Whether it's your first Bonnaroo or you’re a music festival veteran, we welcome you to Inforoo.
Here you'll find info about artists, rumors, camping tips, and the infamous Roo Clues. Have a look around then create an account and join in the fun. See you at Bonnaroo!!
What I am looking at is the votes on players who are dead. This round she seemed to just bandwagon on Phi and at the end of both rounds their votes have been aligned.
still re-reading but wanted to go ahead and address this one. I was already planning to vote for you initially this round and he just beat me to it. as for last round, that's a weak argument. I never changed my vote.
I am not just talking about last round, you have aligned votes multiple times as I have stated. Who accused you of changing your vote? Just as Phi has done, I think you misread what I said. I am not accusing you and Ella of the same thing. I am not targeting you for being vocal about me, once again, please reread what I said. You said you are not the only one to have only voted for players who are dead, who else has? I feel you have misread what I said. In the first two rounds you have only voted for players who are currently dead, no one else has. You say I am just stirring the pot in the 11th hour and creating confusion. What have I said that you are confused about?
I do think it's interesting that Mike initially voted for Tejas and the runoff would have been Mike and Tejas... Mike then switched to me, and when he decided to move his vote again to save himself, instead of putting it back on Tejas he threw it to Phi. even though he stated that he thought mafia was me, Phi and Tejas. so why was Phi suddenly a bigger priority? because he also called out Mike as mafia?
still re-reading but wanted to go ahead and address this one. I was already planning to vote for you initially this round and he just beat me to it. as for last round, that's a weak argument. I never changed my vote.
I am not just talking about last round, you have aligned votes multiple times as I have stated. Who accused you of changing your vote? Just as Phi has done, I think you misread what I said. I am not accusing you and Ella of the same thing. I am not targeting you for being vocal about me, once again, please reread what I said. You said you are not the only one to have only voted for players who are dead, who else has? I feel you have misread what I said. In the first two rounds you have only voted for players who are currently dead, no one else has. You say I am just stirring the pot in the 11th hour and creating confusion. What have I said that you are confused about?
1. I addressed that: we "aligned votes" twice. round 2, a lot of people were aligned on SF. 2. I didn't say anyone did, simply that I didn't change my vote to align with anyone- I simply stayed on the person I found most suspicious at that time. 3. guess I did misread--- seemed like you accused us both of voting for dead players (Jimmy round 1, SF round 2)- please clarify. 4. that's open to debate. 5. I guess I did misread that part. I suppose I did only vote for them both, but that's because I tend to go with my gut and not get influenced too much by all the chatter that happens with runoffs. I am open to changing my mind if a strong argument is presented but I didn't see enough to persuade me to change from jimmy in round 1 or SF round 2. 6. didn't say I was confused, said you are throwing all this crap out to create confusion. your longer posts are difficult to read though.
I do think it's interesting that Mike initially voted for Tejas and the runoff would have been Mike and Tejas... Mike then switched to me, and when he decided to move his vote again to save himself, instead of putting it back on Tejas he threw it to Phi. even though he stated that he thought mafia was me, Phi and Tejas. so why was Phi suddenly a bigger priority? because he also called out Mike as mafia?
I put Phi in because I am seeing connections between you and him and after seeing Phi's response to my post I am much more confident in Phi being mafia than Tajas.
I am not just talking about last round, you have aligned votes multiple times as I have stated. Who accused you of changing your vote? Just as Phi has done, I think you misread what I said. I am not accusing you and Ella of the same thing. I am not targeting you for being vocal about me, once again, please reread what I said. You said you are not the only one to have only voted for players who are dead, who else has? I feel you have misread what I said. In the first two rounds you have only voted for players who are currently dead, no one else has. You say I am just stirring the pot in the 11th hour and creating confusion. What have I said that you are confused about?
1. I addressed that: we "aligned votes" twice. round 2, a lot of people were aligned on SF. 2. I didn't say anyone did, simply that I didn't change my vote to align with anyone- I simply stayed on the person I found most suspicious at that time. 3. guess I did misread--- seemed like you accused us both of voting for dead players (Jimmy round 1, SF round 2)- please clarify. 4. that's open to debate. 5. I guess I did misread that part. I suppose I did only vote for them both, but that's because I tend to go with my gut and not get influenced too much by all the chatter that happens with runoffs. I am open to changing my mind if a strong argument is presented but I didn't see enough to persuade me to change from jimmy in round 1 or SF round 2. 6. didn't say I was confused, said you are throwing all this crap out to create confusion. your longer posts are difficult to read though.
1. Yes, a lot of folks did in the end, but you have both voted for the same person with your first votes twice, a lot of other folks didn't do that. 2. The last sentence of your post in question simply said " I never changed my vote" and I was curious why you said this. I know you didn't change to align with anyone, your initial votes did that. 3. I realize that a lot of folks have voted for someone voted off. Until this round, everyone you have voted for is dead. 4. Fair enough, I stated my reasons and thought I was pretty clear about that. I don't remember including anything about how vocal you have been against me. 5. Nothing else to discuss 6. What do you think is crap I am throwing to create confusion? I am asking this because I have also been accused of spinning things around, but when I ask what I don't get a response. I am trying to avoid going into any longwinded theory's, what if's, or stuff like that. Yes, I asked what others thought about any vote patterns they saw, but I feel I was pretty cut and dry about my stance and reasoning behind them. If you think I need to explain something more in depth or differently, just let me know.
I'm sorry Mike D, I can see why she is having a little bit of an issue with your stance right now. What you are basically doing is saying that her vote is aligning with Phi's are what are making you suspicious, correct? That the people she has voted for are dead? People have to vote people off, that is the way the game is designed.
The problem I am having is that you scoffed when everyone else was saying that the vote exchange between you and linana looked suspicious,and several of us thought it, yet now you are accusing her of aligning with Phi..a much weaker argument in my opinion.
How long are you guys going to keep this up? Cutoff was over an hour ago; you've had 2 days to talk.
Linana >>> Ody >>> MikeD
what, me and Mike? I said my vote was locked for that round. I was just responding to Mike's posts since I didn't get to my computer earlier. and yeah, I've been talking for the past 2 days. the whole game, actually. probably I will keep talking in the game until I die.
I'm sorry Mike D, I can see why she is having a little bit of an issue with your stance right now. What you are basically doing is saying that her vote is aligning with Phi's are what are making you suspicious, correct? That the people she has voted for are dead? People have to vote people off, that is the way the game is designed.
The problem I am having is that you scoffed when everyone else was saying that the vote exchange between you and linana looked suspicious,and several of us thought it, yet now you are accusing her of aligning with Phi..a much weaker argument in my opinion.
Ella >> Mike D
I'm locked LD
Edit for grammar
That is a part of what I am saying yes. I am saying every single player she has voted for thus far is dead. Combine that with her and Phi setting up the first pair of votes twice. Then look at the reasoning of their votes, particularly this round.
I scoffed because all that was brought up was when Linana and I took our votes off each other. No one likes to mention how I kept my vote on her to get her to the final runoff that round though, funny how that works, isn't it? If Linana and I are mafia together, why the hell would I try to get her in the final runoff with me? Someone explain this to me.
I'm sorry Mike D, I can see why she is having a little bit of an issue with your stance right now. What you are basically doing is saying that her vote is aligning with Phi's are what are making you suspicious, correct? That the people she has voted for are dead? People have to vote people off, that is the way the game is designed.
The problem I am having is that you scoffed when everyone else was saying that the vote exchange between you and linana looked suspicious,and several of us thought it, yet now you are accusing her of aligning with Phi..a much weaker argument in my opinion.
Ella >> Mike D
I'm locked LD
Edit for grammar
That is a part of what I am saying yes. I am saying every single player she has voted for thus far is dead. Combine that with her and Phi setting up the first pair of votes twice. Then look at the reasoning of their votes, particularly this round.
I scoffed because all that was brought up was when Linana and I took our votes off each other. No one likes to mention how I kept my vote on her to get her to the final runoff that round though, funny how that works, isn't it? If Linana and I are mafia together, why the hell would I try to get her in the final runoff with me? Someone explain this to me.
I'm sorry Mike D, I can see why she is having a little bit of an issue with your stance right now. What you are basically doing is saying that her vote is aligning with Phi's are what are making you suspicious, correct? That the people she has voted for are dead? People have to vote people off, that is the way the game is designed.
The problem I am having is that you scoffed when everyone else was saying that the vote exchange between you and linana looked suspicious,and several of us thought it, yet now you are accusing her of aligning with Phi..a much weaker argument in my opinion.
Ella >> Mike D
I'm locked LD
Edit for grammar
That is a part of what I am saying yes. I am saying every single player she has voted for thus far is dead. Combine that with her and Phi setting up the first pair of votes twice. Then look at the reasoning of their votes, particularly this round.
I scoffed because all that was brought up was when Linana and I took our votes off each other. No one likes to mention how I kept my vote on her to get her to the final runoff that round though, funny how that works, isn't it? If Linana and I are mafia together, why the hell would I try to get her in the final runoff with me? Someone explain this to me.
2) I voted for Ody b/c out of the 4 people jimmy mentioned (Ody, Mike D, Phi, NBF) Ody seemed the most logical to me. Phi voted for Mike D and I know Mafia use that tactic day 1 to create a kind of distancing move but I think veteran players know that really doesn't work later in the game. NBF really has not done anything suspicious (although its only day 1). However, ody has not casted a voted even though he was online 16 hours ago.. So just based off of that I voted for Ody
I thought that meant that Tejas knew you were mafia and had just slipped.
My second guess was Mike D because of you saving him at the last minute.
Sorry, y'all, I was a terrible inspector!
These quote boxes are all screwed up, and I can't figure out how to fix them. The inside quote was Tejas's post. The rest of this is me commenting on it.
