Whether it's your first Bonnaroo or you’re a music festival veteran, we welcome you to Inforoo.
Here you'll find info about artists, rumors, camping tips, and the infamous Roo Clues. Have a look around then create an account and join in the fun. See you at Bonnaroo!!
Sorry, I'm heavily distracted today and yesterday because I went all basic bitch this summer and watched The Bachelorette. What a dumb broad. Peter was the clear choice there. Anyways.
I'm not moving yet. I don't have reason to. Once JR and Potent I may change my mind, but for now, I'm good.
Sorry, I'm heavily distracted today and yesterday because I went all basic bitch this summer and watched The Bachelorette. What a dumb broad. Peter was the clear choice there. Anyways.
I'm not moving yet. I don't have reason to. Once JR and Potent I may change my mind, but for now, I'm good.
I used to watch this back when we had cable/DVR... Haven't watched the last couple seasons, but from what I hear, Peter is way better off without her.
This is a weird spot for both Potent and me. If only two votes happen in the next 23.5 hours we'll be in one of the following spreads:
A. I vote for Pablo | Potent votes for me We go into R4 with Pablo and me, and Pablo(3), Zolah(1) and Danbob(1) have a free vote.
B. I vote for Potent | Potent votes for me We go into R4 with Potent and me, and Zig(3), Carini(4), and Tainted(2) have a free vote.
C. I vote for Potent | Potent votes for Pablo We go into R4 with Potent and Pablo(3), and LLL(1), Jaz(1), and Maddog have a free vote. ^ Potent just voted for me before I posted.
Pablo or Potent are both pretty up in the air at this point, so I'm voting based on free voters. Seeing what ZIG, Carini and Tainted do will be more useful than seeing what Zolah and Danbob do.
This is a weird spot for both Potent and me. If only two votes happen in the next 23.5 hours we'll be in one of the following spreads:
A. I vote for Pablo | Potent votes for me We go into R4 with Pablo and me, and Pablo(3), Zolah(1) and Danbob(1) have a free vote.
B. I vote for Potent | Potent votes for me We go into R4 with Potent and me, and Zig(3), Carini(4), and Tainted(2) have a free vote.
C. I vote for Potent | Potent votes for Pablo We go into R4 with Potent and Pablo(3), and LLL(1), Jaz(1), and Maddog have a free vote. ^ Potent just voted for me before I posted.
Pablo or Potent are both pretty up in the air at this point, so I'm voting based on free voters. Seeing what ZIG, Carini and Tainted do will be more useful than seeing what Zolah and Danbob do.
JR > Potent
"They've both only voted once, and as long as [Potent's] in the runoff, they can just one vote their way through Day 1. "
The parenthesis indicate how many times the person has voted. That's how I had it written in my notes, forgot to clarify that.
What does how many times a person has voted mean to you in this situation?
I prefer to see the people with fewer votes get put into a position where they have to vote again. In this scenario, it didn't happen that way because Pablo's next vote would be predetermined. They honestly don't offer much to the post and could have been omitted.
This is a weird spot for both Potent and me. If only two votes happen in the next 23.5 hours we'll be in one of the following spreads:
A. I vote for Pablo | Potent votes for me We go into R4 with Pablo and me, and Pablo(3), Zolah(1) and Danbob(1) have a free vote.
B. I vote for Potent | Potent votes for me We go into R4 with Potent and me, and Zig(3), Carini(4), and Tainted(2) have a free vote.
C. I vote for Potent | Potent votes for Pablo We go into R4 with Potent and Pablo(3), and LLL(1), Jaz(1), and Maddog have a free vote. ^ Potent just voted for me before I posted.
Pablo or Potent are both pretty up in the air at this point, so I'm voting based on free voters. Seeing what ZIG, Carini and Tainted do will be more useful than seeing what Zolah and Danbob do.
JR > Potent
"They've both only voted once, and as long as [Potent's] in the runoff, they can just one vote their way through Day 1. "
I must assume that you're twisting my explanation of why I wasn't the best choice in R2 with what is happening in R3. The situation is similar, but not the same. Zolah and Danbob have only made one vote, but if I vote for Pablo, R4 Pablo would have had no choice but to retaliate, and Zolah and Danbob would have been in an already lopsided option. Completely different than the situation you're comparing it to. On the other hand, ZIG, Carini, and Tainted have the non-lopsided choice of me or Potent. More valuable IMO.
For the second time this game you're trying to twist someone's words against them and doing a lousy job of it. I found it shady the first time (against Pablo) and now you're pulling the same trick on me.
I didn't love the way pablo presented the reasoning for his vote, over multiple posts, and with snarky things like "Whew. Crisis averted." and the "LOL. Whelp. Goodnight everyone." in between. The post above my evaluation of Pablo's posts, Potent asked if he cared that LLL was still in the runoff, that was my attempt at answering Potents question.
As far as your's, my vote for you and your vote for Pablo being bad are both out of self preservation, I get that. But quack me for bringing up that you told me, that more information can be gathered from single voters, than people that have voted more often, and then you list out the number of votes everyone made and do the opposite.
Regardless of which group you have revote, there is going to be a lopsided choice. ZIG, Carini, AND Tainted don't have a non lopsided choice, whoever votes first does, whoever votes second would be in the same situation dan/zolah would be. unless you are implying that one of dan/zolah are conspiring with pablo and you'll for sure be voted off. you could just as easily be voted off by zig, carini, and tainted, at which point theyll all have voted over 3 times, while dan/zolah are still at one vote.
I didn't love the way pablo presented the reasoning for his vote, over multiple posts, and with snarky things like "Whew. Crisis averted." and the "LOL. Whelp. Goodnight everyone." in between. The post above my evaluation of Pablo's posts, Potent asked if he cared that LLL was still in the runoff, that was my attempt at answering Potents question.
Fair enough. I agree the Pablo's posts could be taken as a little snarky and they do, in my opinion, seem thrown out without much thought. I still found your response a little thrown out without much thought.
As far as your's, my vote for you and your vote for Pablo being bad are both out of self preservation, I get that. But quack me for bringing up that you told me, that more information can be gathered from single voters, than people that have voted more often, and then you list out the number of votes everyone made and do the opposite.
I was voting for information, not self-preservation.
The parenthesis were there because I was using them in my notes and I pasted names from my notes to my post and they remained. If I was being more thoughtful I would have removed them.
I don't take back my comment about LLL and Jaz nor my later vote that doesn't follow that particular train of logic. Seeing what 2 quiet players do is good. Seeing what 3 less quiet players is better.
Regardless of which group you have revote, there is going to be a lopsided choice. ZIG, Carini, AND Tainted don't have a non lopsided choice, whoever votes first does, whoever votes second would be in the same situation dan/zolah would be. unless you are implying that one of dan/zolah are conspiring with pablo and you'll for sure be voted off. you could just as easily be voted off by zig, carini, and tainted, at which point theyll all have voted over 3 times, while dan/zolah are still at one vote.
I disagree. Pablo's vote would already be on me going in. No info from him. Zolah or Danbob would vote for Potent. No information from that person (except that they were quicker to put the pressure on the other.) The last person is a tiebreaker and gives us some insight. We only really get info from that one person.
Zig, Carini, and Tainted are different. We get info from the first and third voters at least.
Can we please vote for players we find suspicious as our first reasin and not worrying as much about who revotes?
It's Day 1, how much suspicion can there be? I think one of the only notable moves was Pablo expanding the original runoff to 5, and I'm going back and forth on whether it was intentional or not. I'm open to switching my vote to him.
Can we please vote for players we find suspicious as our first reasin and not worrying as much about who revotes?
It's Day 1, how much suspicion can there be? I think one of the only notable moves was Pablo expanding the original runoff to 5, and I'm going back and forth on whether it was intentional or not. I'm open to switching my vote to him.
that seems to be a nice compromise between voting based on suspicion and having no one in the runoff re-voting with two 1 vote people being forced into a second vote
It's Day 1, how much suspicion can there be? I think one of the only notable moves was Pablo expanding the original runoff to 5, and I'm going back and forth on whether it was intentional or not. I'm open to switching my vote to him.
that seems to be a nice compromise between voting based on suspicion and having no one in the runoff re-voting with two 1 vote people being forced into a second vote
that seems to be a nice compromise between voting based on suspicion and having no one in the runoff re-voting with two 1 vote people being forced into a second vote
I don't follow...
JR didn't want anyone to get their vote back who is in the runoff, but also suggested that people with less votes should be forced to make more votes, when it works out. Carini wants people who are suspicious. If you think Pablo is suspicious, that checks both.
JR didn't want anyone to get their vote back who is in the runoff, but also suggested that people with less votes should be forced to make more votes, when it works out. Carini wants people who are suspicious. If you think Pablo is suspicious, that checks both.
This and your other posts makes it seem like you are suspicious of Pablo, is that accurate to say?
So, it's between Zolah and Potent for me. I do not have any particular concerns about either as of now.
It certainly wouldn't ring true for me to throw shade at Zolah for her runoff-breaking vote, since I did something similar as Town. I think that for Mafia to play the way she and I have brings an extra level of scrutiny that I do not expect Mafia to welcome. Tainted expressed angst over my vote. I would like to hear his thoughts on the moves Zolah and I have made.
Pablo > Potent
I do think Pablo is playing a little "nothing to see here" trying to paint dan falling out as suspicious, and making it seem like his inclusion of LLL last minute wasn't strange. Zolah doing it while there is only one stack seems to be more of an attempt to shake someone off potent or see who stacks next than him doing it while there are already 4 in the RO.
I have come to read the 5way in any game of mafia, as a way to attempt (mafia) subtraction by addition. It's already been detailed by other players this game, but the idea that you can add in and take out as the runoff widdles down.
All that means to me is town potentially landed more than 1 mafia in the runoff. Or not.
So, it's between Zolah and Potent for me. I do not have any particular concerns about either as of now.
It certainly wouldn't ring true for me to throw shade at Zolah for her runoff-breaking vote, since I did something similar as Town. I think that for Mafia to play the way she and I have brings an extra level of scrutiny that I do not expect Mafia to welcome. Tainted expressed angst over my vote. I would like to hear his thoughts on the moves Zolah and I have made.
Pablo > Potent
I do think Pablo is playing a little "nothing to see here" trying to paint dan falling out as suspicious, and making it seem like his inclusion of LLL last minute wasn't strange. Zolah doing it while there is only one stack seems to be more of an attempt to shake someone off potent or see who stacks next than him doing it while there are already 4 in the RO.
I have come to read the 5way in any game of mafia, as a way to attempt (mafia) subtraction by addition. It's already been detailed by other players this game, but the idea that you can add in and take out as the runoff widdles down.
All that means to me is town potentially landed more than 1 mafia in the runoff. Or not.
I also think that Tainted explaining his thoughts on the 5 way, Pablo asking him his thoughts after, and then Tainted voting for Pablo is funny.
You make some valid points but I think you may be getting some tunnel vision. I'm not saying I think Pablo is town or mafia (unknown for me right now) but I think doing nothing but putting Pablo under a microscope is dangerous for town.
I know, I don't think putting on the blinders is a good move, its essentially how mafia won last game (even though I tried to tell everyone not to throughout), but just answering potent as to where my suspicion lies.
Can we please vote for players we find suspicious as our first reasin and not worrying as much about who revotes?
It's Day 1, how much suspicion can there be? I think one of the only notable moves was Pablo expanding the original runoff to 5, and I'm going back and forth on whether it was intentional or not. I'm open to switching my vote to him.
I agree that it was one of the few noteworthy events. Certainly not saying it was definitely a Mafia move, but noteworthy nonetheless. it seems JR falls into run-offs frequently, and I almost think he is an easy player for Mafia to get a stack on. I think I'll move for now.
We're all a mess of paradoxes. Believing in things we know can't be true. We walk around carrying feelings too complicated and contradictory to express. But when it all becomes too big, and words aren't enough to help get it all out, there's always music.
SupeЯfuЯЯyanimal
Bleary-Eyed Bonnawook Globlist Facist Slave Dog
We're all a mess of paradoxes. Believing in things we know can't be true. We walk around carrying feelings too complicated and contradictory to express. But when it all becomes too big, and words aren't enough to help get it all out, there's always music.
