Whether it's your first Bonnaroo or you’re a music festival veteran, we welcome you to Inforoo.
Here you'll find info about artists, rumors, camping tips, and the infamous Roo Clues. Have a look around then create an account and join in the fun. See you at Bonnaroo!!
Sorry, I've been super busy and haven't logged on in a few days (3 maybe?)
Anyways,
Surf > rummaging
I'll make it a point to check in more often
Any reason?
My pre determined voting pattern. I hadn't even read through the thread when I voted other than to look to see who was after me in the initial lineup and weather or not it would have overstacked.
Okay, so we're now at a 5 person run-off between Potentpotables, Tainted Opossum, Krissyjo, Jazmo, and Rummagingforanswers7
I think that's overkill, so would like to see it whittled down to 4 or 3. Due to the conversations, I'd like to see Jazmo, Potent, and Taint in it. The fourth could be a toss up between me or rummaging. Obviously, for self-preservation sake, I'd rather not be in it, but for the town's sake, it doesn't bother me to be there.
Anyone agree? Disagree?
Why on earth would you offer yourself to the runoff? You're being way too cooperative here for my liking.
I want Krissy, Rummaging, and Potent in the runoff for sure.
Rummaging needs to keep talking after saying she did something detrimental to the town on purpose. Potent should be in there for the vote change.
She can keep on talking (though hopefully not in 3rd person).
I admitted that I had brought too much sarcasm to the table here and now am realizing that was silly, made me look more guilty than anything - like I was making jokes to take the heat off possibly being a Mafia member. I can assure you that that is not the case. I just needed to get my head in the game > insert head. Done.
From an objective perspective, Krissy is looking more suspicious than anyone else right now. But if I change my vote to her, it will appear as if I am doing so merely to get her in the run-off - potentially in place of me. For that reason, I will keep my vote on Jaz.
Considering you've found the need to respond to my threads as if you are threatened by me I offer you some peace my confused counterpart. May you find peace in your restless soul.
At this point I'm more suspicious of the people who are electing to remain online but not contribute to the conversation. I don't have a who and why yet, but as soon as I do I will post it. It seems to me that the first round is not going in any sort of logical direction, leaving all of our asses exposed and more of an opportunity for Townies to go down in multitude.
Well, you know I've been part of the conversation. I have nothing to hide, as I'm a member of the town. But I realize that someone has to die on the first day and there's an 8 out of 11 chance it's a townie, so if I'm going down, I'm getting as much info out there as possible to help the town. With this reasoning, and to help Krissy get the number of people in the runoff that she wants, but not the exact people, I'm moving my vote.
potent >>> jazmo >>> tainted opossum >>> jfg
He was the first to vote for me, so I will reciprocate here noting that it is based on nothing but reciprocation. I could have reciprocated to the other vote on me, but that would have put him in the runoff and would really have made little discernible difference to where we are. In other words, my vote is a throwaway to get to a 4 person runoff.
You voted for Tainted earlier because he was an early person to stack. What is your reasoning for now taking him out? Because that's what krissy wants? If you're suspicious of Tainted why not just let him proceed into the runoff?
Considering you've found the need to respond to my threads as if you are threatened by me I offer you some peace my confused counterpart. May you find peace in your restless soul.
Right now by my count we have: jaz, potent, krissy, and rummage in the runoff. At this point I am not going to move as it will just put another in the run off and I feel like 5 is excessive.
Well, you know I've been part of the conversation. I have nothing to hide, as I'm a member of the town. But I realize that someone has to die on the first day and there's an 8 out of 11 chance it's a townie, so if I'm going down, I'm getting as much info out there as possible to help the town. With this reasoning, and to help Krissy get the number of people in the runoff that she wants, but not the exact people, I'm moving my vote.
potent >>> jazmo >>> tainted opossum >>> jfg
He was the first to vote for me, so I will reciprocate here noting that it is based on nothing but reciprocation. I could have reciprocated to the other vote on me, but that would have put him in the runoff and would really have made little discernible difference to where we are. In other words, my vote is a throwaway to get to a 4 person runoff.
You voted for Tainted earlier because he was an early person to stack. What is your reasoning for now taking him out? Because that's what krissy wants? If you're suspicious of Tainted why not just let him proceed into the runoff?
Because I'm just as suspicious of everyone else. A 5 person runoff is not appealing to me - while I like to get info out there, I also don't like the game to go on forever, so an extra 36 hours for one undecided vote to move seems superfluous to me. 4 is a good number, I will agree with those who said it. Plus, I want to see what other dominoes fall and who pushes them.
*I especially don't like the game to go forever if I'm going to be lynched first.
I think they had problems with "dead" players in the past liking posts. Just quote and say I agree if you like something someone says.
"Like"
^ I think this is the way the cool kids are doing it, though it seems like its only used in relation to circumstances outside of the game as opposed to liking things directly vital to the flow of the game which is an infraction. This is simply meant to be an example, and it should not be assumed that I like anything bogart has to say. He doesn't like my profile pic so he's kind of on my shit list, along with Crunch Berry Cereal.
I think they had problems with "dead" players in the past liking posts. Just quote and say I agree if you like something someone says.
"Like"
^ I think this is the way the cool kids are doing it, though it seems like its only used in relation to circumstances outside of the game as opposed to liking things directly vital to the flow of the game which is an infraction. This is simply meant to be an example, and it should not be assumed that I like anything bogart has to say. He doesn't like my profile pic so he's kind of on my shit list, along with Crunch Berry Cereal.
Okay yeah that's why I asked - it obviously makes sense to not be allowed to like posts that are directly related to the game, but for posts that you find lol-worthy or of interest for whatever other reason, I was curious why it is not permitted.
Considering you've found the need to respond to my threads as if you are threatened by me I offer you some peace my confused counterpart. May you find peace in your restless soul.
Considering you've found the need to respond to my threads as if you are threatened by me I offer you some peace my confused counterpart. May you find peace in your restless soul.
Tainted saying that he voted for Krissy simply because she said her first vote was random (which is true for most first-round votes) is suspect to me. Potent then taking Tainted (who he was supposed suspicious of) out of the runoff for no real reason other than to lower the amount of people in the runoff is also suspicious to me. I would personally like to see Tainted in this runoff as well, but I want to keep Rummy in so I'm not moving my vote. Her initial stack followed by her "sarcasm" makes me want her there.
Rummy what is your reasoning behind your suspicions of Krissy? Maybe I missed it, but you say you're suspicious of her and I don't see reasoning. Same question to Farrisbueller (you're very quiet this game) and Tainted for holding their votes on her. (Jim has given his reason, which is why I'm not questioning is. Tainted I feel like you may have given one but after a quick reread I'm not seeing one).
Jim - I don't recall offering myself to be in the runoff. I was already basically part of it. Plus, people have to be in the runoff day 1 - do I want it to be me? Of course not. Is whining about it going to do any good? Nope. So if I'm in the day 1 runoff - the town has to start somewhere. I don't think it's that big of a deal. Runoffs give the town information. They're a good thing.
Okay, so we're now at a 5 person run-off between Potentpotables, Tainted Opossum, Krissyjo, Jazmo, and Rummagingforanswers7
I think that's overkill, so would like to see it whittled down to 4 or 3. Due to the conversations, I'd like to see Jazmo, Potent, and Taint in it. The fourth could be a toss up between me or rummaging.Obviously, for self-preservation sake, I'd rather not be in it, but for the town's sake, it doesn't bother me to be there.
Tainted saying that he voted for Krissy simply because she said her first vote was random (which is true for most first-round votes) is suspect to me. Potent then taking Tainted (who he was supposed suspicious of) out of the runoff for no real reason other than to lower the amount of people in the runoff is also suspicious to me. I would personally like to see Tainted in this runoff as well, but I want to keep Rummy in so I'm not moving my vote. Her initial stack followed by her "sarcasm" makes me want her there.
Rummy what is your reasoning behind your suspicions of Krissy? Maybe I missed it, but you say you're suspicious of her and I don't see reasoning. Same question to Farrisbueller (you're very quiet this game) and Tainted for holding their votes on her. (Jim has given his reason, which is why I'm not questioning is. Tainted I feel like you may have given one but after a quick reread I'm not seeing one).
I found the way that she offered herself up, along with a smiley face, seems a little suspect.
Then from her earlier:
Considering others have mentioned their own suspicions of you, I think it's wise to keep you in the runoff.
She has said "so who do we want in the run off? State your picks" about five times... cycling back to that over and over again, so as to keep the discussion on that solely, seems odd to me.
But I haven't played with you guys before. It could just be that Krissy tends to lead discussions like this, whether Mafia or not, and that is something I will have to learn with time of course.
Considering you've found the need to respond to my threads as if you are threatened by me I offer you some peace my confused counterpart. May you find peace in your restless soul.
Okay, so we're now at a 5 person run-off between Potentpotables, Tainted Opossum, Krissyjo, Jazmo, and Rummagingforanswers7
I think that's overkill, so would like to see it whittled down to 4 or 3. Due to the conversations, I'd like to see Jazmo, Potent, and Taint in it. The fourth could be a toss up between me or rummaging.Obviously, for self-preservation sake, I'd rather not be in it, but for the town's sake, it doesn't bother me to be there.
Anyone agree? Disagree?
Yes, this. That was the moment that seemed especially weird to me from Krissy. And then her rampant discussion of the run-off, with smileys sprinkled throughout - idk, too cheery and happy go lucky for me to not find suspicious.
Considering you've found the need to respond to my threads as if you are threatened by me I offer you some peace my confused counterpart. May you find peace in your restless soul.
Okay, so we're now at a 5 person run-off between Potentpotables, Tainted Opossum, Krissyjo, Jazmo, and Rummagingforanswers7
I think that's overkill, so would like to see it whittled down to 4 or 3. Due to the conversations, I'd like to see Jazmo, Potent, and Taint in it. The fourth could be a toss up between me or rummaging.Obviously, for self-preservation sake, I'd rather not be in it, but for the town's sake, it doesn't bother me to be there.
Anyone agree? Disagree?
I guess I'm not following why you find this suspicious, though I'm glad this post was brought to my attention.
krissyjo you gave your reasons for wanting Tainted in - why do you want potent and myself in over rummy?
And how the hell can I resist the nickname Taint? Lol
I'd assume the same way you resist the concept in real life, with a sense of quiet grace and dignity
Ah, okay. I'll add an "ed" to it. Though I think if I met someone with the first name "Tainted" in real life, I'd have a hard time not calling them "Taint"
I'd assume the same way you resist the concept in real life, with a sense of quiet grace and dignity
Ah, okay. I'll add an "ed" to it. Though I think if I met someone with the first name "Tainted" in real life, I'd have a hard time not calling them "Taint"
Haha you can call me Ben as well :-) though that may not supply the same instant gratification that taint does
Okay, so we're now at a 5 person run-off between Potentpotables, Tainted Opossum, Krissyjo, Jazmo, and Rummagingforanswers7
I think that's overkill, so would like to see it whittled down to 4 or 3. Due to the conversations, I'd like to see Jazmo, Potent, and Taint in it. The fourth could be a toss up between me or rummaging.Obviously, for self-preservation sake, I'd rather not be in it, but for the town's sake, it doesn't bother me to be there.
Anyone agree? Disagree?
For starters - the bolded part was based on the votes at the time. We were stuck at a 5 person runoff. I was talking about the 5 people in the runoff. Made sense to me at the time, but if you want to consider that offering myself for a runoff, so be it.
Yes, this. That was the moment that seemed especially weird to me from Krissy. And then her rampant discussion of the run-off, with smileys sprinkled throughout - idk, too cheery and happy go lucky for me to not find suspicious.
Okay, I'll stop being so cheery and happy go lucky damn it! (Seriously, you should meet me. It'd all make sense then.) Also, I find this amusing coming from someone who's played from a position of sarcasm. (resisting the urge to post a winking face)
I guess I'm not following why you find this suspicious, though I'm glad this post was brought to my attention.
krissyjo you gave your reasons for wanting Tainted in - why do you want potent and myself in over rummy?
The exchange between you and potent is what made me want both of you in there. If you'll recall, though, after I initially stated a runoff trio of you, Potent, and Tainted, I posted this:
We're looking at 2 hours til deadline. We can stay with 5 in the runoff or narrow it to 4 or 3. If we keep it to 5 this time, I think it should go to 3 next time. If we want to narrow the runoff, I think one of these people should consider moving their vote: Farris, Jazmo, Taint, Surf. This is based on my feelings that Potent, Taint, and Jazmo should remain in the runoff.
Didn't see Rummy's response before I posted this (keeping windows open and working while trying to respond isn't probably a good idea). Now I'm kind of leaning towards seeing her in the runoff, too. If we did four, that works fine. If we go to three, I'd say it should be potent, taint, and rummy.
Thoughts?
I think Potent's responses and explanations have been more suspect than yours, which is why I replaced your spot in my lineup with Rummy.
Oh also - I like the reference to my "rampant discussion of the run-off" - What else would I be discussing right now? Day 1. Trying to find some connections. The run-off is the way to do that. Seems to me to be the important thing to discuss...
Yes, this. That was the moment that seemed especially weird to me from Krissy. And then her rampant discussion of the run-off, with smileys sprinkled throughout - idk, too cheery and happy go lucky for me to not find suspicious.
Okay, I'll stop being so cheery and happy go lucky damn it! (Seriously, you should meet me. It'd all make sense then.) Also, I find this amusing coming from someone who's played from a position of sarcasm. (resisting the urge to post a winking face)
Virtual hug truce? I don't want to bring your spirit down!
I did say that my rationalizations for voting decisions in this game might be completely off base because I don't know each of your individual styles and tendencies yet.
Considering you've found the need to respond to my threads as if you are threatened by me I offer you some peace my confused counterpart. May you find peace in your restless soul.
Considering you've found the need to respond to my threads as if you are threatened by me I offer you some peace my confused counterpart. May you find peace in your restless soul.
I'm 99% sure that that's right - but if I messed something up please don't crucify me; it wasn't intentional. I've made tally mistakes as a ref before so I just want to give myself a disclaimer. Having to go back two pages for a tally was killing me though.
