Whether it's your first Bonnaroo or you’re a music festival veteran, we welcome you to Inforoo.
Here you'll find info about artists, rumors, camping tips, and the infamous Roo Clues. Have a look around then create an account and join in the fun. See you at Bonnaroo!!
If MD was inspector then the other mafia would have to be a combo of Pink / Rummy / Cum / Durkle because that was all the interaction MD had. He started giving heat to Rummy, placed his vote on Cum, went to Durkle in the runoff, then Pink, then back to Durkle. Thats the only way I see a MD inspector possibility.
wait one last thing bc i didnt respond to this before i starting my quoting.
uhh...what?! it has to be a combo of just those 4 people? dude an inspector doesnt have all three names in D1. it isn't like if he was moving around/interacting with 4 people in the first Day, then 3 of those 4 are the mafia. Inspo MD had one name, his given; so by end of D1, maf had reason to believe that if he was inspo then his given could be one of the people he interacted with/voted for/switched off and on of. but he only had the one name, so if they whacked him due to his movement around pink, it was only because of pink.
Read my other responses, I later included Samp and Dan in that potential list. I dont think that its all of them but one or two is likely.
Anybody that thinks Cum was inspector and never re-clarified their status or their given name before being voted off needs to have the screws in their heads checked.
I don’t think cum was inspector. Re read what I said.
Mafia could’ve thought cum with pink name was a possibility, prior to their fake reveal. Now we all clearly know she wasn’t. Pls read that part of my reply again because I’m quite clear what I mean by it
Okay, I can at least understand that. But Cum was acting way too wild too early imo, thats the only reason I didnt want Cum deciding the runoff D2. Them being inspector and acting the way they did while in the runoff is straight up negligent.
Post by pinkstickynote on Apr 1, 2023 15:06:56 GMT -5
alright finally caught up on rummy’s novel and i really don’t know what to say lol. i feel like i’ve explained my decision making enough, so i can’t match her word to word - sorry! the more rummy says, the less sure i am about who else is mafia alongside her. wish i could just give you all definitive proof that i was inspo and we could boot rummy and focus our energy on who else is maf but going forward, it just feels like the rest of town is just going to be back-and-forth on who’s telling the truth between the two of us
This situation reminds me a lot of a game we played where silver had a wonky uncontested inspector fake day 2 as mafia. I believe it was also MD who got whacked n1 and was inspector who didn’t really leave much to go off of. Don’t remember if silver was self whacked or not. My thinking during that game was essentially to just trust the inspector reveal and if we lose we lose. Thankfully in that instance town did not just follow my thinking. It is still something I do have in my mind though. Losing because you didn’t believe an uncontested reveal feels worse than losing because maf got lucky with their n1 whack.
There’s legitimate arguments on both sides of this. Just gonna ramble here and hopefully spark some discussion.
Let’s start with the pink is telling the truth angle. Obviously when pink drops that mafia may not whack him it almost guaranteed that would be the case. Its probably bad practice to strongly predict what mafia will do as inspector because it makes you look sus when it actually happens. A mafia rummy would be all for this plan as well, in fact rummy and I have done stuff in the same ballpark when we’ve maf together in the past.
If pink is lying then it’s easy to know why pink wasn’t whacked. The play is fine but If I was mafia I’d self whack here. Makes the rest of the game extremely straight forward to play. Rummy gets auto exiled and go into day 4 with likely two mafia alive assuming cum and potent were both town (I will say if pink is lying it’s entirely possible cum was mafia imo). That being said what I would want to do is definitively not standard.
The main meat on the bone here (from not having done a reread yet) is the Cinci guess. Does a mafia pink purposefully plan to whack Cinci and play it off as a fake guess? Low key an incredible high level move if he’s evil. Meta would just be to confirm a town. Not sure I’ve ever seen an inspector guess two whacks in a row. On the flip of this, it’s a risky move for mafia because you are definitely going to get pushback from town. It requires some finesse to pull off, and there are some players here I’d think would not stamp off on this plan if they were maf.
Interested to hear others thoughts. Outside of all the pink and rummy stuff, I am suspicious of Ferris.
Regardless of if pink is lying or not mafia after games of playing so boring I want to put my head in a blender, has finally decided to put the pressure on!
This post, especially the bolded parts have me seriously questioning if Dan has been getting one over on us. Most of the bolded at the top is a filler story that only makes it more murky which way things are going.
The italicized part is what I take the most issues with. Where Dan seems almost completely on board with pink being a fake on both sides of his argument.
My biggest thing with Dan is that he changed after D1. Pink escapes the runoff D1. Dan starts agreeing with Rummy D2. Then Dan and Pink are in the runoff and Dan goes quiet. Dan escapes the runoff and all of a sudden Pink is about to get exiled and the inspector reveal couldn't have been botched much more.
What if it is Pink - Dan - Another (possibly even Rummy) And they decided, with one close call after another and about to lose one mafia. Why not fake reveal and secure town favor with at least one mafia left. Makes me think that even more with Dan trying extra hard to get Pink voted off end of D2. And then flipping to basically agreeing with Rummy again D3. Almost like the botch reveal was too convenient. Dan tried so hard to side with Pink yet didn't tell Pink to shut the hell up after reveal.
It could be Dan - Pink - Samp, or Dan - Pink - Market in that case. The thing is I can even see two experienced players in Dan and Rummy being brave enough to pull some shit like that. Plus with the comment at the bottom Dan made about mafia being boring and this one finally being exciting, I'm starting to think there's something to it.
This situation reminds me a lot of a game we played where silver had a wonky uncontested inspector fake day 2 as mafia. I believe it was also MD who got whacked n1 and was inspector who didn’t really leave much to go off of. Don’t remember if silver was self whacked or not. My thinking during that game was essentially to just trust the inspector reveal and if we lose we lose. Thankfully in that instance town did not just follow my thinking. It is still something I do have in my mind though. Losing because you didn’t believe an uncontested reveal feels worse than losing because maf got lucky with their n1 whack.
There’s legitimate arguments on both sides of this. Just gonna ramble here and hopefully spark some discussion.
Let’s start with the pink is telling the truth angle. Obviously when pink drops that mafia may not whack him it almost guaranteed that would be the case. Its probably bad practice to strongly predict what mafia will do as inspector because it makes you look sus when it actually happens. A mafia rummy would be all for this plan as well, in fact rummy and I have done stuff in the same ballpark when we’ve maf together in the past.
If pink is lying then it’s easy to know why pink wasn’t whacked. The play is fine but If I was mafia I’d self whack here. Makes the rest of the game extremely straight forward to play. Rummy gets auto exiled and go into day 4 with likely two mafia alive assuming cum and potent were both town (I will say if pink is lying it’s entirely possible cum was mafia imo). That being said what I would want to do is definitively not standard.
The main meat on the bone here (from not having done a reread yet) is the Cinci guess. Does a mafia pink purposefully plan to whack Cinci and play it off as a fake guess? Low key an incredible high level move if he’s evil. Meta would just be to confirm a town. Not sure I’ve ever seen an inspector guess two whacks in a row. On the flip of this, it’s a risky move for mafia because you are definitely going to get pushback from town. It requires some finesse to pull off, and there are some players here I’d think would not stamp off on this plan if they were maf.
Interested to hear others thoughts. Outside of all the pink and rummy stuff, I am suspicious of Ferris.
Regardless of if pink is lying or not mafia after games of playing so boring I want to put my head in a blender, has finally decided to put the pressure on!
This post, especially the bolded parts have me seriously questioning if Dan has been getting one over on us. Most of the bolded at the top is a filler story that only makes it more murky which way things are going.
The italicized part is what I take the most issues with. Where Dan seems almost completely on board with pink being a fake on both sides of his argument.
My biggest thing with Dan is that he changed after D1. Pink escapes the runoff D1. Dan starts agreeing with Rummy D2. Then Dan and Pink are in the runoff and Dan goes quiet. Dan escapes the runoff and all of a sudden Pink is about to get exiled and the inspector reveal couldn't have been botched much more.
What if it is Pink - Dan - Another (possibly even Rummy) And they decided, with one close call after another and about to lose one mafia. Why not fake reveal and secure town favor with at least one mafia left. Makes me think that even more with Dan trying extra hard to get Pink voted off end of D2. And then flipping to basically agreeing with Rummy again D3. Almost like the botch reveal was too convenient. Dan tried so hard to side with Pink yet didn't tell Pink to shut the hell up after reveal.
It could be Dan - Pink - Samp, or Dan - Pink - Market in that case. The thing is I can even see two experienced players in Dan and Rummy being brave enough to pull some shit like that. Plus with the comment at the bottom Dan made about mafia being boring and this one finally being exciting, I'm starting to think there's something to it.
This post, especially the bolded parts have me seriously questioning if Dan has been getting one over on us. Most of the bolded at the top is a filler story that only makes it more murky which way things are going.
The italicized part is what I take the most issues with. Where Dan seems almost completely on board with pink being a fake on both sides of his argument.
My biggest thing with Dan is that he changed after D1. Pink escapes the runoff D1. Dan starts agreeing with Rummy D2. Then Dan and Pink are in the runoff and Dan goes quiet. Dan escapes the runoff and all of a sudden Pink is about to get exiled and the inspector reveal couldn't have been botched much more.
What if it is Pink - Dan - Another (possibly even Rummy) And they decided, with one close call after another and about to lose one mafia. Why not fake reveal and secure town favor with at least one mafia left. Makes me think that even more with Dan trying extra hard to get Pink voted off end of D2. And then flipping to basically agreeing with Rummy again D3. Almost like the botch reveal was too convenient. Dan tried so hard to side with Pink yet didn't tell Pink to shut the hell up after reveal.
It could be Dan - Pink - Samp, or Dan - Pink - Market in that case. The thing is I can even see two experienced players in Dan and Rummy being brave enough to pull some shit like that. Plus with the comment at the bottom Dan made about mafia being boring and this one finally being exciting, I'm starting to think there's something to it.
You’re off your rocker
Are you going to respond to anything else Dan? Or are you just going to keep bashing me like you have since D1?
This post, especially the bolded parts have me seriously questioning if Dan has been getting one over on us. Most of the bolded at the top is a filler story that only makes it more murky which way things are going.
The italicized part is what I take the most issues with. Where Dan seems almost completely on board with pink being a fake on both sides of his argument.
My biggest thing with Dan is that he changed after D1. Pink escapes the runoff D1. Dan starts agreeing with Rummy D2. Then Dan and Pink are in the runoff and Dan goes quiet. Dan escapes the runoff and all of a sudden Pink is about to get exiled and the inspector reveal couldn't have been botched much more.
What if it is Pink - Dan - Another (possibly even Rummy) And they decided, with one close call after another and about to lose one mafia. Why not fake reveal and secure town favor with at least one mafia left. Makes me think that even more with Dan trying extra hard to get Pink voted off end of D2. And then flipping to basically agreeing with Rummy again D3. Almost like the botch reveal was too convenient. Dan tried so hard to side with Pink yet didn't tell Pink to shut the hell up after reveal.
It could be Dan - Pink - Samp, or Dan - Pink - Market in that case. The thing is I can even see two experienced players in Dan and Rummy being brave enough to pull some shit like that. Plus with the comment at the bottom Dan made about mafia being boring and this one finally being exciting, I'm starting to think there's something to it.
You’re off your rocker
lol was just trying to reply to Farris but kept backspacing and starting over because more than half of what he wrote is literally incomprehensible to me. So many contradictions, complete lack of logical threads. The only thing I can agree with is that yes I’m a very brave girl.
If others can decipher these threads at all, pls do. Like I want to reply with substance but I’m lost. Read it twice in a row and might feel even more confused after the second read of it tbh
Considering you've found the need to respond to my threads as if you are threatened by me I offer you some peace my confused counterpart. May you find peace in your restless soul.
“Makes me think that even more with Dan trying extra hard to get Pink voted off end of D2. And then flipping to basically agreeing with Rummy again D3. Almost like the botch reveal was too convenient. Dan tried so hard to side with Pink yet didn't tell Pink to shut the hell up after reveal.”
(I’m on mobile and not trying to quote long ass things, I already did that enough earlier with my reread analysis.
But truly - WHAT IS THIS SAYING? Dan didn’t try to get pink voted off at the end of day 2? He was very adamant about not doing so.
He also hasn’t “basically agreed with everything” I’ve said whatsoever today. He mentioned this game feels reminiscent of one where mafia faked and town bought it and we lost - one that I was also playing in. Where’s all the agreement with me?
And he was supposed to tell pink to shut the hell up…when/over what ?
Considering you've found the need to respond to my threads as if you are threatened by me I offer you some peace my confused counterpart. May you find peace in your restless soul.
“Makes me think that even more with Dan trying extra hard to get Pink voted off end of D2. And then flipping to basically agreeing with Rummy again D3. Almost like the botch reveal was too convenient. Dan tried so hard to side with Pink yet didn't tell Pink to shut the hell up after reveal.”
(I’m on mobile and not trying to quote long ass things, I already did that enough earlier with my reread analysis.
But truly - WHAT IS THIS SAYING? Dan didn’t try to get pink voted off at the end of day 2? He was very adamant about not doing so.
He also hasn’t “basically agreed with everything” I’ve said whatsoever today. He mentioned this game feels reminiscent of one where mafia faked and town bought it and we lost - one that I was also playing in. Where’s all the agreement with me?
And he was supposed to tell pink to shut the hell up…when/over what ?
Come on, you know what I meant. I meant Dan tried to save Pink so hard D2 and then is flipping against him now. At least youre responding with something of substance.
“Makes me think that even more with Dan trying extra hard to get Pink voted off end of D2. And then flipping to basically agreeing with Rummy again D3. Almost like the botch reveal was too convenient. Dan tried so hard to side with Pink yet didn't tell Pink to shut the hell up after reveal.”
(I’m on mobile and not trying to quote long ass things, I already did that enough earlier with my reread analysis.
But truly - WHAT IS THIS SAYING? Dan didn’t try to get pink voted off at the end of day 2? He was very adamant about not doing so.
He also hasn’t “basically agreed with everything” I’ve said whatsoever today. He mentioned this game feels reminiscent of one where mafia faked and town bought it and we lost - one that I was also playing in. Where’s all the agreement with me?
And he was supposed to tell pink to shut the hell up…when/over what ?
Also Dan literally said "Its probably bad practice to strongly predict what mafia will do as inspector because it makes you look sus when it actually happens." In that very post I quoted. Why did he not say this WAY earlier.
“Makes me think that even more with Dan trying extra hard to get Pink voted off end of D2. And then flipping to basically agreeing with Rummy again D3. Almost like the botch reveal was too convenient. Dan tried so hard to side with Pink yet didn't tell Pink to shut the hell up after reveal.”
(I’m on mobile and not trying to quote long ass things, I already did that enough earlier with my reread analysis.
But truly - WHAT IS THIS SAYING? Dan didn’t try to get pink voted off at the end of day 2? He was very adamant about not doing so.
He also hasn’t “basically agreed with everything” I’ve said whatsoever today. He mentioned this game feels reminiscent of one where mafia faked and town bought it and we lost - one that I was also playing in. Where’s all the agreement with me?
And he was supposed to tell pink to shut the hell up…when/over what ?
Come on, you know what I meant. I meant Dan tried to save Pink so hard D2 and then is flipping against him now. At least youre responding with something of substance.
I haven’t flipped at all. I argued for not exiling an uncontested inspector reveal which is objectively correct (something YOU agreed with btw). I purposefully didn’t talk about where my thoughts were on his legitimacy.
Considering you've found the need to respond to my threads as if you are threatened by me I offer you some peace my confused counterpart. May you find peace in your restless soul.
Yes but I’m waiting for others to chime in before going ham
v fair. My trail of quotes earlier today was a little much haha but I knew that was a reliable chunk of time I had today to go back and do a full reread
Hopefully some of these absent folks show up soon tho
Considering you've found the need to respond to my threads as if you are threatened by me I offer you some peace my confused counterpart. May you find peace in your restless soul.
Post by steponsampras on Apr 2, 2023 10:32:05 GMT -5
God damn The only thing that really drives me crazy about this game is that if you happen to have a busy weekend day you're basically fucked trying to catch up. Just spent nearly an hour rereading everything from just yesterday morning. Will post something else in a minute.
This situation reminds me a lot of a game we played where silver had a wonky uncontested inspector fake day 2 as mafia. I believe it was also MD who got whacked n1 and was inspector who didn’t really leave much to go off of. Don’t remember if silver was self whacked or not. My thinking during that game was essentially to just trust the inspector reveal and if we lose we lose. Thankfully in that instance town did not just follow my thinking. It is still something I do have in my mind though. Losing because you didn’t believe an uncontested reveal feels worse than losing because maf got lucky with their n1 whack.
Let’s start with the pink is telling the truth angle. Obviously when pink drops that mafia may not whack him it almost guaranteed that would be the case. Its probably bad practice to strongly predict what mafia will do as inspector because it makes you look sus when it actually happens.A mafia rummy would be all for this plan as well, in fact rummy and I have done stuff in the same ballpark when we’ve maf together in the past.
first bold: reminds me of that game too and makes me think there's gotta be a vet behind this, so if it isnt you, im definitely wondering if town could've gotten lucky with exiling a maf potent D1. cum has also played enough at this point (plus has heard plenty of prior maf games from tranter im sure) to maybe concoct this and pull it off too, which is a big part of why i need to dismiss my prior town read of her when i do my re-read.
second bold: at first glance this felt lazy to me (the telegraphing in D2 what they'd do, and lo and behold - pink is still here), but honestly it is sorta smart in this case i think because they can keep framing it as this "but if pink is maf, why would he/they ___?!" thats been stated a lot throughout d2, i know from samp as well as from pink, just this reiteration of, "but this would be silly as maf/why would we say rummy is given, that sets us up for a difficult path/if pink was lying then xyz would happen." it generates confusion for town and has them second guessing everything. for that reason, it isn't a bad play - but as ive already said, i think the telegraphing was TOO direct and should've been more nuanced for this to have worked well for them.
This! The post above from dan on D1 has been bugging me ever since I saw it. I don't feel like we ever got a good explanation for it. Also, I don't understand why no one has brought this post from dan back up. Rummy gave a super comprehensive relook at everything, but this didn't come up even after she was mulling over what happened in that previous game? I'm less convinced about rummy for reasons I'll explain below, but I'm not ruling her out for this reason.
So here's my take... Dan exiled potent and then whacked MD so that the vets that recalled the previous game weren't around to make too much out of what he was about to make happen with the help of pink. Rummy was mostly away for the weekend and then the first part of this past week, and that was a lucky break because it meant there wasn't much in the way of substantive posts for the rest of us to fall back on to question her being named as maf. Maf basically took her out as another potentially reliable voice to question pink faking inspo. Dan could have let that round to go a runoff, but he didn't. I think it was due to timing. He wanted to make sure rummy had as few posts made as possible. They've basically been picking off the more experienced players as fast as possible. Pink was the first to vote for cum on D2 without any explanation. Then came me and Farris. But a couple more people piled on to pink and even locked. This is when pink came out as inspo. I think there is a chance maf would have tried pushing their luck and gunning for a D3 reveal, but it looked too likely that pink was going to get exiled. Farris then immediately locks his vote on cum (like 10 minutes later), followed quickly by Dan.
Also, pink guessing cinci on the night of D2?!? Fucking unbelievable. Makes no sense whatsoever. I tried retracing some of cinci's moves and he was basically MIA the whole game.
My thought - they're all three still alive... Dan and Pink for sure. Probably Farris, but I'm a little less convinced there.
Post by pinkstickynote on Apr 2, 2023 11:42:59 GMT -5
i chose cincy for a few reasons - i didn’t want to only look at very active players as potential mafia, as that’s denying the fact that it’s pretty easy for maf to sometimes go undetected if they just… don’t say anything - some of his moves around me were odd. im not looking at people that are voting for me and thinking they’re instantly maf, but he locked on me pretty early, and in the next round of voting, after my reveal, he asked cum why, if i was maf, id fake so early, as if he was at least considering that fact i was telling the truth. however, he didn’t follow up at all and never changed his vote, further contributing to my exile while also not putting too much on the table that could make him look sus
after learning he was town, it probably just boils down to him being pretty busy, but at the time i thought it was a reasonable enough guess
We're all a mess of paradoxes. Believing in things we know can't be true. We walk around carrying feelings too complicated and contradictory to express. But when it all becomes too big, and words aren't enough to help get it all out, there's always music.
first bold: reminds me of that game too and makes me think there's gotta be a vet behind this, so if it isnt you, im definitely wondering if town could've gotten lucky with exiling a maf potent D1. cum has also played enough at this point (plus has heard plenty of prior maf games from tranter im sure) to maybe concoct this and pull it off too, which is a big part of why i need to dismiss my prior town read of her when i do my re-read.
second bold: at first glance this felt lazy to me (the telegraphing in D2 what they'd do, and lo and behold - pink is still here), but honestly it is sorta smart in this case i think because they can keep framing it as this "but if pink is maf, why would he/they ___?!" thats been stated a lot throughout d2, i know from samp as well as from pink, just this reiteration of, "but this would be silly as maf/why would we say rummy is given, that sets us up for a difficult path/if pink was lying then xyz would happen." it generates confusion for town and has them second guessing everything. for that reason, it isn't a bad play - but as ive already said, i think the telegraphing was TOO direct and should've been more nuanced for this to have worked well for them.
This! The post above from dan on D1 has been bugging me ever since I saw it. I don't feel like we ever got a good explanation for it. Also, I don't understand why no one has brought this post from dan back up. Rummy gave a super comprehensive relook at everything, but this didn't come up even after she was mulling over what happened in that previous game? I'm less convinced about rummy for reasons I'll explain below, but I'm not ruling her out for this reason.
So here's my take... Dan exiled potent and then whacked MD so that the vets that recalled the previous game weren't around to make too much out of what he was about to make happen with the help of pink. Rummy was mostly away for the weekend and then the first part of this past week, and that was a lucky break because it meant there wasn't much in the way of substantive posts for the rest of us to fall back on to question her being named as maf. Maf basically took her out as another potentially reliable voice to question pink faking inspo. Dan could have let that round to go a runoff, but he didn't. I think it was due to timing. He wanted to make sure rummy had as few posts made as possible. They've basically been picking off the more experienced players as fast as possible. Pink was the first to vote for cum on D2 without any explanation. Then came me and Farris. But a couple more people piled on to pink and even locked. This is when pink came out as inspo. I think there is a chance maf would have tried pushing their luck and gunning for a D3 reveal, but it looked too likely that pink was going to get exiled. Farris then immediately locks his vote on cum (like 10 minutes later), followed quickly by Dan.
Also, pink guessing cinci on the night of D2?!? Fucking unbelievable. Makes no sense whatsoever. I tried retracing some of cinci's moves and he was basically MIA the whole game.
My thought - they're all three still alive... Dan and Pink for sure. Probably Farris, but I'm a little less convinced there.
Considering you've found the need to respond to my threads as if you are threatened by me I offer you some peace my confused counterpart. May you find peace in your restless soul.
I was understandably frustrated post fake reveal D2 with Dan’s reaction because I knew pink was/is lying - but the reality is, I would’ve done the same thing in Dan’s position. If I was vanilla town w no info (e.g. no awareness that a reveal is fake by way of being the one framed by it) and an uncontested reveal came out, I’d certainly stake the claim that he did; you don’t immediately exile the claimed inspo in that case, you just don’t. He’s come into D3 open to looking at all options, and it’s same as I’d do in his shoes so I really don’t see what’s sus about his actions.
Samp and Farris are trying to present this idea that Dan has been flip flopping but I don’t see it that way. His opinions are going to evolve/shift with more info like all of ours should. I just don’t buy the Dan Is Maf narrative, and I don’t think he’d play the role of pink’s teammate this way (but a maf dan has tricked me in the past so ofc I could be super off, but I’m trusting my gut for now)
Considering you've found the need to respond to my threads as if you are threatened by me I offer you some peace my confused counterpart. May you find peace in your restless soul.
This! The post above from dan on D1 has been bugging me ever since I saw it. I don't feel like we ever got a good explanation for it. Also, I don't understand why no one has brought this post from dan back up. Rummy gave a super comprehensive relook at everything, but this didn't come up even after she was mulling over what happened in that previous game? I'm less convinced about rummy for reasons I'll explain below, but I'm not ruling her out for this reason.
So here's my take... Dan exiled potent and then whacked MD so that the vets that recalled the previous game weren't around to make too much out of what he was about to make happen with the help of pink. Rummy was mostly away for the weekend and then the first part of this past week, and that was a lucky break because it meant there wasn't much in the way of substantive posts for the rest of us to fall back on to question her being named as maf. Maf basically took her out as another potentially reliable voice to question pink faking inspo. Dan could have let that round to go a runoff, but he didn't. I think it was due to timing. He wanted to make sure rummy had as few posts made as possible. They've basically been picking off the more experienced players as fast as possible. Pink was the first to vote for cum on D2 without any explanation. Then came me and Farris. But a couple more people piled on to pink and even locked. This is when pink came out as inspo. I think there is a chance maf would have tried pushing their luck and gunning for a D3 reveal, but it looked too likely that pink was going to get exiled. Farris then immediately locks his vote on cum (like 10 minutes later), followed quickly by Dan.
Also, pink guessing cinci on the night of D2?!? Fucking unbelievable. Makes no sense whatsoever. I tried retracing some of cinci's moves and he was basically MIA the whole game.
My thought - they're all three still alive... Dan and Pink for sure. Probably Farris, but I'm a little less convinced there.
Samp > Dan
All this effort just to be wrong
No explanation for what was going on with that D1 post I quoted? I just don’t see how that isn’t sus.
Nope. Clearly said in the post I wouldn’t explain.
Great great - big help. Thanks a heap. Don’t know how rummy is over here just saying there isn’t any way Dan is involved with this caper.
it's a Dan Thing, not sure how else to put it.
you mentioned in your longer post earlier today that it was odd how i did a super comprehensive reread but didn't pick out that post from Dan, the "im voting for potent, for reasons i cannot explain" one in D1. and in my reread, i did clock it: but it didn't feel important enough to quote because it felt very typical D1 Dan, regardless of his role. whether hes maf, inspo, vanilla town, whatever - he often likes to make vague/rogue posts like that which typically don't have much tie to his actual role or what he believes later on.
tl;dr: Dan is just as likely to post something like that D1 as vanilla town as he is with a special role, so i dont put much stock in it. if he hasnt circled back to it, im guessing it was a jesty little post that doesnt have much to it - so im not going to over analyze it, in effect
Considering you've found the need to respond to my threads as if you are threatened by me I offer you some peace my confused counterpart. May you find peace in your restless soul.
Considering you've found the need to respond to my threads as if you are threatened by me I offer you some peace my confused counterpart. May you find peace in your restless soul.
The only thing that really drives me crazy about this game is that if you happen to have a busy weekend day you're basically fucked trying to catch up. Just spent nearly an hour rereading everything from just yesterday morning. Will post something else in a minute.