Whether it's your first Bonnaroo or you’re a music festival veteran, we welcome you to Inforoo.
Here you'll find info about artists, rumors, camping tips, and the infamous Roo Clues. Have a look around then create an account and join in the fun. See you at Bonnaroo!!
That's doesn't make any sense. There would be no reason for mafia to whack Jazmo in round 1 if he was actually a mafia. That's crazy.
I'm keeping my vote on Billy.
I'm a bit lost on this detail too. How can anyone be concocting/supporting a theory right now that involves the notion that Jaz was mafia, when he was just killed off in Day 1? That'd be one hugely strange and stupid decision by the Mafia crew...
Considering you've found the need to respond to my threads as if you are threatened by me I offer you some peace my confused counterpart. May you find peace in your restless soul.
[quote author="Tainted Opossum" source="/post/1746443/thread" timestamp="1436282567" Why would I assume that Jaz' strategy is to vote not based on positioning but based simply on who he believed to be mafia, if I am assuming he is mafia? To me, that is counter intuitive and doesn't make sense.
I don't understand what you mean by positioning here.
What I am saying is if you think Jaz was mafia, then he would know who the other two mafia are (duh). I'm going to run through 3 scenarios. The first 2 are proven to be incorrect and the other is unknown as far as its validity.
Scenario 1:
So let's say Jaz, Tejas, and player X (not you) are the 3 mafia. - You think Jaz is mafia. You are unsure on who to vote for between Carini and Tejas. - Carini and Tejas are in the runoff - Jaz votes for Carini to save Tejas - You aren't sure to vote for and ignore the vote of Jazmo and also vote for Carini - You play a role in almost saving a 2nd mafia
Scenario 2 The 3 mafia are Jazmo, and 2 people who aren't Carini or Tejas - You think Jaz is mafia. You are unsure on who to vote for between Carini and Tejas. - Carini and Tejas are in the runoff - Jaz votes for Carini because it doesn't matter who goes between Tejas and Carini as they are both town - You ignore your suspicion of Jaz and vote for Carini as well - 1 townie dies and 1 other townie is saved - Your vote didn't really matter and neither did mine or miffy's
Scenario 3 - The 3 mafia are you, player X, and player Y - You have discussed who you think is the inspector and who you want to whack prior to the final runoff - You have decided on whacking Jazmo after the lynch and the day is over - You mention you are suspicious of Jazmo because you know he will be the lynch and you think this might help provide you with an alibi.
I'm not saying you are mafia, though I'm starting to lean that way. I am voting for you because to me, your throwing of suspicion onto Jaz and then voting with him before he gets lynched is the biggest red flag I have seen so far in this game. You stated at the time of your vote for Carini that you didn't know who to vote for between Carini and Tejas. So you ignore the one lead you thought you had. To me that is bad town gameplay or mafia distancing. Even if you were wrong about Jaz being mafia, you ignored the full amount of information in front of you prior to your vote. You then said you had reasons for voting for Carini but you didn't explain those when you cast your vote and you haven't really explained it during your defense of yourself. If you had said at some point.... "I'm voting for Carini because X, Y, Z" I would have ignored you voting with Carini. But you still haven't done that. To me, it is worth investigating.
I'm at work and haven't gotten shit done all day and I need to change that in the next few hours. I'd like to hear from anyone else in the game with their thoughts on this. I feel like I've made my argument logically and Taint has yet to properly defend himself. I want to know if anyone else has thoughts on this because I don't want to lead the town in the wrong direction.[/quote]
I voted for carini because it made more sense to me. I acknowledge everyone and their votes prior to making my decision, but it will never be a deciding factor. My one real hint was that Tejas seemed to make dumb mistakes then corner himself - something that gets commonly mistaken for clever mafia early on. We've seen it happen on day 1s before, we've wasted townies on day 1 before, and my suspicions were stronger for carini and jaz than tejas. The voting, the silence and the general malaise of the first day, concerned me. I then saw a pattern emerge that I didn't necessarily agree with. I've only ever played with the two guys I ultimately had suspicion of, which was and continues to be a contributing factor. I voted for carini because he initially voted for me. I maintained that vote until I felt it would be beneficial to hear other people out. My votes explain my actions. I don't believe tejas was mafia any more than carini, despite his errors.
Tainted >> Billy
I don't understand your logic at all, I need to get off mobile this evening and see if it makes more sense then.
It seems to me like Billy is basing his vote on Tainted based on an assumption that Jazmo and Tainted were somehow two mafia in cahoots.
That's doesn't make any sense. There would be no reason for mafia to whack Jazmo in round 1 if he was actually a mafia. That's crazy.
I'm keeping my vote on Billy.
That is not my assumption in any way shape or form. At no point do I consider or mention Jaz and Taint to be mafia together. Aren't you a lawyer? I hope your reading comprehension is better than this.
My theory boils down to this. If taint is town, his vote during the Carini/Tejas runoff doesn't make sense. His vote in the Tejas/Carini mentions that he believes Tejas. And maybe on Day 1 believing 1 over the other is all you need to make your vote. I've personally voted with less reason than that many times. But he never states conviction that Carini is mafia. Just that he believes Tejas. But he also mentions he was suspicious of Jaz. So why doesn't Taint take into consideration that Jaz voted for Carini?? Instead he votes with the one person he thought was most likely to be mafia (YES I KNOW JAMES THAT JAZ ISN'T MAFIA. I AM TALKING ABOUT HIS GAMEPLAY AT THAT POINT IN TIME)
My thought is that Taint knew Jaz was going to be the whack during the night (because Taint is maybe mafia) so he wanted to mention suspicion of Jaz so when Day 2 started he could act surprised. I really don't think this theory is all that complicated. His post and his vote conflict. DOES ANYONE ELSE NOT SEE THAT?!?!?!
The other piece of evidence we have is that Jaz voted for Slack and then he voted for me. The town will always pursue the people the whack voted for. So why would I be throwing out my thoughts on Taint when if I was mafia, I should be more quiet knowing that I'm likely to get heat from Jaz's whack.
To recap: 1. Jaz is not mafia. I know this now as does everyone else. But this was not known to the 7 town other than Jaz at the point of Taint's vote for Carini. Jaz knew he was town as did the 3 mafia. 2. At the time of the end of Day 1 several people had mentioned suspicion of Jaz. Including taint. 3. Taint is not convinced that either Carini or Tejas or mafia(at the time of his vote). So he looks at the evidence and believes Tejas more than Carini and votes Carini. I would be fine with that if he hadn't mentioned suspicion of Jaz at all. But taint mentioned he was suspicious of Jaz but then with little to go on to decide his vote between Carini and Tejas, he doesn't look at Jaz's vote, or it doesn't matter enough to him to get him to change his vote. THIS IS WHERE MY PROBLEM IS 4. Either taint is town and just ignored what Jaz had done and made a confusing vote (certainly possible) or he is mafia and wanted to play like a townie who was suspicious of Jaz and then could play shocked when Jaz was lynched. And that is my point about Jaz. Not that Jaz was mafia but that one member (Carini) thought he maybe was at the time of a crucial vote, then apparently voted with little confidence on the two people he could vote for ignoring the one person's vote that he felt strong enough to call out as suspicious.
Full disclosure time: Why did I notice this and why did I call it out? Simple. I was suspicious of Jaz too at that point. He was the most suspicious player to me both because of gameplay and because he sent me a PM. A little backstory on this.... I was mafia a few games back and Jaz was the ref. The mafia (which was me during this game) didn't get their whack in by the deadline so there was no whack. I threw a fucking shitfit and got the decision overturned. Jaz's PM to me during this game was about something a few months back in my personal life and not related to the game in any way. I was hoping in my heart that Jaz was just being a nice guy but I did have a small part of me that thought maybe he was using PMs to be nice to me and to get me back for the nasty PMs I sent when I was mafia a few games back. Jaz's gameplay brought up a few things of notice for me but nothing crazy. But combining that with the PM, I was going to be suspicious of him the whole game. So I saw Jaz's vote for Carini and I voted Tejas. I want to be clear on this: my (wrong) suspicion of Jaz is why I voted for Tejas over Carini. I, like most of you didn't have a strong feel on Day 1 and really didn't have an opinion on Carini vs. Tejas so I went in the opposite direction of who I thought was the most likely mafia at the point (which seems really logical to me). So I was certainly surprised when Taint said he was suspicious of Jaz but voted for carini at the time of his vote. But when Jaz was whacked, I looked back at taint's post as less of a mistaken townie and more of a malicious mafia.
To recap the above paragraph: Taint and I were both suspicious of Jaz. But he voted with Jaz and I voted against him. To me, my vote makes much more sense. As a townie, you want to go against who you think the mafia is and who they are voting for. This is again where I will mention that we know now Jaz is town now but did not at the time of taint's vote for Carini and my vote for Tejas.
Bolding your point #4 for reference. Not sure if you are confusing me with someone else or simply mistaken but I was never suspicious of Jaz
I'll reread later before bed. I admittedly didn't read 100% thoroughly because I get discouraged by incredibly long posts, especially when I'm on lunch break.
Post by Farrisbueller on Jul 7, 2015 14:50:14 GMT -5
Just leaving work, I have been keeping up with the thread today but I actually have to leave the office on a regular basis and I havent had time for a meaningful post. Right now I am going to the gym, then I will be headed home where I can further re-read things. I will try to post and vote by 6-7pm est.
Just leaving work, I have been keeping up with the thread today but I actually have to leave the office on a regular basis and I havent had time for a meaningful post. Right now I am going to the gym, then I will be headed by The AdBlocker"> home where I can further re-read things. I will try to post and vote by 6-7pm est.
#sportsy
I'm in the same boat - been out of the office for meetings most of the day; posted a little bit of my reflections via mobile, but I'm going to post more of my thoughts soon.
Considering you've found the need to respond to my threads as if you are threatened by me I offer you some peace my confused counterpart. May you find peace in your restless soul.
ROUND WILL CLOSE @9.00am, WEDNESDAY JULY 8 (I know that is longer than the normal 36 hour round, but I thought it would be rude to close the round at 4am)
Shit is getting crowded on this page with all the multi-quote posts etc., but thought it would be helpful to update this and bring it over.
Considering you've found the need to respond to my threads as if you are threatened by me I offer you some peace my confused counterpart. May you find peace in your restless soul.
Wow whoops, I put " 1 - Slack" twice instead of just writing " 2 - Slack"
My apologies.
I am not 100% determined yet on who I am voting for, but I can tell you that I'm fairly sure it wont be for Slack OR Billy. I don't think they've been the most suspicious in comments or actions, at all.
Considering you've found the need to respond to my threads as if you are threatened by me I offer you some peace my confused counterpart. May you find peace in your restless soul.
If I had wanted Jazmo dead, I wouldn't have switched my vote until he eliminated from the runoff. In 77, I wanted Farris dead, so I didn't switch my vote. You're pointing to my being mafia because I did the exact opposite of how I've played mafia in previous games.
Wat.
You're trying to spin my play in other games so that you're convincing other players that I'm mafia.
If I had wanted Jazmo dead, I wouldn't have switched my vote until he eliminated from the runoff. In 77, I wanted Farris dead, so I didn't switch my vote. You're pointing to my being mafia because I did the exact opposite of how I've played mafia in previous games.
Wat.
You're trying to by The AdBlocker"> spin my play in other games so that you're convincing other players that I'm mafia.
Slack > Potent
Explanation above.
Haha well if you end up being revealed as Mafia and I'm still in the game at that point, this move right now will look sketchy as fuck as to my involvement, but that's a risk I'm willing to take, because I am ready to cast my vote for Potent. He has been fairly quiet, then when he does speak, none of it has added up to much of significance, and I feel strongly enough that Slack and Billy do NOT seem that suspicious - and thus want someone who I think has been more questionable in his actions/words (or lack thereof) up against them for a run off.
Considering you've found the need to respond to my threads as if you are threatened by me I offer you some peace my confused counterpart. May you find peace in your restless soul.
If I had wanted Jazmo dead, I wouldn't have switched my vote until he eliminated from the runoff. In 77, I wanted Farris dead, so I didn't switch my vote. You're pointing to my being mafia because I did the exact opposite of how I've played mafia in previous games.
Wat.
You're trying to spin my play in other games so that you're convincing other players that I'm mafia.
Slack > Potent
Explanation above.
Don't mistake my vote for you. It had nothing to do with for whom you voted - you'll note we both voted Tejas off at the end of Day One.
It had everything to do with your defensive tone, which was the same tone in 77 when people questioned why you were the only vote not to switch to the revealed mafia member (by the inspector). You were mafia that game, and I detected the same tone from you this game. I could easily be wrong, going on a gut feeling, but your defensiveness again in your response again has me wondering.
I'm willing to switch my vote with the right evidence.
Don't mistake my vote for you. It had nothing to do with for whom you voted - you'll note we both voted Tejas off at the end of Day One.
It had everything to do with your defensive tone, which was the same tone in 77 when people questioned why you were the only vote not to switch to the revealed mafia member (by the inspector). You were mafia that game, and I detected the same tone from you this game. I could easily be wrong, going on a gut feeling, but your defensiveness again in your response again has me wondering.
I'm willing to switch my vote with the right evidence.
Look at 76. I was town in that game and I was defensive then, too.
Post by Farrisbueller on Jul 7, 2015 21:35:38 GMT -5
I dont have much other vote choice unless Carini moves his vote. Considering I want the most amount of voting rounds per day, and the fact that Billy has quite clearly stated his case against Tainted AKA I doubt hes moving his vote. I actually would like to see where this Billy/Tanted exchange is going to go after their back and forth earlier.
Farris > Tainted Opossum
Its not a super strong feeling but still not a whole bunch to work with at this point. As a side note I did find it strange how Carini disappeared from discussion in Day 2 after going to the final round of Day 1. His play style does seem to semi jive with how he presses people when he is town, but there is something about how hes saying it that reminds me of my first game where he was mafia.
I claimed that you were attempting to spin my play in other games to say I was Mafia.
You then used my play in other games (namely my tone) to say I was Mafia.
Inasmuch as any vote after Day 1 is saying someone is mafia, maybe. I also made clear my vote can move, which I think is as clear as possible that I don't know whether you are mafia.
You have the order wrong too - I said your tone had me concerned and voted for you and then you stated that I was trying to convince others you were mafia. I don't believe I've really tried to convince anyone else of anything; I just explained why my vote was going where it was, and also that my vote is mobile at this point.
If I had wanted Jazmo dead, I wouldn't have switched my vote until he eliminated from the runoff. In 77, I wanted Farris dead, so I didn't switch my vote. You're pointing to my being mafia because I did the exact opposite of how I've played mafia in previous games.
Wat.
You're trying to spin my play in other games so that you're convincing other players that I'm mafia.
Don't mistake my vote for you. It had nothing to do with for whom you voted - you'll note we both voted Tejas off at the end of Day One.
It had everything to do with your defensive tone, which was the same tone in 77 when people questioned why you were the only vote not to switch to the revealed mafia member (by the inspector). You were mafia that game, and I detected the same tone from you this game. I could easily be wrong, going on a gut feeling, but your defensiveness again in your response again has me wondering.
I'm willing to switch my vote with the right evidence.
I am not sure timestamps are particularly good at lying.
Don't mistake my vote for you. It had nothing to do with for whom you voted - you'll note we both voted Tejas off at the end of Day One.
It had everything to do with your defensive tone, which was the same tone in 77 when people questioned why you were the only vote not to switch to the revealed mafia member (by the inspector). You were mafia that game, and I detected the same tone from you this game. I could easily be wrong, going on a gut feeling, but your defensiveness again in your response again has me wondering.
I'm willing to switch my vote with the right evidence.
I am not sure timestamps are particularly good at lying.
Are you trying to say you voted for me before I voted for you? You left out my first post where I voted for you and indicated you were defensive. Why would you leave that out if you had nothing to hide?
I am not sure timestamps are particularly good at lying.
Are you trying to say you voted for me before I voted for you? You left out my first post where I voted for you and indicated you were defensive. Why would you leave that out if you had nothing to hide?
I left it out because it is irrelevant to my argument; my argument was never about the order of the votes.
Are you trying to say you voted for me before I voted for you? You left out my first post where I voted for you and indicated you were defensive. Why would you leave that out if you had nothing to hide?
I left it out because it is irrelevant to my argument; my argument was never about the order of the votes.
To step sideways from the whack a bit, as I'm sure other runoff candidates will be derived from it I feel like Tejas is/was mafia and it looked to me like Farris was trying to protect him by saying he wanted to stay on him, but when push came to shove his vote was on either Jaz or myself.
Okay I let this sit long enough seeing what would happen/being busy. Its laughable you are going to jump to such a conclusion. The only reason I moved off of Tejas was to progress to a 3 person runoff as I stated. Btw, totally ignoring what happened with the wack, even going so far as to say so yourself in the bolded above. This stretch of an accusation is really more than anything you took from the wack? Well what was your opinion of the wack anyway?
I agree that Farris's extreme degree of silence makes him suspicious. Definitely with you on that one. But it is interesting that you believe Tejas was mafia; idk, I just had a pretty strong feeling by the end of Day 1 (once it was down to the two person run off) that neither of the two were Mafia. It all just went down so easily, seemed to me that the mafia were happy with those final two candidates and then just let it transpire as it did.
What tipped me off on Tejas was when he tried to claim he misread the deadline after his vote change to me. If he "missed" the deadline as he put it what would have happened is he would have gone into a 2 way runoff against me with his vote open and mine on him giving him an advantage. The last time a player tried to sneak through without a final runoff I was mafia with them and myself and the other mafia member were against them doing this. Also when I asked him to clarify he didn't respond. Tejas isn't the most talkative player around but it also isn't like him to duck something.
He changed his vote to you because he was afraid he would miss the deadline, and that was going to vote you off so it effectively means the same as the missed deadline scenario. I honestly do not know wtf was going on with Tejas or his role in this game, he could have made a mistake in multiple ways. Could a mafia member screw up that bad and get lynched on Day 1? I guess its possible but mafia has a lot of influence, plus they usually plan out who they vote for so him flip flopping like that doesnt make much sense for a mafia member to do. At the end of the day, you survived and Tejas did not. Whats intriguing is how little heat youve gathered after that first quote of yours I have above and surviving in general. I dont think youve defended yourself that well for you not to be questioned.
To step sideways from the whack a bit, as I'm sure other runoff candidates will be derived from it I feel like Tejas is/was mafia and it looked to me like Farris was trying to protect him by saying he wanted to stay on him, but when push came to shove his vote was on either Jaz or myself.
Okay I let this sit long enough seeing what would happen/being busy. Its laughable you are going to jump to such a conclusion. The only reason I moved off of Tejas was to progress to a 3 person runoff as I stated. Btw, totally ignoring what happened with the wack, even going so far as to say so yourself in the bolded above. This stretch of an accusation is really more than anything you took from the wack? Well what was your opinion of the wack anyway?
What tipped me off on Tejas was when he tried to claim he misread the deadline after his vote change to me. If he "missed" the deadline as he put it what would have happened is he would have gone into a 2 way runoff against me with his vote open and mine on him giving him an advantage. The last time a player tried to sneak through without a final runoff I was mafia with them and myself and the other mafia member were against them doing this. Also when I asked him to clarify he didn't respond. Tejas isn't the most talkative player around but it also isn't like him to duck something.
He changed his vote to you because he was afraid he would miss the deadline, and that was going to vote you off so it effectively means the same as the missed deadline scenario. I honestly do not know wtf was going on with Tejas or his role in this game, he could have made a mistake in multiple ways. Could a mafia member screw up that bad and get lynched on Day 1? I guess its possible but mafia has a lot of influence, plus they usually plan out who they vote for so him flip flopping like that doesnt make much sense for a mafia member to do. At the end of the day, you survived and Tejas did not. Whats intriguing is how little heat youve gathered after that first quote of yours I have above and surviving in general. I dont think youve defended yourself that well for you not to be questioned.
Glad you decided to play
1. My opinion of whack-It either points to Slack or Billy if they thought he was inspector and voting his given name. I was correct in my calculations that they would get attention and both are currently in position to be in the runoff. We also need different options to discuss so I went that direction. Funny you are calling me out and you have offered almost nothing all game. The heat on me day 1 is same as always. Look back a few games and let me know the last time I wasn't involved in runoff. I bring some upon myself by being active and maybe they are noticing that is all that it was.
2. Your section I bolded and Italicized is very, very wrong. At the time he changed his vote to me the tally was Him at 4, me at 4, and Jaz at 3 with his vote on Jaz. What would have gone wrong for him had he not done anything at the deadling? NOTHING!!! He would have been in the same 2 way runoff with me that ended up happening anyway but would have his vote open as it was on Jaz giving him a big advantage over me in survival as my vote was already on him. If you have a scenerio where him missing that deadline would have affected anything at all please let me know.
3. What do I need to defend myself on? If other members of the town had a problem with my voting for you or my explanation wouldn't they have said something by now? Pretty sure everyone has at least read it.
I dont just want to vote off Tejas but I also didnt want to move from him, regardless, a runoff is more important
Farris > Jaz
If you were that suspicious of Tejas on Day 1 and only moved off him to create the runoff instead of voting him straight out, why are you making the turn around to defend him now?
Okay I let this sit long enough seeing what would happen/being busy. Its laughable you are going to jump to such a conclusion. The only reason I moved off of Tejas was to progress to a 3 person runoff as I stated. Btw, totally ignoring what happened with the wack, even going so far as to say so yourself in the bolded above. This stretch of an accusation is really more than anything you took from the wack? Well what was your opinion of the wack anyway? He changed his vote to you because he was afraid he would miss the deadline, and that was going to vote you off so it effectively means the same as the missed deadline scenario. I honestly do not know wtf was going on with Tejas or his role in this game, he could have made a mistake in multiple ways. Could a mafia member screw up that bad and get lynched on Day 1? I guess its possible but mafia has a lot of influence, plus they usually plan out who they vote for so him flip flopping like that doesnt make much sense for a mafia member to do. At the end of the day, you survived and Tejas did not. Whats intriguing is how little heat youve gathered after that first quote of yours I have above and surviving in general. I dont think youve defended yourself that well for you not to be questioned.
Glad you decided to play
1. My opinion of whack-It either points to Slack or Billy if they thought he was inspector and voting his given name. I was correct in my calculations that they would get attention and both are currently in position to be in the runoff. We also need different options to discuss so I went that direction. Funny you are calling me out and you have offered almost nothing all game. The heat on me day 1 is same as always. Look back a few games and let me know the last time I wasn't involved in runoff. I bring some upon myself by being active and maybe they are noticing that is all that it was.
2. Your section I bolded and Italicized is very, very wrong. At the time he changed his vote to me the tally was Him at 4, me at 4, and Jaz at 3 with his vote on Jaz. What would have gone wrong for him had he not done anything at the deadling? NOTHING!!! He would have been in the same 2 way runoff with me that ended up happening anyway but would have his vote open as it was on Jaz giving him a big advantage over me in survival as my vote was already on him. If you have a scenerio where him missing that deadline would have affected anything at all please let me know.
3. What do I need to defend myself on? If other members of the town had a problem with my voting for you or my explanation wouldn't they have said something by now? Pretty sure everyone has at least read it.
Okay first off, I have similar thoughts on the wack. Although I don't feel any certainty in that, just more clues to follow.
Secondly I am calling you out because you came up with a half ass excuse to vote for me when I had explained myself solidly throughout my voting. And contrary to what many have said, I have posted a decent amount. Just as much as some others in this game and yet people keep bringing it up about me. And I don't give a shit if you are active Day 1 or not. You can hide behind both play styles as I mentioned earlier this game.
Regarding Tejas, when he moved his vote to you when it was 4-4-3 that would have bumped you up to 5, in both scenarios he was going to end up choosing you. That's all I was saying. I don't understand what happened with him and why he made the decisions he did, in no way have I defended Tejas at all. He could have been town or mafia and I asked the question, would mafia get themselves into a voting see-saw on day 1? And sure its possible, but I'm leaning more towards us being down two townfolk over having already nabbed a mafioso. NOT saying that is definitely the case, you said I was defending him when I'm giving you some viewpoint that you've been asking of me. Overall on your behalf I believe it to be a weak assumption to say Tejas is certainly mafia when he was lynched by the town, and to say I was covering for him by casting shade on him while switching my vote. If you want to get me to talk that's fine and dandy, but I am calling you out on a weak attack on me and want more of an explanation of that, or more specifically why that voting choice was the best choice in your opinion. I haven't had a ton to say because I still don't have a ton to go off of, ever since that first game with you and I, I've decided to survey information over relaying it early in the game, I end up creating more confusion if I bring forth more talk and perspective than is necessary when the town has the least information they will have all game, end of Day 1 told us something, end of Day 2 will really tell us what direction to look in. I have ideas now of possible groupings but its not enough to bring up, perhaps it's because you attacked me and I am certain of my role that I responded the way I had to you, but I really couldn't feel any more differently about my role in this game than you right now.
Post by Farrisbueller on Jul 8, 2015 8:23:58 GMT -5
To clarify the Tejas comment. Obviously Tejas could and should have just kept his vote where it was, him moving around drew lots of heat which is partly why I wanted to stay on him. He changed his vote to essentially vote you off (that's when you took offense) but everyone knows the town wouldn't let that happen when there is more runoff opportunity this early. Much like when Tainted did the same thing and I switched my vote as well to accommodate a larger runoff. Yet nobody took any heat for that. Granted, Tejas had even less of a reason to change his vote but still. In the game of mafia I have seen townfolk flub worse than this (including myself). So its troubling you are running away with this scenario so quickly.
ROUND WILL CLOSE @9.00am, WEDNESDAY JULY 8 (I know that is longer than the normal 36 hour round, but I thought it would be rude to close the round at 4am)
Considering you've found the need to respond to my threads as if you are threatened by me I offer you some peace my confused counterpart. May you find peace in your restless soul.
