice here), and that nobody's voted affected anyone else's. As it stands at the time of me starting to do the work the vote stands at 70-17 in favour of the Capp Dogg's reinstatement.
That's 70/87 or roughly 80% to 20%. A 99% credible interval (basically a confidence interval but roided up computation) is bounded at [69.5%, 91.4%]. This means any reasonable test, say 50% to find a majority, would show statistically significant evidence to support the hypothesis that Inforoo wants the Capp Dog back. Reject the null all that, you don't want to see that part.
Here's that fact visualized in a probability distribution. The implied distribution is in black and this absurd 50% of people might still not want the Capp Dog back assumption is in red. Doesn't look like it fits.
More numbers! If it were a 50/50 split on opinion about Capp Dog, the odds of us seeing a 70-17 vote (or more dramatic in the "yea" column) is 9.78E-08. That's 0.000000098%, or roughly 1 in 10.2 million. It's close to the odds you'll get Ebola in the next year (assuming you live in the US of A) at 1 in 13.3 million, and those of North Korea winning the next World Cup.
Here's that fact visualized in a probability distribution. The assumed distribution is in black and our place on that is red. Doesn't look like it fits.
As for this idea that we'd need 21,000 people to vote to make it valid,or 10,500 yeas, I think that's a bit silly. People aren't contesting election results because they don't have 100% turnout. In every US presidential election (I know electoral college, let's pretend it's a popular vote) since 1828 the result has been decided by a margin slimmer than the remainder of the voter turnout. So if you want to be pedantic about this, then there's no real true democratically elected president in the US in 200 years.
I voted yes. Capp Dogg adds value to the forum which is more than can be said of most of 20,999 other members. Will do a survey analysis on that if you want.
edit: Woops, figures are huge. edit 2: Spotted a small error in code. Figure 2 updated accordingly. Typed numbers still correct.
I just got around to voting yes. I find juggs to be much more funny with his normal account, because parodies bore me after a while.
The idea that "a rule is a rule" got me thinking... If insider created a second account and started dropping headliner leaks from that account, everyone would be ok with it, including the mods. As long as that assumption is correct, that means that the quality of the duplicate account does matter. The poll here says the rest.
This cogent argument will be summarily dismissed by the moderators.
I just got around to voting yes. I find juggs to be much more funny with his normal account, because parodies bore me after a while.
The idea that "a rule is a rule" got me thinking... If insider created a second account and started dropping headliner leaks from that account, everyone would be ok with it, including the mods. As long as that assumption is correct, that means that the quality of the duplicate account does matter. The poll here says the rest.
This cogent argument will be summarily dismissed by the moderators.
I'm pretty sure that they're done addressing this issue.
I know it may seem like the moderators of this web sight are being absurdly stubborn and foolish on the issue of allowing funny jokes. But remember, things could be worse. They could be indiscriminately banning people for the crime of hanging out in a chat room...
And instead of saying all of your goodbyes - let them know you realize that life goes fast - It's hard to make the good things last-you realize the sun doesn't go down - It's just an illusion caused by the world spinning round
I also like how spending twenty three pages whining about how the only way people can express themselves is by reading an unimaginative, unfunny "satire" account makes them the cool ones.
I also like how spending twenty three pages whining about how the only way people can express themselves is by reading an unimaginative, unfunny "satire" account makes them the cool ones.
Or we're just a super majority of the board with vastly contrasting opinions on every issue except for one - that The Big Capp Dogg is funny and brings a sliver of entertainment into what is realistically a dull life.
