Whether it's your first Bonnaroo or you’re a music festival veteran, we welcome you to Inforoo.
Here you'll find info about artists, rumors, camping tips, and the infamous Roo Clues. Have a look around then create an account and join in the fun. See you at Bonnaroo!!
Post by potentpotables on Aug 14, 2017 9:59:44 GMT -5
I'm hesitant to make a change this close to the deadline, but I'm also considering putting Tainted in instead of JR. Does anyone have thoughts on this?
I'm hesitant to make a change this close to the deadline, but I'm also considering putting Tainted in instead of JR. Does anyone have thoughts on this?
why would you do that if your initial vote for LLL was based on her "saving JR"?
I'm hesitant to make a change this close to the deadline, but I'm also considering putting Tainted in instead of JR. Does anyone have thoughts on this?
why would you do that if your initial vote for LLL was based on her "saving JR"?
Because LLL is in, and I find it fishy that Tainted didn't take the layup and put JR in the runoff and instead bumped up LLL to 3. I'm looking at all options. I think a lot of town mistakes come in fashioning a D2 runoff, this is crucial to us, and I just want to get it right.
That's fair. I do want to give the benefit of the doubt since the tally's haven't been super kept on top of, and one of the ones on the last page was mine and wrong.
That's fair. I do want to give the benefit of the doubt since the tally's haven't been super kept on top of, and one of the ones on the last page was mine and wrong.
That's the kind of feedback that I'm looking for, thanks!
I'm hesitant to make a change this close to the deadline, but I'm also considering putting Tainted in instead of JR. Does anyone have thoughts on this?
LLL and Taint both made decisive bits to push Pablo forward in the Day 1 runoffs. If one is in the runoff, the other should be as well.
Jaz with 0 votes so far this game is also a bit disconcerting.
Unfortunately, we're making almost no progress in a hurry. Most of our voting is being made based on very weak theories and guesses. Mafia is doing well to not stand out it seems.
I would really like to avoid having another three way. As mafia last game, we were able to hide behind that and use all the changes that it brings to steer people the wrong direction.
Post by LoveLuckLaughter on Aug 14, 2017 20:37:10 GMT -5
I'm staying put.
Boy wouldn't that be the shit if, after being Mafia only a handful of times in years, I was suddenly Mafia two games in a row. And with JR again (as has been hypothesized by someone else).
I think everyone needs to go back and read Carini's posts again. Consider who would want him gone after what he said.
We're all a mess of paradoxes. Believing in things we know can't be true. We walk around carrying feelings too complicated and contradictory to express. But when it all becomes too big, and words aren't enough to help get it all out, there's always music.
We're all a mess of paradoxes. Believing in things we know can't be true. We walk around carrying feelings too complicated and contradictory to express. But when it all becomes too big, and words aren't enough to help get it all out, there's always music.
I think everyone needs to go back and read Carini's posts again. Consider who would want him gone after what he said.
I agree. I worry that with all the quietness in this game though that mafia is just sitting back okay with this. There's been minimal movement since D1R1.
I'll try to check in during the day today, but JR flew to Detroit this morning and I have to go grocery shopping and do the "Meet the Teacher" thing solo.
For a runoff. If anyone has a better idea, my vote can move again if needed.
only thing I don't like about this is it gives Zolah her vote back, and also gives Dan and JR their votes back.
if we are sticking with the '1-2 out of the 4' as possible mafia, 1 giving votes back to the other 3 doesn't make me very confident that town is playing this right.
I'm not really sure why we all are surprised of the lack of activity. D1R1 was the only time with any real action, and most of the players involved in they action are dead. Add in the fact that we put some of the same people in the day 2 runoff that were in the Day 1 runoff...
Post by LoveLuckLaughter on Aug 15, 2017 10:16:29 GMT -5
Jaz did a nice job of highlighting all of Carini's posts. Thank you for that. I don't mean to take up space repeating, but these seem to be the most telling, mentioning names or moves he found suspicious. He even specifically questions why one wouldn't vote for who they find most suspicious.
He voted for 3 players. Maddog, Zolah, and Pablo.
He also called out Danbob, saying he may be the one who got away. He also specifically said that he thought we had two Mafia in there. Which then allows us to add Potent and Jr.
We may have gotten lucky and Pablo was Mafia, and that is who they thought he was casting doubt on so they cut him loose. But I'm not sure why the other Townie players wouldn't want to placing a microscope over Maddag, Zolah, Danbob, Potent or JR at this point more than myself. Seems like some purposeful misguidance going on. Carini didn't mention me once that I can see, or even insinuate anything about me. Seems the safer townie move would be to vote for someone who Carini at least mentioned or voted for, since Mafia thinks may be Inspector.
Carini doesn't like the runoff being pushed to 5 but pushes the runoff to 5...
Yes. I want Pablo in the runoff and I had to make it 5 in order to do that. Typically pushing a way runoff to 5 indicates mafia is trying to up their odds of survival. Not saying he is definitely mafia but I've seen this move enough times to run with it for now and include him.
We had 4 in the runoff: you, JR, Zolah, and Potent. Pablo expanded to 5 which I spoke earlier of often being a tactic used by mafia to dilute the pool and increase their survival odds. Under my theory at least 1 maybe 2 of the original 4 are mafia. I'm not in the way of having any idea who yet.
We're all a mess of paradoxes. Believing in things we know can't be true. We walk around carrying feelings too complicated and contradictory to express. But when it all becomes too big, and words aren't enough to help get it all out, there's always music.
I'm not really sure why we all are surprised of the lack of activity. D1R1 was the only time with any real action, and most of the players involved in they action are dead. Add in the fact that we put some of the same people in the day 2 runoff that were in the Day 1 runoff...
you and zolah are still alive. lll made the only move after d1r1 and she's in as well.
For a runoff. If anyone has a better idea, my vote can move again if needed.
Thank you for at least expanding to a run-off. Seems strange that the players who would usually be all over making sure we have a run-off are eerily silent. I don't mind being in a run-off at all, or even being voted off. Not that you can take my word for it, but I am not somehow Mafia twice in a row. I can't say if Zolah is or isn't Mafia. I think she is a good person to have in the run-off. She is the only one among the two of us who the whacked player voted for or mentioned, and the only one who was among the last day's run-off, which the now whacked player also mentioned as noteworthy.
We're all a mess of paradoxes. Believing in things we know can't be true. We walk around carrying feelings too complicated and contradictory to express. But when it all becomes too big, and words aren't enough to help get it all out, there's always music.
Potentially lynching LLL to me feels way too similar to lynching Pablo on day 1. I think her "saving" JR is being blown out of proportion just like Pablo expanding the runoff to five was. I'd much rather see a final runoff of JR and Zolah.
