Whether it's your first Bonnaroo or you’re a music festival veteran, we welcome you to Inforoo.
Here you'll find info about artists, rumors, camping tips, and the infamous Roo Clues. Have a look around then create an account and join in the fun. See you at Bonnaroo!!
Silver Surfer is a friend of mine and my roommate during last school year. He was at Bonnaroo and has met a few people from the board. @radiatebased can confirm.
I created the account in our dorm is there a way to check it now or is it stuck at that one? I am going to Kentucky this Sunday with my grandma and I can probably stop at Nashville if you really need me to
I created the account in our dorm is there a way to check it now or is it stuck at that one? I am going to Kentucky this Sunday with my grandma and I can probably stop at Nashville if you really need me to
Go to Nashville or we will ban you from the boards for life.
I created the account in our dorm is there a way to check it now or is it stuck at that one? I am going to Kentucky this Sunday with my grandma and I can probably stop at Nashville if you really need me to
Go to Nashville or we will ban you from the boards for life.
Rule 8 has been updated. (Emphasis added on the new text.)
8) Trades are allowed. All participants must verify the terms of the trade. (Note: Trades are subject to dispute. In the even that a trade is believed to be unrealistically lopsided, a participant can call for a poll on the validity of said trade.)
1) Once an artist or member of an act is drafted they are unavailable to anyone else however side-projects and solo artist from that act would still be eligible until separately drafted.
Could this be clarified please? The second half of this sentence seems to nullify the first half. An example of what would be ineligible would be helpful.
1) Once an artist or member of an act is drafted they are unavailable to anyone else however side-projects and solo artist from that act would still be eligible until separately drafted.
Could this be clarified please? The second half of this sentence seems to nullify the first half. An example of what would be ineligible would be helpful.
couple examples how I interpret it. if someone drafts The Grateful Dead, someone else can then draft The Jerry Garcia Band. Also if someone takes NWA then Dre and Cube are still eligible to be taken as solo acts.
1) Once an artist or member of an act is drafted they are unavailable to anyone else however side-projects and solo artist from that act would still be eligible until separately drafted.
Could this be clarified please? The second half of this sentence seems to nullify the first half. An example of what would be ineligible would be helpful.
That may not have been very artfully worded. Sorry.
For example, there have been several iterations of Neil Young and... (Crazy Horse, Booker T & the MG's, Promise of the Real, etc.). Once one of those has been drafted, others are off the table. But Crosby, Stills, Nash & Young are an actual group as opposed to a Neil Young solo show with a kickass house band. Likewise, if CSNY were drafted you could still take Neil Young (or Neil Young and...).
Does that make sense? I am reluctant to give too many real-world examples because I don't want to flag potential picks.
This may be the thing that gets us into most polls. It's not ideal but I don't want people splitting hairs and having eight versions of bands featuring eight slightly different iterations showing up on posters. It defeats the purpose of drafting.
The other potential sticky wicket may come from somebody choosing an act whose live CV is sparse or possibly non-existent. The burden of proof will be on the drafter there to show that they played real live shows and not, for example, a couple of songs together at a charity event. (And to further clarify, performing on a talk or variety show does not count as publicly available even though you could theoretically get tickets to that show.)
1) Once an artist or member of an act is drafted they are unavailable to anyone else however side-projects and solo artist from that act would still be eligible until separately drafted.
Could this be clarified please? The second half of this sentence seems to nullify the first half. An example of what would be ineligible would be helpful.
That may not have been very artfully worded. Sorry.
For example, there have been several iterations of Neil Young and... (Crazy Horse, Booker T & the MG's, Promise of the Real, etc.). Once one of those has been drafted, others are off the table. But Crosby, Stills, Nash & Young are an actual group as opposed to a Neil Young solo show with a kickass house band. Likewise, if CSNY were drafted you could still take Neil Young (or Neil Young and...).
Does that make sense? I am reluctant to give too many real-world examples because I don't want to flag potential picks.
This may be the thing that gets us into most polls. It's not ideal but I don't want people splitting hairs and having eight versions of bands featuring eight slightly different iterations showing up on posters. It defeats the purpose of drafting.
The other potential sticky wicket may come from somebody choosing an act whose live CV is sparse or possibly non-existent. The burden of proof will be on the drafter there to show that they played real live shows and not, for example, a couple of songs together at a charity event. (And to further clarify, performing on a talk or variety show does not count as publicly available even though you could theoretically get tickets to that show.)
So.. Kanye West + Jay Z doing their Throne show is not okay as is Dr Dre + Snoop Dogg who performed at Coachella, right? A supergroup should have an official name to be egible imo
