Whether it's your first Bonnaroo or you’re a music festival veteran, we welcome you to Inforoo.
Here you'll find info about artists, rumors, camping tips, and the infamous Roo Clues. Have a look around then create an account and join in the fun. See you at Bonnaroo!!
Ya I see what you are saying bacon. I also think the deeper we get into this, the people involved in the runoff will start switching for preservation and it's really going to convolute things.
Hakuna >> jfg
Basically right now 2 of cariniss jfg's votes are from the other people runoff and that isn't sitting well with me, not a ton but enough to tip the scale.
Fixed your post.
Tejas. 6(Hakuna, Carini, Mike D, Jimmy, Jazmo, Sleepy)
Ya I see what you are saying bacon. I also think the deeper we get into this, the people involved in the runoff will start switching for preservation and it's really going to convolute things.
Hakuna >> jfg
Basically right now 2 of cariniss jfg's votes are from the other people runoff and that isn't sitting well with me, not a ton but enough to tip the scale.
Fixed your post.
Tejas. 6(Hakuna, Carini, Mike D, Jimmy, Jazmo, Sleepy)
Hakuna said carini was number two on his suspicious list, behind surfbum. Then, rather than force a pointless re-run-off between myself, carini, and surf, he voted for me, with the offered logic that it was hinky-looking that two voters for carini also voted for tejas's elimination.
I was merely pointing out the same applied to me - hakuna and carini both voted for tejas.
At this point point a second run-off is a waste of time in my mind, especially since the two people I would most like to see in the run-off are JFG and Surf. If Hakunah was to vote for Surf and Jazmo null his vote the result would be JFG and Surf voting for eachother and Jazmo decided the kill. I'm never fan of creating situations where one person has the deciding vote.
Can you please explain why you're so interested in me being in a 2 person runoff?
If I get voted dead, I'm not too worried about it because it will hopefully show patterns to the townies and I won't have gotten killed off for no reason. But your pushing for me is bothersome to me because I'm a townie and when someone comes at me relentlessly and hard it makes me think they're mafia.
Couple that with the fact that you were pushing for less information via a 2 way instead of a 3 way realllllly makes me think you are working against the town.
I'm sure you'll keep you're vote on me and that is fine, but I'm coming for you after this round unless your purpose for putting me on the block with this much fervor makes sense to me.
For that matter, can anyone give one solid reason why I'd be voted out? Real stuff, not a feeling.
Ya I see what you are saying bacon. I also think the deeper we get into this, the people involved in the runoff will start switching for preservation and it's really going to convolute things.
Hakuna >> jfg
Basically right now 2 of cariniss jfg's votes are from the other people runoff and that isn't sitting well with me, not a ton but enough to tip the scale.
Fixed your post.
Tejas. 6(Hakuna, Carini, Mike D, Jimmy, Jazmo, Sleepy)
At this point point a second run-off is a waste of time in my mind, especially since the two people I would most like to see in the run-off are JFG and Surf. If Hakunah was to vote for Surf and Jazmo null his vote the result would be JFG and Surf voting for eachother and Jazmo decided the kill. I'm never fan of creating situations where one person has the deciding vote.
Can you please explain why you're so interested in me being in a 2 person runoff?
If I get voted dead, I'm not too worried about it because it will hopefully show patterns to the townies and I won't have gotten killed off for no reason. But your pushing for me is bothersome to me because I'm a townie and when someone comes at me relentlessly and hard it makes me think they're mafia.
Couple that with the fact that you were pushing for less information via a 2 way instead of a 3 way realllllly makes me think you are working against the town.
I'm sure you'll keep you're vote on me and that is fine, but I'm coming for you after this round unless your purpose for putting me on the block with this much fervor makes sense to me.
For that matter, can anyone give one solid reason why I'd be voted out? Real stuff, not a feeling.
Nope, no one has real solid stuff at this point in the game, except maybe the inspector. That's the way it goes. And really do you think we have gotten any information for this run-off? I maintain this would of been way more useful as a 2 way run-off than it is now. There are no obvious connections between players that I am seeing right now.
Jfg - If you're trying to make a defense for yourself, it's not doing anything but confusing the heck out of things.
I realize in hindsight my screwing with his quote was a mistake that confused people unnecessarily.
Can people really not follow what I said?
June 27, at 10.17am, hakuna voted for surfbum, saying there was a near zero chance (in his opinion) that I was mafia, and that carini was second most likely to get his vote behind surf.
Twenty four hours later he casts his vote for me, citing that he was on the fence, but what pushed him to vote the way he did was that two of the voters gunning for carini also among the group of voters responsible for tejas' exit.
Does that sound like a good reason, regardless of the fact that I also have two looking to take me out that also voted for tejas?
If none of that makes sense (gameplay-wise) or is a flat-out inaccurate recap of things - what was your motivation, hakuna?
(Some of you bugging me to speak up probs regret it now)
Also I could be trying much harder to get you voted out right now surfbum, but it would be through a second run-off with two canceling self-preservation votes and one person having the deciding vote and I don't think that helps anyone.
Jfg - If you're trying to make a defense for yourself, it's not doing anything but confusing the heck out of things.
I realize in hindsight my screwing with his quote was a mistake that confused people unnecessarily.
Can people really not follow what I said?
June 27, at 10.17am, hakuna voted for surfbum, saying there was a near zero chance (in his opinion) that I was mafia, and that carini was second most likely to get his vote behind surf.
Twenty four hours later he casts his vote for me, citing that he was on the fence, but what pushed him to vote the way he did was that two of the voters gunning for carini also among the group of voters responsible for tejas' exit.
Does that sound like a good reason, regardless of the fact that I also have two looking to take me out that also voted for tejas?
If none of that makes sense (gameplay-wise) or is a flat-out inaccurate recap of things - what was your motivation, hakuna?
(Some of you bugging me to speak up probs regret it now)
I get what you are saying here but that has absolutely nothing to do with the Hakuna quote you changed.
Jfg - If you're trying to make a defense for yourself, it's not doing anything but confusing the heck out of things.
I realize in hindsight my screwing with his quote was a mistake that confused people unnecessarily.
Can people really not follow what I said?
June 27, at 10.17am, hakuna voted for surfbum, saying there was a near zero chance (in his opinion) that I was mafia, and that carini was second most likely to get his vote behind surf.
Twenty four hours later he casts his vote for me, citing that he was on the fence, but what pushed him to vote the way he did was that two of the voters gunning for carini also among the group of voters responsible for tejas' exit.
Does that sound like a good reason, regardless of the fact that I also have two looking to take me out that also voted for tejas?
If none of that makes sense (gameplay-wise) or is a flat-out inaccurate recap of things - what was your motivation, hakuna?
(Some of you bugging me to speak up probs regret it now)
When did I say any of this had anything to to with Tejas or anyone that voted for him??
Ya I see what you are saying bacon. I also think the deeper we get into this, the people involved in the runoff will start switching for preservation and it's really going to convolute things.
Hakuna >> jfg
Basically right now 2 of cariniss votes are from the other people runoff and that isn't sitting well with me, not a ton but enough to tip the scale.
Hakuna, can you further explain why two of carini's votes coming from people in the other runoff makes you want to vote for jfg?
Jfg-what is your angle falsifying hakuna's post and bringing up the Tejas voters?
As I said in an earlier post, I regret doing that to illustrate me point. I understand that it could be construed as a way to mislead. Although, as it was an obvious change (I strike-through fonted it), I hope that shows I did not have a nefarious purpose.
But you suggesting I did have an angle is a nice touch
Also I could be trying much harder to get you voted out right now surfbum, but it would be through a second run-off with two canceling self-preservation votes and one person having the deciding vote and I don't think that helps anyone.
I'm really feeling like jfg is mafia and am tempted to change my vote but that would be stacking and I'm not sure how much of that would be self preservation.
But I do feel more comfortable in a runoff with Jfg and ultimately getting him out.
So
Surf > Jfg
However I reserve the right to switch back in the case that there isn't vote movement. I'm not trying to stack I'm trying to get in a runoff with Jfg
Actually I see a serious trend developing. I would bet money either Carini or Surf are mafia. There is obviously some mafia movement to protect someone here.
Actually I see a serious trend developing. I would bet money either Carini or Surf are mafia. There is obviously some mafia movement to protect someone here.
Then it would be carini, but it seems like its Jfg.
We may have 3 scampering townies too and the shuffle is a normal natural way it would shake out anyhow.
Like I said if there isn't vote movement I'm going back to carini - because a stack isn't ok
Okay, from the way I read it, Hakuna wasn't saying anything about the Tejas vote. He was saying he wasn't comfortable with the other two in the CURRENT runoff (surf, jfg) were voting for carini.
So there's a player who stacked when mathematically unnecessary, in a stated attempt to get to a mathematically impossible run-off. Then they unstacked.
Then there's a guy who votes for someone he called out as suspected mafia and has not changed his vote since.
There certainly is some shady voting going on here.
Actually I see a serious trend developing. I would bet money either Carini or Surf are mafia. There is obviously some mafia movement to protect someone here.
Actually I see a serious trend developing. I would bet money either Carini or Surf are mafia. There is obviously some mafia movement to protect someone here.
