Whether it's your first Bonnaroo or you’re a music festival veteran, we welcome you to Inforoo.
Here you'll find info about artists, rumors, camping tips, and the infamous Roo Clues. Have a look around then create an account and join in the fun. See you at Bonnaroo!!
Post by LoveLuckLaughter on Jun 22, 2012 23:44:25 GMT -5
It might have been, at which point I'd say he and Kdogg were working together and distancing themselves from one another with the Viking vs Kdogg thing. But geez Viking took it pretty far involving a mod in all of that, but hell I wouldn't but it past Viking. He's treats Mafia like it is his last shot at the Olympics, so he may have hatched a plan that far out.
Also. Bacon and EAP, what gives? You two are like bosom buddies here. I can't tell if you two are working together, or one of you is Mafia trying to butter up the other (in which case it would be Bacon buttering up EAP I'd imagine). MMMMmmm Bacon wrapped EAP. Yum.
We're all a mess of paradoxes. Believing in things we know can't be true. We walk around carrying feelings too complicated and contradictory to express. But when it all becomes too big, and words aren't enough to help get it all out, there's always music.
We're all a mess of paradoxes. Believing in things we know can't be true. We walk around carrying feelings too complicated and contradictory to express. But when it all becomes too big, and words aren't enough to help get it all out, there's always music.
It might have been, at which point I'd say he and Kdogg were working together and distancing themselves from one another with the Viking vs Kdogg thing. But geez Viking took it pretty far involving a mod in all of that, but hell I wouldn't but it past Viking. He's treats Mafia like it is his last shot at the Olympics, so he may have hatched a plan that far out.
I don't know. I think if Viking was mafia you could make a case for several other players to make posts distancing themselves.
Last Edit: Jun 23, 2012 0:29:51 GMT -5 by Deleted - Back to Top
Post by LoveLuckLaughter on Jun 23, 2012 0:44:41 GMT -5
So one of our whacked players voted for EAP, and then states that she was perturbed at the way the 3 person run-off turned out, saying that she would have liked to have seen EAP in it.
The second whacked player voted for and pushed hard for Bacon to be in the next run-off. He said that he was fine with the Kdogg-Bacon-LLL runoff.
If we assume that one of these two players was our inspector, we should probably go with Bacon or EAP.
We're all a mess of paradoxes. Believing in things we know can't be true. We walk around carrying feelings too complicated and contradictory to express. But when it all becomes too big, and words aren't enough to help get it all out, there's always music.
I think she is talking about how you guys always tend to post after each other. It is sort of weird how often it happens.
i really think this has happened b/c we are both in chat so much. i check inforoo constantly during chat, and i know he does too. we probably just noticed each other's posts more that way. i dunno.
i promise you i'm not in cahoots with him, or i wouldn't have kept him in the runoff last time.
LLL, if i was mafia, why would i whack NBF when i was the only player she really talked about?? hopefully i'd have more sense than that.
We're all a mess of paradoxes. Believing in things we know can't be true. We walk around carrying feelings too complicated and contradictory to express. But when it all becomes too big, and words aren't enough to help get it all out, there's always music.
i really think this has happened b/c we are both in chat so much. i check inforoo constantly during chat, and i know he does too. we probably just noticed each other's posts more that way. i dunno.
I'm usually in there with you guys, so I know that's probably why it happens. Was just pointing it out. Plus, it would be a pretty noob mafia move for two players to do that.
i promise you i'm not in cahoots with him, or i wouldn't have kept him in the runoff last time.
I don't really think the vote history shows any way the two of you could be working togeather. I was thinking more like one might be mirroring the other. No what I mean?
Edit: Messed up the code somehow. That's atleast readable.
Last Edit: Jun 23, 2012 0:54:44 GMT -5 by Deleted - Back to Top
Post by LoveLuckLaughter on Jun 23, 2012 1:19:22 GMT -5
So looking at the voting patterns as to who votes for each other in safe times, but alike when it counts the most, I can line up Nic, Quacker and Mike D (First round Quacker and Mike D vote for each other but end up with Viking, and Nic votes Viking. Second round Nic votes for Mike D but ends up on Kdogg, Quacker votes for Kdogg. Third Round Mike D votes Nic but then changes to EAP, Quacker votes Mike D then EAP, Nic votes EAP)
Or Kdogg and Bacon (First round voted for each other early on, but then aligned for Viking, started out with votes for SFA/EAP and then aligned to me).
We're all a mess of paradoxes. Believing in things we know can't be true. We walk around carrying feelings too complicated and contradictory to express. But when it all becomes too big, and words aren't enough to help get it all out, there's always music.
Post by LoveLuckLaughter on Jun 23, 2012 1:30:21 GMT -5
And now EAP and Bacon's banter really catches my eye as well, because they too vote each other but then seem to switch off when it counts (First round they had an important part in putting Viking and Me in runoff, Bacon second round voted EAP and then me. EAP kept her Bacon vote. Now in 3rd round she jumpted from Bacon to Mike D, Bacon voted for Mike D as well) If they were working with Kdogg, EAP knew she could keep her Bacon vote as long as they did because they knew Kdogg was going to step out.
So the two groups of three I have come up with are
We're all a mess of paradoxes. Believing in things we know can't be true. We walk around carrying feelings too complicated and contradictory to express. But when it all becomes too big, and words aren't enough to help get it all out, there's always music.
We're all a mess of paradoxes. Believing in things we know can't be true. We walk around carrying feelings too complicated and contradictory to express. But when it all becomes too big, and words aren't enough to help get it all out, there's always music.
Post by LoveLuckLaughter on Jun 23, 2012 1:35:10 GMT -5
So everyone but me is Mafia, basically.
but really, I'm trying just trying to find associations of people who vote for each other to distance (when it doesn't count) and then align when it does.
We're all a mess of paradoxes. Believing in things we know can't be true. We walk around carrying feelings too complicated and contradictory to express. But when it all becomes too big, and words aren't enough to help get it all out, there's always music.
We're all a mess of paradoxes. Believing in things we know can't be true. We walk around carrying feelings too complicated and contradictory to express. But when it all becomes too big, and words aren't enough to help get it all out, there's always music.
We're all a mess of paradoxes. Believing in things we know can't be true. We walk around carrying feelings too complicated and contradictory to express. But when it all becomes too big, and words aren't enough to help get it all out, there's always music.
Mike D >> Nic >> EAP Nic >> EAP EAP >> Nic >> Bacon >> Null >> Mike D Quacker >> Mike D >> EAP SFA >> Bacon >> Null Bacon >> Quacker >> Mike D LLL >> Bacon
Well all I can do is change my vote to somebody who has none now to force a runoff. Will that be helpful to us? One would think that it would be better than a straight vote off on EAP. Thoughts anyone?
Mike D >> Nic >> EAP Nic >> EAP EAP >> Nic >> Bacon >> Null >> Mike D Quacker >> Mike D >> EAP SFA >> Bacon >> Null Bacon >> Quacker >> Mike D LLL >> Bacon
I think Fawn got this wrong. This is correct, isn't it? Day 3 tally:
EAP - 3 bacon - 1 Mike D - 2
Mike D >> Nic >> EAP Nic >> EAP EAP >> Nic >> Bacon >> Null >> Mike D Quacker >> Mike D >> EAP SFA >> Bacon >> Null Bacon >> Quacker >> Mike D LLL >> Bacon
I don't know. I think LLL is probably right with it being a mix of those two groups. My Mike vote is more just to protect from the possiblity of their being 3 mafia left. He's one of the only ones that has flew under the radar enoghe to be part of that hypothtical group. At least that's how it seems.
Count was correct - list was incorrect - put SFA's vote for Bacon back on the list.
Day 3 tally:
EAP - 3 bacon - 2 Mike D - 2
Mike D >> Nic >> EAP Nic >> EAP EAP >> Nic >> Bacon >> Null >> Mike D Quacker >> Mike D >> EAP SFA >> Bacon >> Null >> Bacon Bacon >> Quacker >> Mike D LLL >> Bacon
Mike D >> Nic >> EAP Nic >> EAP EAP >> Nic >> Bacon >> Null >> Mike D Quacker >> Mike D >> EAP SFA >> Bacon >> Null >> Bacon >> Mike D Bacon >> Quacker >> Mike D LLL >> Bacon
Mike had posted that he would probably have little to no communication this weekend. Unless we hear from Mike, we will not be moving to a runoff until Monday. Have to follow the weekend rule since we have all been told he is not around.
We're all a mess of paradoxes. Believing in things we know can't be true. We walk around carrying feelings too complicated and contradictory to express. But when it all becomes too big, and words aren't enough to help get it all out, there's always music.
