Whether it's your first Bonnaroo or you’re a music festival veteran, we welcome you to Inforoo.
Here you'll find info about artists, rumors, camping tips, and the infamous Roo Clues. Have a look around then create an account and join in the fun. See you at Bonnaroo!!
Nothing crazy so far, but can see NFT applications for video game skins, perks, etc. like you said.
Nice glad to see some use case but definitely wanna see it from bigger publishers. It'd be so dope to beat a game and unlock like a legendary weapon with real world value
Post by Silver Surfer on Sept 24, 2021 10:59:06 GMT -5
Also considering china doesn't really care about human rights, it makes me feel better about investing in something that is so overhwlemingly good for people that China wants to ban it
Post by piggy pablo on Sept 24, 2021 11:12:14 GMT -5
By the way, the US and Europe will absolutely do this too. If crypto ever comes anywhere near the pipe dream the libertarian utopians think it could be, the currency leaders in the world will do everything in their power (which is plenty, don't believe otherwise) to stop it. This has always been extremely obvious.
By the way, the US and Europe will absolutely do this too. If crypto ever comes anywhere near the pipe dream the libertarian utopians think it could be, the currency leaders in the world will do everything in their power (which is plenty, don't believe otherwise) to stop it. This has always been extremely obvious.
If this is going to be the standard that governments use to decide whether or not to ban it then I don't think crypto fans have anything to worry about. Though I do think there are other factors they will consider.
Also considering china doesn't really care about human rights, it makes me feel better about investing in something that is so overhwlemingly good for people that China wants to ban it
this is not true of BTC or coins. only true of punks, apes, and koalas
How do you destroy $2T of wealth and not have an effect on the world economy?
you talking about Evergrande or what
The current global market cap of Crypto is almost $2T - i just wonder how the people who want to destroy crypto overnight think the global markets would respond?
The current global market cap of Crypto is almost $2T - i just wonder how the people who want to destroy crypto overnight think the global markets would respond?
What's the market cap of the oil and gas industry? I would also like to see that end.
The current global market cap of Crypto is almost $2T - i just wonder how the people who want to destroy crypto overnight think the global markets would respond?
What's the market cap of the oil and gas industry? I would also like to see that end.
I don't think you really know what you're talking about and your opinion is informed by a consent manufacturing apparatus that is Sinophobic.
The CCP is committing genocide on a massive scale. That's objectively evil. I don't care where the government lies.
And the scale and atrocity of this genocide is well documented all over the world, not just from U.S. media. There's nothing about manufacturing consent there.
They're currently interlinked, and the basis of your argument is flawed.
What are you talking about, I asked a question.
You asked a question that was obviously rhetorical and were trying to make a point.
The answer to your question is probably not much of anything. Just because something is valued highly on paper doesn't mean that it being valued less or not at all would have a massive impact on the economy, because it's functionally a speculative asset. Things are overvalued all the time. Conversely, if crypto were worth 4 trillion dollars tomorrow, what would be the impact? There wouldn't really be any aside from the price people are buying or selling at. Until that asset is traded it's just numbers on paper. What would happen if crypto lost value is people that bought high would lose money and people that sold high would make money.
I don't think you really know what you're talking about and your opinion is informed by a consent manufacturing apparatus that is Sinophobic.
The CCP is committing genocide on a massive scale. That's objectively evil. I don't care where the government lies.
And the scale and atrocity of this genocide is well documented all over the world, not just from U.S. media. There's nothing about manufacturing consent there.
It actually has a lot to do with whipping up anti-Chinese sentiment in the United States and furthering U.S. political aims. That's why you know about it and are worried about it. And similarly, you are using it as an example of why people should hate China, who you're currently mad at because they might affect you financially.
You asked a question that was obviously rhetorical and were trying to make a point.
The answer to your question is probably not much of anything. Just because something is valued highly on paper doesn't mean that it being valued less or not at all would have a massive impact on the economy, because it's functionally a speculative asset. Things are overvalued all the time. Conversely, if crypto were worth 4 trillion dollars tomorrow, what would be the impact? There wouldn't really be any aside from the price people are buying or selling at. Until that asset is traded it's just numbers on paper. What would happen if crypto lost value is people that bought high would lose money and people that sold high would make money.
Your assumption is incorrect. I was not being rhetorical at all.
The current global market cap of Crypto is almost $2T - i just wonder how the people who want to destroy crypto overnight think the global markets would respond?
You're really bad at framing innocent questions, then.
The current global market cap of Crypto is almost $2T - i just wonder how the people who want to destroy crypto overnight think the global markets would respond?
You're really bad at framing innocent questions, then.
Thanks for the insult.
I am interested to see people's reactions these sorts of things, because obviously, no matter what you say, the destruction of wealth (speculative or elsewise) has an affect on the economy. Is that disruption worth it to get rid of something which is perceived as damaging? That's what makes this interesting to me, not people talking about things about which they know very little. And no, because you take things personally, that was not a dig at you. Neither was that. Promise.
You're really bad at framing innocent questions, then.
Thanks for the insult.
I am interested to see people's reactions these sorts of things, because obviously, no matter what you say, the destruction of wealth (speculative or elsewise) has an affect on the economy. Is that disruption worth it to get rid of something which is perceived as damaging? That's what makes this interesting to me, not people talking about things about which they know very little. And no, because you take things personally, that was not a dig at you. Neither was that. Promise.
Thanks for the insult.
I'm not dumb enough to think that you framing crypto being banned as a possible global market catastrophe comes from a neutral viewpoint. Cheers.
The CCP is committing genocide on a massive scale. That's objectively evil. I don't care where the government lies.
And the scale and atrocity of this genocide is well documented all over the world, not just from U.S. media. There's nothing about manufacturing consent there.
It actually has a lot to do with whipping up anti-Chinese sentiment in the United States and furthering U.S. political aims. That's why you know about it and are worried about it. And similarly, you are using it as an example of why people should hate China, who you're currently mad at because they might affect you financially.
Between this and our Afghanistan discussion, you've spent the better part of your posts claiming what I think and what I've said, all of which have been inaccurate. I'm not sitting here saying you think about something because of X, or that you have said something when you demonstrably haven't, so I'd appreciate the same from you.
I've read about the Uyghur genocide in NY Times, BBC, the Guardian, etc. I've read reports from independent journalists and people who've managed to escape. Genocide is evil, full-stop. If I have to choose between the U.S. and China, I'm choosing the U.S. literally every time. The U.S. isn't perfect, far from it. But we're not rounding up a group of people based on their religion, harvesting their organs, enslaving them, and attempting to eradicate them.
I NEVER said people should hate China. Not once. I said fuck the CCP, the Chinese Communist Party. The party that orchestrates aforementioned genocide. The party that will "disappear" someone for speaking negatively about the party or its leaders. The party that controls its citizens lives.
I'm mad at the CCP for genocide. Every day. So, when I see yet another reason why the CCP can go fuck right off, I'll chime in and say it. It just so happened to be because of this fool's errand of banning crypto. If the CCP had announced they were banning all plant-based foods, I'd hop over to the food thread and say, "Fuck the CCP." If the CCP banned music festivals, I'd be posting "Fuck the CCP" somewhere on this board. They're EVIL. Evil. And as for the inaccurate claim that I'm mad at "because they might affect [me] financially," "I'd honestly donate my net wealth if it meant the CCP no longer existed and there'd be no genocide. I don't care.
I have friends, family who are Chinese. Chinese culture has impacted my life in ways I can't ever express enough gratitude for. But the CCP is evil. Fuck the CCP.
I am interested to see people's reactions these sorts of things, because obviously, no matter what you say, the destruction of wealth (speculative or elsewise) has an affect on the economy. Is that disruption worth it to get rid of something which is perceived as damaging? That's what makes this interesting to me, not people talking about things about which they know very little. And no, because you take things personally, that was not a dig at you. Neither was that. Promise.
Thanks for the insult.
I'm not dumb enough to think that you framing crypto being banned as a possible global market catastrophe comes from a neutral viewpoint. Cheers.
