Whether it's your first Bonnaroo or you’re a music festival veteran, we welcome you to Inforoo.
Here you'll find info about artists, rumors, camping tips, and the infamous Roo Clues. Have a look around then create an account and join in the fun. See you at Bonnaroo!!
Sorry. Been too busy to defend my line up and it looks like it's probably too late but here goes:
Rhino vs rhino is a wash.
Tiger is superior to lion. As Silver Surfer said, the tiger is just much stronger. Also, lions are pack hunters while tigers hunt alone.
I think that the size of the wolverine is not being given enough consideration here compare to the tazzie. Wolverines max out at about 3 1/2 feet and 55 pounds. Tazzies are about two feet and 18 lbs. The sheer size of the wolverine is a huge advantage. Also the fact that they could attack something other than the zombies' legs.
I cede that the musk ox has more power than an ostrich. The ostrich has more speed and, as Silver Surfer illustrated, the ability to killshot a lion.
So then it comes down to how you want to vote. To me, it's two superior animals to one and I think that there are more clubs in my team's bag than trantsgiving 's.
Sorry. Been too busy to defend my line up and it looks like it's probably too late but here goes:
Rhino vs rhino is a wash.
Tiger is superior to lion. As Silver Surfer said, the tiger is just much stronger. Also, lions are pack hunters while tigers hunt alone.
I think that the size of the wolverine is not being given enough consideration here compare to the tazzie. Wolverines max out at about 3 1/2 feet and 55 pounds. Tazzies are about two feet and 18 lbs. The sheer size of the wolverine is a huge advantage. Also the fact that they could attack something other than the zombies' legs.
I cede that the musk ox has more power than an ostrich. The ostrich has more speed and, as Silver Surfer illustrated, the ability to killshot a lion.
So then it comes down to how you want to vote. To me, it's two superior animals to one and I think that there are more clubs in my team's bag than trantsgiving 's.
So I vote for me. (Shocker.)
The strength of a tiger doesn’t mean much since they’re both killing zombies with one hit anyway but the lion is about 15MPH faster which certainly matters. Being 55 vs 18 points doesn’t really mean much when the Wolverine doesn’t have anything as powerful as the Taz’s munching ability.
Sorry. Been too busy to defend my line up and it looks like it's probably too late but here goes:
Rhino vs rhino is a wash.
Tiger is superior to lion. As Silver Surfer said, the tiger is just much stronger. Also, lions are pack hunters while tigers hunt alone.
I think that the size of the wolverine is not being given enough consideration here compare to the tazzie. Wolverines max out at about 3 1/2 feet and 55 pounds. Tazzies are about two feet and 18 lbs. The sheer size of the wolverine is a huge advantage. Also the fact that they could attack something other than the zombies' legs.
I cede that the musk ox has more power than an ostrich. The ostrich has more speed and, as Silver Surfer illustrated, the ability to killshot a lion.
So then it comes down to how you want to vote. To me, it's two superior animals to one and I think that there are more clubs in my team's bag than trantsgiving 's.
So I vote for me. (Shocker.)
The strength of a tiger doesn’t mean much since they’re both killing zombies with one hit anyway but the lion is about 15MPH faster which certainly matters. Being 55 vs 18 points doesn’t really mean much when the Wolverine doesn’t have anything as powerful as the Taz’s munching ability.
I think that strength matters in the ability to kill zombies, especially since lions aren't solo hunters. So now you've got the lion doing something that's not instinctive. And why are you having your lion sprinting after a shambling zobmie? Advantage: tiger.
The tazzie might have a stronger jaw but it also has a smaller mouth and doesn't have the power to topple a zombie. Advantage: wolverine.
The strength of a tiger doesn’t mean much since they’re both killing zombies with one hit anyway but the lion is about 15MPH faster which certainly matters. Being 55 vs 18 points doesn’t really mean much when the Wolverine doesn’t have anything as powerful as the Taz’s munching ability.
I think that strength matters in the ability to kill zombies, especially since lions aren't solo hunters. So now you've got the lion doing something that's not instinctive. And why are you having your lion sprinting after a shambling zobmie? Advantage: tiger.
The tazzie might have a stronger jaw but it also has a smaller mouth and doesn't have the power to topple a zombie. Advantage: wolverine.
strength does matter but at a certain point it’s not making a huge difference when you’re fighting weak beings. Both animals are killing zombies with one hit. The speed matters cause their jobs is to protect me and the lion is gonna be used as a missle sorta. He can go full speed through a field of zombies and if ever I’m in trouble, he can get to me quicker. Also, the lion would be with three other animals so it wouldn’t be completely solo.
I’m not sure a Wolverine at 55 pounds would have the power to topple a zombie either. They’re both gonna be low radar animals but the devil is the only one of the two with the ability to significantly help by biting zombie ankles.
I’m not sure a Wolverine at 55 pounds would have the power to topple a zombie either. They’re both gonna be low radar animals but the devil is the only one of the two with the ability to significantly help by biting zombie ankles.
LOL. Regardless of that other noise you just said, why on Earth would a wolverine be unable to bite a zombie's ankles if it wanted to go that route?
Considering you've found the need to respond to my threads as if you are threatened by me I offer you some peace my confused counterpart. May you find peace in your restless soul.
