Whether it's your first Bonnaroo or you’re a music festival veteran, we welcome you to Inforoo.
Here you'll find info about artists, rumors, camping tips, and the infamous Roo Clues. Have a look around then create an account and join in the fun. See you at Bonnaroo!!
I actually intended to move off Dan if he was still at 3 as I started catching up on the thread a few minutes ago. In fact, I think Dan has had enough attention for only 3 pages without actually standing out.
JR > Dan > Tainted
This is an interesting move. Not really sure what to think about it. On one hand JR could be a townie who just got pummeled for his opening vote. However, on the other hand it could be a mafia JR who is trying to backtrack from the heat he got. Not sure which one it is but it’s an interesting move none the less.
Vote History Dan > Pablo Viking > Jaz JR > Dan Zolah > ZIG Dan > Pablo > JR Viking > Jaz > JR Pablo > Potent Jaz > Viking Maddog > Zolah Potent > Dan ZIG > Zolah Tainted > Dan Thor > Viking Potent > Dan > Tainted JR > Dan > Tainted
Left To Vote N/A
This round is scheduled to end on Saturday, December 23rd at 12:00 P.M. EST
Kdogg was a serial cheater. You accused Danbob of cheating either in jest or not, but did the same thing as him in mafia 105 and were a townie. They are just small breadcrumbs that add up to finding a rat.
And again, if you were not cheating by talking at home, then LOGICALLY you are mafia together. You can understand how Zolah jumping to your defense looks bad especially if you claim not to be a cheater, no?
I forgot about the 105 thing and the 110 thing was a joke. If you kill me based on my first post, you'll find a way to kill me in just about every game, because I usually say weird shit on page one because the first few pages tend to be boring.
I'm intrigued why you lean town on ZIG so early. Maybe later you can share.
I'll explain re Zig in due time. Note that I said leaning. We are still early and that can change.
And my interest is not necessarily in killing you atm. It just seemed especially curious. Right now, Zolah is much more interesting to me, but she is already in the runoff.
I actually intended to move off Dan if he was still at 3 as I started catching up on the thread a few minutes ago. In fact, I think Dan has had enough attention for only 3 pages without actually standing out.
JR > Dan > Tainted
This is an interesting move. Not really sure what to think about it. On one hand JR could be a townie who just got pummeled for his opening vote. However, on the other hand it could be a mafia JR who is trying to backtrack from the heat he got. Not sure which one it is but it’s an interesting move none the less.
I didn't pummel him. I just pulled at some loose threads. The pummeling will come upon the pommel horse later on.
I actually intended to move off Dan if he was still at 3 as I started catching up on the thread a few minutes ago. In fact, I think Dan has had enough attention for only 3 pages without actually standing out.
JR > Dan > Tainted
This is an interesting move. Not really sure what to think about it. On one hand JR could be a townie who just got pummeled for his opening vote. However, on the other hand it could be a mafia JR who is trying to backtrack from the heat he got. Not sure which one it is but it’s an interesting move none the less.
Hmm... This comment actually makes me wonder about you a little.
Moving my vote doesn't take any heat off of me. If I wanted to remove heat, I'd make less moves and play less aggressively.
Having played with me as many times as you have, it shouldn't be all that interesting a move at all. I regularly throw myself into heat on D1R1 and shake up the runoffs. And I do it more when I'm town than when I'm mafia.
Idk it's hard to shake two people being so tied, did the same thing with Dan and zolah last game, which was a big swing and a miss, but still, it seems too coordinated for so early in the game.
Also Maddog, I voted for Tainted because I wanted to change the runoff, my options were Potent, ZIG and Tainted. Maybe a foolish move in hindsight. I voted for Tainted and gave him vote back for Round 2, where I'll probably be in the runoff.
Also Maddog, I voted for Tainted because I wanted to change the runoff, my options were Potent, ZIG and Tainted. Maybe a foolish move in hindsight. I voted for Tainted and gave him vote back for Round 2, where I'll probably be in the runoff.
I basically said that the move was interesting and I could see both townie and JR making the move. I don’t have feelings one way or the other right now, but it may be useful down the line. Don’t see why JR sees such a problem with it.
I basically said that the move was interesting and I could see both townie and mafia JR making the move. I don’t have feelings one way or the other right now, but it may be useful down the line. Don’t see why JR sees such a problem with it.
Why aren't you asking me? Probably because it's obvious. I don't always vote for Dan, but I voted like 8th or 9th in this game and needed to stack on someone, and I try to vote for Dan when I can. When Tainted bumped him up to 3, I moved because I was trying to preserve the runoff.
Why aren't you asking me? Probably because it's obvious. I don't always vote for Dan, but I voted like 8th or 9th in this game and needed to stack on someone, and I try to vote for Dan when I can. When Tainted bumped him up to 3, I moved because I was trying to preserve the runoff.
Why do you vote for Dan when you can? I don't get it.
I basically said that the move was interesting and I could see both townie and JR making the move. I don’t have feelings one way or the other right now, but it may be useful down the line. Don’t see why JR sees such a problem with it.
The problem is that we've played together like a dozen times and you find it "interesting" that I'm playing like I play pretty much every time I'm town. I open with a nonsense first vote, eventually switch my vote to someone else in the runoff or the most suspicious person to me at the moment with limited D1R1 knowledge, even if it means I get heat for it. And then the kicker... you say I vote swapped to avoid heat. D1R1 vote changes doesn't avoid heat, it attracts it.
I basically said that the move was interesting and I could see both townie and JR making the move. I don’t have feelings one way or the other right now, but it may be useful down the line. Don’t see why JR sees such a problem with it.
The problem is that we've played together like a dozen times and you find it "interesting" that I'm playing like I play pretty much every time I'm town. I open with a nonsense first vote, eventually switch my vote to someone else in the runoff or the most suspicious person to me at the moment with limited D1R1 knowledge, even if it means I get heat for it. And then the kicker... you say I vote swapped to avoid heat. D1R1 vote changes doesn't avoid heat, it attracts it.
JR > Dan > Tainted > Dan
If the heat was for you vote then I’d be 100% inclined to agree with you. However the heat wasn’t because of your vote on me - it was because of your reasoning. By switching your vote no one would continue to call you out for the rule 3 reasoning. That being said I don’t think your suspicious right now and I was simply making an observation about something that may or may not be useful down the road.
The problem is that we've played together like a dozen times and you find it "interesting" that I'm playing like I play pretty much every time I'm town. I open with a nonsense first vote, eventually switch my vote to someone else in the runoff or the most suspicious person to me at the moment with limited D1R1 knowledge, even if it means I get heat for it. And then the kicker... you say I vote swapped to avoid heat. D1R1 vote changes doesn't avoid heat, it attracts it.
JR > Dan > Tainted > Dan
If the heat was for you vote then I’d be 100% inclined to agree with you. However the heat wasn’t because of your vote on me - it was because of your reasoning. By switching your vote no one would continue to call you out for the rule 3 reasoning. That being said I don’t think your suspicious right now and I was simply making an observation about something that may or may not be useful down the road.
Switching my vote didn't save me from the rule 3 comment, it brought more attention to me for a whole nother reason by altering the runoff. That's twice now that your intent is questionable to me...
If the heat was for you vote then I’d be 100% inclined to agree with you. However the heat wasn’t because of your vote on me - it was because of your reasoning. By switching your vote no one would continue to call you out for the rule 3 reasoning. That being said I don’t think your suspicious right now and I was simply making an observation about something that may or may not be useful down the road.
Switching my vote didn't save me from the rule 3 comment, it brought more attention to me for a whole nother reason by altering the runoff. That's twice now that your intent is questionable to me...
I could care less what you think of my intentions. I brought up something I saw and it’s clear that it struck a cord. Even if you’re town.
Switching my vote didn't save me from the rule 3 comment, it brought more attention to me for a whole nother reason by altering the runoff. That's twice now that your intent is questionable to me...
I could care less what you think of my intentions. I brought up something I saw and it’s clear that it struck a cord. Even if you’re town.
It struck a chord because it was wrong or fabricated. I don't know what to think of you either, but I've seen a few yellow flags.
I could care less what you think of my intentions. I brought up something I saw and it’s clear that it struck a cord. Even if you’re town.
It struck a chord because it was wrong or fabricated. I don't know what to think of you either, but I've seen a few yellow flags.
Neither wrong nor fabricated. You keep saying that moving your vote wouldn’t take attention away from your rule 3 comments but you clearly were backtracking with your switch. You called me a cheater then tried to laugh it off and switch off me. Then you switched back to me even after you said I’ve received enough attention over 3 pages. Then you’ve continued to argue with me. Then you said you don’t know what to think of me but that’s clearly wrong since you willing switched off me then came back. I could care less that I’m raising “yellow flags” for you because I know what I’m saying is neither wrong nor fabricated.
It struck a chord because it was wrong or fabricated. I don't know what to think of you either, but I've seen a few yellow flags.
Neither wrong nor fabricated. You keep saying that moving your vote wouldn’t take attention away from your rule 3 comments but you clearly were backtracking with your switch. You called me a cheater then tried to laugh it off and switch off me. Then you switched back to me even after you said I’ve received enough attention over 3 pages. Then you’ve continued to argue with me. Then you said you don’t know what to think of me but that’s clearly wrong since you willing switched off me then came back. I could care less that I’m raising “yellow flags” for you because I know what I’m saying is neither wrong nor fabricated.
Saying I was backtracking with my switch is absolute garbage. I defended you as a non-cheater and said my first post was in jest as soon as it was brought up. I switched off of you for the exact reasons I said. I switched back to you for the exact reasons I said. Other than my first post, which was admittedly weird, I've been straight forward as I can be. Are you a blind townie or mafia?
