Whether it's your first Bonnaroo or you’re a music festival veteran, we welcome you to Inforoo.
Here you'll find info about artists, rumors, camping tips, and the infamous Roo Clues. Have a look around then create an account and join in the fun. See you at Bonnaroo!!
I don't, actually. There are two people I am suspicious of in particular but I'm not set yet on even a movable vote.
Oh I'm sorry, were you waiting on me?
Noooo!
Wait, have you voted yet?
Tainted >> LD
Your approach of working so diligently to flush out supporters of potent then rothric seemed reasonable enough, then your rant about how mafia would surely peg you and the moronic townies following them tickled me pink. If you are town, congrats - you're a hero! A real peach - But you worked aggressively to bring attention to yourself, so I don't mind accommodating you. Not locked, just not convinced.
Your approach of working so diligently to flush out supporters of potent then rothric seemed reasonable enough, then your rant about how mafia would surely peg you and the moronic townies following them tickled me pink. If you are town, congrats - you're a hero! A real peach - But you worked aggressively to bring attention to yourself, so I don't mind accommodating you. Not locked, just not convinced.
Your approach of working so diligently to flush out supporters of potent then rothric seemed reasonable enough, then your rant about how mafia would surely peg you and the moronic townies following them tickled me pink. If you are town, congrats - you're a hero! A real peach - But you worked aggressively to bring attention to yourself, so I don't mind accommodating you. Not locked, just not convinced.
Considering you've found the need to respond to my threads as if you are threatened by me I offer you some peace my confused counterpart. May you find peace in your restless soul.
Please note that this round will end Wednesday Sept 16th at 9 am.
***There are still 3 players left to cast their votes, with ~8 hours left in the round. If a player does not cast his/her vote in the allotted time, s/he will receive a warning; if that individual misses a second vote at any point in the game, s/he will be immediately auto-lynched.
Considering you've found the need to respond to my threads as if you are threatened by me I offer you some peace my confused counterpart. May you find peace in your restless soul.
9am is 7am for me. Seeing as I've been drinking all day, I don't see me waking up before the round ends.
I know I've been pretty inactive. Had I known last week was gonna work out like it did, I probably wouldn't have signed up. I'm a pretty big advocate for harping on players being active in games, and I do apoligize for my lack there of. I'm fine being in the runoff, and glad to see other fairly silent players in this runoff as well. With that said, I'm going to make it 3
Boner >>>Taint
If nobody else votes tonight, I'd suggest at least extending until noon. I wouldn't mind seeing what the morning brings, but I also don't feel entitled to demand an extension due to my lack of attention to the game.
I read the tally backwards and thought tainted had a vote against him already, so yeah, didn't add to the runoff. Looking at round 1, he was quick to justify him being silent, when it was a bit too early in the game to really accuse anyone. Either honest admission, or over compensating for a guilty conscience.
Alright, I don't particularly want to give warnings to two players for not sending in their votes on time, and I'm going to bed soon. Going to extend the round by merely three hours.
Thus, this round will now end at 12:00 EST, Wednesday September 16.
Considering you've found the need to respond to my threads as if you are threatened by me I offer you some peace my confused counterpart. May you find peace in your restless soul.
I'm trying to work out what (if anything) this all means. SFA called out Potent a couple times right before getting whacked. Could be nothing, but the night one whack is a critical time to make a move against a potential inspector. What throws me off more is that now seemingly everyone is ignoring that? Seems... off.
I'm trying to work out what (if anything) this all means. SFA called out Potent a couple times right before getting whacked. Could be nothing, but the night one whack is a critical time to make a move against a potential inspector. What throws me off more is that now seemingly everyone is ignoring that? Seems... off.
Sleepy >>> Potent
HE DID NOT. Please show me the post that you interpret this happening. If anything, Jazmo was the only one who was upset about all votes moving off me, and AT BEST SFA said that he could see where Jaz was coming from.
Again, please show the post and explain what you could possibly be interpreting as him calling me out "a couple times".
I'm trying to work out what (if anything) this all means. SFA called out Potent a couple times right before getting whacked. Could be nothing, but the night one whack is a critical time to make a move against a potential inspector. What throws me off more is that now seemingly everyone is ignoring that? Seems... off.
Sleepy >>> Potent
HE DID NOT. Please show me the post that you interpret this happening. If anything, Jazmo was the only one who was upset about all votes moving off me, and AT BEST SFA said that he could see where Jaz was coming from.
Again, please show the post and explain what you could possibly be interpreting as him calling me out "a couple times".
The last five vote changes have all been off of Potent. I'm hesitant to speak when in a runoff because experience has shown me that this tends to garner me votes, but does no one else find that to be just a little suspicious? If we want to vote someone straight off that's fine, but we've gone to a de facto runoff between Rothric and I because apparently everyone thinks potent is significantly less suspicious. That's a train I'm not ready to hop on (and not just because I'm in the runoff). I don't think the fact that no one jumped to save potent clears him off anything...there was so much time left in the round at that point. If nobody thought he was suspect before that's one thing, but I've never seen a mass exodus off a player like that before. You would think that if someone truly didn't have a preference between Rothric and I they would stay on potent and let the other townies decide, but instead we have players moving their votes. That piques my curiosity.
I certainly see what you are saying. There could be something to what you said last night. In that the mafia was sitting back waiting for someone to make the first move.
As far as a mass exodus off of Potent, part of that can be explained by talk of going ahead and settling this day without another runoff. So that partially explains at least some of those moves, if not all. It's certainly possible that it provided a cover for a mafia member to move their vote. But the suspects seemed limited when you consider that several of these people voted to put Potent in that position to begin with... votes that likely weren't distancing moves, to be specific. I just have a hard time rapping my head around how it could be a full on mafia push.
That's not to say that mafia had to be switching votes to save Potent. It could easily be to buddy up with him or make themselves look less suspicious in the eyes of people that didn't like how things were standing at that time.
Are there other possible angles you are thinking of here?
I think forcing the Jaz voters to all have to vote again in a runoff between Potent and Rothric would have been the best for gathering info. At least there wouldn't be self-preservation to hide behind. Meh.
Nope, Potent. He seemed the most innocent when looking at the situation. So that seemed the best way to have a chance of not unknowingly voting along with the mafia.
So I dunno. I would like to hear more from you, but I feel we have more information to glean from adding another to the runoff. It's a tough call between whether I think we have more to learn from Rothric or LD. Both seem to be playing a little differently this game. LD is always our resident wildcard, so it's always hard to get a good read on him. I haven't played so much with Rothric, so it's tougher to say. I guess what's sticking out for me more is that he was in the lead for a while last round, but is hardly getting any attention now.
So I dunno. I would like to hear more from you, but I feel we have more information to glean from adding another to the runoff. It's a tough call between whether I think we have more to learn from Rothric or LD. Both seem to be playing a little differently this game. LD is always our resident wildcard, so it's always hard to get a good read on him. I haven't played so much with Rothric, so it's tougher to say. I guess what's sticking out for me more is that he was in the lead for a while last round, but is hardly getting any attention now.
Sleepy >>> Potent >>> Rothric
You really want to put me right back in another runoff when it was your vote specifically that saved me on Day 1? What are you hoping to learn from it?
And considering this is only my second game, I find it hard to see how you've already established my pattern of play.
With how quiet things were on Day 1, what makes you so certain that we had some Mafia tangled up in the runoff?
To me, things were too quiet. Which is why my attention has turned to others that weren't in the Day 1 runoff.
I'm trying to work out what (if anything) this all means. SFA called out Potent a couple times right before getting whacked. Could be nothing, but the night one whack is a critical time to make a move against a potential inspector. What throws me off more is that now seemingly everyone is ignoring that? Seems... off.
Sleepy >>> Potent
This reads to me like a mafia member trying to figure out if they have killed the inspector.
So I dunno. I would like to hear more from you, but I feel we have more information to glean from adding another to the runoff. It's a tough call between whether I think we have more to learn from Rothric or LD. Both seem to be playing a little differently this game. LD is always our resident wildcard, so it's always hard to get a good read on him. I haven't played so much with Rothric, so it's tougher to say. I guess what's sticking out for me more is that he was in the lead for a while last round, but is hardly getting any attention now.
Sleepy >>> Potent >>> Rothric
You really want to put me right back in another runoff when it was your vote specifically that saved me on Day 1? What are you hoping to learn from it?
And considering this is only my second game, I find it hard to see how you've already established my pattern of play.
With how quiet things were on Day 1, what makes you so certain that we had some Mafia tangled up in the runoff?
To me, things were too quiet. Which is why my attention has turned to others that weren't in the Day 1 runoff.
I'm with you 100% Rothric. In fact, one of the people I'm most suspicious about is Sleepy.
Post by potentpotables on Sept 16, 2015 9:50:24 GMT -5
First of all, I want to call bullshit on Sleepy's posts from SFA that supposedly call me out. I think he's is totally misreading them. If I am crazy, somebody tell me.
Secondly, his vote for Rothric is also bullshit. If he were so suspicious of Rothric, he could have voted for Rothric last round - you know, when he cast the deciding vote between Jaz and Rothric, and switched from Rothric to Jaz 80 minutes before voting closed. I don't know that he's saving LD (I'm leaning toward LD being town), but it could be to widen the runoff to try to save EAP or (less likely to me at this point) Boner with someone who already has been to the edge and back and had plenty of scrutiny thrown his way.
I don't want to move my vote from EAP, but I want to clearly state that, absent other pertinent information, my day 3 vote is going on Sleepy.
