Whether it's your first Bonnaroo or you’re a music festival veteran, we welcome you to Inforoo.
Here you'll find info about artists, rumors, camping tips, and the infamous Roo Clues. Have a look around then create an account and join in the fun. See you at Bonnaroo!!
What’s funny is that one can see the majority of the bands on festival lineups in most cities for a 20-30 dollar ticket nowadays. That isn’t exclusive to the electronic genre.
Also feel that a primary purpose for a festival is having all of this great music TOGETHER as opposed to 16 different club shows.
Last Edit: Jun 14, 2018 16:05:38 GMT -5 by Deleted - Back to Top
Yeah but on top of that a bunch of the lower acts on that day have blown up. Rex Orange County has sold out every stand alone show on his tour. Great has had massive festival crowds. Throw in the electronic acts and I really don’t understand how they can’t get to 30k
Those electronic acts aren't really popular except with people here. Most of them play in Brooklyn multiple times a year for $15-20. If you are a fan of those acts and are local, spending over a hundred or more on a festival to see them doesn't make much sense.
I think Friday of this is probably going to do really well just based off The Weeknd and Migos. It may even sell out now that they cut 10k people off the attendance. But I'm thinking Sat and Sun are going to be ghost towns.
I get that but still go take a look at Rex Orange County on Stubhub. He’s a 100 dollar show pretty much right now
Post by Launchpad McQuack on Jun 14, 2018 16:19:55 GMT -5
Techno/Electro is not that popular man. You don't have to take it as an insult. You can see it as your taste is superior and you are part of some super secret club if you want. Just facts.
I look at those Point acts and I get they are acclaimed in their genre and all that. But I really wonder what the point even is? These acts will be playing on basically the equivalent of Bonnaroos Kalliope side stage; and while I am sure some ppl will show up to specifically see them, the overwhelming majority of ppl who witness these sets are are going to be kids who have no idea what they are watching; and only there as either a breather or to waste time until Migos come on.
You know, NYC has a techno festival too right? Last year it was on Governors Island. It didn't crack 2k people from what I heard. Not a bad lineup though if you are into that kind of thing. And at least I am sure they played to an engaged crowd.
The fact is it’s obviously more popular than just on inforoo. There’s an entire world out beyond your Jersey bubble. Unless 2,000 board members attended the techno festival you’re talking about, that’s 2,000 more than what you accounted for earlier. Circles like Boiler Room prove there’s an audience for this kind of music and festivals continue to book these kinds of acts (see Kolsch). The Yuma routinely proves you wrong. It might not be as packed as the Sahara, but it serves as an option to many.
Edit: it’s not even that popular of a genre on this website. There’s really only a few that are really into it from what I can see. I’m sure all those can attest for small crowds at these kinds of shows so you aren’t really saying anything new. It’s not as if this is the only reason Panorama is “failing”. If anything it’s a cool option for music fans. I don’t really get the point you’re trying to make. No one in here is trying to say this should be sold out because of Mall Grab.
Last Edit: Jun 14, 2018 18:41:35 GMT -5 by Deleted - Back to Top
The fact is it’s obviously more popular than just on inforoo. There’s an entire world out beyond your Jersey bubble. Unless 2,000 board members attended the techno festival you’re talking about, that’s 2,000 more than what you accounted for earlier. Circles like Boiler Room prove there’s an audience for this kind of music and festivals continue to book these kinds of acts (see Kolsch). The Yuma routinely proves you wrong. It might not be as packed as the Sahara, but it serves as an option to many.
Edit: it’s not even that popular of a genre on this website. There’s really only a few that are really into it from what I can see. I’m sure all those can attest for small crowds at these kinds of shows so you aren’t really saying anything new. It’s not as if this is the only reason Panorama is “failing”. If anything it’s a cool option for music fans. I don’t really get the point you’re trying to make. No one in here is trying to say this should be sold out because of Mall Grab.
Agreed, it is more popular than just inforoo. It still is not popular.
You bring up Kolsch, like thats an ace in the hole. I had no idea who he was until a few weeks ago, and only found out from listening to a playlist of Osheaga's undercard.. I post on a music festival message board daily. If I didnt know who he was, do you really think the average attendee does? Do you think they are buying a ticket based on him being on a lineup? Nevermind the fact, he is on the bill for a fest in Montreal which is a totally different market than NY.
The Yuma proves me wrong? All that proves is Coachella is such a brand name they can literally book anyone they want and sell the thing out. Stone Roses and Phoenix headlined it once and sold it out. No other festival can get away with that in this country.
The point I was making is that these acts are not a draw. That is it. Somebody else said on the last page they thought the Sunday would sell out based on the headliners and the electronic acts; and I said the electronic acts are not a draw and you took offense or disagreed or whatever. You just said these shows will have a small crowd. Sweet. We are on the same page. Not sure what your gripe with what I said is.
I bring up Kolsch because you just heard about him a few weeks ago - which is what I assume is the case with many of these kinds of acts. Not saying you’re wrong or my taste is superior because of that, just seems like you have limited experience with these kinds of acts outside of some festival sets and NYC. That said, just because he isn’t playing to a packed stage of high school kids doesn’t mean they’re wrong for booking him. Many have followed his work for years. These dance/techno acts are obscure and their bases reflects that, sure, but it’s awesome that North American festivals have started to take notice.
I also wouldn’t call them unpopular by any means. There’s a global dance culture that extends beyond NYC’s club scene. I think these promoters knew what they were getting into with these kinds of acts and tried to make up for it in other areas. Whether that worked or not isn’t the point. I think it’s cool that they aren’t just about throwing random acts together for the sake of profit. It’s almost is if they care about the art form itself.
I would argue Coachella always sales out because they give everyone what they want. They didn’t just transform into a multi-weekend, guaranteed sale out over night. It was with reunions, rare sets, and lineups that pleased everybody. They also have a knack for following trends and have genres that reflect that. Tech/house is currently one of those trends. The Yuma is a quality option, no doubt. If it’s packed or drives sales is really none of my concern. I’m just happy with its inclusion.
Panorama might not be back next year. I truly do not care. After three years of solid lineups I’d say they were a success and I appreciate their effort.
Last Edit: Jun 14, 2018 21:20:00 GMT -5 by Deleted - Back to Top
Post by Fozzie Bear on Jun 14, 2018 21:19:01 GMT -5
I was surprised to find so many Yuma acts draw big crowds. Pachanga Boys, Peggy Gou, Talaboman, Avalon Emerson, Michael Mayer all had big crowds, and of course the big names like Jamie Jones and Chris Liebing.
Heck, they gave Black Coffee a Mojave set and be still packed it out.
I bring up Kolsch because you just heard about him a few weeks ago - which is what I assume is the case with many of these kinds of acts. Not saying you’re wrong or my taste is superior because of that, just seems like you have limited experience with these kinds of acts outside of some festival sets and NYC. That said, just because he isn’t playing to a packed stage of high school kids doesn’t mean they’re wrong for booking him. Many have followed his work for years. These dance/techno acts are obscure and their bases reflects that, sure, but it’s awesome that North American festivals have started to take notice.
I also wouldn’t call them unpopular by any means. There’s a global dance culture that extends beyond NYC’s club scene. I think these promoters knew what they were getting into with these kinds of acts and tried to make up for it in other areas. Whether that worked or not isn’t the point. I think it’s cool that they aren’t just about throwing random acts together for the sake of profit. It’s almost is if they care about the art form itself.
I would argue Coachella always sales out because they give everyone what they want. They didn’t just transform into a multi-weekend, guaranteed sale out over night. It was with reunions, rare sets, and lineups that pleased everybody. They also have a knack for following trends and have genres that reflect that. Tech/house is currently one of those trends. The Yuma is a quality option, no doubt. If it’s packed or drives sales is really none of my concern. I’m just happy with its inclusion.
Panorama might not be back next year. I truly do not care. After three years of solid lineups I’d say they were a success and I appreciate their effort.
I like your response here. I disagree with it, but I think it was well put together.
How many times in the last two plus years have we discussed ad nauseam why Bonnaroo is not drawing like they used to? You guys keep pointing to the lineups not being up to par. If Bonnaroo is down and you think its due to lineup... Then wouldnt it stand to reason that Panorama never was because they are also putting out a product that not enough people really want either? Time of year is definitely a major hurdle; just like location and effort are factors working against Roo...But just like Roo, if they really booked a lineup so good people couldnt pass it up, theyd be in good shape.
As far as how Coachella got to be Coachella; so many factors went into that besides what you mentioned we could be here all night discussing them. They basically have the perfect storm with everything from dates, to venue, to proximity to more than one major city, to basically having no competition to worry about in booking.
You just think it is awesome that these acts are being booked because this is the kind of music you like. And that is fair enough. But just because you like something does not make it popular or the promoter being right for booking it. In fact losing millions probably means they were horrifically wrong. It just appeals to you. So they win in your eyes. But your feelings are not the bottom line. Panorama probably wont be back next year. Because its a product not many people wanted.
Techno is great. It is not popular. People don't like super repetitive music. Festivals book it because it nicely rounds out lineups and offers an alternative kind of dance music to EDM.
Also a friend of mine works at a tech/house club in Chicago and says people literally travel from Europe to go to that particular club. So I guess it's giving European people a reason to come too
Also a friend of mine works at a tech/house club in Chicago and says people literally travel from Europe to go to that particular club. So I guess it's giving European people a reason to come too
Post by Delicious Meatball Sub on Jun 14, 2018 22:03:31 GMT -5
There was a time where the Perry’s stage at Lolla was a few hundred people in a tiny corner of the fest, then it became the main draw of the weekend. Just because techno is only kinda popular now, doesn’t mean it won’t end up the next big thing, in fact it kinda seems poised to blow up.
You cultivate these different genres so you can keep up with trends and maintain a dynamic fan base. That’s why Gov Ball should keep booking guitar bands even though Post Malone is a far bigger draw, and it’s why having critical acclaimed techno line ups at a fest is worth doing.
Launchpad McQuack I think if you went to Coachella then you would fully get why it’s so successful. As long as they continue to serve well rounded, quality lineups then I will continue to be interested. Like most others, I appreciate when festivals book music I’m into and sure, Southern California is nice in April.
Panorama tried. It didn’t work. That’s fine. Govball will continue to thrive because it books music kids can get lit to in the city. That’s fine too. Didn’t Cut Copy play their own cheap NYC show btw? I’d rather catch that instead of dealing with a crowd like Govball’s or the hassle of a festival day, but that’s just me. Maybe all the Mall Grab fans out there made a similar move? Maybe there’s not that many to begin with? Maybe they should have booked stronger top lines to lure in the traveling techno fan or music nerd? Dunno. I’m definitely not here for the economics of major corporations or festivals I do not attend though. I’m just here for the music. Panorama was an experience I greatly enjoyed, but there are more experiences to be had.
I’m sure the Yuma will be rad again next year and in a few weeks I’ll be at Melt with 20K others who ARE into these genres. Shit, they might not even hit 20K. Either way I have never thought about how much of a profit they’ll turn and do not plan to. As far as my feelings are concerned, I thought the whole purpose of all this was giving our opinion/saying how we feel about fests and things?
Last Edit: Jun 14, 2018 23:03:34 GMT -5 by Deleted - Back to Top
There was a time where the Perry’s stage at Lolla was a few hundred people in a tiny corner of the fest, then it became the main draw of the weekend. Just because techno is only kinda popular now, doesn’t mean it won’t end up the next big thing, in fact it kinda seems poised to blow up.
You cultivate these different genres so you can keep up with trends and maintain a dynamic fan base. That’s why Gov Ball should keep booking guitar bands even though Post Malone is a far bigger draw, and it’s why having critical acclaimed techno line ups at a fest is worth doing.
I don't think techno is popular at all man. I see no indication that it is poised to blow up; but agree to disagree.
Bringing up Gov Ball is a bit of a what aboutism. But I'll indulge it. Even though guitar indie rock is on a bit of a down swing, it is still vastly more popular than a niche like techno music. I think going forward Gov Ball has to be much more careful in which acts in that genre are placed where on the lineup. But it's not going to be scrapped entirely.
Launchpad McQuack I think if you went to Coachella then you would fully get why it’s so successful. As long as they continue to serve well rounded, quality lineups then I will continue to be interested. Like most others, I appreciate when festivals book music I’m into and sure, Southern California is nice in April.
Panorama tried. It didn’t work. That’s fine. Govball will continue to thrive because it books music kids can get lit to in the city. That’s fine too. Didn’t Cut Copy play their own cheap NYC show btw? I’d rather catch that instead of dealing with a crowd like Govball’s or the hassle of a festival day, but that’s just me. Maybe all the Mall Grab fans out there made a similar move? Maybe there’s not that many to begin with? Maybe they should have booked stronger top lines to lure in the traveling techno fan or music nerd? Dunno. I’m definitely not here for the economics of major corporations or festivals I do not attend though. I’m just here for the music. Panorama was an experience I greatly enjoyed, but there are more experiences to be had.
I’m sure the Yuma will be rad again next year and in a few weeks I’ll be at Melt with 20K others who ARE into these genres. Shit, they might not even hit 20K. Either way I have never thought about how much of a profit they’ll turn and do not plan to. As far as my feelings are concerned, I thought the whole purpose of all this was giving our opinion/saying how we feel about fests and things?
We aren't really talking about Gov Ball, so yeah like in the previous post thats one of those "well what abouts." But I can explain the difference: Cut Copy played T5 last fall and they did an after show (that sold out immediately). They also were not really an act being pushed as the crux of the lineup or the major draw of the fest.
Gov Ball hung their hat this year on: Yeah Yeah Yeahs (hometown act, first major NYC show in 5 years; besides a theater date last November that sold out in seconds; and you were lucky if you scored a ticket) Jack White (first major NYC show in 4 years; other than an album release show at a small venue that sold out in seconds; and the few who got to go were lucky) Eminem (first major NYC show in 7 years; other than an album release show at a small venue that sold out in seconds; and the few who got to go were lucky) NERD (first NYC show period in 8 years) and Travis Scott and Halsey who were there promoting new albums with new productions that hadn't been done anywhere before
Compare that to Panorama's highlights: Janet Jackson (played 2 arena dates around NYC since just last November) The Killers (4 arena shows in the area since last fall; and a few more at small venues) The Weeknd (played 5 different arena shows in the area just in the last year) Migos (5 arena dates with Drake coming up; also just played Meadows fest a couple months ago) SZA (if she actually shows up Panorama will be her 7th show in New York since just last August)
Gov Ball had a bunch of major highlights on their lineup that people in the area have not had much of an opportunity to see in years. Compared with Panorama's big draws, who we have had numerous opportunities to see in large venues over the last year. That is the difference there.
I think bringing up Coachella isn't really relevant because they can get away with booking anything they want. Nobody else can. Even AEG's other fests can't; which is why this one is on its last legs and FYF is already done or being forced to rebrand or whatevers going on with that.
Have fun at Melt man. I don't see any problem with you liking whatever flavor of ice cream you want. My point is only that just because it is your favorite does not make it everyone elses too.
I literally never said techno is everyone’s favorite genre. I just said it’s more popular than you can comprehend/give it credit for. You completely exclude an entire world of tech/house culture outside of the NYC festival bubble. I don’t give a shit about Panorama. Have you heard of Fabric? Berghain? These places are packed and provide spaces for one of the most exciting underground genres of music today - one that you have admitted to knowing nothing about. Late night techno spots at Glasto reach capacity. Other people here are telling you the Yuma fills up. We aren’t lying to you. If you want to be hard headed and act as if your experience is absolute, that’s fine too. Get down to the glitch mob or a stale version of Jack White for the 7th time. Do you. At least even with a shitty headliner like The Killers this festival has provided some quality alternatives. You keep talking about ice cream and flavors. I prefer a quality controlled shop that has lots of good flavors for everyone. Not one with just different versions of vanilla.
Do you not understand though that I do not care if these mid-tier festivals succeed or not? I don’t know how else to say it. I do not care how their top acts compared or how much they’ll draw. I do not care if this is the last year or not. The good ones will always be around anyways. I’ve had my moments with these events. I can move on with my life if they stop functioning. It’s truly fine.
You admit you don’t know much about these acts and even said you don’t get the point of them being booked. That alone proves that you don’t know what you’re talking about and I’m wasting my time here. We were just saying the stage is cool and you start talking about how they’re a bad draw and how promoters are in the wrong for booking them. Typical negativity. I know how this works. We’ve been through it before. When in reality we all know that you either have some vendetta against this festival still or you’re just hating on the genre at hand because it’s favored by certain message board enemies. You just continue to downplay the genre as if it doesn’t exist when in reality it’s something you just happen to know very little about. If techno/house did not do it’s part in selling out Panorama 2018, I simply do not give a shit. It’s still a thriving genre on the rise.
Bonnaroo used to book acts like Nick Cave and while the crowd was small, I didn’t ask what the point was. I understood. The overwhelming majority might have went to Kaskade or whatever, but I still found value in an empty Nick Cave tent. Gorillaz played to one of the smallest headliner crowds I ever saw at Coachella in 2010. I didn’t question why they headlined or why festivals booked them to headline after. I for sure wasn’t concerned with how much profit they contributed to that year. It’s not all about money, man.
Last Edit: Jun 15, 2018 8:43:48 GMT -5 by Deleted - Back to Top
Post by 3post1jack1 on Jun 15, 2018 8:38:32 GMT -5
great dialogue between Launchpad McQuack and @jonesjupiter, you both make good points.
i'm likely biased since i've gotten into the genre over the past three years or so, but speaking strictly on the subject of techno and tech-house, i do think it is slowly gaining popularity in the United States. not sure about "poised to blow up", if by "blow up" we mean reach the level of popularity EDM did, since techno has pretty much zero popular radio appeal. but i could see it gaining a type of underground grassroots popularity in the US, kind of like the late 90s/early 00s jamband boom, when the top jambands would easily sell out arenas, and jamband festivals would regularly attract 60-80,000 attendees.
there is zero doubt that techno is big business internationally. The Awakenings festival attracts 80,000 fans, if the internet is to be believed, and crowds for big techno names like Carl Cox, Adam Beyer, and Nina Kraviz are huge at non-techno centric international electronic festivals. Techno radio shows are ubiquitous internationally and have been for decade(s).
But even in the US, Movement regularly attracts 35,000 fans, the Resistance stage at Ultra continues to get bigger and always appears well-attended by looking at videos, smaller (5-7,000 attendees) tech-house events like the Dirty Bird Campouts keep popping up, every big EDM festival (like EDC) now has a techno or tech-house centric stage, and we continue to see more accessible tech-house artists like Von Stroke popping up on multi-genre festivals like Bonnaroo. I admit these are small indicators, but they are just that, indicators that maybe this genre is on the rise in the US.
Regarding large multi-genre festivals and techno's place on their lineups, I'm still of the opinion that headliners (and certain big name second line acts) sell tickets, and that a unique and diverse undercard then sells more tickets to more musically discriminating people who are less likely to care as much about a headliner. So if a festival organizer sprinkles a bit of techno into the undercard, I don't think it necessarily hurts their bottom line to give that spot to a techno artist instead of say some small name EDM or pop act that has a ten thousand spotify plays, but it might help their brand to present the more unique and diverse offerings.
Regarding Coachella, they are in the unique position of being able to push the festival culture forward without having to worry about making a profit. They are going to sell out for all the reasons we've discussed ad nauseam, so it is less risky for them to curate a stage of interesting electronic artists, or taking a chance on an interesting headliner. The benefit to them is that if this music does continue to increase in popularity, then they have established themselves as a premiere destination for this type of music to fans, complete with high quality sound and production, and have developed a relationship with the artists over several years that will ensure the artists exposure and I'm assuming a decent paycheck for the artists and the artists' teams.
Other festivals, like Panorama, may try to do this and fail. They may fail for any number of reasons, but I appreciate them trying. It can't just be Coachella pushing the culture forward. Looking at the festival market from a high level, less established festivals have to provide these artists exposure to, even if doing so is risky in the short term. As a music fan I appreciate it when festivals take these risks, and I try to express that appreciation with my time and money when possible.
great dialogue between Launchpad McQuack and @jonesjupiter, you both make good points.
i'm likely biased since i've gotten into the genre over the past three years or so, but speaking strictly on the subject of techno and tech-house, i do think it is slowly gaining popularity in the United States. not sure about "poised to blow up", if by "blow up" we mean reach the level of popularity EDM did, since techno has pretty much zero popular radio appeal. but i could see it gaining a type of underground grassroots popularity in the US, kind of like the late 90s/early 00s jamband boom, when the top jambands would easily sell out arenas, and jamband festivals would regularly attract 60-80,000 attendees.
This is more what I meant, yes. Or, at least poised to get as big here as it is in Europe, where places like Berghain are pilgrimage worthy institutions.
There’s a reason why labels like Brainfeeder are signing more straightforward dance acts like Ross From Friends. Those lo-fi guys are only a small spectrum of what new and exciting things are happening in electronic music. Check out a techno act like Daniel Avery on Arcadia. It’s other worldly. I get excited just thinking about it. Meanwhile you have acts like Koze putting out AOTY material.
I literally never said techno is everyone’s favorite genre. I just said it’s more popular than you can comprehend/give it credit for. You completely exclude an entire world of tech/house culture outside of the NYC festival bubble. I don’t give a shit about Panorama. Have you heard of Fabric? Berghain? These places are packed and provide spaces for one of the most exciting underground genres of music today - one that you have admitted to knowing nothing about. Late night techno spots at Glasto reach capacity. Other people here are telling you the Yuma fills up. We aren’t lying to you. If you want to be hard headed and act as if your experience is absolute, that’s fine too. Get down to the glitch mob or a stale version of Jack White for the 7th time. Do you. At least even with a shitty headliner like The Killers this festival has provided some quality alternatives. You keep talking about ice cream and flavors. I prefer a quality controlled shop that has lots of good flavors for everyone. Not one with just different versions of vanilla.
Do you not understand though that I do not care if these mid-tier festivals succeed or not? I don’t know how else to say it. I do not care how their top acts compared or how much they’ll draw. I do not care if this is the last year or not. The good ones will always be around anyways. I’ve had my moments with these events. I can move on with my life if they stop functioning. It’s truly fine.
You admit you don’t know much about these acts and even said you don’t get the point of them being booked. That alone proves that you don’t know what you’re talking about and I’m wasting my time here. We were just saying the stage is cool and you start talking about how they’re a bad draw and how promoters are in the wrong for booking them. Typical negativity. I know how this works. We’ve been through it before. When in reality we all know that you either have some vendetta against this festival still or you’re just hating on the genre at hand because it’s favored by certain message board enemies. You just continue to downplay the genre as if it doesn’t exist when in reality it’s something you just happen to know very little about. If techno/house did not do it’s part in selling out Panorama 2018, I simply do not give a shit. It’s still a thriving genre on the rise.
Bonnaroo used to book acts like Nick Cave and while the crowd was small, I didn’t ask what the point was. I understood. The overwhelming majority might have went to Kaskade or whatever, but I still found value in an empty Nick Cave tent. Gorillaz played to one of the smallest headliner crowds I ever saw at Coachella in 2010. I didn’t question why they headlined or why festivals booked them to headline after. I for sure wasn’t concerned with how much profit they contributed to that year. It’s not all about money, man.
This is getting a little dark and personal with the insults so I'll try to dial it back. I thought we were having a good discussion up until this point. But just some thoughts on this:
- A google search tells me these are clubs that fit 1,500 people. I dont see how that is an indication of popularity.
- Again, Coachella and Glasto for that matter can literally book any act they want.
- Then why did you bring it up and make the Cut Copy dig?
- I think that proves that somebody who spends all day listening to music and posting on a music forum; not knowing much about these acts. Means they are far from popular or the consciousness of the mainstream. Which is completely fine. But that is literally the entire point I am making; which you are taking exception to.
- I actually thought we were having a pretty good discussion on this up until this post; and none of it has anything to do with any personal bias's you think I may have. I said before I think you made some good points. Why do you take differences of opinion so personally? Not everyone is going to think exactly like or enjoy the same stuff as you man. It's a big world.
Cut Copy wasn’t a dig. You just always seem to point out how dance acts play in NYC for cheap and how that might have detoured buyers. Cut Copy is also a cheap ticket that routinely comes through, but I assume you saw them and that they were still a priority for many on this board. People are going to like what they want and like you said it’s a big world. There might even be some people willing to drop some money on this lineup specifically because of The Point. Had they still bought a ticket had the lineup just been Migos and The Killers? Maybe not. We can’t answer for everyone, nor should we.
Edit: I don’t think I got anymore personal than you did?
Last Edit: Jun 15, 2018 9:07:52 GMT -5 by Deleted - Back to Top
Cut Copy wasn’t a dig. You just always seem to point out how dance acts play in NYC for cheap and how that might have detoured buyers. Cut Copy is also a cheap ticket that routinely comes through, but I assume you saw them and that they were still a priority for many on this board. People are going to like what they want and like you said it’s a big world. There might even be some people willing to drop some money on this lineup specifically because of The Point. Had they still bought a ticket had the lineup just been Migos and The Killers? Maybe not. We can’t answer for everyone, nor should we.
Cut Copy are not an act that plays for cheap or comes through often. I freaking wish that were the case, I love those guys. Not counting Gov Ball; the show last fall was the first time they had played here since 2014. Pretty much the same as any touring outfit that comes through in cycles and plays regular venues.
The DJs we are talking about don't really release albums or have any sort of production. So they are here all the time. Black Madonna for instance, spins regularly at dance clubs in Brooklyn.
Post by Delicious Meatball Sub on Jun 15, 2018 9:13:51 GMT -5
3post1jack1 I’d also respond to you that I think your comment about radio play misses the mark a little. Yes, stuff like Skee Mask isn’t going to pop up on the radio, but EDM never really did either, it took some evolution. You weren’t hearing Daft Punk on the radio, you were hearing Kanye sample Daft Punk on the radio. Eventually guys like SHM and Calvin Harris has radio hits, but they did so with a sound that had evolved significantly from what the genre was doing 5-10 years earlier.
Same was true of the first wave electro boom in the US. Stuff like Moby and Fatboy Slim that were mainstream successful represented a far edge of the total genre, but that mainstream success of a few made the other artists more popular and viable. And guys like OutKast sampling jungle beats played an important role as well.
I also think there's something to be said here as well for the internet and how global trends can easily gain traction. This music is more accessible than ever.
Post by Delicious Meatball Sub on Jun 15, 2018 9:24:08 GMT -5
Isn’t the fact that all these artists play all the time in NY kind of an argument FOR the genre’s popularity? If they’re really booking Black Madonna several times a year it’s because people keep turning up to see her.