Whether it's your first Bonnaroo or you’re a music festival veteran, we welcome you to Inforoo.
Here you'll find info about artists, rumors, camping tips, and the infamous Roo Clues. Have a look around then create an account and join in the fun. See you at Bonnaroo!!
D2 is a great time to glean voting data. Why skimp on that intentionally?
it leads to a 3 way tie, we still get data by moving to 2 and having the round close w revoters rather than the round closing at a stalemate
That suggestion was also out of left field. And why would we automatically drop Theo? Rummy and I had both identified him as a person of concern. Sketch.
it leads to a 3 way tie, we still get data by moving to 2 and having the round close w revoters rather than the round closing at a stalemate
That suggestion was also out of left field. And why would we automatically drop Theo? Rummy and I had both identified him as a person of concern. Sketch.
*at least Rummy and I. KPO has voted for him multiple times, but he didn't have a particularly strong reason?
it leads to a 3 way tie, we still get data by moving to 2 and having the round close w revoters rather than the round closing at a stalemate
That suggestion was also out of left field. And why would we automatically drop Theo? Rummy and I had both identified him as a person of concern. Sketch.
it's not that out of left field, this discussion on 3 v 2 on d2 happens a lot, I promise.
and I didn't say people would move off or should move off theo, I'm saying in a kpo otter situation, kpo and otter would get revotes
That suggestion was also out of left field. And why would we automatically drop Theo? Rummy and I had both identified him as a person of concern. Sketch.
*at least Rummy and I. KPO has voted for him multiple times, but he didn't have a particularly strong reason?
I don’t have particularly strong thoughts on anyone yet so I just stuck by my vote
even if we go to 3 someone needs to drop, I don't think highlighting if it's you that the revoters are the other two in, is that big of a flag that rummy/otter made it out to be
Post by Silver Surfer on Apr 28, 2021 22:03:00 GMT -5
The more we play without role reveals the more I miss it. I feel like our gameplay has gotten so anti meta that you can't ever draw any clear conclusions without it
One reason that I feel like at least the oracle should reveal day 2. I think it applies a tiny bit of pressure to mafia and the ability for us to remove at least one name from combos/suslists/reread data.
The more we play without role reveals the more I miss it. I feel like our gameplay has gotten so anti meta that you can't ever draw any clear conclusions without it
One reason that I feel like at least the oracle should reveal day 2. I think it applies a tiny bit of pressure to mafia and the ability for us to remove at least one name from combos/suslists/reread data.
I feel like there's been a lot of discussion about the meta this game particularly so not sure I follow
The more we play without role reveals the more I miss it. I feel like our gameplay has gotten so anti meta that you can't ever draw any clear conclusions without it
One reason that I feel like at least the oracle should reveal day 2. I think it applies a tiny bit of pressure to mafia and the ability for us to remove at least one name from combos/suslists/reread data.
I feel like there's been a lot of discussion about the meta this game particularly so not sure I follow
I just mean there are no absolutes because you can't draw any conclusions about someone's role without a role reveal. I feel like with oracle revealing day 2 we get a role reveal basically every day going forward even if it's just a townie.
Post by Silver Surfer on Apr 28, 2021 22:40:17 GMT -5
Scenarios:
Day 2: Oracle Reveals M3: Mafia whacks oracle, role reveal Day 3: Living inspector, with 3 names
Day 2: Oracle Reveals N3: Mafia whacks inspector Day 3: Living Oracle + Mafia taking a guess at inspector in that scenario is more than likely truly traceable back to at least one mafia member N3: Mafia whacks oracle, role reveal OR mafia whacks vanilla Day 4: follow role reveal or have a confirmed townie day 4 and good info from n2 whack N4: mafia whacks oracle, follow role reveal or vanilla D5: oracle 50/50 or follow role reveal
The more we play without role reveals the more I miss it. I feel like our gameplay has gotten so anti meta that you can't ever draw any clear conclusions without it
One reason that I feel like at least the oracle should reveal day 2. I think it applies a tiny bit of pressure to mafia and the ability for us to remove at least one name from combos/suslists/reread data.
as the only one w experience as the oracle, don’t tell them what to do unless they’re sure they have a rock solid guess. Also. Still no activity from Jortles.
The more we play without role reveals the more I miss it. I feel like our gameplay has gotten so anti meta that you can't ever draw any clear conclusions without it
One reason that I feel like at least the oracle should reveal day 2. I think it applies a tiny bit of pressure to mafia and the ability for us to remove at least one name from combos/suslists/reread data.
as the only one w experience as the oracle, don’t tell them what to do unless they’re sure they have a rock solid guess. Also. Still no activity from Jortles.
Round One Jaz - 2 (Jortles, Rummy) Jortles - 2 (Tranter, Maddog) Theo - 2 (Dan, KPO) KPO - 2 (Theo, Silver) Rummy - 2 (Jaz, Potent) Dan - 1 (Otter)
Tranter > Jortles Jaz > Otter Maddog > Jortles Dan > Theo Rummy > Dan Theo > KPO Otter > Dan Jortles > Jaz Silver > KPO KPO > Theo Potent > Rummy Rummy > Jaz Potent > Rummy > Jaz Jaz > Otter > Rummy Potent > Jaz > Rummy Otter > Dan > Theo Otter > Theo > Dan
Considering you've found the need to respond to my threads as if you are threatened by me I offer you some peace my confused counterpart. May you find peace in your restless soul.
Round One Jaz - 2 (Jortles, Rummy) Jortles - 2 (Tranter, Maddog) Theo - 2 (Dan, KPO) KPO - 2 (Theo, Silver) Rummy - 2 (Jaz, Potent) Dan - 1 (Otter)
Tranter > Jortles Jaz > Otter Maddog > Jortles Dan > Theo Rummy > Dan Theo > KPO Otter > Dan Jortles > Jaz Silver > KPO KPO > Theo Potent > Rummy Rummy > Jaz Potent > Rummy > Jaz Jaz > Otter > Rummy Potent > Jaz > Rummy Otter > Dan > Theo Otter > Theo > Dan
Round One Jaz - 2 (Jortles, Rummy) Jortles - 2 (Tranter, Maddog) Theo - 2 (Dan, KPO) KPO - 2 (Theo, Silver) Rummy - 2 (Jaz, Potent) Dan - 1 (Otter)
Tranter > Jortles Jaz > Otter Maddog > Jortles Dan > Theo Rummy > Dan Theo > KPO Otter > Dan Jortles > Jaz Silver > KPO KPO > Theo Potent > Rummy Rummy > Jaz Potent > Rummy > Jaz Jaz > Otter > Rummy Potent > Jaz > Rummy Otter > Dan > Theo Otter > Theo > Dan
Considering you've found the need to respond to my threads as if you are threatened by me I offer you some peace my confused counterpart. May you find peace in your restless soul.
