Whether it's your first Bonnaroo or you’re a music festival veteran, we welcome you to Inforoo.
Here you'll find info about artists, rumors, camping tips, and the infamous Roo Clues. Have a look around then create an account and join in the fun. See you at Bonnaroo!!
House #1 A 20 room mansion ( not including 8 bathrooms ) heated by natural gas. Add on a pool ( and a pool house) and a separate guest house, all heated by gas. In one month this residence consumes more energy than the average American household does in a y ear. The average bill for electricity and natural gas runs over $2400. In natural gas alone, this property consumes more than 20 times the national average for an American home. This house is not situated in a Northern or Midwester n "snow belt" area. It's in the South.
House #2 Designed by an architecture professor at a leading national university. This house incorporates every "green" feature current home construction can provide. The house is 4,000 square feet ( 4 bedrooms ) and is nestled on a high prairie in the American southwest. A central closet in the house holds geothermal heat-pumps drawing ground water through pipes sunk 300 feet into the ground. The water (usually 67 degrees F. ) heats the house in the winter and cools it in the summer. The system uses no fossil fuels such as oil or natural gas and it consumes one-quarter electricity required for a conventional heating/cooling system. Rainwater from the roof is collected and funneled into a 25,000 gallon underground cistern. Wastewater from showers, sinks and toilets goes into underground purifying tanks and then into the cistern. The collected water then irrigates the land surrounding the house. Surrounding flowers and shrubs native to the area enable the property to blend into the surrounding rural landscape.
~~~~~ HOUSE #1 is outside of Nashville, Tennessee; it is the abode of the "environmentalist" Al Gore.
HOUSE #2 is on a ranch near Crawford, Texas; it is the residence the of the President of the United States, George W. Bush.
Post by stallion pt. 2 on Aug 22, 2007 14:03:51 GMT -5
I had heard a while back that Bush's ranch was off the grid and powered by alternative energy. I was surprised to say the least. Alternative energy is quite doable, and obviously Bush knows that. The thing is he still stands to make more money promoting oil and fossil fuels. The day Bush's portfolio is more Alt energy than petrolium is the day we will end out "addiction" to foreign money...er I mean oil.
and f**k that Al Gore guy. I never liked him anyway. And I still haven't forgiven Tipper for the PMRC.
John: We don't even understand our own music Spider: It doesn't, does it matter whether we understand it? At least it'll give us . . . strength John: I know but maybe we could get into it more if we understood it
Al and Tipper buy all kinds of "green credits", their home is also both of their offices. Add in W & Laura's offices see how it balances out. Then count in the other homes they have.
In fairness, Snopes has another article where Gore responded to issues relating to his homes energy usage, citing factors such as (1) his house is four times the size of the average house, and thus, consumes more energy, (2) the house is used both as his residence and as a business office for both him and his wife, (3) he pays an extra $432 per month to obtain some of the electricity from green sources such as solar and other renewable energy, and (4) they are in the process of installing solar panels, and (5) they try to use other energy effecient measures (such as compact fluorescent bulbs) in order to offset their energy uses.
So, while, yes, the above is essentially true, it is not necessarily the entire truth.
^^^^good deal - someone posted it on another board I am on and I figured if there was more to the story - then I would get the "rest of the story" here - LMAO
Post by oleander124 on Aug 22, 2007 14:10:41 GMT -5
bos1969 said:
^^^^good deal - someone posted it on another board I am on and I figured if there was more to the story - then I would get the "rest of the story" here - LMAO
yes, these boards are a great place to get information on just about anything. It's not called INFOroo for nothing! ;D
LOL - see - the other thing I love is that - for the most part also - I can get information without the uptight attitude of "I am right and you are wrong"
^^^^good deal - someone posted it on another board I am on and I figured if there was more to the story - then I would get the "rest of the story" here - LMAO
Us liberal lefties will straiten you out yet babe! ;D
Post by stallion pt. 2 on Aug 22, 2007 14:18:12 GMT -5
Hey - did you see that I actually scored with most of ya'll on that political test?
I did. I also noticed that most of the candidates for president are in the exact oppisite quadrent: Democrat and Republican. Just more proof we have a one-party system masquarading as a two-party system. I'm sure Gore would fall into that Right-Authoritarian block as well. we are truely governed by corperations for corperations. Most people who identify themselves as Republicans are like you Meg. We're notdifferent at all. It's ust the old Divide and Conquer technique. Pit us against each other even though it should be us against them.
And just to be clear my dislike for Al Gore has nothing to do with his house.
John: We don't even understand our own music Spider: It doesn't, does it matter whether we understand it? At least it'll give us . . . strength John: I know but maybe we could get into it more if we understood it
^^^ Hey - did you see that I actually scored with most of ya'll on that political test?
Yeah, I saw...I am proud of ya, no doubt. I just think you need to stop lying to yourself and admit what you truely are!
It's OK now, everyone in my office is off the Electric Bush Kool-Aid now, and they will readily admit that they were duped by the guy!
I truely believe that there are literally thousands of people in this country right now that feel SOOOO duped by Bush.
4 or 5 years ago, you saw so many people defending him and standingup for the war and all of his policies. It seams lately that there are fewer and fewer of those folks to be found!
I love you either way Meg, because you are who you are, thats reason enough!
^^^ Hey - did you see that I actually scored with most of ya'll on that political test?
Yeah, I saw...I am proud of ya, no doubt. I just think you need to stop lying to yourself and admit what you truely are!
It's OK now, everyone in my office is off the Electric Bush Kool-Aid now, and they will readily admit that they were duped by the guy!
I truely believe that there are literally thousands of people in this country right now that feel SOOOO duped by Bush.
4 or 5 years ago, you saw so many people defending him and standingup for the war and all of his policies. It seams lately that there are fewer and fewer of those folks to be found!
I love you either way Meg, because you are who you are, thats reason enough!
thanks!!!! and yes - in a lot of ways I feel duped by Bush - but I figured that out shortly after we sent troops to Afghanistan - I am still either a liberal Republican or a conservative Democrat - you pick
Post by stallion pt. 2 on Aug 22, 2007 14:33:12 GMT -5
I'm still surprised so many of you think Republican is a bad word yet think Democrats are OK. If that political test prooved anything, it's that making a distinction between the two parties is meaningless. In the end, they stand for the same things, and its not what most Americans (regardless of party affiliation) stand for.
John: We don't even understand our own music Spider: It doesn't, does it matter whether we understand it? At least it'll give us . . . strength John: I know but maybe we could get into it more if we understood it
It wasn't the Dems who lied to us about national intelligence and led us into an illegal war, while at the same time taking our moral standing in the world to an all time low. It wasn't Dems who ignored New Orleans while it drowned, it wasn't Dems who have infringed on our privacy, and it's not Dems who refer to our CONSTITUTION as a quaint, outdated document.
It wasn't the Dems who lied to us about national intelligence and led us into an illegal war, while at the same time taking our moral standing in the world to an all time low. It wasn't Dems who ignored New Orleans while it drowned, it wasn't Dems who have infringed on our privacy, and it's not Dems who refer to our CONSTITUTION as a quaint, outdated document.
Post by spookymonster on Aug 22, 2007 14:45:38 GMT -5
Gore recommends examining your 'carbon footprint' and reducing it as much as possible. That doesn't mean ditching civilization and living in a cave. Both houses have made environmentally friendly choices. Obviously, Bush's modern ranch (completed in 2000) is the hands-down winner when compared to Gore's mansion (purchased in 2002). However, Gore is trying to do what he can by using efficient lighting and appliances, purchasing 'green' credits, and trying to install solar panels, although zoning laws put an end to that:
Post by stallion pt. 2 on Aug 22, 2007 14:47:14 GMT -5
I'm talking about Ideologically. I know this particular administration has been terrible, even for a Republian one. You don't need to tell me that. But when we have Dems like Hillary or Gore saying they're different, while supporting the death penalty, "free" trade and deregulation of businesses...who is being fooled now.
It was a Dem who signed over the digital airwaves to corperations to do as they will. It was a dem who championed a dracionian crime bill and increased penalties for non-violent drug offenders. and it has been Dems like Gore and (now indipendant) Lieberman who championed government censorship of rock music, and it was a Dem (or a Dem's wife and future dem) who decided cozying up to Big Pharma and insurance companies was more important than advocating universal health care. It was Dems who gave us NAFTA. And lest we forget it was a Dem who unconstitutionally fabricated the Gulf of Tonkin incident to get us into Vietnam full-bore.
John: We don't even understand our own music Spider: It doesn't, does it matter whether we understand it? At least it'll give us . . . strength John: I know but maybe we could get into it more if we understood it
Post by spookymonster on Aug 22, 2007 14:58:47 GMT -5
stallion said:
I'm still surprised so many of you think Republican is a bad word yet think Democrats are OK. If that political test prooved anything, it's that making a distinction between the two parties is meaningless. In the end, they stand for the same things, and its not what most Americans (regardless of party affiliation) stand for.
I think that same political poll also showed that the Dems are more progressive than the GOP. IMHO, any step forward is better than supporting the status quo.
I personally would love it if mainstream America was honestly willing to accept a candidate like Obama, Nader, or Kucinich. However, I don't think you're going to see that kind of paradigm shift happen overnight; I think it'll take a bunch of smaller steps, building momentum over the span of a decade or so (if not longer). Let's not forget - it took almost 150 years to recognize that women were smart enough to vote, and almost 200 years to realize skin color was irrelevant...
wow - look what I did - "I" started a poltical thread - LOL - "me" who tries to stay out of the political arena with ya'll - what have you done to me - how did you manage to influence me and have it all come to this?????
Post by stallion pt. 2 on Aug 22, 2007 15:12:38 GMT -5
spookymonster said:
I think that same political poll also showed that the Dems are more progressive than the GOP. IMHO, any step forward is better than supporting the status quo.
I personally would love it if mainstream America was honestly willing to accept a candidate like Obama, Nader, or Kucinich. However, I don't think you're going to see that kind of paradigm shift happen overnight; I think it'll take a bunch of smaller steps, building momentum over the span of a decade or so (if not longer). Let's not forget - it took almost 150 years to recognize that women were smart enough to vote, and almost 200 years to realize skin color was irrelevant...
I agree it will take baby steps. I also remember that Obama ranked smack in the middle of Authoritarian right w/ Hillary and McCain. Over all, point by point a Democrat is more likely to be progressive on a few things. The problem is that for every baby step we take toward a populist government, special interests and party politics ensure we take two more back towards authoritarian rule. 1 candidate cannot change the system. A lot of angry Americans, however, can.
John: We don't even understand our own music Spider: It doesn't, does it matter whether we understand it? At least it'll give us . . . strength John: I know but maybe we could get into it more if we understood it
I'm talking about Ideologically. I know this particular administration has been terrible, even for a Republian one. You don't need to tell me that. But when we have Dems like Hillary or Gore saying they're different, while supporting the death penalty, "free" trade and deregulation of businesses...who is being fooled now.
It was a Dem who signed over the digital airwaves to corperations to do as they will. It was a dem who championed a dracionian crime bill and increased penalties for non-violent drug offenders. and it has been Dems like Gore and (now indipendant) Lieberman who championed government censorship of rock music, and it was a Dem (or a Dem's wife and future dem) who decided cozying up to Big Pharma and insurance companies was more important than advocating universal health care. It was Dems who gave us NAFTA. And lest we forget it was a Dem who unconstitutionally fabricated the Gulf of Tonkin incident to get us into Vietnam full-bore.