Whether it's your first Bonnaroo or you’re a music festival veteran, we welcome you to Inforoo.
Here you'll find info about artists, rumors, camping tips, and the infamous Roo Clues. Have a look around then create an account and join in the fun. See you at Bonnaroo!!
I see what you were trying to do, but people posted after you, which is why I did not get it. You are either lying or you were not paying attention, and have caused a huge issue for no good reason.
I see what you were trying to do, but people posted after you, which is why I did not get it. You are either lying or you were not paying attention, and have caused a huge issue for no good reason.
its only a "huge issue" because the mafia are making it one to frame a townie.
so it makes sense since it creates a polarizing gameplay for the mafia.
I am still haven't fully let it go, but I am switching off of Phi. There are a few others talking about his move, if yall want him in the runoff you can vote for him.
Phi - 1 Roo - 1 Mike D - 1 JimmyRoo - 1 Hakunna - 1 Kiko - 1 MC - 1
Votes:
Phi >>> Mike D >>> MC >> Mike D >> Viking Mike D >>> NoAge >> Phi >> MC Roonectar >> Viking SFA >>> LD Viking >>> Roonectar >> SFA >> Roonectar Kiko >>> LD NoAge >> Mike D Hakunna >> JimmyRoo MC >> Phi JimmyRoo >> Hakunna LD >> Kiko
Left to Vote:
Still a lot of chat and movement. We will move to a runoff or vote off at 10:30 pm EDT tonight.
Really guys? LD and Viking in the first runoff? This is like mafia gold (more then likely). As I said last time I played, I'm starting to come around on my stance again more people in the earlier runoffs. Just walked in the door a little bit ago. Going to read over and might switch my vote if noone else is willing to add an additional person or two.
you do realize I didnt stack against LD right? how would I be able to predict who was going to post after me?
like i said earlier, and you obviously didnt read, the plan was for kiko to vote for me, then id delete my post and tell kiko he'd have to vote for himself.
No, I read your post, but LD posted while the placeholder was up. Kiko stacked, but you have to admit that LD is a usual target due to how he plays.
All I have to do in a Mafia game is say hello and I already got two votes. I think I got a vote at Brunch for the game after it.
Same. It is really rediculous. This will be the 6th time in a row. I am really trying to bite my tongue at this point after what happened last game, bilut I find it interesting that the people in the original runoff who voted for each other each get out of it.
Ok, so I am home again. As I said in my post on the way, this seems like the perfect scenario for the mafia with both LD and I in the runoff. In fact, right now, the runoff is ONLY LD and I. LD has done nothing more than post after Phi after Kiko's post, and really has been very un-LD like this game. As he said, all he has to do is say hello. With regards to me, as soon as I offer an opinion, it seems like I am tossed in. I did not vote for Phi, but he obviously was pissed enough at me pointing out he has done this before to vote for me. Noage, in response to this:
To be fair to Phi, if he is mafia he is taking a huge (rather unnecessary) risk by coming out so strong this early in the game.
I absolutely agreed if you look back to page one, and in fact defended him. However, after scratching the surface a bit this afternoon, he lied about deleting his post in Mafia 42, and at this point, I think he may be lying here. Look at it this way. No one is posting in the first 24 hours, so he puts that up after Kiko posts. If an unassuming player posts, he does what he says he was going to do, and has his own personal laugh, and says it is suspicious. But LD posts, and he thinks he can slip one in and get a stack on LD. But, despite not posting, many of the players are monitoring and he gets called out on it.
The part that rubs me funny was it took people calling him out for him to respond. He never came out and said "Hey guys, it was a joke". It only became a joke after people said Phi, what were you doing.
The nail in the coffin for me was his explanation earlier today saying he tricked LD into a stack. I just ask him to explain this and mention his previous deletion, and he calls me a liar. I point out where he previously deletes and he switches to me.
At this point, I feel comfortable voting for Phi. I may be wrong, and initially, I was going to give him the benefit of the doubt, but I am sick people voting for me for the way I play, and I think there is a better than 50% chance he may be mafia. As for Phi's last note before he got taken out of the runoff (which was when he went silent):
I see what you were trying to do, but people posted after you, which is why I did not get it. You are either lying or you were not paying attention, and have caused a huge issue for no good reason.
its only a "huge issue" because the mafia are making it one to frame a townie.
so it makes sense since it creates a polarizing gameplay for the mafia.
Phi, the majority of people are confused by what you did. You know mafia is a detail game, and yet you do this maneuver. It is not polarizing gameplay. All it does is muddy the waters if you are a townie.
Therefore,
WLViking >>> Phi
I am voting for him to return it to a 3 person runoff. If others want to chime in, I am open to opinions.
Ok, so I am home again. As I said in my post on the way, this seems like the perfect scenario for the mafia with both LD and I in the runoff. In fact, right now, the runoff is ONLY LD and I. LD has done nothing more than post after Phi after Kiko's post, and really has been very un-LD like this game. As he said, all he has to do is say hello. With regards to me, as soon as I offer an opinion, it seems like I am tossed in. I did not vote for Phi, but he obviously was pissed enough at me pointing out he has done this before to vote for me. Noage, in response to this:
To be fair to Phi, if he is mafia he is taking a huge (rather unnecessary) risk by coming out so strong this early in the game.
I absolutely agreed if you look back to page one, and in fact defended him. However, after scratching the surface a bit this afternoon, he lied about deleting his post in Mafia 42, and at this point, I think he may be lying here. Look at it this way. No one is posting in the first 24 hours, so he puts that up after Kiko posts. If an unassuming player posts, he does what he says he was going to do, and has his own personal laugh, and says it is suspicious. But LD posts, and he thinks he can slip one in and get a stack on LD. But, despite not posting, many of the players are monitoring and he gets called out on it.
The part that rubs me funny was it took people calling him out for him to respond. He never came out and said "Hey guys, it was a joke". It only became a joke after people said Phi, what were you doing.
The nail in the coffin for me was his explanation earlier today saying he tricked LD into a stack. I just ask him to explain this and mention his previous deletion, and he calls me a liar. I point out where he previously deletes and he switches to me.
At this point, I feel comfortable voting for Phi. I may be wrong, and initially, I was going to give him the benefit of the doubt, but I am sick people voting for me for the way I play, and I think there is a better than 50% chance he may be mafia. As for Phi's last note before he got taken out of the runoff (which was when he went silent):
its only a "huge issue" because the mafia are making it one to frame a townie.
so it makes sense since it creates a polarizing gameplay for the mafia.
Phi, the majority of people are confused by what you did. You know mafia is a detail game, and yet you do this maneuver. It is not polarizing gameplay. All it does is muddy the waters if you are a townie.
Therefore,
WLViking >>> Phi
I am voting for him to return it to a 3 person runoff. If others want to chime in, I am open to opinions. [/quote]
tl;dr
you've been wrong about me everytime we've played this game together, and you're wrong about me again.
you're the only person who seems "confused" or "has an issue" with me deleting my post on page 1. everyone else seems to get it, but you. but instead your determined to convince everyone that I am mafia because of it.
this obviously makes you look like the guilty one. i will be keeping my vote on you and hope you go in the runoff cause im more certain of you being mafia than anyone else so far in this game.
Post by kikosanchez on Aug 15, 2012 21:27:35 GMT -5
Well, as my current vote is completely arbitrary and I've been up for changing it assuming LD gave me no reason to keep my vote, it's that time. I've had a few people I've been skeptical of, based on those that are making a mountain out of a mole hill, which seems like a way to rally against someone. I'm completely in agreement with Phi on this point and I don't mind stating I think he has the right thinking. Two people caught my attention from the beginning and I'm going with the one on the cutting board.
It's a vote with no value used to prolong the game when you want to make sure everyone has a chance to look at the game and think things over, etc.
It basically means that I plan on voting later but don't feel comfortable with the way things are. It's kind of like a filibuster but without a GOP assclown behind it.
Either Kiko is a newb being a newb or he has a mafia member coaching him to act this way.
Yup, mafia would definitely throw in a blatantly last second vote and do something other than VP... Your logic is rotten, sir.
I don't personally see a mafia angle behind it either. If you will look I've already argued that the two people in the runoff contention at the time were probably innocent.
I gave two possible reason, that's far from drawing a logical conclusion. I still don't understand the move.
:format(jpeg):mode_rgb():quality(40)/discogs-images/R-1417367-1217939740.jpeg.jpg)
