Whether it's your first Bonnaroo or you’re a music festival veteran, we welcome you to Inforoo.
Here you'll find info about artists, rumors, camping tips, and the infamous Roo Clues. Have a look around then create an account and join in the fun. See you at Bonnaroo!!
Post by chicagorooer on Jul 19, 2007 11:15:03 GMT -5
snoochio said:
I was Reehash in the Times of Jason. Jason, if I remember correctly, got banned for having multiple accounts. CR thinks his opinion is sooo popular and obvious, that anyone who disagrees with him is jason.
Anyone who really wants to know-(i don't know why they would even care?!, except for not understanding where CR is coming from) can pull up some Old Ass political threads from after last years roo and see Myself(Reehash), Jason, DudewheresmyRoo(possibly a different name then), Dudezer, and a couple of others going rounds. I believe that some of the debates were so heated and swift, that it may be determined by posting times that I could not be both. Nor do I even know him like Meg, Oats, and Danbird may.
Moreover, I suspended my own account because of the druq overtones. Initially, I had signed up to go over last years roo experiences and thought that Reehash was a cute ambiguosity. As it got further and futhur from roo 06, I thought that the name had less irony and more overtones. I was also getting tired of the same ol' same ol' out of CR, so I suspended my account and came back as Snoochio months later. I would suspect that a MOD could confirm whether someone was suspended or just left. That's my story. Sorry for any of you that got caught up in CR's shenanigans.
My question at this point is, HAD I ACTUALLY BEEN JASON, would it have made any of my points/counterpoints to CR any less valid<rhetorical, AND why would CR think it would ?
Like CR's technique against Michael Moore--try to kill the messenger instead of the message.
And like the Young Turks that TRoo has perked my interest about-------------------------- E N O U G H !
so what I got out of this is Jason and reehash are one in the same??? or maybe you are Jason's brother....
With all due respect, I ignored the whole j-word thing until people started wondering what the f CR was talking about.
This sort of threadlocking approach was used a year ago and I believe it is unfair for 95 % of the participants involved--participants who help each other all over this forum and don't just live under the bridge in political threads. Participants who spread smiles and not misinformation.
I will do my part, however, and skeedaddle from these posts. In fact , I was gonna go into early retirement when my post count reached 420, mostly so I could get more done around home by breaking my inforoo addiction. There are certainly competent souls in the likes of Troo, Stallion, Spooks, et al who can more than represent my opinion here for the most part. Sorry if I am the root of this. I kinda know I'm not, but sometimes things are not within our control. Peace to all. All who wanna take us all higher, rather than bring us down, no matter which side of the fence you choose !
Don't leave us entirely! I've curtailed my posts since Roo so as to get more done (though these political threads drag me back in) so I understand. Just be sure stop by now and again.
Thread locking is not a threat. It just what happens when conversations get played out. I'm not blaming anyone and certainly don't want anyone to leave. Just wanted to clarify...... ???
Oh I'll be here. Mostly reading tho-is my pledge.It doesn't take nearly as long as conversing and refreshing. I'll chime in when I can be helpful or someone needs support. There is just no point in me being trollbait, resulting in entire threads being locked.
Becca- admit it. You DO like when I talk about poo
Last Edit: Jul 19, 2007 12:22:38 GMT -5 by snoochio - Back to Top
Thread locking is not a threat. It just what happens when conversations get played out. I'm not blaming anyone and certainly don't want anyone to leave. Just wanted to clarify...... ???
not trying to play victim. not trying to lay blame. just seems to be a pattern that none of us can escape when a certain someone shows up here.
i feel like i have had good intentions, but to no avail as far as getting threads locked go. I'm trying to be progressive and not reactionary here. There has been awesome dialogue here to a point. And I don't think I can steer the results any more or less. Eventually, someone shows up and attacks or accuses the messenger. If that person cannot be stopped, the thread gets locked. The most effective thing I can do to have that not happen on my behalf, is just watch. That's all. I LOVE YOUS
i was very pro national healthcare until i seen michael moore and Dr. sangai gupta (sp?) debate on cnn, then i realized its a little more complicated and im not edjucated enough about it to have a decisive opinion other than the system needs to be fixed D