Whether it's your first Bonnaroo or you’re a music festival veteran, we welcome you to Inforoo.
Here you'll find info about artists, rumors, camping tips, and the infamous Roo Clues. Have a look around then create an account and join in the fun. See you at Bonnaroo!!
Talking about this post. I think it's disengenuous to say that a lot of the online shit Cardi caught during her last festival cycle didn't include some gross racial overtones. I don't believe either of you feel that way personally, but saying "people on Reddit wouldn't like Cardi B" appeals to that kind of thinking imo. Gocats obviously felt the same way based on his response (and for the record, I have never interacted with that guy off board and once told him to go fuck himself here, so it's not like he's in my pocket).
tЯist♡n I get that this is how you play the game, but surely you can admit that you're way more aggressive in your approach than most of the people on here. I don't feel victimized, but it is annoying to see people get needled for voting for us when I'm proud of what we put out.
I mean you said that post is "fucking gross"? For literally asking if your headliner repeat was really well received enough to come back two Bonnaroo's in a row? It's almost like you were saying my partner is feeding into racism for questioning you repeating a headliner.
I wouldn't deny I play more aggressively than others.
Genuinely sorry, that's how I took it at the time.
I can not count jackson and Jackson cause I believe those are the most "trolly" ones but only for this matchup (per juggs request). If both teams want a runoff, then I could do it for a day.
I mean, the other part of the problem is we were up like 7 when you extended the vote by 48 hours so this whole thing has gone sideways
I can not count jackson and Jackson cause I believe those are the most "trolly" ones but only for this matchup (per juggs request). If both teams want a runoff, then I could do it for a day.
I mean, the other part of the problem is we were up like 7 when you extended the vote by 48 hours so this whole thing has gone sideways
it was extended one day not 2, but that was because I sensed a lack of activity from people who weren't playing. This is a different thing. Do you agree with Juggs prop? That's really only two votes that I would consider inherently "trolling". The options rn are: one day runoff regardless of final count, drop jackson and Flanz votes, count all votes. Up to you guys and if there's another suggestion, I'd include it. Sorry for the mess, but I appreciate you guys being willing to work it out.
it has all the feel of a troll. Idk do whatever you want.
*Fwiw I've said multiple times T has done the worst job as draft commish but this is a nightmare and I don't envy handling this
I'm inclined to agree with not counting these votes but I really don't think I have standing here without doing a prop. If any team who is on the receiving end of these votes would like me not to count them, I can do that.
I mean, the other part of the problem is we were up like 7 when you extended the vote by 48 hours so this whole thing has gone sideways
it was extended one day not 2, but that was because I sensed a lack of activity from people who weren't playing. This is a different thing. Do you agree with Juggs prop? That's really only two votes that I would consider inherently "trolling". The options rn are: one day runoff regardless of final count, drop jackson and Flanz votes, count all votes. Up to you guys and if there's another suggestion, I'd include it. Sorry for the mess, but I appreciate you guys being willing to work it out.
No you can take those two out that’s fine. It’s just kinda shitty that this is falling on our heads when the extended time has done nothing but hurt us.
I mean, the other part of the problem is we were up like 7 when you extended the vote by 48 hours so this whole thing has gone sideways
Bingo
don't get why you think this is the same. In both rounds, I got explicit requests by users to extend the voting. I couldn't extend this to 12pm today because I thought I had class, so I did 6 which was when I thought i'd get out.
I mean, the other part of the problem is we were up like 7 when you extended the vote by 48 hours so this whole thing has gone sideways
it was extended one day not 2, but that was because I sensed a lack of activity from people who weren't playing. This is a different thing. Do you agree with Juggs prop? That's really only two votes that I would consider inherently "trolling". The options rn are: one day runoff regardless of final count, drop jackson and Flanz votes, count all votes. Up to you guys and if there's another suggestion, I'd include it. Sorry for the mess, but I appreciate you guys being willing to work it out.
I don't need/want a runoff, that's silly, we're not electing a senator here.
I mean you said that post is "fucking gross"? For literally asking if your headliner repeat was really well received enough to come back two Bonnaroo's in a row? It's almost like you were saying my partner is feeding into racism for questioning you repeating a headliner.
I wouldn't deny I play more aggressively than others.
Genuinely sorry, that's how I took it at the time.
I think we should stop extending voting just because ______ hasn't chimed in. If they were interested it seems like they could have participated by now. We just came off a long weekend too. It does seem fishy - no offense - that the league commissioner (who is also a running a losing team) is extending time for the voting period whilst tagging other posters.
I'm inclined to agree with not counting these votes but I really don't think I have standing here without doing a prop. If any team who is on the receiving end of these votes would like me not to count them, I can do that.
I think we should stop extending voting just because ______ hasn't chimed in. If they were interested it seems like they could have participated by now. We just came off a long weekend too. It does seem fishy - no offense - that the league commissioner (who is also a running a losing team) is extending time for the voting period whilst tagging other posters.
I don't really know what to say to this. It wasn't extended because certain people hadn't voted that I thought benefitted me. I didn't say "extend it because I think cdev might vote". It was because barely anyone had voted, I got requests to extend it (per last round) and no one was against it when proposed. I would've granted this extension to anyone who did not vote yet, whether that be you, sang or deto.
it was extended one day not 2, but that was because I sensed a lack of activity from people who weren't playing. This is a different thing. Do you agree with Juggs prop? That's really only two votes that I would consider inherently "trolling". The options rn are: one day runoff regardless of final count, drop jackson and Flanz votes, count all votes. Up to you guys and if there's another suggestion, I'd include it. Sorry for the mess, but I appreciate you guys being willing to work it out.
I don't need/want a runoff, that's silly, we're not electing a senator here.
I thought we weren't doing runoffs and it automatically went to highest seed? Isn't that how truevine and I lost to the captains?
you guys lost by a vote, but the runoff isn't because of a tie. DMS suggested it because a lot of recent votes are troll votes and we aren't sure if we should count them.
I say keep their votes. While fun, I don't think it's all part some elaborate troll. There have been others who had no real stake in this game cast votes today as well without any explanation.
JazFredTOSTIEproblem dog , do you agree with this? Would need consent from both sides in each matchup to do this.
I know jackson took a swing there, but he also actually wrote out some reasons. So I would count that. Flanz just quoted it, so whatever, chuck that one if he doesn't feel like clarifying. He seems mostly interested in breaking Chandler, so probably not.
I say keep their votes. While fun, I don't think it's all part some elaborate troll. There have been others who had no real stake in this game cast votes today as well without any explanation.
I say keep their votes. While fun, I don't think it's all part some elaborate troll. There have been others who had no real stake in this game cast votes today as well without any explanation.
we're talking about 3 voters specifically. I agree with pd's Flanz take and will not count that unless there is any objection.
