Whether it's your first Bonnaroo or you’re a music festival veteran, we welcome you to Inforoo.
Here you'll find info about artists, rumors, camping tips, and the infamous Roo Clues. Have a look around then create an account and join in the fun. See you at Bonnaroo!!
What a silent game this has been. My vote is purely to put a new face in a runoff. I'm voting for Taint instead of Carini (who would also be a new face) because I don't want the Mafia to hide their votes on players who currently don't have any, allowing us to just go into a JFG/Carini runoff with them having 2 votes each. Usually I don't think the town would let that happen, but this has been a rather inactive game and I don't want to risk it if people end up missing their votes. We should have at least three people, in my opinion.
I also think EAP is being decidedly unhelpful. I can't tell if she's trying to throw the game in a certain direction or just being whiny.
Jaz > Taint
I get that, I've been entirely too quiet this match and it isn't helpful. I've read through everything and will try to post more during work. With that in mind, going with my r1 instinct
So we've got two people voting in someone new based on the whack, and two people voting just to get new faces in... and two people disregarding the whack and voting for someone from the last runoff based on "a feeling", and EAP, who's just holding a grudge. Lovely.
So we've got two people voting in someone new based on the whack, and two people voting just to get new faces in... and two people disregarding the whack and voting for someone from the last runoff based on "a feeling", and EAP, who's just holding a grudge. Lovely.
A note before I begin: I was...a little busy this weekend. With things. That put me in no condition to play mafia on Halloween. Or this morning for that matter.
I think we do need new faces in the runoff. For my estimate, it was well-established that we were wrong on both Dragon and Jimmy, and that both were town. So I think throwing Jimmy in there again is useless.
I also think that Taint has been a little too quiet this game; his "defense" was quite sloppy, and going off a R1 "reaction" even now is cause for concern.
Post by Tainted Opossum on Nov 2, 2015 10:41:05 GMT -5
Im working from the office today, have third screen dedicated entirely to inforoo and.. reddit, and will answer any questions I can. I like my votes so far, and going back for jaz makes sense to me given that I don't feel like my first instincts were satisfied - rather, that he fell off the radar for more shiny targets.
Sorry to interrupt the game, but I hope she is OK. Do you know why? Maybe take a look at any meds she is taking. They could be contributing to the problem.
Considering you've found the need to respond to my threads as if you are threatened by me I offer you some peace my confused counterpart. May you find peace in your restless soul.
Was MIA during the weekend due to Monster Mash, and have a trainee today along with being practically brain dead from lack of sleep. So not even going to promise to really look at this today.
I do however, want to actually give this game the time it deserves and go back through. I just know that's not going to happen before tomorrow at 10am.
So for purely selfish reasons, I'm requesting a 12 hour extension until 10pm tomorrow night. I'll have some time tomorrow afternoon that I can dedicate to this.
Sorry to interrupt the game, but I hope she is OK. Do you know why? Maybe take a look at any meds she is taking. They could be contributing to the problem.
carini12, you cited one of SFA's posts as potentially pointing towards me.
Two questions:
1. Did you read his next post? He said he was staying on his vote as 'switching is just as likely to help Mafia than staying'. He stayed on that vote until it was wiped. Him staying on that vote was my take away from SFA.
2. Does this means you suspect he was inspector, and so giving a bare mention of my name lends weight due to your perception of his role? Or do you think he was just some unlucky town who used my name in passing and Mafia are jumping on it?
If Mafia isn't sure on the Inspector, it behooves them to go for a vet or a player who's posts they can twist after the player is dead and can't clarify. In SFA's case it looks like they got at least the latter two reasons with one whack. You've played this game a lot though - you know that.
1. I read the next one. He had no need to bring up your name at all. He could have said he didn't want to switch because it might help mafia.
2. You have played same length I have as in long enough to know mafia's main goal is to kill the inspector asap. Yes if mafia isn't sure they will often go after a vet like SFA or Mike D but I have to think he did or said something to get on their radar.
1. Ah; so you did read the next post of SFA's and saw him say 'all joking aside'. He was making fun of my first day voting luck, and he has reason as it is bad. Is SFA giving me the business and then laughing it off what you are hanging your hat on?
You followed that up with 'He [SFA] could have said he didn't want to switch because it might help mafia.' Ugh, SFA said exactly that. Why do you think him switching would have helped Mafia? They are your words.
2. You totally avoided both of my questions. Do you think that SFA joshing around with me was him acting as inspector to lay breadcrumbs? That is what you are implying.
Because you are avoiding direct questions and you are using a dead player's posts to weakly give purpose to vote for me - these are my reasons I vote for you.
1. I read the next one. He had no need to bring up your name at all. He could have said he didn't want to switch because it might help mafia.
2. You have played same length I have as in long enough to know mafia's main goal is to kill the inspector asap. Yes if mafia isn't sure they will often go after a vet like SFA or Mike D but I have to think he did or said something to get on their radar.
1. Ah; so you did read the next post of SFA's and saw him say 'all joking aside'. He was making fun of my first day voting luck, and he has reason as it is bad. Is SFA giving me the business and then laughing it off what you are hanging your hat on? You followed that up with 'He [SFA] could have said he didn't want to switch because it might help mafia.' Ugh, SFA said exactly that. Why do you think him switching would have helped Mafia? They are your words.
2. You totally avoided both of my questions. Do you think that SFA joshing around with me was him acting as inspector to lay breadcrumbs? That is what you are implying.
Because you are avoiding direct questions and you are using a dead player's posts to weakly give purpose to vote for me - these are my reasons I vote for you.
I'm not sure what I'm avoiding, If this doesn't clear things up let me know what to clarify. I interpret the night 1 whack as mafia going for who they think is the inspector. SFA could point to several people, 1 of which is you. I didn't mention others because I wanted to see what thoughts came from others, seems many disregarded the whack completely.
For the part I bolded: Yes, That is what he said, I was pointing out he could have said it without mentioning you. I don't know if him switching would have helped or hurt mafia. Also yes, it could have been him leaving breadcrumbs about you.
Also Rothric didn't respond to you at all, was that considered in your vote for me? I might not have answered the questions to your complete satisfaction, but I answered and I'm not ducking anything.
My immediate reaction is probably that SFA was killed because he is experienced and not because he did anything in particular. He barely did anything at all throughout round one. The reason I'm voting for jazz is because I just get a bad vibe from him the way that he handled himself in around one and how he stacked me up even though what I was saying I think was really reasonable.
I concur. On both points - that SFA was likely killed more so because of his experience/skill than anything he said (unless Dragon was mafia, but as someone else said, that is somewhat irrelevant for this particular round since he is dead and we need to focus on looking elsewhere - though for later rounds, considering the idea that Dragon might've been Mafia could be helpful in seeking out the other Mafias). Also on your comments to do with Jazzy.
What a silent game this has been. My vote is purely to put a new face in a runoff. I'm voting for Taint instead of Carini (who would also be a new face) because I don't want the Mafia to hide their votes on players who currently don't have any, allowing us to just go into a JFG/Carini runoff with them having 2 votes each. Usually I don't think the town would let that happen, but this has been a rather inactive game and I don't want to risk it if people end up missing their votes. We should have at least three people, in my opinion.
I also think EAP is being decidedly unhelpful. I can't tell if she's trying to throw the game in a certain direction or just being whiny.
Jaz > Taint
I do think EAP is being decidedly unhelpful. Intersting though that you mention that, then choose to not vote for her.
Considering you've found the need to respond to my threads as if you are threatened by me I offer you some peace my confused counterpart. May you find peace in your restless soul.
Im working from the office today, have third screen dedicated entirely to inforoo and.. reddit, and will answer any questions I can. I like my votes so far, and going back for jaz makes sense to me given that I don't feel like my first instincts were satisfied - rather, that he fell off the radar for more shiny targets.
What a silent game this has been. My vote is purely to put a new face in a runoff. I'm voting for Taint instead of Carini (who would also be a new face) because I don't want the Mafia to hide their votes on players who currently don't have any, allowing us to just go into a JFG/Carini runoff with them having 2 votes each. Usually I don't think the town would let that happen, but this has been a rather inactive game and I don't want to risk it if people end up missing their votes. We should have at least three people, in my opinion.
I also think EAP is being decidedly unhelpful. I can't tell if she's trying to throw the game in a certain direction or just being whiny.
Jaz > Taint
I do think EAP is being decidedly unhelpful. Intersting though that you mention that, then choose to not vote for her.
Rummy>Jazzy
I figured someone would point that out. Like I said, I mostly wanted new faces in the runoff. If I had voted for her and she got stacked up, 2 out of the 3 people in the runoff would be the same as in last round (or 2 out of 4 depending on how the other votes went). I'm always wary of EAP when she plays because you never know what she's up to, but at the same time I know that she can be...emotional sometimes in Mafia. It wouldn't be the first time someone placed a vote in Mafia out of vindictiveness (re: Slack on me in D1R1), and unhelpful does not a Mafia make (re: Gab last game or JFG often). Given these, I voted towards putting a new person in the runoff instead.
Im working from the office today, have third screen dedicated entirely to inforoo and.. reddit, and will answer any questions I can. I like my votes so far, and going back for jaz makes sense to me given that I don't feel like my first instincts were satisfied - rather, that he fell off the radar for more shiny targets.
