Whether it's your first Bonnaroo or you’re a music festival veteran, we welcome you to Inforoo.
Here you'll find info about artists, rumors, camping tips, and the infamous Roo Clues. Have a look around then create an account and join in the fun. See you at Bonnaroo!!
Wow the pace of this game changed in a hurry. Guess gnr plus holiday will do that.
I'm good with my vote on Jimmy for now. Kdogg and Viking are being their usual long winded selves with Kdogg being more confusing but Jimmy is also making strange moves.
Also to add to the Nonsense, I didn't have a lucky shirt, but I did have a lucky pair of underwear that I wore whenever I was pitching. For hockey it was more ritual like I always put the right skate and shin pad on first (for some reason gloves never mattered), always left skate touching ice first, and always having an even #. Hockey players are weird lol.
Back to the game now
A goalie I knew had to kiss every one of his pads before putting them on. Fucking goalies man.
But I agree back to the game.
Lucky shirt, would not wash pads for an entire season. Skates on before pants, and had to throw up before every game.
But all of that pales in comparison to a goalie. They were the weird ones.
Wow the pace of this game changed in a hurry. Guess gnr plus holiday will do that.
I'm good with my vote on Jimmy for now. Kdogg and Viking are being their usual long winded selves with Kdogg being more confusing but Jimmy is also making strange moves.
Also to add to the Nonsense, I didn't have a lucky shirt, but I did have a lucky pair of underwear that I wore whenever I was pitching. For hockey it was more ritual like I always put the right skate and shin pad on first (for some reason gloves never mattered), always left skate touching ice first, and always having an even #. Hockey players are weird lol.
Back to the game now
A goalie I knew had to kiss every one of his pads before putting them on. Fucking goalies man.
But I agree back to the game.
I also play goalie at times. Took a few year hiatus from forward after doing it once as a fill in and i got hooked. You have to be nuts to have pucks fired at you all the time even though doesn't hurt at all unless your gear is total crap.
Lucky shirt, would not wash pads for an entire season. Skates on before pants, and had to throw up before every game.
But all of that pales in comparison to a goalie. They were the weird ones.
Before they added zippers to pants how did you get them over the skates?
I would slit the backs and sew in a v cut whenever I bought a new pair. Toes first, poke through, then slide the blade thorough with an extra pair of socks over the blade.
Hey now, nobody's perfect. I've admitted where I felt my logic was on shaky ground in this game, and I feel I've been at least as transparent with my reasoning as anyone this time around. I'm at least putting things out there.
Contrast that with a certain other candidate in this runoff, who's basically told the other two candidates in this runoff that he won't respond to their questions and/or read the entirety of their posts - and that's when a runoff opponent is defending themselves against his accusations and/or making their case against him.
Wouldn't you want to shoot that down? Worst case, feels like the overconfidence associated with a certain role to me; best case, innocent player won't even bother with others? Either way, I don't think it's a very productive approach for the Townspeople here.
If you want to ask me a direct question that is no longer than two tweets, sure. If you want to write an incomprehensible short story with veiled references at "certain other candidates" buried within and except me to respond to them, you can hold your breath.
Whatever. I had to ask you 2-3x to even get you to vaguely respond to what you called "nonsense." (98/140 characters.)
We're all in a runoff with Viking, but you won't even read his thoughts on it? Even as you're both poised to advance. Can I ask why not? (138/140 characters.)
Because I don't know shit about anyone's roles. All I know is you were making up some shit justifications for everyone's initial votes like you know something. So I stacked you up to 3. You proclaimed you'd take a break on posting, so I said mission accomplished and switched to potent to create a runoff.
Then you started posting shit again, so I switched back to you. And that's it. That's where I'm at.
In terms of Viking, he's also posting a bunch of nonsense. The only thing that has really piqued my attention so far is Danbob trying to rally people against me with mischaracterizations about my earlier posts. Otherwise things seem to be par for the course in terms of Kdogg and Viking post useless novels in round 1.
Because I don't know shit about anyone's roles. All I know is you were making up some shit justifications for everyone's initial votes like you know something. So I stacked you up to 3. You proclaimed you'd take a break on posting, so I said mission accomplished and switched to potent to create a runoff.
Then you started posting shit again, so I switched back to you. And that's it. That's where I'm at.
In terms of Viking, he's also posting a bunch of nonsense. The only thing that has really piqued my attention so far is Danbob trying to rally people against me with mischaracterizations about my earlier posts. Otherwise things seem to be par for the course in terms of Kdogg and Viking post useless novels in round 1.
Because I don't know shit about anyone's roles. All I know is you were making up some shit justifications for everyone's initial votes like you know something. So I stacked you up to 3. You proclaimed you'd take a break on posting, so I said mission accomplished and switched to potent to create a runoff.
Then you started posting shit again, so I switched back to you. And that's it. That's where I'm at.
In terms of Viking, he's also posting a bunch of nonsense. The only thing that has really piqued my attention so far is Danbob trying to rally people against me with mischaracterizations about my earlier posts. Otherwise things seem to be par for the course in terms of Kdogg and Viking post useless novels in round 1.
Because I don't know shit about anyone's roles. All I know is you were making up some shit justifications for everyone's initial votes like you know something. So I stacked you up to 3. You proclaimed you'd take a break on posting, so I said mission accomplished and switched to potent to create a runoff.
Then you started posting shit again, so I switched back to you. And that's it. That's where I'm at.
So basically as long as I'm alive and playing this game, you'll vote for me. Got it. Cool strategy, bro.
Because I don't know shit about anyone's roles. All I know is you were making up some shit justifications for everyone's initial votes like you know something. So I stacked you up to 3. You proclaimed you'd take a break on posting, so I said mission accomplished and switched to potent to create a runoff.
Then you started posting shit again, so I switched back to you. And that's it. That's where I'm at.
So basically as long as I'm alive and playing this game, you'll vote for me. Got it. Cool strategy, bro.
At least you know the strategy from years in politics. NAHNAHNAHNAH NOT LISTENING NAHNAHNAHNAH, oh shit, how did things get so bad?
I'll stop voting for you and Viking when you stop posting garbage theories in round 1 of every game you play even when you actually know nothing about what's going on.
I'll stop voting for you and Viking when you stop posting garbage theories in round 1 of every game you play even when you actually know nothing about what's going on.
Except for all those times when I correctly tag 2 mafia members right? I am willing to put my Day 1 record against yours if you are up for the Pepsi Challenge....
I can keep going Mr Juris Doctorate, but you of all people should know that the devil is in the details.
The only people who truly understand the details of shit that happens in D1R1 is Mafia and referee and that's the truth.
We have had this debate before and every time you are proven wrong. So either 1, your memory and method are crap and if so, well sorry to hear it. or 2, you are intentionally trying to get people to shut up and kill them for some reason. Which is it?
How have I mischaracterized Thors posts in anyway? Can you not handle pushback on your votes/actions. Everytime you've been questioned (kdogg and Viking too- not just me) your responses have been to lash out and insult. The votes against you are definitely justified.
First he pushes kdogg up to three votes - forcing the at most a three way runoff.
Then after some pushback he says "that worked" and voted for potent for no other reason than my vote was also on potent. Soon after kdogg creates a 5 way runoff.
After seeing kdogg expand the the runoff Thor then goes off on kdogg and reverts his vote back to kdogg (once again forcing a three way runoff at most). If no one had moved off of kdogg it means that two people would have had to leave the runoff. By switching his vote from potent to kdogg Thor decides who one of those players will be (unless two people would have magically voted for potent to bring him back into the runoff). I'm not saying that potent is scum but it is worth mentioning.
Why was Thor so aggressively trying to push a three way runoff? Was there more of a reason for his vote on potent besides me? What does "that worked" mean?
We definitely need more answers then what we have.
danbob > Thor
1. My 3-stack on Kdogg did initially work, in that it got him to stop spouting off nonsense where he was making theories about round first round initial votes.
2. At the time, prior to ZIG's case study, I think everyone would agree that as a whole town was opposed to 5 way runoffs. When Kdogg made a 5 way runoff, i felt he genuinely needed to be guaranteed to advance because he didn't seem to be acting in the best interests of the town.
3. There is no genuine proof that there is something wrong with a 3-way runoff. There is therefore no reason to take issue with me stacking up Kdogg unless you're Mafia with him.
I wasn't "aggressively pushing for a 3-way runoff."
That is a mischaracterizations. Multiple times I stated that I was OK with a 4 way runoff. Me stacking Kdogg up to 3 did not foreclose the opportunity for someone already on Kdogg to switch off him and create a 4-way runoff. I actually suggested that, and someone did it.
So your characterization that I aggressively advocated for a 3 way runoff is false.
And your characterization that I prevented or attempted to prevent a 4 way runoff from happening is obviously also false.
Danbob, if you have any specific questions regarding my last two posts, please state them specifically. Otherwise I'll assume you are satisfied with my response.
I would like to see a 4 person runoff. I would normally not have an issue switching my vote, however, seeing both Thor and Viking moving off of kdogg makes me want to keep my vote where it is.
Why don't you compile some stats to see if a d1r1 4 person runoff is actually better than a 3 person runoff whe compared to ultimate outcome for the town. I don't want to say I'm opposed to either one, because I really don't know if one is definitively better. But how do I know you're not just trying to expand the runoff to save a Mafia? That's what helped JR escape the first runoff last game after all.
I still want kdogg in the runoff but a 4 person runoff isn't possible with kdogg at 3 votes. In my opinion it seems like mafia benefits from a 3 person run off d1r1 more than town.
You actually have no basis for this opinion. I've been a part of plenty of games with a 3 person runoff without much fuss. For some reason Kdogg is trying to make it into an issue now. Probably because of his own self interest.
My vote will remain on Kdogg, the person who expanded to a 5 person runoff which I think we universally agree is a poor bet for the town. If someone wants to take their vote off Kdogg and start the process to a 4 person runoff that is fine with me. But I'm content with a 3 way runoff as well.
