Whether it's your first Bonnaroo or you’re a music festival veteran, we welcome you to Inforoo.
Here you'll find info about artists, rumors, camping tips, and the infamous Roo Clues. Have a look around then create an account and join in the fun. See you at Bonnaroo!!
You said earlier it was a mistake. Now it was on purpose. Rummy 500 look at this!
the mistake was not looking at the time of tranter's post, not realizing he only posted it a minute before maddog did his whole thing, though now that i'm looking back again i don't really think it's a mistake
the mistake was not looking at the time of tranter's post, not realizing he only posted it a minute before maddog did his whole thing, though now that i'm looking back again i don't really think it's a mistake
why was it not a mistake?
because he's still doing mafia's work for them if he isn't mafia
I purposely put the quotes in the order they did because I wanted to bring up the maddog quotes first, then your quote later on
You said earlier it was a mistake. Now it was on purpose. Rummy 500 look at this!
yeah im literally going to go back and read that whole exchange now. gimme a few. from what i recall reading earlier, he said he copy and pasted bbcodes and it makes sense he wanted to quote the two MD ones, comment on them, and then quote the tranter one and comment on it. that seems absolutely sensible to me.
but him switching between 'it was intentional' and 'it was a mistake' is weird, yes.
Considering you've found the need to respond to my threads as if you are threatened by me I offer you some peace my confused counterpart. May you find peace in your restless soul.
You said earlier it was a mistake. Now it was on purpose. Rummy 500 look at this!
yeah im literally going to go back and read that whole exchange now. gimme a few. from what i recall reading earlier, he said he copy and pasted bbcodes and it makes sense he wanted to quote the two MD ones, comment on them, and then quote the tranter one and comment on it. that seems absolutely sensible to me.
but him switching between 'it was intentional' and 'it was a mistake' is weird, yes.
I could overlook posting things out if order. Multi-quoting in mafia has tripped up plenty of players over the years.
Making different claims about is very sus.
Potent, you kicked Rooloo up to 3 I believe.
but how does one post things out of order? I covered this earlier today and Theo gave an excuse but now claims it was on purpose. I'm tingling from this explanation (from Theo).
yeah i moved in panic at like 9:58 haha because i knew if things were about to proceed til runoff and we didnt get extension granted, we at least needed a 3 way instead of moving straight to 2 way.
was planning to move back to rooloo but now hes got 2 on him, luckily.
right now i feel pretty good on you being town, sfa. and potent's narrowing in on this theo thing feels townish to me, too, whereas tranter hopping onto it after "rooloo or teddy!" earlier feels less townish.
theo not being able to decide if it was a mistake or intentional though is definitely making me look more at him than before. i will say, there have absolutely been times as town where i got flustered and misspoke like that, but it did in turn look bad on me and prob got me voted out. sucks when that happens and it's a townie mistake, but also it is fair that people look on it as maf like behavior.
Considering you've found the need to respond to my threads as if you are threatened by me I offer you some peace my confused counterpart. May you find peace in your restless soul.
I could overlook posting things out if order. Multi-quoting in mafia has tripped up plenty of players over the years.
Making different claims about is very sus.
Potent, you kicked Rooloo up to 3 I believe.
but how does one post things out of order? I covered this earlier today and Theo gave an excuse but now claims it was on purpose. I'm tingling from this explanation (from Theo).
to your first question - i definitely get how because it is how i used to multi-quote things in mafia from desktop before i learned the "Select quote" route was much better. you open "quote post" in multiple tabs of the diff things you're trying to compile, then copy-paste the bbcode into one window with a New Post draft. i have no qualms or suspicions about him doing it this way, so ive been confused why y'all up in arms about it.
but now if he cant decide whether he put them in that order in purpose (due to content of the posts, not thinking about putting them in chrono order)..... hmmm
Considering you've found the need to respond to my threads as if you are threatened by me I offer you some peace my confused counterpart. May you find peace in your restless soul.
Post by potentpotables on Feb 22, 2022 22:39:08 GMT -5
The whole crux of the Theo post was that Tranter telling Maddog he could be whacked at any minute was doing mafia work for them or was mafia.
This ignores the fact that mafia Tranter could have gone in the PM and asked the ref to whack Maddog. Which is why Tranter feels town to me.
It still doesn't explain why Theo posted Maddog #1, Maddog #2, and Tranter in those posts (top of page 13 I think). Chronologically they happened MD#1, T, MD#2. So Theo had to go out of his way to reorder them. I feel like this is a huge mistake, along with voting for me for a BS reason.
yeah im literally going to go back and read that whole exchange now. gimme a few. from what i recall reading earlier, he said he copy and pasted bbcodes and it makes sense he wanted to quote the two MD ones, comment on them, and then quote the tranter one and comment on it. that seems absolutely sensible to me.
but him switching between 'it was intentional' and 'it was a mistake' is weird, yes.
i got confused about what was being asked about
what did you think was being asked about instead?
work with me here. im trying to see your side fully and not descend down this path blindly w the ones who are on you for it, but im feeling a little uneasy now.
Considering you've found the need to respond to my threads as if you are threatened by me I offer you some peace my confused counterpart. May you find peace in your restless soul.
but how does one post things out of order? I covered this earlier today and Theo gave an excuse but now claims it was on purpose. I'm tingling from this explanation (from Theo).
to your first question - i definitely get how because it is how i used to multi-quote things in mafia from desktop before i learned the "Select quote" route was much better. you open "quote post" in multiple tabs of the diff things you're trying to compile, then copy-paste the bbcode into one window with a New Post draft. i have no qualms or suspicions about him doing it this way, so ive been confused why y'all up in arms about it.
but now if he cant decide whether he put them in that order in purpose (due to content of the posts, not thinking about putting them in chrono order)..... hmmm
whoever said that that i couldn't decide what order to put them in is completely misleading you, at no point did i argue that i put them in the wrong order.
I could overlook posting things out if order. Multi-quoting in mafia has tripped up plenty of players over the years.
Making different claims about is very sus.
Potent, you kicked Rooloo up to 3 I believe.
but how does one post things out of order? I covered this earlier today and Theo gave an excuse but now claims it was on purpose. I'm tingling from this explanation (from Theo).
ohh, I agree that it’s pretty much impossible to do if you use select post. I thought he claimed he was copy/pasting. Just saying that’s a little more believable on. But the flip/flop his intentions is totally shady.
The whole crux of the Theo post was that Tranter telling Maddog he could be whacked at any minute was doing mafia work for them or was mafia.
This ignores the fact that mafia Tranter could have gone in the PM and asked the ref to whack Maddog. Which is why Tranter feels town to me.
It still doesn't explain why Theo posted Maddog #1, Maddog #2, and Tranter in those posts (top of page 13 I think). Chronologically they happened MD#1, T, MD#2. So Theo had to go out of his way to reorder them. I feel like this is a huge mistake, along with voting for me for a BS reason.
ok, so as someone who is sus of Tranter, i want to reply to some of this.
yes, a mafia tranter *could have* gone into the PM and asked ref to whack MD. but we sorta have established that at least one maf was around between vague reveal and MD actually providing his given name, so it isnt really a thing of "was maf around to see it?" we know at least part of the team was.
that sus tranter post that theo quoted rubbed me wrong too because it reads to me as like "don't yall see, mafia could whack you any time? but it isnt me. im not maf, im here and engaging, not off whacking MD!" when in reality, the maf could have easily been having a convo about how they WEREN'T planning to off MD that Day at all, so tranter was potentially planting a seed there.
Considering you've found the need to respond to my threads as if you are threatened by me I offer you some peace my confused counterpart. May you find peace in your restless soul.
but how does one post things out of order? I covered this earlier today and Theo gave an excuse but now claims it was on purpose. I'm tingling from this explanation (from Theo).
ohh, I agree that it’s pretty much impossible to do if you use select post. I thought he claimed he was copy/pasting. Just saying that’s a little more believable on. But the flip/flop his intentions is totally shady.
to clarify, SFA: correct, he didn't use "select post." at no point did he claim he did. he copy/pastes for multi quoting, that much has remained consistent in his responses about it.
Considering you've found the need to respond to my threads as if you are threatened by me I offer you some peace my confused counterpart. May you find peace in your restless soul.
This is Theo's post voting for Tranter. Let me ask you something Jeremy Fragrance - why did you post these out of order? Someone who doesn't know your role could view this as a misleading way to make people think that Tranter's post came after Maddog revealed Otter as his given. I was going to remove the Maddog posts from your posts, but then I realized that the Maddog post you have second here, naming Otter, came one minute *after* Tranter said that Maddog could be whacked at any minute. It took some effort on your part to organize the posts like that, unless I'm an idiot which is entirely possible. Anytime I've quoted multiple posts, using "select post", it puts them in chronological order. I guess maybe if you select posts in a different order maybe it puts them in a different order? Still seems like it takes effort.
Anyway, I'm glad you responded so I could notice this, because it's super weird.
It seems entirely reasonable to me for Tranter to point out that Maddog could have been whacked without revealing his given, which would have been detrimental to the town.
I knew that the tranter post came before the Maddog reveal, but I made a mistake and didn't look at the time of Tranter's post.
this is the post that is being referred to. when i said i made a mistake, it was me realizing that tranter's post i have been talking about came only 1 minute before maddog's reveal, when I thought there was more time in between due to there being a couple posts between tranters post and maddogs reveal.
The whole crux of the Theo post was that Tranter telling Maddog he could be whacked at any minute was doing mafia work for them or was mafia.
This ignores the fact that mafia Tranter could have gone in the PM and asked the ref to whack Maddog. Which is why Tranter feels town to me.
It still doesn't explain why Theo posted Maddog #1, Maddog #2, and Tranter in those posts (top of page 13 I think). Chronologically they happened MD#1, T, MD#2. So Theo had to go out of his way to reorder them. I feel like this is a huge mistake, along with voting for me for a BS reason.
ok, so as someone who is sus of Tranter, i want to reply to some of this.
yes, a mafia tranter *could have* gone into the PM and asked ref to whack MD. but we sorta have established that at least one maf was around between vague reveal and MD actually providing his given name, so it isnt really a thing of "was maf around to see it?" we know at least part of the team was.
that sus tranter post that theo quoted rubbed me wrong too because it reads to me as like "don't yall see, mafia could whack you any time? but it isnt me. im not maf, im here and engaging, not off whacking MD!" when in reality, the maf could have easily been having a convo about how they WEREN'T planning to off MD that Day at all, so tranter was potentially planting a seed there.
im curious, Jeremy Fragrance - is this what rubbed you wrong too, or was it something else?
Considering you've found the need to respond to my threads as if you are threatened by me I offer you some peace my confused counterpart. May you find peace in your restless soul.
ok, so as someone who is sus of Tranter, i want to reply to some of this.
yes, a mafia tranter *could have* gone into the PM and asked ref to whack MD. but we sorta have established that at least one maf was around between vague reveal and MD actually providing his given name, so it isnt really a thing of "was maf around to see it?" we know at least part of the team was.
that sus tranter post that theo quoted rubbed me wrong too because it reads to me as like "don't yall see, mafia could whack you any time? but it isnt me. im not maf, im here and engaging, not off whacking MD!" when in reality, the maf could have easily been having a convo about how they WEREN'T planning to off MD that Day at all, so tranter was potentially planting a seed there.
im curious, Jeremy Fragrance - is this what rubbed you wrong too, or was it something else?
potent / Rummy being the other two seems a little too on the nose, right?
this first one from pg 2 upon reread absolutely screams "easy d1 verbal distancing from a teammate" since if it is rooloo/otter/tranter, they had NO TEAMMATES in trouble whatsoever. this is pre reveal and ofc no one knew we'd get such an early inspo reveal wherein maf distancing mattered less than it might in a different game where a reveal occurs d2 or 3.
and then that second post--didnt like it then, dont like it now upon reread either. he just sorta popped it into the convo randomly, and hes been doing that this game overall, "drop a little of this here, a little of that there" which is classic maf goading to see where you might be able to pick up traction on framing townie(s)
Considering you've found the need to respond to my threads as if you are threatened by me I offer you some peace my confused counterpart. May you find peace in your restless soul.
trantsgiving
Inforoo Influencer Well known PRANKSTER
I guess I read it as he didn't want the runoff to be him and Jortles cause it would look sus to reveal against the other person in a 1v1 runoff? Therefore he is revealing now to avoid confusion later.. Maybe overthinking it but there's a lot of ambiguity in that post
I mean there’s a lot that’s confusing in his post. Don’t get me wrong. I’m mostly just annoyed he didn’t tell us the given tho haha wtf
potent / Rummy being the other two seems a little too on the nose, right?
this first one from pg 2 upon reread absolutely screams "easy d1 verbal distancing from a teammate" since if it is rooloo/otter/tranter, they had NO TEAMMATES in trouble whatsoever. this is pre reveal and ofc no one knew we'd get such an early inspo reveal wherein maf distancing mattered less than it might in a different game where a reveal occurs d2 or 3.
and then that second post--didnt like it then, dont like it now upon reread either. he just sorta popped it into the convo randomly, and hes been doing that this game overall, "drop a little of this here, a little of that there" which is classic maf goading to see where you might be able to pick up traction on framing townie(s)
hey quote more, I’ve said a lot of stuff about rooloo. I think he goes today or tomorrow 100% so I’m not really concerned when he goes. It’s not like I fell off him, I just wanted to vote Theo off today. Apparently that’s really struck a nerve.
The second one is just a loose thought I had. You have like a million posts that are stream of consciousness.
this first one from pg 2 upon reread absolutely screams "easy d1 verbal distancing from a teammate" since if it is rooloo/otter/tranter, they had NO TEAMMATES in trouble whatsoever. this is pre reveal and ofc no one knew we'd get such an early inspo reveal wherein maf distancing mattered less than it might in a different game where a reveal occurs d2 or 3.
and then that second post--didnt like it then, dont like it now upon reread either. he just sorta popped it into the convo randomly, and hes been doing that this game overall, "drop a little of this here, a little of that there" which is classic maf goading to see where you might be able to pick up traction on framing townie(s)
hey quote more, I’ve said a lot of stuff about rooloo. I think he goes today or tomorrow 100% so I’m not really concerned when he goes. It’s not like I fell off him, I just wanted to vote Theo off today. Apparently that’s really struck a nerve.
The second one is just a loose thought I had. You have like a million posts that are stream of consciousness.
nothing wrong with stream of consciousness. These feel a bit manufactured, that’s my point.
At the end of the day this is a gut read in addition to some tangibles that have made me suspicious. Fwiw it isn’t like I come at you often when we play together - I just genuinely think you might be maf this time.
Considering you've found the need to respond to my threads as if you are threatened by me I offer you some peace my confused counterpart. May you find peace in your restless soul.
trantsgiving
Inforoo Influencer Well known PRANKSTER
hey quote more, I’ve said a lot of stuff about rooloo. I think he goes today or tomorrow 100% so I’m not really concerned when he goes. It’s not like I fell off him, I just wanted to vote Theo off today. Apparently that’s really struck a nerve.
The second one is just a loose thought I had. You have like a million posts that are stream of consciousness.
nothing wrong with stream of consciousness. These feel a bit manufactured, that’s my point.
At the end of the day this is a gut read in addition to some tangibles that have made me suspicious. Fwiw it isn’t like I come at you often when we play together - I just genuinely think you might be maf this time.
I have never extended a deadline and tried to rally people based on a “gut feeling”.
Post by potentpotables on Feb 23, 2022 7:40:23 GMT -5
SupeЯfuЯЯyanimal your vote just hanging out on Teddy for no reason is really not painting you in a good light. I want to believe you but you need a better idea today.
Rummy 500 this doesn't concern you about SFA townliness?
SupeЯfuЯЯyanimal your vote just hanging out on Teddy for no reason is really not painting you in a good light. I want to believe you but you need a better idea today.
Rummy 500 this doesn't concern you about SFA townliness?
I’m confused; SFA isnt on Teddy. He is on Rooloo. Who absolutely needs to be in this runoff, which SEEMED to be agreed upon among most of the group yesterday until suddenly it just….wasn’t?
Considering you've found the need to respond to my threads as if you are threatened by me I offer you some peace my confused counterpart. May you find peace in your restless soul.
nothing wrong with stream of consciousness. These feel a bit manufactured, that’s my point.
At the end of the day this is a gut read in addition to some tangibles that have made me suspicious. Fwiw it isn’t like I come at you often when we play together - I just genuinely think you might be maf this time.
I have never extended a deadline and tried to rally people based on a “gut feeling”.
maybe you need to be more bold then.
But also, again w the dramatics! I extended it specifically re: 1) this Rooloo fiasco , not necessarily trying to get you in too though that would’ve been swell and 2) the fact that multiple people had been busy enough yesterday evening that an extension seemed the right call.
Considering you've found the need to respond to my threads as if you are threatened by me I offer you some peace my confused counterpart. May you find peace in your restless soul.
SupeЯfuЯЯyanimal
Bleary-Eyed Bonnawook Globlist Facist Slave Dog
SupeЯfuЯЯyanimal your vote just hanging out on Teddy for no reason is really not painting you in a good light. I want to believe you but you need a better idea today.
Rummy 500 this doesn't concern you about SFA townliness?
I find Teddy’s playing style to be reminiscent of games I’ve played with him when he’s mafia. That’s the reason I gave while voting for him. It’s really just a numbers game to me at this point. The info we have is a mix of a really solid and then the rest is pretty wide open to interpretation. So I’m mostly just trying to illuminate based on who I have a slight town read on vs who I think the two left could be.
I said I wanted Teddy and was glad Rooloo was in to. I switched to Rooloo to make sure we got at least one… once he was moved out.
SupeЯfuЯЯyanimal your vote just hanging out on Teddy for no reason is really not painting you in a good light. I want to believe you but you need a better idea today.
Rummy 500 this doesn't concern you about SFA townliness?
I’m confused; SFA isnt on Teddy. He is on Rooloo. Who absolutely needs to be in this runoff, which SEEMED to be agreed upon among most of the group yesterday until suddenly it just….wasn’t?
