Whether it's your first Bonnaroo or you’re a music festival veteran, we welcome you to Inforoo.
Here you'll find info about artists, rumors, camping tips, and the infamous Roo Clues. Have a look around then create an account and join in the fun. See you at Bonnaroo!!
Considering you've found the need to respond to my threads as if you are threatened by me I offer you some peace my confused counterpart. May you find peace in your restless soul.
Do you really believe that somehow only Israeli fire is hitting civilians? Hamas is exchanging fire in and around a hospital but the IDF is to blame for any and all civilian casualties? Do I have that right?
Also, there isn't enough fuel to power the hospital but there is somehow enough fuel to fire rockets into Israel?
ummmmm... are you claiming that the COUNTLESS sources reporting that the hospital's electricity has been deliberately cut by Israel are all just fucking lying?
if so, this might actually be the worst thing you've posted this entire time.
Considering you've found the need to respond to my threads as if you are threatened by me I offer you some peace my confused counterpart. May you find peace in your restless soul.
Do you really believe that somehow only Israeli fire is hitting civilians? Hamas is exchanging fire in and around a hospital but the IDF is to blame for any and all civilian casualties? Do I have that right?
Also, there isn't enough fuel to power the hospital but there is somehow enough fuel to fire rockets into Israel?
ummmmm... are you claiming that the COUNTLESS sources reporting that the hospital's electricity has been deliberately cut by Israel are all just fucking lying?
if so, this might actually be the worst thing you've posted this entire time.
The hospital's generator runs on fuel. The same fuel they are using to fire rockets into Israel. Let me know if this still isn't clear for you.
ummmmm... are you claiming that the COUNTLESS sources reporting that the hospital's electricity has been deliberately cut by Israel are all just fucking lying?
if so, this might actually be the worst thing you've posted this entire time.
The hospital's generator runs on fuel. The same fuel they are using to fire rockets into Israel. Let me know if this still isn't clear for you.
you have truly lost it, Palest of Horses. THE HOSPITAL DOES NOT HAVE ELECTRICITY. BABIES ARE DYING
Considering you've found the need to respond to my threads as if you are threatened by me I offer you some peace my confused counterpart. May you find peace in your restless soul.
ummmmm... are you claiming that the COUNTLESS sources reporting that the hospital's electricity has been deliberately cut by Israel are all just fucking lying?
if so, this might actually be the worst thing you've posted this entire time.
The hospital's generator runs on fuel. The same fuel they are using to fire rockets into Israel. Let me know if this still isn't clear for you.
not on the topic, but I have a question for you.
I've seen the "human shield" argument used a lot. How is it morally different than mandatory IDF service?
ummmmm... are you claiming that the COUNTLESS sources reporting that the hospital's electricity has been deliberately cut by Israel are all just fucking lying?
if so, this might actually be the worst thing you've posted this entire time.
The hospital's generator runs on fuel. The same fuel they are using to fire rockets into Israel. Let me know if this still isn't clear for you.
Does Israel have blackmail on your or something? I can’t fathom why anyone would willingly post such awful takes
Considering you've found the need to respond to my threads as if you are threatened by me I offer you some peace my confused counterpart. May you find peace in your restless soul.
I'll put this one together for you since you seem to be having a hard time. If Hamas shared their fuel with the hospital, instead of using it to fire rockets into Israel, the hospital would still have power, which would presumably help save lives.
I'll put this one together for you since you seem to be having a hard time. If Hamas shared their fuel with the hospital, instead of using it to fire rockets into Israel, the hospital would still have power, which would presumably help save lives.
How would completely giving up attacks when a ceasefire isn't being offered going to "save lives"? Your solution to saving lives is to tell Palestinians to do nothing as they get wiped out?
I'll put this one together for you since you seem to be having a hard time. If Hamas shared their fuel with the hospital, instead of using it to fire rockets into Israel, the hospital would still have power, which would presumably help save lives.
How would completely giving up attacks when a ceasefire isn't being offered going to "save lives"? Your solution to saving lives is to tell Palestinians to do nothing as they get wiped out?
that is precisely correct. hes literally acting as if Isreal is going to stop bombing the hospital if Hamas offers up some fuel for its generator?? absolute ramblings of a madman
all the while, Israelis who are protesting in support of ceasefire are being beaten and arrested for speaking out. but yeah, i mean by my estimation if hamas just offered a wee bit of fuel up for the generator, peace would immediately transpire. such a shame they wont do taht.
Considering you've found the need to respond to my threads as if you are threatened by me I offer you some peace my confused counterpart. May you find peace in your restless soul.
The hospital's generator runs on fuel. The same fuel they are using to fire rockets into Israel. Let me know if this still isn't clear for you.
not on the topic, but I have a question for you.
I've seen the "human shield" argument used a lot. How is it morally different than mandatory IDF service?
If you are asking this question in earnest, I believe the answer is that Israel is a country whose short history is filled with war - most of which they did not initiate. For years, they were surrounded by countries that were openly calling for their destruction, several of whom still are. For that reason, most folks are more than willing to serve. With that said there are plenty of exceptions, most notably, the ultra-religious.
I do think that is morally different than having the military hide among civilians, using hospitals as bases or schools as weapons manufacturing sites.
I've seen the "human shield" argument used a lot. How is it morally different than mandatory IDF service?
If you are asking this question in earnest, I believe the answer is that Israel is a country whose short history is filled with war - most of which they did not initiate. For years, they were surrounded by countries that were openly calling for their destruction, several of whom still are. For that reason, most folks are more than willing to serve. With that said there are plenty of exceptions, most notably, the ultra-religious.
I do think that is morally different than having the military hide among civilians, using hospitals as bases or schools as weapons manufacturing sites.
you don't think invading foreign soil is initiating war?
I'll put this one together for you since you seem to be having a hard time. If Hamas shared their fuel with the hospital, instead of using it to fire rockets into Israel, the hospital would still have power, which would presumably help save lives.
How would completely giving up attacks when a ceasefire isn't being offered going to "save lives"? Your solution to saving lives is to tell Palestinians to do nothing as they get wiped out?
Is it Palestinians or Hamas? You're describing them as if they're one and the same.
Firing those rockets isn't doing anything to save Palestinian lives, most of them are caught by the Iron Dome. That fuel would be better served to power the hospital, but that is not Hamas' priority.
I've seen the "human shield" argument used a lot. How is it morally different than mandatory IDF service?
If you are asking this question in earnest, I believe the answer is that Israel is a country whose short history is filled with war - most of which they did not initiate. For years, they were surrounded by countries that were openly calling for their destruction, several of whom still are. For that reason, most folks are more than willing to serve. With that said there are plenty of exceptions, most notably, the ultra-religious.
I do think that is morally different than having the military hide among civilians, using hospitals as bases or schools as weapons manufacturing sites.
babes wake up! Pale Horse just wrote another lie on inforoo dot com.
Considering you've found the need to respond to my threads as if you are threatened by me I offer you some peace my confused counterpart. May you find peace in your restless soul.
If you are asking this question in earnest, I believe the answer is that Israel is a country whose short history is filled with war - most of which they did not initiate. For years, they were surrounded by countries that were openly calling for their destruction, several of whom still are. For that reason, most folks are more than willing to serve. With that said there are plenty of exceptions, most notably, the ultra-religious.
I do think that is morally different than having the military hide among civilians, using hospitals as bases or schools as weapons manufacturing sites.
you don't think invading foreign soil is initiating war?
Are you referring to the creation of Israel as "invading foreign soil"? Or are you referring to the land they captured from surrounding countries after being attacked?
If you are asking this question in earnest, I believe the answer is that Israel is a country whose short history is filled with war - most of which they did not initiate. For years, they were surrounded by countries that were openly calling for their destruction, several of whom still are. For that reason, most folks are more than willing to serve. With that said there are plenty of exceptions, most notably, the ultra-religious.
I do think that is morally different than having the military hide among civilians, using hospitals as bases or schools as weapons manufacturing sites.
you don't think invading foreign soil is initiating war?
If you are asking this question in earnest, I believe the answer is that Israel is a country whose short history is filled with war - most of which they did not initiate. For years, they were surrounded by countries that were openly calling for their destruction, several of whom still are. For that reason, most folks are more than willing to serve. With that said there are plenty of exceptions, most notably, the ultra-religious.
I do think that is morally different than having the military hide among civilians, using hospitals as bases or schools as weapons manufacturing sites.
babes wake up! Pale Horse just wrote another lie on inforoo dot com.
Are you familiar with the history of the territory? Because it doesn't seem like you are. Maybe do some reading.
How would completely giving up attacks when a ceasefire isn't being offered going to "save lives"? Your solution to saving lives is to tell Palestinians to do nothing as they get wiped out?
Is it Palestinians or Hamas? You're describing them as if they're one and the same.
Firing those rockets isn't doing anything to save Palestinian lives, most of them are caught by the Iron Dome. That fuel would be better served to power the hospital, but that is not Hamas' priority.
the reason I say Palestinians is because I don't believe there is any military action taken in any capacity by Hamas or any other Palestinian that would be acceptable to you. Even if Palestine had an army closer to the IDF in form, I think the arguments would be the same from your end.
you don't think invading foreign soil is initiating war?
Are you referring to the creation of Israel as "invading foreign soil"? Or are you referring to the land they captured from surrounding countries after being attacked?
you don't think invading foreign soil is initiating war?
Who invaded foreign soil October 7th?
who are you and why is your entire recent activity on inforoo dot com just "liking" every single post that Pale Horse writes? the Israeli govt paying you off too?
Considering you've found the need to respond to my threads as if you are threatened by me I offer you some peace my confused counterpart. May you find peace in your restless soul.
Are you referring to the creation of Israel as "invading foreign soil"? Or are you referring to the land they captured from surrounding countries after being attacked?
yep
I think I see where we are going to have a fundamental disagreement, but humor me. What do you think Israel was before 1948?
Can we all just agree that neither side gives AF about the people in that hospital? Hamas and Israel couldn't care less about the people in that hospital.
I think I see where we are going to have a fundamental disagreement, but humor me. What do you think Israel was before 1948?
non-existant
I'm not sure if you are purposely being difficult, but I will try to rephrase the question. What do you think was in between the Jordan River & the Mediterranean Sea prior to 1948?
oh wow youre off to a great start there with the first on your list being the "1948 Arab Israeli War" -- which came about after decades of conflict from Isreali Zionists INVADING THE PALESTINIANS' LAND. i dont even have to click your links to know that. but i will gladly share this one:
"Every year on May 15, Palestinians around the world mark the Nakba, or catastrophe, referring to the ethnic cleansing of Palestine in 1948.
Having secured the support of the British government for the creation of a Jewish state in Palestine, on May 14, 1948, as soon as the British Mandate expired, Zionist forces declared the establishment of the State of Israel, triggering the first Arab-Israeli war.
Zionist military forces expelled at least 750,000 Palestinians from their homes and lands and captured 78 percent of historic Palestine. The remaining 22 percent was divided into what are now the occupied West Bank and the besieged Gaza Strip."
Considering you've found the need to respond to my threads as if you are threatened by me I offer you some peace my confused counterpart. May you find peace in your restless soul.