Whether it's your first Bonnaroo or you’re a music festival veteran, we welcome you to Inforoo.
Here you'll find info about artists, rumors, camping tips, and the infamous Roo Clues. Have a look around then create an account and join in the fun. See you at Bonnaroo!!
Post by Dave Maynar on Jan 17, 2012 11:36:29 GMT -5
Don't forget your original vote in there surfbum, i.e. Surfbum --> NoAge --> EAP. I don't know if that a strict rule, but it seems to be what everyone does.
Welcome back Bonz, but I do not find it strange that your presence being requested in the Orgy thread and then you showing up, like it was the quacking Bonzai Bat Signal.
Jhamm and Duddits......why again do I need to be in a runoff? I'm a townie. If you are too I suggest you dig a little deeper into some other suspicious people.
Jhamm and Duddits......why again do I need to be in a runoff? I'm a townie. If you are too I suggest you dig a little deeper into some other suspicious people.
Duddits >>> Phi >>> Scrog
A 4 way runoff is kind of silly. I mean, where do you draw the line? 5 way runoff? 6? I feel like a runoff between EAP, SFA, and Quacker will be more telling than Phi taking the place of any of the above.
Welcome back Bonz, but I do not find it strange that your presence being requested in the Orgy thread and then you showing up, like it was the quacking Bonzai Bat Signal.
It's like I posted in at the end of the last game. I said I was going to call out people who have been quiet and try to get them talking. If it ends up getting me thrown out or killed I wouldn't be surprised. But at least I'll be pointing out the quiet ones. I have no idea if anybody I voted for is Mafia of course but I think the quieter people are the more this game is like playing powerball.
4 is too many and 2 is too less, 3 is not a crowd in Mafia round 1. 3 in the run-off is good. Personally Phi likes to 'stir the pot' and as a townie IDK what to make of that, so like I said before, Phi should always be in the runoff, but I am happy with these three, so with that in mind...
4 is too many and 2 is too less, 3 is not a crowd in Mafia round 1. 3 in the run-off is good. Personally Phi likes to 'stir the pot' and as a townie IDK what to make of that, so like I said before, Phi should always be in the runoff, but I am happy with these three, so with that in mind...
Scrog>>>Abra>>>Duddits
Why Duddits?
Why anyone at this point? If I took EAP out of the runoff, it would look like I was protecting her. Sigh. You are wrong if you think switching votes around over and over before a runoff is effective. What if you aren't on target? Also, it's probably just going to come back to bite you in the butt because it gives the mafia something to use against you.
4 is too many and 2 is too less, 3 is not a crowd in Mafia round 1. 3 in the run-off is good. Personally Phi likes to 'stir the pot' and as a townie IDK what to make of that, so like I said before, Phi should always be in the runoff, but I am happy with these three, so with that in mind...
Scrog>>>Abra>>>Duddits
Im sorry, but I do not understand this vote either. It looks to me like a lateral move that makes no difference? Changing your vote from one person with 1 vote to another person with 0 votes does nothing...unless I am missing something?
4 is too many and 2 is too less, 3 is not a crowd in Mafia round 1. 3 in the run-off is good. Personally Phi likes to 'stir the pot' and as a townie IDK what to make of that, so like I said before, Phi should always be in the runoff, but I am happy with these three, so with that in mind...
Scrog>>>Abra>>>Duddits
I'm kind of confused about this too. Is it that you wanted to get rid of the option for anyone to switch their vote to Abra and put 4 back in the runoff?
4 is too many and 2 is too less, 3 is not a crowd in Mafia round 1. 3 in the run-off is good. Personally Phi likes to 'stir the pot' and as a townie IDK what to make of that, so like I said before, Phi should always be in the runoff, but I am happy with these three, so with that in mind...
Scrog>>>Abra>>>Duddits
Im sorry, but I do not understand this vote either. It looks to me like a lateral move that makes no difference? Changing your vote from one person with 1 vote to another person with 0 votes does nothing...unless I am missing something?
This^. SFA, why would you take EAP out of the runoff? I am not asking anybody to change their vote. Weird response, last time you acted like that you were Mafia, just sayin. My vote changes nothing. It is a stab at Duddits when he reduced the runoff from 4 to 3 and voted for me. I had no votes at the time, but like I use to say "any time someone votes for me, they are Mafia!" Duddits did not have votes either. So if he is gonna give me a vote, I am going to give him a vote. That is all.
Welcome back Bonz, but I do not find it strange that your presence being requested in the Orgy thread and then you showing up, like it was the quacking Bonzai Bat Signal.
Scrog its cool. You see why I voted for you, it was a vote where it would remove Phi from the potential 4-way runoff and it didn't put anyone else in its place. I don't really find you suspicious or anything, it was simply a placeholder vote if you will. I needed to vote for someone who didn't have a vote.