Whether it's your first Bonnaroo or you’re a music festival veteran, we welcome you to Inforoo.
Here you'll find info about artists, rumors, camping tips, and the infamous Roo Clues. Have a look around then create an account and join in the fun. See you at Bonnaroo!!
The way I look at the first round normally is to assume a towny will die. We have to try to develop as many voting patterns as possible and hope the inspector gets lucky on their guess and that the mafia is unlucky in their kill.
So while this is lessening the voting patterns we have to work off of it is probably protecting the inspector. It's hard for me even to advise who the inspector should guess about, but hopefully with the name they already have they will be able to come up with something.
IMO Viking's rant about posting the PM of his role is as bad as LD faking inspector as a Townie. At least LD's action is just bad strategy.
This is true, and if he does it like he's still threatening to do, I'm going to be super pissed, as I'm sure everyone else will be, but, while I think his rants have been somewhat similar to rants I've seen before from mafia backed into a corner in a first round runoff, I'm not so sure that this is not just plain old frustration at being put in first round runoffs over and over again. Honestly, I think I'd be pretty frustrated if I was in five first round runoffs in a row.
I don't really know whether I think Viking is guilty or innocent, but I disagree with voting for someone because I don't like the way he is playing or has played in the past.
NBF >>> LLL
First, this is half of the problem, but it is not so much getting tossed into the runoff, as for why, as I have explained ad nauseam in what everyone has taken as a rant. 5 players basically said that they cant figure me out and I drew 3 votes from that crowd. KDogg took the early run at me with his word counting after initial votes, and LLL switched over for "reasons" that were never explained. This all happened before we left page 2. That left NBF, SFA, and Bacon as the only ones who either had nothing to say about not figuring me out, or voting for me for an obscure reason.
Even then, the 7 way attack is fine if I can defend against it, but there is NO way to defend against the cant figure him out so lets kill him reason. NBF, you are a para-legal for the state. That would be like saying well a crime was committed and these 11 people were in the room. I know this one guy has a great poker face, so instead of trying to figure out if he did it, lets toss him in the chair and light him up. Maybe now you can understand why I was so mad.
I am not mad anymore, but I do intend to follow through if need be with regards to posting my role. It is not a threat. It is simply a statement of intention until people can say what makes me so guilty that I get to fry for getting mad.
With regards to the names and activity today, I am pretty comfortable that I came pretty damn close or hit the nail on the head. KDogg is the loud one, LLL is the mid foil and Quacker is the mole.
Quacker, to answer your earlier post, you put LLL in for the same reason I kept promoting runoffs instead of the easy kill last game. It seperates you from the other 2 and allows you to lie low if someone links KDogg and LLL.
LLL, glad to hear you got your chi in order. I finally got my BAC in order from Friday night so I feel better as well. That said, I never attacked you other than say I believe you are mafia, and as your post today shows, I think you are protesting too much when I have said nothing too damning about you yet.
KDogg, I believe you were trying too hard to be the old KDogg, and came up with a theory that did not hold water to try and take a run at me, since that was what you said you would do via pm, and in the final messages of last game.
As I said, I could be wrong, but this is what makes the most sense to me right now. Kill me and as I have stated, you will find out you killed a townie. Don't kill me and you have a shot and putting the mafia down one member day 1. Bacon, Nic, EAP, and MC, the choice is yours. Definitely knowing you are 6-3 or potentially being 7-2, but not knowing for sure if I am a townie.
I am asking you to trust me. I know that in some of your minds, I may not deserve that trust for my Friday Night drunken rant, but I am still asking because I do want us to win. The choice is in the 4 of your hands at this point. I would like to live and keep the integrity of this game intact, and I am trying to give a little here in exchange for just one of you giving a bit back.
Anyone feel free to chime in. I will check in from time to time tonight.
Fawn, may I have permission to post the PM exchange Viking & I had outside of this game? The PMs in question were an offshoot conversation from my Scott Walker thread and took place long before this game began. I think they might go to show that what Viking is talking about here is much ado about nothing. I feel the exchange is not as damning as he repeatedly claims it to be, and since these PMs are not related to this (or any) Mafia game I feel transparency regarding the aforementioned exchange would not violate Mafia rules.
Post by LoveLuckLaughter on Jun 17, 2012 21:38:07 GMT -5
Ummm. Viking. I hardly said anything, especially in comparison to what I USUALLY have to say. However, you did list me on your list of people who are surely Mafia. I guess if you don't call that "damning", I'm not sure what you would call "damning". But keep reaching man. Just like you did last time we played together.
We're all a mess of paradoxes. Believing in things we know can't be true. We walk around carrying feelings too complicated and contradictory to express. But when it all becomes too big, and words aren't enough to help get it all out, there's always music.
Post by LoveLuckLaughter on Jun 17, 2012 21:39:48 GMT -5
I'm trying to stay level headed with you here Viking, despite your once again wonky theories. It's too easy to get sucked into long winded ridiculousness with you.
We're all a mess of paradoxes. Believing in things we know can't be true. We walk around carrying feelings too complicated and contradictory to express. But when it all becomes too big, and words aren't enough to help get it all out, there's always music.
Post by LoveLuckLaughter on Jun 17, 2012 21:43:32 GMT -5
I also explained my "reasons" multiple times now. However you apparently choose to ignore that fact. and the fact that it is the same "reason" you gave for a vote earlier in the round.
We're all a mess of paradoxes. Believing in things we know can't be true. We walk around carrying feelings too complicated and contradictory to express. But when it all becomes too big, and words aren't enough to help get it all out, there's always music.
LLL, the big difference is that last time I was mafia, and I knew you were a townie. Now I am a townie, and I THINK you are mafia. That is a very very big difference.
Also, as even you noted, you are playing differently. If others think it is a reach, then I am going to die. If they don't, and see beyond my posts from Friday night, then you will.
Really, Day one comes down to do people feel that
1) My Friday posts deserve Death
2) I am too difficult to read to live
3) People actually think I am mafia
OR
1) Your abnormal stacking is more suspicious
2) Lack of any reasoning after you claimed to have one, and then back filling it with saying you were trying to bait me is suspicious
3) Completely different playing behavior with quick filler posts, plus posting almost immediately after I made both of my posts today like someone texted you to come on and post is suspicious
I know I am a townie, and when I looked at the above 3 points for you, I made the guess that you are mafia. As I said, if you feel it is a reach or feel like this is some sort of rabbit hole, feel free to ignore it.
I am not mad anymore, but I do intend to follow through if need be with regards to posting my role. It is not a threat. It is simply a statement of intention until people can say what makes me so guilty that I get to fry for getting mad.
Maybe it's just because I've spent plenty of time on Photoshop but posting a screengrab wouldn't make me belive it to be true. I think that would just cause more trouble then anything. Plus, it is clearly against the rules.
With regards to the names and activity today, I am pretty comfortable that I came pretty damn close or hit the nail on the head. KDogg is the loud one, LLL is the mid foil and Quacker is the mole.
I think it's way to early to have it pegged down like this. All three of them have played to much to so openly manuplate things. Way to risky for the three of them. And I agree with Quacker. I don't think mafia would throw it's on member in a second runoff when it doesn't have to.
Post by LoveLuckLaughter on Jun 17, 2012 21:51:20 GMT -5
I'm logging out, I'm going to bed and then to work. Whatever happens here happens. Chances are we have two townies in the run-off. That's the way it usually is. I'm not going to get into a back and forth with Viking tonight. I've had waaaaay to chill of a weekend for the it.
We're all a mess of paradoxes. Believing in things we know can't be true. We walk around carrying feelings too complicated and contradictory to express. But when it all becomes too big, and words aren't enough to help get it all out, there's always music.
Fawn, may I have permission to post the PM exchange Viking & I had outside of this game? The PMs in question were an offshoot conversation from my Scott Walker thread and took place long before this game began. I think they might go to show that what Viking is talking about here is much ado about nothing. I feel the exchange is not as damning as he repeatedly claims it to be, and since these PMs are not related to this (or any) Mafia game I feel transparency regarding the aforementioned exchange would not violate Mafia rules.
I would be fine with this. He's bringing it up as some sort of evidence, so if the ref is cool with it then I think it's fair that others get to read it. If both parties are cool with it being posted then I don't see a reason why it shouldn't be.
P.S. Sorry I meant to put both of these response in the same reply.
I assume that the particular PM from our conversation to which you have been referring is the one I sent you on May 9th at 3:34am. Let me know if you are referring to a different PM from that discussion, which - frankly - I wish you hadn't discontinued.
I actually got a chuckle out of reading some of the political content with the context of this game in mind. As such, I sent the entire PM to Fawnmart for her approval - and asked permission to post that PM in its entirety. Seeing that I am its author and only quoted four single sentences from your end, I don't think that is entirely unreasonable.
You want to say I'm going too far with disclosure regarding this PM? Pot. Kettle. Black.
I am not mad anymore, but I do intend to follow through if need be with regards to posting my role. It is not a threat. It is simply a statement of intention until people can say what makes me so guilty that I get to fry for getting mad.
Maybe it's just because I've spent plenty of time on Photoshop but posting a screengrab wouldn't make me belive it to be true. I think that would just cause more trouble then anything. Plus, it is clearly against the rules.
With regards to the names and activity today, I am pretty comfortable that I came pretty damn close or hit the nail on the head. KDogg is the loud one, LLL is the mid foil and Quacker is the mole.
I think it's way to early to have it pegged down like this. All three of them have played to much to so openly manuplate things. Way to risky for the three of them. And I agree with Quacker. I don't think mafia would throw it's on member in a second runoff when it doesn't have to.
Fair. Thats why I have a screen grab instead of a quote, but I don't photoshop much so I did not think of it like you did. I would think it would be pretty easy to tell anyways, but since I respect yours and Fawn's opinion, I will sleep on posting it and consider not doing so. Regardless, I am still hoping that someone comes around on this.
Also, I am going to respectfully disagree on quacker, although he is the one I am least sure of at this point. I have him at 50% which is well above the next person, on my list (EAP who I have at 33%). You can agree that SOMEONE will be distancing though either through content, votes, or both.
You guys have WAAAAYYYY too much to say and speculate about for it being the first round. WAAAYYY too much. Townies tend to not do so much speculating first round. Just saying.
The only reason for putting ANYONE in the runoff first round is to see how they and others will react to it Viking. That is exactly why I picked you.
Here is where I said my reason. Three days ago, right after I did it. No back pedaling here man. But nice try at the reaching again.
Viking, you are the only person that I get into it with like this. I'm trying to not do that for the sake of the game because that BS from the last game fucked up the townies. I'm a townie, I'd like to see us not be fucked up by this bullshit AGAIN. This does not help us AT ALL. You are WRONG, so you are either Mafia purposely sabotaging us, or you are a townie doing it inadvertently. If that is the case, why do it man? it is the fucking first round dude. If we are both townies, there are more townies out there who will use the votes here and the kill to piece it together. No matter who they vote of between us, they will get some knowledge and can use it to win. Jesus.
We're all a mess of paradoxes. Believing in things we know can't be true. We walk around carrying feelings too complicated and contradictory to express. But when it all becomes too big, and words aren't enough to help get it all out, there's always music.
We're all a mess of paradoxes. Believing in things we know can't be true. We walk around carrying feelings too complicated and contradictory to express. But when it all becomes too big, and words aren't enough to help get it all out, there's always music.
I assume that the particular PM from our conversation to which you have been referring is the one I sent you on May 9th at 3:34am. Let me know if you are referring to a different PM from that discussion, which - frankly - I wish you hadn't discontinued.
I actually got a chuckle out of reading some of the political content with the context of this game in mind. As such, I sent the entire PM to Fawnmart for her approval - and asked permission to post that PM in its entirety. Seeing that I am its author and only quoted four single sentences from your end, I don't think that is entirely unreasonable.
You want to say I'm going too far with disclosure regarding this PM? Pot. Kettle. Black.
Yes, I think posting the last line from that PM would be fine, but I was fairly explicit in an earlier PM that I did not want the political discourse disclosed under any circumstances. If you feel that that is the pot calling the kettle black, so be it, but I do not see where my political opinions or discourse with you have any bearing on the game.
Plus, I feel you are riding this one point to death, when I find your initial word count theory much more suspicious. The PM only reenforced my opinion regarding your earlier post.
That PM predates Mafia 49.5 even, so I fail to see what relevance it has to this particular game. The most I'm guilty of here is a little friendly smack talk, and the record will show that.
Plus, I don't think you really said anything worth shying away from there. You were more reasonable in that conversation than in this game, as far as I'm concerned.
I actually agree with Viking at the moment. Seems a little to easy to me. Viking, Bacon and Kdogg are easy people to get in a runoff without the mafia bringing much attention to themselves.
So either we got the mafia going for an easy first round runoff to get through the round
Or we have a mafia member in these three. If that is the case then the mafia is the one pushing for a three-way runoff.
No way of knowing either way but something seems kind of fishy to me.
The fact that you, the "quiet in the first round when a townie" type, have started this much speculation already makes me pretty leery of you sir.
And Viking, I have my reasons. Best believe I'm not a random acts of Mafia type.
Here was your post 5 minutes before. If you only reason is to get a rise, I will always rise. Add that to your timing, and I find I continue to find it suspicious.
Having said that, it is still a better reason than I cant figure Viking out, so I am going to vote for him.
That PM predates Mafia 49.5 even, so I fail to see what relevance it has to this particular game. The most I'm guilty of here is a little friendly smack talk, and the record will show that.
Plus, I don't think you really said anything worth shying away from there. You were more reasonable in that conversation than in this game, as far as I'm concerned.
I noted that it predated this game in my first post referencing it. And I will agree that it was friendly smack talk.
But I do not want the post in its entirety put out there since it is not relevant to the game and as I said previously, I did not want shared, even with Fawn. THAT is a violation of the privacy I had asked for in that pm conversation, and that is much more serious to me than a rules violation in this game.
Fair. Thats why I have a screen grab instead of a quote, but I don't photoshop much so I did not think of it like you did. I would think it would be pretty easy to tell anyways,..
I can't speek for everyone playing but I know I could doctor it up where you couldn't tell the if it was legit or not. From what I've seen of Bacon's Photoshoppping, he could do it too.
Also, I am going to respectfully disagree on quacker, although he is the one I am least sure of at this point. I have him at 50% which is well above the next person, on my list (EAP who I have at 33%). You can agree that SOMEONE will be distancing though either through content, votes, or both.
Ohhh, yes they will be distancing. I just don't think they would be reckless about it. No need to risk it. Remember, Quacker voted for LLL before you had your blow up. Now if it came afterwards it would make a lot more sense. They could be pretty sure that you would get voted off and that would be risky but well worth it later on in the game....
Edit: spelling.
Last Edit: Jun 17, 2012 22:17:57 GMT -5 by Deleted - Back to Top
Keeping my personal beliefs private is more important to me than letting everyone know I am not a townie in an internet game. I have PMed Fawn to tell her I do not want to have that PM posted and in exchange I will keep my role PM private.
It may not seem like a big deal to you, but as I outlined in other PMs to you, my ability to do my job depends on no taking a stance as I did in that PM. I was fine with the one line being put into the thread for the record, but whether you intended to or not, you have made it personal, since not everyone has the ability or inclination to discuss politics on here as you do.
Instead of going there again, as KDogg said, it was banter that predates this game. Lets leave it at that.
Ohhh, yes they will be distancing. I just don't think they would be reckless about it. No need to risk it. Remember, Quacker voted for LLL before you had your blow up. Now if it came afterwards it would make a lot more sense. They could be pretty sure that you would get voted off and that would be risky but well worth it later on in the game....
Edit: spelling.
Good point. I was on a cell at the time, and looking back on the computer, I see where Quacker came in. So if I am right about the other 2, I am most likely wrong about him. It would have been dangerous to vote LLL at the time he did it since I had not shot myself in the dick at that point. I'll need to reconsider that one.
It is much nicer to be back on my computer at this point. Makes following the game much easier.
To hell with it. As I see it, what I am about to post involves zero violation of Rule 10 so I'm going to go with it. Viking's comments are removed, but I will indicate where I have redacted his comments.
Here's that "smoking gun" he keeps bringing up:
First, as I have said 3 times in a row now, and in the original post referencing it, it was never the smoking gun. It was a piece of background info related to your Page 2 post.
Second, I reported this to the mods and asked for it to be removed, since even redacted, you are responding to comments I made supposedly in confidence.
I so want to be, like, a secure person and just let this go, but I owe way too much money to Sallie Mae and the federal government to not correct this. I'm an attorney.
I am not mad anymore, but I do intend to follow through if need be with regards to posting my role. It is not a threat. It is simply a statement of intention until people can say what makes me so guilty that I get to fry for getting mad.
It is a threat. That's exactly a threat. Even if you intend to follow through with it, it's a threat. What's more, you've basically said, let me get through this runoff or I will ruin the game. It's a threat, and it's childish.
With regards to the names and activity today, I am pretty comfortable that I came pretty damn close or hit the nail on the head. KDogg is the loud one, LLL is the mid foil and Quacker is the mole.
I've thought a number of times in day 1 that I had a pretty good idea who the three mafia were, and I've never been right. I'm not saying one or more or all three of those people aren't mafia, but if you are really just a townie, I'd say there's a pretty good chance you are dead wrong about one or more of these people.
I was very clear with regards to that PM, and posting it. I asked repeatedly for you not to do it, and told you I would consider it a violation of my privacy to do so. That is why I reported you.
That is far more important to me than this game or this board. If it is a straw to grasp, then fine, but you crossed a very big line.