Whether it's your first Bonnaroo or you’re a music festival veteran, we welcome you to Inforoo.
Here you'll find info about artists, rumors, camping tips, and the infamous Roo Clues. Have a look around then create an account and join in the fun. See you at Bonnaroo!!
I'll do whatever the group wants because it's not that big a deal, but I personally have no interest whatsoever in dragging out everyone's lineup over several days/weeks, or explaining/presenting different acts. If everyone does 75 UFDAs, that's 1,500 acts that I'm not nearly as interested or invested in as the 500 we've already drafted. Don't get me wrong, this has been a lot of fun and I've thoroughly enjoyed seeing what people pick, but 1,500 majority-undercard acts isn't really going to hold my attention nor make as much of a difference to people's votes as the past 25 rounds.
I'll do whatever the group wants because it's not that big a deal, but I personally have no interest whatsoever in dragging out everyone's lineup over several days/weeks, or explaining/presenting different acts. If everyone does 75 UFDAs, that's 1,500 acts that I'm not nearly as interested or invested in as the 500 we've already drafted. Don't get me wrong, this has been a lot of fun and I've thoroughly enjoyed seeing what people pick, but 1,500 majority-undercard acts isn't really going to hold my attention nor make as much of a difference to people's votes as the past 25 rounds.
A lot of them will be repeats. I think it's a really helpful way to clear up the ineligible acts though. Last year had some that were definitely not eligible, and also a good amount of ones that had already been drafted.
I'll do whatever the group wants because it's not that big a deal, but I personally have no interest whatsoever in dragging out everyone's lineup over several days/weeks, or explaining/presenting different acts. If everyone does 75 UFDAs, that's 1,500 acts that I'm not nearly as interested or invested in as the 500 we've already drafted. Don't get me wrong, this has been a lot of fun and I've thoroughly enjoyed seeing what people pick, but 1,500 majority-undercard acts isn't really going to hold my attention nor make as much of a difference to people's votes as the past 25 rounds.
10 spread out across the course of a day for two days or something isn’t that long if we do it that way.
To be clear, I'm talking about a two or three hour window for these things, not days. Also, there should be a lot of overlap so I can't imagine it being anywhere near 1500 acts.
To be clear, I'm talking about a two or three hour window for these things, not days. Also, there should be a lot of overlap so I can't imagine it being anywhere near 1500 acts.
Oh okay, I must be misunderstanding things then. I'm actually busy at work today so I probably didn't read things all the way through. I thought you guys were talking about each person individually releasing a few of their UFDAs at a time. So I was like...bruh.
Post by RedFrog Intern on Mar 14, 2018 12:36:21 GMT -5
Even though his festival appearances are over saturated and his fan base is pretty whack, I still think its ridiculous that Bassnectar hasnt been picked yet. His shows are pretty good. Ill take him. Plus hes a stand up guy
Even though his festival appearances are over saturated and his fan base is pretty whack, I still think its ridiculous that Bassnectar hasnt been picked yet. His shows are pretty good. Ill take him. Plus hes a stand up guy
Jack and I actually had an entire conversation about drafting him last night and how I was surprised he hadn't been drafted yet. If he didn't go I was going to petition for him to include him in his UDFA... He's a huge name to go so late, but that says a lot about how awful his fans are. I think I've somehow only seen him once, I was very fucked up, but the show was fun.
This was another big EDM name I tried to get Jack to draft a long time ago. I couldn't believe he kept going unpicked. To a point where I thought maybe he was drafted as part of another act.
After considering it a bit more, I am voting against the slow reveal. Yes, it would be cool to give more attention to individual lineups and let everyone highlight some of their acts - but if there are any disputes about who has already been drafted or who is active, that would give a strong advantage to the posters whose lineups were released first (assuming we stick with last year's rule that you can't replace an ineligible free agent with a free agent from anyone else's lineup).
After considering it a bit more, I am voting against the slow reveal. Yes, it would be cool to give more attention to individual lineups and let everyone highlight some of their acts - but if there are any disputes about who has already been drafted or who is active, that would give a strong advantage to the posters whose lineups were released first (assuming we stick with last year's rule that you can't replace an ineligible free agent with a free agent from anyone else's lineup).
Couldn’t we just say that any replacements would not be made until after all the lineups were released?
Post by piggy pablo on Mar 14, 2018 14:23:00 GMT -5
I think we'd all submit our lineups to cdev first, so there would be a record of who had what at the time of the initial submissions. That way there wouldn't be any funny business.
I think we'd all submit our lineups to cdev first, so there would be a record of who had what at the time of the initial submissions. That way there wouldn't be any funny business.
Ohhhh. That makes much more sense. Nevermind then, I like this idea now. I was just fuzzy on logistics.
