Whether it's your first Bonnaroo or you’re a music festival veteran, we welcome you to Inforoo.
Here you'll find info about artists, rumors, camping tips, and the infamous Roo Clues. Have a look around then create an account and join in the fun. See you at Bonnaroo!!
I'm on my way. I got sidetracked going to my parents to take care of their sick cat while they are out of town. Pretty sure he is dieing. And I really don't know what to do.
Now I've got to run back to the shop real quick.
I agree with LLL. I think Mike just doesn't really care at this point.
Be right back.
Very sorry to hear about the cat. I had to take care of a neighbor cat like that in January. Tough situation man.
BTW, thanks. He's actually doing a little better it seems. He came upstairs and set with me at the computer. I didn't think he acted like he had energy to even do that earlier.
As to the game. I'm not really sure what to say. It's still early for me to really make any sense out of anything. At first I was thinking one of the more talkative players might be trying to lead the game. Now I'm leaning more towards it might be townies banging their heads against the wall while the mafia sit back and watch.
1 - She ran up the count after I pointed out she was running up the count. It is now so far out of whack as to be useless. Regarding editing, I hate editors, even just for grammar. I hate leaving spelling errors and grammar errors in my posts, but after reading previous games, even though it is only my 3rd game, I know this is a no no move. And the fun smoke screen was a lot of fun, but you have to admit that it makes it easier to hide in. After joking around, she could come out and say she is just having fun, just like Mike D just did. I am all for fun in the mafia thread as evident of my participation in that, but even then, it concerned me that it was going to come back and haunt me later.
2 - CSTNZ both praised you and called you a valuable townie resource. I know since he was using it against me, and I called him on it. I can go quote it if you want, but I am researched out after this afternoon and just want to go to chat. However, I will look it up if you need me to.
3 - I just apologized for it in my last post, but I get very frustrated that people don't look at the facts, and just look to you or Bacon to drive the game. If I had my way, everyone would be just as active and research as much as I do, but everyone is different and plays differently. Again, sorry if I was over the top.
4 - The point was, trust no one. I learned that the hard way with Mike D in game 46. I didn't mean it to be too literal. I am not 100% she is mafia. I have said many times in the last 3 games that the only people who can be 100% sure are the mafia and the inspector with the name they have as mafia. But as I have said before in previous games, and I am saying again now, I am very comfortable with my vote and think LLL is more likely to be mafia at this point. Again, I could be wrong, but the facts point to this being the case.
BTW, thanks. He's actually doing a little better it seems. He came upstairs and set with me at the computer. I didn't think he acted like he had energy to even do that earlier.
This is great news! Our neighbor's cat did not make it. We offered to take it to the vet for them or shoot it full of drugs (another neighbor is a doc) and they told me no, just leave it in the house. It was really sad. By the time they got home, it was dead. One of their daughters found it.
Post by LoveLuckLaughter on Apr 12, 2012 21:19:34 GMT -5
I always edit posts. every game. Always. I don't follow that fake rule. Sorry. And I always post small posts, and lots of them. I was being a smart ass and I posted 3 or 4 to disprove your claim that post counts are a way to pull out Mafia. A quiet player is always Mafia, and a loud player trying to spin is always Mafia. However, it is more about what they say. The fact is most of my posts up to that point had nothing to do with the game, and to try to use my post count at that point as evidence is asinine.
Do you think I am Inspector and that I may have your name, and you are trying to discredit me now? Interesting that you even brought up that theory at this point. Seems you are safeguarding for that possibility since I am voting for you.
Today at 7:18pm, lovelucklaughter wrote: I've read vikings post like 5 times. Makes me LOL. He sounds like he is running for President.
"I strive to only provide facts and the facts in this case speak very clearly for themselves. I strive to always be an honest person, even in this game when it seems everyone is lying."
I like playing with you and Bacon together. Makes for a fun game.
EDIT (Because I have pretty bad flight of ideas most of the time, so I do tend to post a lot of small posts, I'll try better to not flood out the thread with so many little posts.)
This is really too much thought and discussion to be going into the first round. Can we get some votes here my friends?
"This really pissed me off. I am really trying not to take personal shots, and regret the few that slipped through when I was mad earlier. I apologized to SFA last game for the personal shots then and I am sorry I made them against you earlier. Also, I could never be President due to the no no word. And please don't associate the way I play with Bacon's guess and hide method. His method does not work. Mine does. "
Why does that piss you off so much? It's funny to claim honesty in a game where being dishonest is half of the battle, at least for Mafia. So when you are Mafia, you are going to tell us straight out that you are, since you are so honest? See why that statement is so funny.
I'm not pissed that you called me nuts or crazy. I've been called it before. I am, I have 2 certifiable psych diagnosis. No biggie. I call my patients crazy all the time. If you are going to be crazy, Manic Depression is about the best crazy you can get. It's fun. Some of our most talented and intelligent humans are. No biggie.
And I'm sorry to burst your bubble, but your style of playing doesn't always work. You were wrong in the last game we played together, and if people would have listened to you, we may very well have lost the game. It's a part of playing Mafia. Sometimes we are wrong, sometimes we are right. You can't call it facts. I get hunches about peole, that's for sure. And a lot of times I'm right, and I'm also frequently wrong. Especially in the first 2 rounds or so. To claim in the first round that you have facts, or have any clue what is going on is pretty bold, because really only Mafia and Inspector have any clue to who is who in the game.
You may be Mafia, I don't know for sure, but you sure are stuck on incriminating me for sticking up for Mike D. Which looks kinda spooky. Anytime someone comes so hard line against another player in the first round, it looks pretty suspect. I'm voting for you because I think that it would be good to have you in the run-off too. I think it would be telling.
We're all a mess of paradoxes. Believing in things we know can't be true. We walk around carrying feelings too complicated and contradictory to express. But when it all becomes too big, and words aren't enough to help get it all out, there's always music.
Post by LoveLuckLaughter on Apr 12, 2012 21:32:21 GMT -5
Also, I called on SFA because he is one of the best Mafia players out there. That is a fact. If you stop trying to bolster yourself up to be gods gift to Mafia, you may someday be one of the best too. But the last few games have proven that you like to stomp around and create dust and then you grab some in your hand and throw it in other people's eyes.
We're all a mess of paradoxes. Believing in things we know can't be true. We walk around carrying feelings too complicated and contradictory to express. But when it all becomes too big, and words aren't enough to help get it all out, there's always music.
mike is this what you intended to do?? null your vote?
mike d:2 LLL:2 viking:2 bacon:1 CMP:1 bonzai:1 hakunah:1
WLViking>>>roonectar>>SFA>>>bacon>>>LLL roonectar>>>viking SFA>>>LLL>>>viking>>>LLL LLL>>>SFA>>>viking Mike D>>>mike D>>>>null bonzai>>>hakunah hakunah>>>bonzai duddits>>>bacon LD>>>>CMP bacon>>>mike d CMP>>>mike d
left to vote: mike d
Last Edit: Apr 12, 2012 21:43:18 GMT -5 by EAP - Back to Top
Post by LoveLuckLaughter on Apr 12, 2012 21:50:48 GMT -5
love you EAP.
Being Ref is a hard ass job that I would NEVER want to do EVER. You just asked for some benign advise, it doesn't seem like it mattered. It was turned into something bigger than it probably was. I've only had to bring it up to use as a defense against people calling me Mafia because they are using some things I said against me to get the attention off of them and on to me. It really isn't that big of a deal.
We're all a mess of paradoxes. Believing in things we know can't be true. We walk around carrying feelings too complicated and contradictory to express. But when it all becomes too big, and words aren't enough to help get it all out, there's always music.
We have 3 in the runnoff, I don't see any use in adding another. If votes do change or yall think we would be better off with someone else in it I may change, but to get something on record i'll go with someone with none
I always edit posts. every game. Always. I don't follow that fake rule. Sorry. And I always post small posts, and lots of them. I was being a smart ass and I posted 3 or 4 to disprove your claim that post counts are a way to pull out Mafia. A quiet player is always Mafia, and a loud player trying to spin is always Mafia. However, it is more about what they say. The fact is most of my posts up to that point had nothing to do with the game, and to try to use my post count at that point as evidence is asinine.
You may always edit posts, (you do, I checked), but you have never been this far in front on post count. Again, by themselves, minor ticks that bother me, but taken together, it is two ticks. And I have had much more to say about your content than the number of your posts. I agree with the loud / quiet theory, which is why I want a runoff. I would like to see where the votes stack up behind you. I continue to want to have a runoff.
I also got harassed by EAP and CSTNZ last game for running a full on statistical analysis on how Phi chose names. I have already stated I will look at every piece of raw data I can get my hands on. Yes, it can lead to incorrect assumptions, but to say that looking at data is asinine is the same thing they told me last game. You are saying that looking at HARD FACTS and drawing a conclusion is wrong and that instead, we should just listen to your assumptions? That's why the townies lost so many games in a row.
Do you think I am Inspector and that I may have your name, and you are trying to discredit me now? Interesting that you even brought up that theory at this point. Seems you are safeguarding for that possibility since I am voting for you.
I have been pretty clear that I think you are mafia. Both of the last 2 games I played, I have warned everyone to watch out for a fake inspector. After reading Mike D's post, it seemed like the next logical move for you, so yes, I am safeguarding myself. I did it in game 46 as well. Maybe if someone had said something about EAP in that same game, you would not have had the trouble you had then either. I find it interesting that you find this interesting.
Why does that piss you off so much? It's funny to claim honesty in a game where being dishonest is half of the battle, at least for Mafia. So when you are Mafia, you are going to tell us straight out that you are, since you are so honest? See why that statement is so funny.
I'm not pissed that you called me nuts or crazy. I've been called it before. I am, I have 2 certifiable psych diagnosis. No biggie. I call my patients crazy all the time. If you are going to be crazy, Manic Depression is about the best crazy you can get. It's fun. Some of our most talented and intelligent humans are. No biggie.
I am pissed because everyone takes shots at how I play and I am getting really sick of it! If and when I get to be mafia, I plan on being the best mafiosa I can without all the lying and deceit. I know that that sounds weird to you, since you feel this game is all about lying, but real mafiosas have a code of honor. Until that time, I am going to do the best I possibly can to help the townies keep winning.
And I'm sorry to burst your bubble, but your style of playing doesn't always work. You were wrong in the last game we played together, and if people would have listened to you, we may very well have lost the game. It's a part of playing Mafia. Sometimes we are wrong, sometimes we are right. You can't call it facts. I get hunches about peole, that's for sure. And a lot of times I'm right, and I'm also frequently wrong. Especially in the first 2 rounds or so. To claim in the first round that you have facts, or have any clue what is going on is pretty bold, because really only Mafia and Inspector have any clue to who is who in the game.
You may be Mafia, I don't know for sure, but you sure are stuck on incriminating me for sticking up for Mike D. Which looks kinda spooky. Anytime someone comes so hard line against another player in the first round, it looks pretty suspect. I'm voting for you because I think that it would be good to have you in the run-off too. I think it would be telling.
Also, I called on SFA because he is one of the best Mafia players out there. That is a fact. If you stop trying to bolster yourself up to be gods gift to Mafia, you may someday be one of the best too. But the last few games have proven that you like to stomp around and create dust and then you grab some in your hand and throw it in other people's eyes.
I have never said I am god's gift to mafia, and I have repeatedly said I am wrong in my early assumptions. Please stop twisting what I say and putting words in my mouth. The way I play makes people uncomfortable. I DO kick up a lot of dirt. I do stomp around and kick over rocks. Ultimately though, I don't have the power to vote for all the other players. They make decisions for themselves. The nice thing about the way I play though, is that by turning over rocks and kicking up dirt, even if I am wrong, I can count on the rest of the townies looking at things from a distanced perspective and sorting out the additional information that results from it. It only feels like I come at you hard because instead of dodging voting patterns and opinions, you actually have to work against data, which is typically a lot harder.
I learned a lot in my first 2 games and if townies had listened, we would have gone 1,2,3 again. I am not god's gift to this game, but I take it very very seriously, and get pretty pissed when people say shit about how I play. I think 5 for 7 on voting is pretty good in 2 games. As is being on 2 townie winning teams (and soon to be 3) in a row. And I never ever throw dirt in peoples eyes. If anything, I do research and turn over rocks to open them. My question for you is why you are so dead set on me?
You have come at me hard for no reason, belittled me and the way play. Insulted both the way I write and my intelligence and no one has stopped to ask why. Maybe people are ok with that type of abuse to me because I don't have ovaries, but all you have done is insult me and offer up lies about me twisting facts and bending the truth.
Post by LoveLuckLaughter on Apr 12, 2012 22:12:06 GMT -5
Umm I'm not on a computer that is allowing me to do so without it taking 5 minutes to load. Since you have done so much research, you will note that I have had to do this in the past. However, I the other 99% of the time I do.
We're all a mess of paradoxes. Believing in things we know can't be true. We walk around carrying feelings too complicated and contradictory to express. But when it all becomes too big, and words aren't enough to help get it all out, there's always music.
We're all a mess of paradoxes. Believing in things we know can't be true. We walk around carrying feelings too complicated and contradictory to express. But when it all becomes too big, and words aren't enough to help get it all out, there's always music.
We're all a mess of paradoxes. Believing in things we know can't be true. We walk around carrying feelings too complicated and contradictory to express. But when it all becomes too big, and words aren't enough to help get it all out, there's always music.
We're all a mess of paradoxes. Believing in things we know can't be true. We walk around carrying feelings too complicated and contradictory to express. But when it all becomes too big, and words aren't enough to help get it all out, there's always music.
We're all a mess of paradoxes. Believing in things we know can't be true. We walk around carrying feelings too complicated and contradictory to express. But when it all becomes too big, and words aren't enough to help get it all out, there's always music.
Post by LoveLuckLaughter on Apr 12, 2012 22:18:57 GMT -5
And note that, although I will point out your playing because it is related to the game, and it is WHAT EVERYONE INCLUDING YOURSELF DOES. I will never call you crazy or nuts or anything like that. that was BEYOND inappropirate and rude and far more than this came calls for. If anyone should be pissed it is me. And I am not. Because I am playing a game in the way that I have learned in my games flushes out Mafia.
We're all a mess of paradoxes. Believing in things we know can't be true. We walk around carrying feelings too complicated and contradictory to express. But when it all becomes too big, and words aren't enough to help get it all out, there's always music.
I give up on you. I ask for answers, and all I get are accusations back.
I am walking away for a few hours. To the other townies, I have said my piece and posted what I could find. You all have to make your own call based on who you would like to be in the runoff. Yes I would still like a runoff. I think voting patterns are important in later rounds. I believe LLL is a mafia member, but still would like to pressure test that assumption. Looking forward to hearing what everyone has to say.
Post by LoveLuckLaughter on Apr 12, 2012 22:23:36 GMT -5
Sorry, I just saw accusations and shots at my own playing style. If you have specific questions, do ask, I'd be more than happy to answer. I just don't see any in your posts.
The main reason I said anything about your playing style is because you dogged Bacon's style, and mine, and bragged about your own. Just trying to make you more self-aware. I can't tell if your claims are part of your method of playing, or if you really feel like you are so great at all of this, and the rest of us are so bad. Cause that is how your posts come across.
We're all a mess of paradoxes. Believing in things we know can't be true. We walk around carrying feelings too complicated and contradictory to express. But when it all becomes too big, and words aren't enough to help get it all out, there's always music.
Post by LoveLuckLaughter on Apr 12, 2012 22:27:59 GMT -5
"I am pissed because everyone takes shots at how I play and I am getting really sick of it! If and when I get to be mafia, I plan on being the best mafiosa I can without all the lying and deceit. I know that that sounds weird to you, since you feel this game is all about lying, but real mafiosas have a code of honor. Until that time, I am going to do the best I possibly can to help the townies keep winning"
Ok, well this makes this easy. Viking, are you a Mafia member this game?
We're all a mess of paradoxes. Believing in things we know can't be true. We walk around carrying feelings too complicated and contradictory to express. But when it all becomes too big, and words aren't enough to help get it all out, there's always music.
Post by LoveLuckLaughter on Apr 12, 2012 23:17:39 GMT -5
Just an FYI from the last game I played, since Viking has such a hard on over the post counts I have. This is, unfortunately for you guys, how I play. In this last game I was a Townie as well. (Inspector)
Thread Posters Total Posts: 939 User # of Posts lovelucklaughter 176 Phi 136 WLViking 129 fawnmart 113 nicthedick85 95 Superfurryanimal 57 CSTNZ 53 EAP 48 RDK 45 Mike D 37 surfbumdj 16 abrakapokus 11 Dave Maynar 7 popsicle sarah 6 baconus66 2 CMPMGCTRCKS 2 quacker 2 Lowerdeck 1 Mr. Forward 1 Duddits 1 roonectar 1
We're all a mess of paradoxes. Believing in things we know can't be true. We walk around carrying feelings too complicated and contradictory to express. But when it all becomes too big, and words aren't enough to help get it all out, there's always music.
1 - She ran up the count after I pointed out she was running up the count. It is now so far out of whack as to be useless. Regarding editing, I hate editors, even just for grammar. I hate leaving spelling errors and grammar errors in my posts, but after reading previous games, even though it is only my 3rd game, I know this is a no no move. And the fun smoke screen was a lot of fun, but you have to admit that it makes it easier to hide in. After joking around, she could come out and say she is just having fun, just like Mike D just did. I am all for fun in the mafia thread as evident of my participation in that, but even then, it concerned me that it was going to come back and haunt me later.
The post count is fairly useless without some context within the game. It really weird to be so concerned about her making it so "out of whack as to be useless." It's the first round.
Being dyslexia I've been known to edit my posts to make them more readable because people could actually misunderstand everything I've said if I didn't. The last person to bring it up to me was EAP last game and she was mafia. It's really not hard evidence of anything. Just one of those things that's usually used against someone when they are trying to paint someone as guilty. Not saying that's what your doing. But that's how I normally read it. Besides when Jham use to say it to me and that was sort of a running joking between the two of us.
She told the mods she was just fucking around at the top of the second page and she told Bacon the same thing on down the page, so I'm not sure what you are getting at. Also, the smoke screen thing could apply to you or I as well. Not sure why it makes her stick out more or how you figure it makes her easier to hide. She's sticking out like a sore thumb right now.
2 - CSTNZ both praised you and called you a valuable townie resource. I know since he was using it against me, and I called him on it. I can go quote it if you want, but I am researched out after this afternoon and just want to go to chat. However, I will look it up if you need me to.
Why would I need you to look it up? I remember everything he said and I was aware of his possible angle during the whole game. I just happened to put more weight in his early exchanges with EAP then others did. My point was that he didn't ask my opinion in the way you are saying people do. Angela calmed me level headed because aside from the occasionally hissy fit I am a very level headed player who tries to look at every side. See me questioning if EAP was guilty last game. I always play like that until there is more actual proof.
3 - I just apologized for it in my last post, but I get very frustrated that people don't look at the facts, and just look to you or Bacon to drive the game. If I had my way, everyone would be just as active and research as much as I do, but everyone is different and plays differently. Again, sorry if I was over the top.
No need to apologize. It didn't offend me. I just don't think it is necessarily true. I certainly don't feel like I drive the games. In fact, the people saying Bacon was driving the last game were the mafia members. And EAP was the one saying it about me the game before that. They weren't necessarily being truthful you know.
I don't know. It just seems like you are trying a little hard to discredit Bacon and I. It's sort of weird.
4 - The point was, trust no one. I learned that the hard way with Mike D in game 46. I didn't mean it to be too literal. I am not 100% she is mafia. I have said many times in the last 3 games that the only people who can be 100% sure are the mafia and the inspector with the name they have as mafia. But as I have said before in previous games, and I am saying again now, I am very comfortable with my vote and think LLL is more likely to be mafia at this point. Again, I could be wrong, but the facts point to this being the case.
I don't think there is a single fact on anyone at this point in the game. I also I think you are more then likely wrong base on your case against her so far.
Sorry I've been at school working on a presentation for a while, took a while to catch up on reading and then of course inforoo does a 30 min backup right when I finish reading.
I think Mike D explained himself well enough for me. I'm not feeling he is guilty.
I hate trying to vote when half of the players have said almost nothing at all
I really think that 1 and very likely 2 of the mafia are hiding in this group. Please people post and explain why you are so quiet and why you are voting the way you are voting.
Sorry I've been at school working on a presentation for a while, took a while to catch up on reading and then of course inforoo does a 30 min backup right when I finish reading.
I think Mike D explained himself well enough for me. I'm not feeling he is guilty.
I hate trying to vote when half of the players have said almost nothing at all
I really think that 1 and very likely 2 of the mafia are hiding in this group. Please people post and explain why you are so quiet and why you are voting the way you are voting.
For now I'm going null
Baconus66>>>null
I really agree with this approach.
I think it's dangerous to allow a runoff based off the input of basically the people involved in it. Plus one or two others. It's far to likely the mafia are happy with the possible runoff.
Sorry I've been at school working on a presentation for a while, took a while to catch up on reading and then of course inforoo does a 30 min backup right when I finish reading.
I think Mike D explained himself well enough for me. I'm not feeling he is guilty.
I hate trying to vote when half of the players have said almost nothing at all
I really think that 1 and very likely 2 of the mafia are hiding in this group. Please people post and explain why you are so quiet and why you are voting the way you are voting.
For now I'm going null
Baconus66>>>null
What would you guys like me to say?!? Fuckin A. Its the first round, I voted for someone who had no votes, yet as we creep towards the first run-off i still have not ONE vote for myself. Either the townies don't think I'm a threat, or the Mafia don't think I'm a threat, and either my vote right now is for a Townie, or its for Mafia and they are trying to play it cool.
Bacon I don't think you are Mafia more than I think anyone else is Mafia this game thus far. Its the fuckin first round, and as a Townie (both first Mafia 48 and then now this Mafia 48) I don't know what else I'm supposed to say.
Oh please for love of God don't start poop like this again. If you didn't want to play you shouldn't have signed up. Suck it up and don't ruin the game for the rest of us please
I find it very interesting the way LLL is getting dogged about this. She was clearly referring to her state of mind when the game started. Why is that so hard for you guys to figure out? She never said she was given up on THIS game. She was referring to the disappointment of the original one being stopped and her lack of motivation at the beginning of this one.
She, also, mostly used it to explain her thought process on Mike D's self-vote. You guys are the ones misunderstanding what she was saying and it's pretty freaking fishy that three players have now brought it up that misrepresented her original point.
Even Mike D, who she was defending, brought it up. You don't find anything strange about that Bacon? Or the fact that Viking feels the need to try to discredit you and I? Especially when he is saying things about going off of "facts" when their really aren't any at this point and most of the things he brought up in his last response to me were actually things mafia members in the last two games were were saying. I'm not saying he is guilty but I am saying that it's really suspicious and odd.