Whether it's your first Bonnaroo or you’re a music festival veteran, we welcome you to Inforoo.
Here you'll find info about artists, rumors, camping tips, and the infamous Roo Clues. Have a look around then create an account and join in the fun. See you at Bonnaroo!!
yeah if we do an auction the maximum bid should be the full allowance.
Typically in an auction the max bid is the budget minus a dollar for each remaining draft pick for that drafter. So if I have a 100 dollar budget and have to make thirteen picks, my max bid at the start is 88. I still have to spend at least a dollar on each of the last twelve acts. I can nominate an act for a dollar, but I have to hope no one bids two. If someone did, I'm then out on that artist.
I would probably do some number of drafted acts like that, like 25, with a budget of, whatever, let's say 300. So the most anyone could spend for an act would be 276, and then they'd probably be picking semi-leftovers at the end with dollar bids. Then we could proceed with free agency in the usual way we do it.
But you are right, there would not be an arbitrarily lowered max bid, the way that NBA has max contracts. That would just lead people to max bid when they nominate their headliners, if I had to guess, meaning whoever jumped on X-act first would get them, rather than the person who valued them highest.
Ive done it where you can bid $0 and if no one wants to bid $1 you win. Functionally its the same concept.
yeah if we do an auction the maximum bid should be the full allowance.
Typically in an auction the max bid is the budget minus a dollar for each remaining draft pick for that drafter. So if I have a 100 dollar budget and have to make thirteen picks, my max bid at the start is 88. I still have to spend at least a dollar on each of the last twelve acts. I can nominate an act for a dollar, but I have to hope no one bids two. If someone does, I'm then out on that artist. This would, for the most part, mean I'd be picking from the leftovers toward the end of the draft.
I would probably do some number of drafted acts like that, like 25, with a budget of, whatever, let's say 300. So the most anyone could spend for an act would be 276, and then they'd probably be picking semi-leftovers at the end with dollar bids. Then we could proceed with free agency in the usual way we do it.
But you are right, there would not be an arbitrarily lowered max bid, the way that NBA has max contracts. That would just lead people to max bid when they nominate their headliners, if I had to guess, meaning whoever jumped on X-act first would get them, rather than the person who valued them highest.
Also, most auctions have a set nomination order, non-snaking, so at the end, when the only players left to pick are those who have one dollar per pick to make, it turns into a non-snake draft like a typical IRL sports league draft. We could do that, but I have a couple alternative ideas that I think I like more.
Typically in an auction the max bid is the budget minus a dollar for each remaining draft pick for that drafter. So if I have a 100 dollar budget and have to make thirteen picks, my max bid at the start is 88. I still have to spend at least a dollar on each of the last twelve acts. I can nominate an act for a dollar, but I have to hope no one bids two. If someone does, I'm then out on that artist. This would, for the most part, mean I'd be picking from the leftovers toward the end of the draft.
I would probably do some number of drafted acts like that, like 25, with a budget of, whatever, let's say 300. So the most anyone could spend for an act would be 276, and then they'd probably be picking semi-leftovers at the end with dollar bids. Then we could proceed with free agency in the usual way we do it.
But you are right, there would not be an arbitrarily lowered max bid, the way that NBA has max contracts. That would just lead people to max bid when they nominate their headliners, if I had to guess, meaning whoever jumped on X-act first would get them, rather than the person who valued them highest.
Also, most auctions have a set nomination order, non-snaking, so at the end, when the only players left to pick are those who have one dollar per pick to make, it turns into a non-snake draft like a typical IRL sports league draft. We could do that, but I have a couple alternative ideas that I think I like more.
So is Infinity first, then iii points or we doing it both or what's poppin'? cdevaneyJake JortlesJulie
How are you feeling about running another draft, cdevaney? Are you alright with all the madness going on right now? Idk if I've underestimated running a draft but I gotta say that I'd have never done it without Fred. That's for sure.
Thanks.
I'm totally fine with iii points happening next but it sounds like the group is maybe more in the mood for ID3 since we've already teased it once?
So is Infinity first, then iii points or we doing it both or what's poppin'? cdevaneyJake JortlesJulie
How are you feeling about running another draft, cdevaney? Are you alright with all the madness going on right now? Idk if I've underestimated running a draft but I gotta say that I'd have never done it without Fred. That's for sure.
Thanks.
I'm totally fine with iii points happening next but it sounds like the group is maybe more in the mood for ID3 since we've already teased it once?
Yeah that def works for me considering its already been delayed.
So is Infinity first, then iii points or we doing it both or what's poppin'? cdevaneyJake JortlesJulie
How are you feeling about running another draft, cdevaney ? Are you alright with all the madness going on right now? Idk if I've underestimated running a draft but I gotta say that I'd have never done it without Fred . That's for sure.
Thanks.
I'm totally fine with iii points happening next but it sounds like the group is maybe more in the mood for ID3 since we've already teased it once?
I just wanted to know if you're okay and also if you're okay with hosting another one of these, not necessarily asking for one thing to happen before the other.
Post by Nathan Fieldcяab on Apr 30, 2020 17:41:11 GMT -5
I'm team Infinity 3 (as is, it seems, most everyone else), but I'm also team not making anyone bite off more than they can chew. If cdev is burnt out or needing to prioritize real-life stuff and the III Points gang is raring to go, that's totally understandable.
But I'm very juiced for ID3, whenever that happens
I'm totally fine with iii points happening next but it sounds like the group is maybe more in the mood for ID3 since we've already teased it once?
I just wanted to know if you're okay and also if you're okay with hosting another one of these, not necessarily asking for one thing to happen before the other.
I'll be up for it when we're ready to roll in a few weeks. Thanks for checking.
That might be ok but not totally sure if it’s fair. No hard feeling either way.
The argument is that it makes those at the end of the first round more competitive.
I'm just not sure if it's not just more complicated.
I think those at the end of the first are at an advantage tbh. Having your 2nd and 3rd close is huge. This just really hurts those in the middle who fall after the big 5.
:format(webp):no_upscale()/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_asset/file/12414833/Nathan_Fielder_AMA_Cool_Band.0.png)
